The American Experiment- A Nullification Timeline

Status
Not open for further replies.
I love the use of the name "Columbia", by the way; very fitting!

The mention of industrialists is a bit worrying. Should slaves start being used enmass in factories ... Ugh. And, unlike a few decades later, Columbia night actually be able to get the foreign capital needed to invest in industrializing, after the war.
 
So good update? Good choices for people for positions? Seem realistic?

I am also looking for a Flag for Columbia. So open to suggestions, ideas, thoughts on that.

How about a sickle (representing King Cotton) interwined with a cross (representing "true christian values") and a whip (representing slavery) on a... say, blue background?

On the other hand, religion was not very important for most people in the South at this time. They were religious of course, but religion did not play an significant role in politics as it would later do.
 
Hmm so we know "Columbia" manages to win independence, but how much of the South will it hold by the end of the war? Good update.
 
The way this post was written makes it seem like Columbia will at least survive this war independent. After that, though, who knows.
 
Do you find that to be a negative? That some parts of the future are hinted at?

Not at all; I do a lot of references to future events in my timeline as well; sometimes subtle, sometimes not (I'm still amazed no one has asked me about the state of Israel in my Amalingian TL, since I've referenced it a number of times!). I think such references, when done right, help to create a more fleshed out world. Keep it up! :)
 
Franklin, Fredrick. A Lion Beset: Jackson's Strategic Choices in the American War of Secession. Baltimore: Orchard, 2000. Print.

In life, Andrew Jackson’s first response to a problem was to attack it head on. This is not to say Jackson was simple or reckless, for he was neither. He simply felt the best way to solve problems was to attack them with the full force and will available until either he broke or the enemy.


It had served him well in his political life and his command style was no different. When the Northwest declared a state of neutrality, President Jackson’s instinct was the same as it was for the South, to raise an army, invade and impose order. It was the direct, forceful option.


It nearly happened. Jackson had even written up some orders and had begun looking for a commander for the ‘Western Operation’ when Henry Clay stepped in. Clay, Jackson's old rival and still antagonist had been horrified by the virtual secession of the Western states. Still, unlike Jackson, he hoped to end it via reconciliation and medication, a cause that would be impossible if Jackson invaded with fire and sword.


Just simply staging a direct Clay and Jackson meeting was quite a political event. Clay and Jackson had cobbled together a rough working relationship after the Grand Compromise of 1836. Populating Jackson’s Cabinet with Northern Whigs had forced the two to communicate several times, but rarely in person. It was no mistake that no deal had ever been made that let Clay into the administration. But now, when the fate of the nation hung in the balance, Clay went into the ‘Lion’s Den’ and spoke with Jackson on the delicate issue of western neutrality.


Sadly, exactly what was said at the meeting is lost to history, but apparently the ‘Great Pacifier’ managed to work his magic on the cantankerous ‘American Lion’. No army would march on Kentucky and other Western states, at least not yet. That said, Jackson sent a virtual army of agents and operatives into the neutral states to gather information, support Unionist groups and generally sabotage the Neutral movement. In addition Clay himself was sent West to hammer out what ‘Neutrality’ exactly meant.


The negotiations, which took place in Frankfort, Kentucky yielded a mixed bag of results. In was an impressive collection of men, certainly. Meeting Clay in Frankfort where established political men like John Crittenden or Thomas Metcalfe, former Governor of Kentucky. It was painful for Clay to meet these men, most of whom were former Whigs, his strongest supporters and allies. Now Clay was representing Jackson, the old foe of all of them. It was an odd reversal. Still, the discussions went ahead, perhaps helped by old associations, perhaps not.
220px-TMetcalfe.jpg

Thomas Metcalfe, 'Old Stone Hammer', a Whig dedicated to the Neutral movement.

The western states had no desire for independence, unlike the Southern states. They still considered themselves patriots and Americans. They just wished to be free of a destructive war brought about by Southern insolence and Jackson’s bull-headedness.


They would continue to pay taxes and tariffs due to the United States at rates from before the conflict. They would continue to deliver mail and follows USA legal codes. The Western states would send Congressmen and other government officials to Washington, all as before.


What they would not do is send the state volunteers into the East, or pay new war taxes. They would not allow Federal troops to ‘make war in their borders’, although they hastened to add the same applied any armies from Columbia.


Clay took the terms back to Washington, adding he thought that over time negotiation could soften the demands and limitations. Jackson, facing a rival government arising in Columbia reluctantly agreed (while also redoubling his agents in the Northwest) and made the choice that the first blows in the war would land in the East.
 

Steed, William F., Dr. The American War of Secession: A Study in Contrasts. 4th ed. Vol. 1. London: Imperial, 1956. Print. A History of North America.



