The American Experiment- A Nullification Timeline

Status
Not open for further replies.
The American Experiment
An American Timeline



Fenning, Arthur. America on the Brink. London: Robinson, 2016. Print.

It is unfortunate that Jackson’s legendary constitution failed him at this critical moment. Who knows how Old Hickory would have altered the political landscape in late 1833. But the President was too ill to do little and watch as the Nullification Crisis came to a head. The bout of pneumonia sidelined one of the key figures and one of the few who could have perhaps have stopped the landslide.


It had been going for months, years really. South Carolina, outraged at increasingly high tariffs leveled against foreign goods, had finally grasped at a weapon. Nullification, the concept that a state had the final say on what laws would be enforced, not the federal government in Washington.


It was a radical idea, one that had only gathered support as the tariffs grew in weight. By 1833 however, it has been turned into a war-cry by South Carolinan nationalists like John C. Calhoun. Calhoun, once Jackson's Vice President and now a Senator claimed the federal government had no right to enforce ‘unconstitutional laws’.


Tensions were high in South Carolina, as Nullification voices were raised louder and louder. The fans were flamed in November 1832 when the Nullification Convention met in Charleston. As Jackson lay in his sickbed, the Southerners were emboldened by a lack of federal reaction. Declaring SOuth Carolina as ‘inviolate’ they declared any federal action would be be made ‘unenforceable’ and voted to organize a militia force of 25,000 men to defend the state.


At the close of the rambunctious and fiery meeting South Carolina Governor Robert Hayne stated, in open defiance of the federal government, “If the sacred soil of Carolina should be polluted by the footsteps of an invader, or be stained with the blood of her citizens, shed in defense, I trust in Almighty God that no son of hers … who has been nourished at her bosom … will be found raising a parricidal arm against our common mother. And even should she stand ALONE in this great struggle for constitutional liberty … that there will not be found, in the wider limits of the state, one recreant son who will not fly to the rescue, and be ready to lay down his life in her defense”.


As the words of treason and violence spread northward, attempts were made in the winter of 1832-33 to compromise and mend the fences. Henry Clay, that accomplished legislator (just coming off a presidential election defeat) headed the movement to ‘repair relations’ with the enraged South. The Kentuckian met with Calhoun many times, hammering out a new, Compromise Tariff to replace the hated ones. Calhoun, faced with laggard federal action (Jackson, slowly recovering was still in no shape to guide policy) haggled for months, hoping for weaker tariffs.

scaletowidth

A popular political cartoon showing the effectiveness of Nullification


Even as he supposedly worked in Washington to calm tensions, he continued to fan the flames. As he had in previous years Calhoun stated, in direct terms, that no only tariffs were at stake. Slavery, the very heart of the Southern way of life, was under attack. Economics was just a guise, he said, to disguise federal power that would intrude into every part of the American sphere. Nothing was safe, nothing sacred, nothing protected if King Andy would have his way.


Tensions grew in South Carolina as the tariff was impossible to enforce and goods and bills stacked up in Charleston. Armed men on both sides nervously stared at each other as the militia grew in number, marched through the city, captained by local fire-eaters. Winfield Scott, a calm and leveled handed commander, who had been keeping the peace, was transferred away to deal with reclairant Indians in Georgia. His removal ratcheted tensions further.


Finally the Compromise Tariff of 1833 was ready in March 1833, just as violence seemed to be cresting in South Carolina. It was a hard won effort, with months of careful give and take on both sides. Calhoun, seeing how powerful his hand was had asked for much and received it.


Northern legislators balked at agreeing to such a blatant attempt at political blackmail. If Nullification was a legal tactic, what stopped any state from forbidding laws it disagreed with? Southerners took notice at the gains South Carolina had made by willing to take things to the brink. A healing Jackson, finally mobile and gaining his old powers, lambasted the Compromise as ‘all carrot and no stick’.


It was this obvious show of contempt from the American president that killed the Compromise Tariff. Disliked by all and loved by none it died, despite being the last best chance to avoid violence in South Carolina. As the bill failed to pass, armed men in South Carolina become increasingly edgy as nothing but violence presented itself as an option. Eventually, something snapped...


tenementfire.jpg
 

Lee, Francis. Charleston Is Burning. Richmond: Southern, 1956. Print.



Faced with the growing numbers of federal troops and the totally frozen state of Charleston's’ vibrant commercial districts, it was only a matter of time until events came to a head. With Congress apparently unable to rectify matters, being bought and sold by northern merchants, Southrons began to reluctantly face the realization they would have to take matters into their own hands.


The final tipping point came in April 1833, when a US Army captain decided to collect tariff dues owed by a local cotton merchant named Joseph Broomley. As the troops circled the small shop, an angry crowd quickly formed, supplemented by local militiamen, trained and armed over the previous months. Unlike prior encounters, however, the federal troops refused to back down, and aggressively entered the shop. When Broomley refused to turn over the payments, he was arrested on the spot, with little legal pretext.


The crowd erupted into a riot as the soldiers emerged. Faced with the unruly crowd, the soldiers fixed bayonets and marched through, pushing civilians out of the way. Rocks and bricks began to fly as tensions mounted. Finally, as the hail of projectiles and increased and the crowd grew in fury, the captain gave the order to fire. The soldiers compiled and a fusillade of bullets ripped through the men and women of Charleston. The Massacre of Charleston, as it has become infamously known as, ignited general panic in the city.


