When Stonehenge was auctioned in 1915 there were fears that some American millionaire might purchase it and ship it overseas, as had happened to several castles and stately homes and later happened to London Bridge - thankfully, it was bought by a Sailsbury local and donated to the Crown instead. Presumably those fears were somewhat overblown since the stones had already been scheduled as worthy of preservation. But what if its owners had sold it before the Ancient Monuments Protection Act 1882 had passed into law?
How big an outcry would there be? I've read that it was very difficult for John Lubbock to get even the weak 1882 act through Parliament because historic preservation by the state was seen as interfering with private property rights. Would a historic treasure being sent overseas spur an earlier, stronger movement for preservation? Perhaps an earlier English Heritage and National Trust? What did Britain lose IOTL that might be saved by an earlier push for protection?
How big an outcry would there be? I've read that it was very difficult for John Lubbock to get even the weak 1882 act through Parliament because historic preservation by the state was seen as interfering with private property rights. Would a historic treasure being sent overseas spur an earlier, stronger movement for preservation? Perhaps an earlier English Heritage and National Trust? What did Britain lose IOTL that might be saved by an earlier push for protection?