As the political situation settled, the two governments, both North and South began to consider the resulting military consequences. The potential battlegrounds stretched thousands of miles, through wilds and cities alike. The planners and strategists had to contend with environments ranging to the bayous of Louisiana, the steep mountain valleys of the Appalachians, the rolling hills of Virginia and even to the swamps of coastal Carolina. All could be places of future importance and deciding which was most valuable was a key decision as the armies began to assemble.


In the North, these choices were made by President Jackson and his selected military advisors and personal cronies. Congress had been shattered by the war, divided and terrified. Jackson, as usual, took control of the situation and swiftly began moving the massive Federal war machine.


Jackson, with iconic directness, considered the East the primary theater of war. Virginia was the largest and most populous state the Rebels possessed as well as being a gateway to the deeper South. Victory here could bring an early and swift defeat of Columbia. Echoes of the successful march by Winfield Scott in 1832 could be heard as Jackson assembled war plans.


On paper it appeared simple. A Federal force would move swiftly on Richmond, smash whatever rabble the South could assemble in time, take the city and reattach Virginia to the Union. With this done, the force could move south, fighting the rest of the war on Southern soil. The Federal Navy, far stronger than the South, would blockade and then supply the southward force, keeping it in contact with Washington. Jackson even stated that ‘one year’s hard campaigning might bring the entire affair to a satisfactory and through conclusion’.


For Jackson, the other theaters were secondary at best. Why bother sending troops, at great expense and effort to Carolina Outer Banks or the rugged hills of Tennessee when the great blow would obviously be delivered in Virginia then South Carolina? While, unlike some of his contemporaries, Jackson did not think the war would be easy, he did picture it as swift.

Virginia-State-1836-Tanner-Historic-Map-Reprint.jpg

Virginia, the main propose battleground.

Indeed, the bigger question than ‘where’ was ‘who’? What general would Jackson and Congress choose to save the Republic? There were certainly many possible choices as was recognized at the time. Horace Greely, merely a minor reporter at the time, remarked ‘Every man from private to General assumed the Eastern Command would be just about right for him’.


There was a small movement, started by the President himself, that Jackson should lead the troops personally. He had mooted the idea during the Nullification Uprising and it was raised again. Jackson had the talent and experience of course, not to mention the loyalty of the state militiamen and Regulars alike. It seemed poetic justice that the President himself ‘curb and cow’ the Southern rebellion.


Despite obviously being flattered, the president was in no fit shape to take the field however. Aged 70, with gout and still often wracked by ancient malarial pains, Jackson’s health was much worse than common myth has held it. Gracefully, the President allowed the calls for his command to die away.


Winfield Scott was a natural choice of course. ‘Old Fuss and Feathers’ had led the successful march to Charleston after all, a similar assignment and was even a friend of Jackson. Scott was also a highly respected tactician and leader, considered by many to be the finest soldier of his generation. The man himself however, held that the war would be a long one won by logistics, planning and economic pressure. He made it clear he wished to remain in Washington and lead from a strategic position. No field command, no matter how lofty, would satisfy him.


Zachary Taylor, current Secretary of War, celebrated veteran of the War of 1812 and the Black Hawk War, was a contender as well. ‘Old Rough and Ready’, one of the Whigs placed in Jackson’s Cabinet during the Compromise of 1836, had a taste for the military limelight and saw the Eastern Command as a sure ticket to fame, glory and history. Taylor offered to resign his Cabinet post in order to lead the troops in Virginia. However both Jackson, who did not wish for a potential political rival to gain glory and the Whig party, who did not wish to see a Cabinet resignation result in a Jackson replacement, pressured Taylor to stay on as Secretary of War.


So the way was clear for the President to pick a loyal, capable ally. His eye fell on Lewis Cass, a staunch Democrat who had just wrapped up his service as Governor of the Michigan Territory (no longer needed since Michigan had recently become a state) and had been Jackson’s Secretary of War in the past. A loyal Jackson supporter, Cass had also seen action in the War of 1812 as well as a number of Indian campaigns (North and South). Considered a prudent and solid commander, he certainly had the military skills. The only downside was Cass’s increasingly anti-slavery mindset, which made the prospect of sending him Southward sit uneasily in some minds. Henry Clay, in particular thought Cass would ‘blow the whole thing up’. Jackson however was convinced, and in May 1837, Lewis Cass was placed in command of the Army of the East and sent South towards Richmond and certain victory.
2256_999312881.jpg

The careful, prudent Lewis Cass, Commander of the Army of the East.

In Columbia however, the strategic command choices were made in a very different atmosphere. While Washington D.C. was in the firm grip of third-term Jackson, the South was still forming the nation itself. Personalities and departments still grappled for control and power in a way unlike more stable nations.