The fleeing people soon rallied in taverns, businesses and militia barracks. Having been on edge for months, the city exploded into a frenzy of chaos and panic. Federal troops stormed the streets, setting up barricades and checkpoints, hoping to quell the violence. All this did was terrify and weaken the city officials until they were powerless to stop events.


Fires started all over town and small firefights broke out between Federal troops and militia. Customs houses were overrun by Southrons and the illegally held goods were liberated to the populace. Businesses of pro-Federal leanings were burned all over the city, and several federal armories were raided.


A small fleet of local ships was amassed and forces of militia sailed to Fort Moultire. The Southrons soon took the fortified island, gaining a store of weapons and ammunition. Raising the South Carolina flag over the fort, the militia cheered ‘Nullification’! Castle Pinckney, a walled bastion dating back 1797 proved a tougher nut to crack. Well garrisoned in the previous months, the ramshackle walls had been repaired and armed with new cannon. These troops held out the longest, repelling the Southrons with bullet and bayonet.

795px-Castle_Pinckney_-_showing_early_light_beacon.jpg


Castle Pinckney, the bastion that outlasted all others

The rest of the federal troops were soon overwhelmed and began to retreat out of the city, fighting as they went. Only hours later, when the rest of the federal troops were dead or fleeing, did Castle Pinckney surrender, and the troops held in South Carolinan custody with due honor and civility even as the city burned from the Federal troop’s scorched-earth tactics.


The South was aflame and the people awakened. It would be long before the long-ranging fires of Charleston were put out, not before they reached every corner of the new nation.
 
With some luck this results in a longer war that allows Mexico to keep modernizing and resist later attempts.
Will follow this TL with interest.
 
With some luck this results in a longer war that allows Mexico to keep modernizing and resist later attempts.
Will follow this TL with interest.

I plan to get to the effects outside of America, but it may be a few updates (so bear with me!). If you have ideas, feel free to share.
 

TFSmith121

Banned
A) Why transfer Winfield Scott in the middle of the crisis?

B) Likewise, South Carolina was pretty deeply divided internally over nullification; Poinsett had almost as many Unionists lined up as Hayne had nullifiers...

Best,
 
A) Why transfer Winfield Scott in the middle of the crisis?

B) Likewise, South Carolina was pretty deeply divided internally over nullification; Poinsett had almost as many Unionists lined up as Hayne had nullifiers...

Best,

Both excellent questions.

1. Scott was actually transferred sooner in OTL to deal with the Native Americans. Here he was kept longer due to the building tension, but even in late 1832, few thought it would really boil over into violence. Also, many thought a Compromise Tariff would suffice to calm matters.

2. This is an excellent point. It is hardly a unanimous uprising (which will b reflected). The author of that segment wasn't unbiased. A few things are helping Hayne and his ilk. Jackson/Federal reaction has been slow and diffuse, giving them more room to maneuver. Slavery is being mentioned more which is cutting deeper then just talk of tariffs. Finally, the Massacre of Charleston pushed many over the edge. Once it comes to violence, Hayne gained more. He still has plenty of Unionists to deal with. It isn't nearly as united as OTL secession was.

Hope those are worthy answers.

Wait so we won't be able to grab California and the rest?

Who knows?
Mexico can have Texas, but California must be of the USA.

'Should' and 'must' aren't part of history....
 

TFSmith121

Banned
Both excellent questions.

1. Scott was actually transferred sooner in OTL to deal with the Native Americans. Here he was kept longer due to the building tension, but even in late 1832, few thought it would really boil over into violence. Also, many thought a Compromise Tariff would suffice to calm matters.

2. This is an excellent point. It is hardly a unanimous uprising (which will b reflected). The author of that segment wasn't unbiased. A few things are helping Hayne and his ilk. Jackson/Federal reaction has been slow and diffuse, giving them more room to maneuver. Slavery is being mentioned more which is cutting deeper then just talk of tariffs. Finally, the Massacre of Charleston pushed many over the edge. Once it comes to violence, Hayne gained more. He still has plenty of Unionists to deal with. It isn't nearly as united as OTL secession was.

Hope those are worthy answers.

Okay, understood - good luck; for my money, the "Charleston Massacre" thing seems unlikely; the regulars were known for their discipline, for one thing. Maybe make it a clash between rival militias?

There's a really good work - The Role of Federal Military Forces in Domestic Disorders, 1789-1878, by Robert Coakley - that includes a chapter on the Nullification Crisis that goes into significant detail on the military situation; its available on-line here:

http://www.history.army.mil/html/books/030/30-13-1/index.html

Best,
 
Last edited:
Okay, understood - good luck; for my money, the "Charleston Massacre" thing seems unlikely; the regulars were known for their discipline, for thing. Maybe make it a clash between rival militias?

There's a really good work - The Role of Federal Military Forces in Domestic Disorders, 1789-1878, by Robert Coakley - that includes a chapter on the Nullification Crisis that goes into significant detail on the military situation; its available on-line here:

http://www.history.army.mil/html/books/030/30-13-1/index.html

Best,

I will read it, certainly.

Rival militias could work, but it might not provide the impetuses I need narrative wise. I'm not an expert or anything (but who of us is?) but I can see the situation turning violent if it looks insolvable in Washington. I hope you continue to read and provide this excellent feedback.
 

TFSmith121

Banned
Sure - the MHC website is a wealth of excellent reference material, all professionally done and available for free.

Best,
 
Top
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top