raharris1973
Gone Fishin'
WI after successful completion of the Dzungar Wars in 1763, Qing Emperor committed fully and irrevocably to the conquest and absorption of Southeast Asia for his lifetime. And his successor the "cha-ching" Jiaqing Emperor had the same commitment. That gives China between 1763 and 1820 to make headway.
In OTL, Qianlong ran campaigns to either conquer or "chastise" Burma and Vietnam. He may have begun with the intent to conquer but then saved face by claiming he was merely punishing them for this or that offense, and they cooperated by resuming formal tributary status.
What if he is just absolutely determined and persistent in trying to conquer Vietnam, the Lao Kingdoms and Burma, and if he can get past them, on to Arakan, Cambodia, Siam and Malaya.
Here is a map of Southeast Asia 13 years before the effort starts:
What could he achieve in terms of conquests, and what would this be doing to the Chinese economy and society at the time.
I am content to see Qianlong succeed wildly, fail spectacularly, or anything in-between.
Would wars and occupation deteriorate the state's fiscal health and lead to an advancement of the mid-19th century rebellions to the 1790s or early 1800s, by reactions against higher taxes?
Or would recruitment of more soldiers to conquer and bureaucrats to rule and develop occupied lands employ many frustrated would-be bureaucrats who otherwise would have turned to rebellion?
Could China increase its food supply and tax base through conquests?
If Qianlong is willing and interested in buying western weapons to aid his campaigns, would he find willing sellers? Could that make western merchants less dependent on opium?
Does this expansionist policy accelerate western penetration of China and Southeast Asia, enable China to fend off western advances in the region, or have results similar to OTL?
As far as attempted conquests go, maybe Qianlong is likely to have more success if subdues the Lao Kingdoms of Luangprabang and Vientiane, and the northern Thai Kingdom of Chingmai, first. These areas are less rich and taxable (at least before development efforts) but force the Vietnamese and Burmese to spread their forces thinner.
------Additional options - what if Qianlong discovers Japanese de facto influence over Liu-chiu/Okinawa, finds it unacceptable, and campaigns to bring Okinawa under central authority and oust the Japanese completely? Or, what if he decides he want to directly absorb the Kingship of Korea directly into his domains and list of titles?
In OTL, Qianlong ran campaigns to either conquer or "chastise" Burma and Vietnam. He may have begun with the intent to conquer but then saved face by claiming he was merely punishing them for this or that offense, and they cooperated by resuming formal tributary status.
What if he is just absolutely determined and persistent in trying to conquer Vietnam, the Lao Kingdoms and Burma, and if he can get past them, on to Arakan, Cambodia, Siam and Malaya.
Here is a map of Southeast Asia 13 years before the effort starts:
What could he achieve in terms of conquests, and what would this be doing to the Chinese economy and society at the time.
I am content to see Qianlong succeed wildly, fail spectacularly, or anything in-between.
Would wars and occupation deteriorate the state's fiscal health and lead to an advancement of the mid-19th century rebellions to the 1790s or early 1800s, by reactions against higher taxes?
Or would recruitment of more soldiers to conquer and bureaucrats to rule and develop occupied lands employ many frustrated would-be bureaucrats who otherwise would have turned to rebellion?
Could China increase its food supply and tax base through conquests?
If Qianlong is willing and interested in buying western weapons to aid his campaigns, would he find willing sellers? Could that make western merchants less dependent on opium?
Does this expansionist policy accelerate western penetration of China and Southeast Asia, enable China to fend off western advances in the region, or have results similar to OTL?
As far as attempted conquests go, maybe Qianlong is likely to have more success if subdues the Lao Kingdoms of Luangprabang and Vientiane, and the northern Thai Kingdom of Chingmai, first. These areas are less rich and taxable (at least before development efforts) but force the Vietnamese and Burmese to spread their forces thinner.
------Additional options - what if Qianlong discovers Japanese de facto influence over Liu-chiu/Okinawa, finds it unacceptable, and campaigns to bring Okinawa under central authority and oust the Japanese completely? Or, what if he decides he want to directly absorb the Kingship of Korea directly into his domains and list of titles?