The Colombian government fell into two broad military factions. On one side were the ‘Grand Battle’ types who believed the war would be won in short order by a dazzling display of Southern arms on the field of battle. Much like Jackson in the north, they pictured a few large scale set-piece battles, whereupon one side could dictate terms to a beaten, fallen foe.


The other side was the ‘Bitter-Enders’, who believed the North would be defeated in a long war of attrition. Only after the United States tired of sending army after army to conquer the South would Columbia be free. While this was a minority view (that many regarded as near treasonous), it did have one powerful proponent, John C. Calhoun.


John C. Calhoun, Vice President of Columbia, wielded great influence of course, through his public oratory and his backroom dealing, not to mention sheer force of will. It was mostly through his vision of a long war that the South took steps, unlike the North, to plan for a protracted conflict. Unlike Jackson, Calhoun assumed a number of theaters would form. Although Columbia often lacked the supplies and men to fully form armies everywhere, at least he could send commanders to support local troops and guide policy.


Again, the most important command was that of Virginia, where the Federal blow would fall hardest and swiftest. The cities and industry of Virginia had to be preserved if Columbia were to have any chance of standing on its own two feet. After a whirling kaleidoscope of political maneuvering Calhoun, supported by others, managed to name David E. Twiggs to the command. The Georgian was nicknamed ‘the Bengal Tiger’ for his ferocity in attack and his volcanic temper. A soldier in both the War of 1812 and the Black Hawk War, he was probably the most experienced general available to the South. Twiggs was sent North to guard Virginia, the Sword and Shield of Columbia.
220px-David_E._Twiggs.jpg

David Twiggs, the 'Bengal Tiger'

Columbia also named other commanders to other distant areas. John Macgruder, an eccentric Indian fighter, known as “Prince John, wrangled the command of Louisiana and New Orleans. Considered a prime target and a plum assignment, reports from Macgruder’s front seemed to dwell more on elegant balls and posh nightlife. Macgruder seemed secure however announcing the Crescent City was ‘unassailable’.


For the Carolina coasts, full of long, vulnerable islands that could be held and used to blockade key Southern ports, Charles Gratiot was chosen. He was a natural pick, having been assigned to the same duty of fort building and repair by the Federal government for nearly a decade. The Missourian engineer was sent East, along with his highly-regarded second in command, Robert E. Lee.


Less discussed was the commander needed to deal with the increasingly apparent ‘Appalachian’ problem. The desire for secession was hardly universal and in the mountain areas of northern Alabama, western North Carolina and Eastern Tennessee, large areas of the South were solidly unionist, with no desire to fight a ‘rich man’s war’. Worse, in Tennessee they were gathering around one man. Daniel Smith Donelson, a relative of Jackson and a retired soldier, was helping take the odd bits of state volunteers and local militia and creating an actual fighting force.


In response Columbia had to send military force. Even this command was a politically rich plum, and non-military men eagerly competed for such sweet fruits. In this case John B. Floyd, former Governor of Virginia and a secession hard-liner, was awarded the command. He was sent to Tennessee to ‘restore law and order’ in the backcountry. Still, it was regarded as a minor front.


So the two sides had picked the battlegrounds and assigned their leaders, with the South being more wide-ranging and the North more direct. The stage was set for the massive conflict over the soul of America and for the soil of Virginia. Twiggs and Cass hurtled at each, pushed by forces that swept thousands of others along with them.
 
Would either side be willing to hire more professional troops and leaders from Europe?

Both sides, right now, consider the war to be a short, quick affair like Scott's march over Nullification. Calhoun has a deeper inkling but he is only one man and Columbia is a pretty cash poor place.

But who knows what might happen....It is an interesting idea to say the least.
 
The American Experiment
An American Timeline



Fenning, Arthur. America on the Brink. London: Robinson, 2016. Print.

It is unfortunate that Jackson’s legendary constitution failed him at this critical moment. Who knows how Old Hickory would have altered the political landscape in late 1833. But the President was too ill to do little and watch as the Nullification Crisis came to a head. The bout of pneumonia sidelined one of the key figures and one of the few who could have perhaps have stopped the landslide.


It had been going for months, years really. South Carolina, outraged at increasingly high tariffs leveled against foreign goods, had finally grasped at a weapon. Nullification, the concept that a state had the final say on what laws would be enforced, not the federal government in Washington.


It was a radical idea, one that had only gathered support as the tariffs grew in weight. By 1833 however, it has been turned into a war-cry by South Carolinan nationalists like John C. Calhoun. Calhoun, once Jackson's Vice President and now a Senator claimed the federal government had no right to enforce ‘unconstitutional laws’.


