World Without The USA

Well thank you now if you excuse I'll have to go gouge my eyes out (the finniwank worst I say)
 
what a moron...to destroy a contient, and leave most of the rest of the world untouched is BS...:confused:

That's not really the part I object to. Basically what they want is an ASB scenario but they haven't the ASB's. I've done similar things myself with threads about what would the Byzantine Empire or British Hannover do in WW2.

What irks me is the aftermath. All these countries banding together despite the fact that they hate each other and the EU suddenly deciding to wipe the UK out of existence.
 
That's not really the part I object to. Basically what they want is an ASB scenario but they haven't the ASB's. I've done similar things myself with threads about what would the Byzantine Empire or British Hannover do in WW2.

What irks me is the aftermath. All these countries banding together despite the fact that they hate each other and the EU suddenly deciding to wipe the UK out of existence.

And it described being a new Roman Holy Empire (generally something you see in christian b-movie) you know it's funny how people band up together so quickly (do all country have secret plan for Supra-national state in some drawer)

Have you notice but South America goes mostly unnotice
 
I won't waste my time signing into that board after reading the patently ridiculous excerpts from that board posted here. The author's idea of the USA being replaced by ocean, while leaving the rest of the planet unaffected physically, is complete and utter nonsense. I wouldn't dignify any of his material with a response.
 
Will Great Britain finally join the EU? I'd say no. The reason being she has traditionally never been considered part of mainland Europe, and mainland Europe is destined to become more and more hardline Roman Catholic. Great Britain has up until now always stood in opposition to the power of Rome. As we shall see, the new European leader and his Pope will not dare give Great Britain the benefit of the doubt. With seventy percent of the European Union Forces preparing to head South to engage the Moslems they could not risk the British interfering with their plans.
We've got a fucking moron here. Doesn't he know the british are a member of the EU?
Also while the events portrayed may cause an upswing in religious feeling in Europe it is not going to turn all of Europe into ranting pseudo-Catholics... I mean fucking hell much of Europe -Switserland, parts of Germany, Denmark, Norway, Sweden, Greece- are distinctly non-Catholic.

Operation Eagle Day 2 will be set in motion. This operation, like the one some seventy years prior, will aim to wipe the RAF from the face of the earth. Britains’ Naval forces, and commercial fishing boats too will be sunk where they berth. All airfields, airports, both military and domestic will be flattened. All seaports too will be annihilated. The European leader will have to be sure that there could be no surprises coming his way from the British mainland. Revenge will be sweet. Great Britain having been a thorn in their side for far too long.
If the ASBs decided to throw all of Europe vs the UK then this would happen. But in these circumstances whats the chances that would happen?

The sudden demise of America will be such a blessing for the Ayatollahs of Iran and most of the peoples of the Middle East. With this seemingly 'Allah-like' event having removed Iran's main stumbling block, with regards to the removal of the Jewish State, the minarets of the Middle East will bellow with the rejoicing of the Arabs finally being able to rid themselves of the eternally hated Jew!
I can see the islamic world combining to take out Israel. I do not see the alliance holding together for any extended period... quite simply the racial and secterian divides will see to that.

Several months later, in the Southern Pacific, China made its first move. Along with her two new Islamic allies, Malaysia and Indonesia, by her side China quickly decimated Singapore, then The Philippines and then Papua New Guinea. The technique was the same in all cases. Russian and Chinese Submarine launched cruise missiles against Navy, Army and Air Force facilities, followed by mixes of second and third generation fighter bombers like J-6 (MiG-19S), J-7 (MiG-21), and Q-5D/E/F Fantan, followed by the newer generation J-10A/B, JH-7/A Flying Leopard and J-11A / 30MKK2 fighters.
Again utter bullshit. Quite simply Malaysia, Indonesia and China have many reasons to be hostile to each other and few to ally. Also the J-6, J-7 and Q-5s would litrally be scythed out of the air by the Singaporean airforce and any UASF or ASN reminants that may have rebased from Japan. Also it is somehow implied that the Russians are working closely with the Chinese in this situation, which is simply rediculous.

This tactic had the effect of using-up the defenders meagre anti-air defence capabilities on old and expendable aircraft leaving the way relatively clear for the new fighters to do their work. For the first time PLAN J-6 and J-7 fighters were used as both remote controlled super bombs and suicide jets. Also the New 60,000 ton aircraft carriers Mao Tse Tung (used ever so effectively in the Spratley Island war) and Jiang Zemin were put to effective use with their J-10C, J-11MKK and Su-30MKK2 aircraft.
Of cause two CVNs that magically appear from nowhere... complete with fully trained airgroups. Also the use of J-6s and J-7s as "suicide jets" suggests the idiot has assumed all Asians would follow the Japanese Kamikaze tactics.

