WI: Probably circa 1970s - Toyota buys Citroen, Maserati, Alfa Romeo, Lamborghini, Chrysler Europe, and Honda until the latter marque went bankrupt

Well let me put that this hypothetically-speaking alternate business history here, then I would rather showcase this thread with links to check out:

===

The precursor/prequel to this thread:






===

And here are the invitees of this thread:

===

So therefore, I will recap the priorities Toyota would perform through its takeovers of Citroen, Maserati, Alfa Romeo, Lamborghini, Chrysler Europe (in which it includes Simca, Rootes, Barreiros), and as well as Honda, on which the latter [Honda] would have become the first to end up being financially merged and reorganised, hence liquidated, into Toyota's orbit:
  • At first, Toyota would have gained benefit from the parts bin Honda utilised for its products, particularly motorbikes, but this was deeply coincidental that Honda made a pact with Toyota to form a deal and thus purchase the former [Honda] circa 1940s.
  • Honda later ended up as a nameplate being digested into the stomach of some emerging challenger named Toyota, as while the latter had performed dealing with Yamaha starting circa 1960s, the admission of Honda within Toyota's umbrella meant this even led the company [Toyota] to twist its mind over the potential to make such deals with one of the greatest car manufacturers in the world - for examples: Citroen, Alfa Romeo.
  • As a form of challenge, Toyota attracted itself to aim a takeover of both financially-ill European car manufacturers, Citroen and Maserati. As a result, Toyota forged its purchase of both Citroen and Maserati, thus as a result, this benefited Toyota from utilising the underpinnings of the double chevrons - Citroen's nickname - marque's cars and as well as its [Citroen's] deeply vast know-how of developing its cars with the use of front-engine, front-wheel-drive (FF layout).
  • After that scenario, Toyota even sought more prizes to acquire and possess, and thus one of these were Alfa Romeo and Lamborghini - both European car manufacturers, just like Citroen and Maserati, with the possession of having beautiful designs but terrible technologies.
  • Following its takeovers of Citroen, Maserati, Alfa Romeo (AR), and Lamborghini, Toyota for the last time targeted an acquisition of Chrysler's proufoundly ailing European division. This eventually meant Toyota benefited from access to Chrysler Europe's manufacturing plant located in Ryton-on-Dunsmore, which also resulted the former [Toyota] to become in charage of the assembly plant - as this would consider to be Toyota's first attempt to build cars within the European Economic Community.
  • But as considered to be an aftermath, Chrysler Europe went bankrupt and reorganised, alongside Honda and Maserati, into the orbit of Toyota. Whereas the Citroen and Alfa Romeo brands on the other hand, remained alive and kicking, and the conclusion was both European car manufacturers benefited from Toyota's technologies - while both AR and Toyota committed each other to gain their cars benefit from Citroen's underpinnings (except for others like Celica, Supra, and others).
- Genda Nicolai Yturzaeta Iwakawa/awakawI ateazrutY ialociN adneG, this is just a prologue, as well as something of a sequel.
 
Last edited:

PNWKing

Banned
So let's start with the Toyota Supra. This gets rebadged as the Citroen Elf and the Alfa Romeo Cherry.
 
So let's start with the Toyota Supra. This gets rebadged as the Citroen Elf and the Alfa Romeo Cherry.
There was no Citroen Elf, the latter name in fact was the same name as the French oil company - Elf Aquitaine.

The Alfa Romeo Cherry you were saying was the Nissan Cherry/Pulsar (N12), the AR version was called as the Alfa Romeo Arna - the model was definitely the worst kind of experiment that the automotive industry expected.

The Toyota Supra following its manufacturer's takeover of Citroen, Maserati, Alfa, Lambo, and Chrysler Europe (plus Honda) on other hand, ended up being either of a Maserati or Ferrari basis - the latter manufacturer in fact was actually started its life through the help of AR.

Toyota on other hand, took over Ferrari from Fiat, and many of its performance-centred cars, e.g. [Toyota] Celica, etc., all switched to Ferrari-sourced underpinnings - but technological components from Toyota remained stuff inside however...

- Genda Nicolai Yturzaeta Iwakawa/awakawI ateazrutY ialociN adneG,
 

PNWKing

Banned
Could the Citroen then be renamed the Citroen Leon. And the Alfa could be called the Alfa Romeo Charlatan.
 
Could the Citroen then be renamed the Citroen Leon. And the Alfa could be called the Alfa Romeo Charlatan.

Perhaps not, but I think the DS would might as well go FR and five-door along with the Celica and Alfetta, see also:


If Toyota would have kept both Citroen and Alfa in company with each other, then here are the following models and segments both companies share platforms with each other as well:
  • Toyota Yaris - Citroen C3 - Alfa Romeo Arcta (Alfa Romeo Citroen Toyota Autoveicoli) = superminis
  • Toyota Corolla - Citroen C4 - Alfa Romeo Giulietta = small family cars
  • Toyota Camry - Citroen C5 - Alfa Romeo Giulia = large family cars
  • Toyota Celica - Citroen DS - Alfa Romeo Alfetta = executive [liftback] cars
  • Toyota Supra - Citroen SM - Alfa Romeo GTV = luxury saloons
But for the sake of evolution, Toyota ditched its inline-six engine in favour of benefiting Ferrari's V6, the former kept its own inline-fours and automatic transmissions inside its parts bin in fact. So Toyota also gained from Ferrari's FR vehicles and thus evolved it into use for developing large family, executive, and luxury cars for use...
 
Last edited:
Top