Tensions were high in South Carolina, as Nullification voices were raised louder and louder. The fans were flamed in November 1832 when the Nullification Convention met in Charleston. As Jackson lay in his sickbed, the Southerners were emboldened by a lack of federal reaction. Declaring SOuth Carolina as ‘inviolate’ they declared any federal action would be be made ‘unenforceable’ and voted to organize a militia force of 25,000 men to defend the state.


At the close of the rambunctious and fiery meeting South Carolina Governor Robert Hayne stated, in open defiance of the federal government, “If the sacred soil of Carolina should be polluted by the footsteps of an invader, or be stained with the blood of her citizens, shed in defense, I trust in Almighty God that no son of hers … who has been nourished at her bosom … will be found raising a parricidal arm against our common mother. And even should she stand ALONE in this great struggle for constitutional liberty … that there will not be found, in the wider limits of the state, one recreant son who will not fly to the rescue, and be ready to lay down his life in her defense”.


As the words of treason and violence spread northward, attempts were made in the winter of 1832-33 to compromise and mend the fences. Henry Clay, that accomplished legislator (just coming off a presidential election defeat) headed the movement to ‘repair relations’ with the enraged South. The Kentuckian met with Calhoun many times, hammering out a new, Compromise Tariff to replace the hated ones. Calhoun, faced with laggard federal action (Jackson, slowly recovering was still in no shape to guide policy) haggled for months, hoping for weaker tariffs.

scaletowidth

A popular political cartoon showing the effectiveness of Nullification


Even as he supposedly worked in Washington to calm tensions, he continued to fan the flames. As he had in previous years Calhoun stated, in direct terms, that no only tariffs were at stake. Slavery, the very heart of the Southern way of life, was under attack. Economics was just a guise, he said, to disguise federal power that would intrude into every part of the American sphere. Nothing was safe, nothing sacred, nothing protected if King Andy would have his way.


Tensions grew in South Carolina as the tariff was impossible to enforce and goods and bills stacked up in Charleston. Armed men on both sides nervously stared at each other as the militia grew in number, marched through the city, captained by local fire-eaters. Winfield Scott, a calm and leveled handed commander, who had been keeping the peace, was transferred away to deal with reclairant Indians in Georgia. His removal ratcheted tensions further.


Finally the Compromise Tariff of 1833 was ready in March 1833, just as violence seemed to be cresting in South Carolina. It was a hard won effort, with months of careful give and take on both sides. Calhoun, seeing how powerful his hand was had asked for much and received it.


Northern legislators balked at agreeing to such a blatant attempt at political blackmail. If Nullification was a legal tactic, what stopped any state from forbidding laws it disagreed with? Southerners took notice at the gains South Carolina had made by willing to take things to the brink. A healing Jackson, finally mobile and gaining his old powers, lambasted the Compromise as ‘all carrot and no stick’.


It was this obvious show of contempt from the American president that killed the Compromise Tariff. Disliked by all and loved by none it died, despite being the last best chance to avoid violence in South Carolina. As the bill failed to pass, armed men in South Carolina become increasingly edgy as nothing but violence presented itself as an option. Eventually, something snapped...


tenementfire.jpg

Been reading this entire TL from start to finish and I'm definitely liking what I'm seeing so far; it even kinda reminds me of a TL I was working on that had an earlier Civil War planned(although it's been unofficially shelved for now). WI wonder where this'll go next?

It was very good; I enjoyed reading it! My only suggestion would be to weaken the section about Evangelical Protestantism. Although the South is very religious in the modern era, that is more of a post-war development.

Someone who knows more than me, can correct me if I'm wrong; but I was always under the impression that the South during this era was one of the least religious parts of the nation; especially amongst the Planter class. Evangelical faith would have been important amongst the Scots-Irish of the Appalachians, true; but elsewhere, religion wasn't nearly as strong as, say, New England or the Old Northwest.

Erm.....while it certainly is true that religiosity was still fairly strong in New England and some parts of the Old Northwest around this time IOTL, it wasn't at all absent in the South, either, including amongst the planter classes.....and it's also been a bit overstated for the Scots-Irish as well(not that they weren't fairly religious as well-they were, just not extremely so, as some historians have insisted), at least where the antebellum period is considered.

How about a sickle (representing King Cotton) interwined with a cross (representing "true christian values") and a whip (representing slavery) on a... say, blue background?

This is utterly perfect, when one thinks about it: in fact, this was right around the time that religious fervor began to become a lot more in the open in the South IOTL.....which was, btw, in no small way intertwined with an increasing reliance on slavery not just as an economic phenomenon, but as a whole way of life, and the Bible was often used to justify some of the most hardcore arguments in favor of slavery.


And with that in mind, to @The Tai-Pan , if you do decide to turn Columbia into an utterly planter-dominated state, if anything does change much from OTL in that particular regard, it would almost certainly would be more religious than the OTL South, not less.
 
Top
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top