However Australia had a bit of an advantage over her Northern Asian neighbours that had just fallen. US Forces! Lots of them. With the demise of their homeland many US military units re-deployed to Australia to rally together, mourn, and prepare the defence of Australia. Their new, and only, home. Two Carrier Battle groups had managed to survive the European, Chinese and Russian submarine threat and made it safely to Australian waters. Also making the journey were several US Submarines and many US fighter aircraft from their bases in Japan and South Korea along with their accompanying tankers and AWACS.
Why would the Europeans have targetted US forces? I mean surely given the Yank reminants only have three places they can realistically head -Japan, Australia, Europe- logic would suggest the Europeans would instead take the oppertunity get get three of four CVBGs.

The Australian and US forces had precious little time to prepare and train for the Chinese onslaught. It was decided early-on to try and get the civilian population from the Northern and Eastern States to head South and West and rally near Melbourne and Adelaide. This was halfway through its cycle when the Chinese and Russian missiles began slamming into their respective targets
Pray tell, how can the illogical alliance have time to secure the Philipenes, etc. and upgrade the Indonesian airbases to the degree needed to opperate a sizable number of aircraft without providing Australia with enough time to ready itself?
Also is not the logistics utterly insane? I mean given that for Gulf War I it took the yanks the better part of 6 months to relocate sufficient forces to the Middle east how the fucking hell does this moron believe the Chinese (with little by way of Sealift beyond that needed to take Taiwan) and Indonesians (with no power projection capability period.) to shift sufficient forces into position to threatern Australia?

F/A-18’s from the USS Theodore Roosevelt, operating in the Coral Sea, put up a sterling advanced defence. But the numerical superiority of the Chinese forces was just too great for the brave Naval aviators to have much effect.

The Carrier and all her support ships were destroyed two and a half hours after the attacks begun. It was an outstanding effort to survive that long against a determined enemy throwing at the US Carrier suicide jets, air and submarine launched cruise missiles, anti-ship missiles, torpedoes and highly specialised ‘anti-carrier missiles’ launched from PLAN Su-30MMK2 fighters. The Chinese, Indonesian and Malaysian forces paid a heavy price though with one hundred and seventeen aircraft shot down by a combination of Surface to Air Missiles from the accompanying Aegis Cruisers and the intense efforts of the Hornet pilots.
Possible if:
1. Stocks of those aircraft and missiles had not been depleted during the earlier campaigns (i.e. bullshit).
2. Sufficiently many large airbases are constructed within range of the Coral Sea (again pure bullshit, none of the Indonesian airbases east of Java have been designed to accomodate any significant number of fighters and any airfields and airports seized in New Guinea will be even worse. The time taken to modify these airbases would dent this scenario heavily)
Despite three months of the heaviest fighting the region had seen since the end of WWII, Australia fell to the Tsunami-like invaders. Some of the population made it deeper into the heart of Australia where they were left to their own fate. The Chinese weren’t interested in them, they had what they came for. Not only had they claimed the country, they also managed to acquire enough of the civilian population to work the mines, farms, oil rigs gas fields and steelworks for the Chinese war effort to grow and continue.
1. Logistically impossible. China may be able to fling heaps of troops across to Taiwan but it lacks the capability to support a much larger force at a much longer range. while Indonesia... how often have we done this to death? At the best they can support perhaps 30,000 troops in Northern Australia and that involves shoving their entire navy and many of their inter-island ferries into the role.
2. Would the afore-mentioned equipment (oil rigs, etc) fall into hostile hands intact? No fucking way.
The European leader ordered all Jews to be either exterminated or taken to Europe to be enslaved. Then, he oversaw a massive pre-emptive strike on the massing Russian and Asian forces.
Utter ASB.
 
We've got a fucking moron here. Doesn't he know the british are a member of the EU?

-snip-

Also is not the logistics utterly insane? I mean given that for Gulf War I it took the yanks the better part of 6 months to relocate sufficient forces to the Middle east how the fucking hell does this moron believe the Chinese (with little by way of Sealift beyond that needed to take Taiwan) and Indonesians (with no power projection capability period.) to shift sufficient forces into position to threatern Australia?

-snip-

Utter ASB.

All good points. The writer is having some uber-China power trip here. Must have read Eric L. Harry's Invasion one too many times...
 
All good points. The writer is having some uber-China power trip here. Must have read Eric L. Harry's Invasion one too many times...

not just that, every single continent on Earth is prevent from tyranny and destruction by the sole power of the U.S!
 
Top