TL: UK Overseas Regions [Redux]

Chapter 1: Eden

Devvy

Donor
Anthony Eden
Conservative Premiership, 1953-1960, won election 1955

1708955861142.png

Eden and Eisenhower oversaw a souring of the US-British relationship following the Second World War.

The United Kingdom today owes a significant part of it's heritage to the efforts of Anthony Eden. Taking over from Churchill as party leader and Prime Minister in 1953 following Churchill's rapidly failing health (and following his own successful surgery that year), Eden had to tackle a rapidly evolving global stage with the British Empire in decline, the ascendency of the United States and Soviet Union and a divided Europe.

In 1956, Gamal Abdel Nasser nationalised the Suez Canal - as legally allowed, if controversial - and set in to play a series of events for the United Kingdom. This led to an almost quick-fire set of international discussion on how to handle it; for France and Britain (although for slightly different reasons) the Suez Canal was a critical piece of global infrastructure, allowing freight to transit between Asia/Pacific and Europe far quicker then circumventing the entire continent of Africa. Eden was incensed by the Egyptian move, despite the fact that the 1954 Treaty required Britain to draw down it's troops in the Suez Canal Zone anyhow. Franco-Israeli desires to hit Nasser hard and quickly were also therefore shared by Eden in Britain, who saw Nasser as potentially the next Hitler, but ideas of Britain taking action against Nasser were quickly stymied by American opposition. The US was deeply involved in the British economy, and could make or break the country in the 1950s, and discussions between Eden and Eisenhower highlighted the deep opposition of the Americans to any action in Egypt which could jeopardise their attempts to keep Egypt out of the Soviet camp, and avoid any notion of backing a colonialist power move. Despite the United Kingdom awarding India and Pakistan independence in the late 1940s, it was still a heavily empire-led nation at the time - an increasing contradiction between the world's foremost imperial power and the world's foremost presidential republic at the time. This set off a chain of events leading to Britain's "Allied Approaches" foreign policy strategy to the United States, recognising it as a crucial ally, but a nation who Britain would routinely have different strategies, aims and processes to even if pursuing the same end goal.

Although acknowledging Egypt's actions to nationalise the canal, as long as the flow of traffic was not interfered with and the charging process remained reasonable, Eden was wary of Nasser. In to this mix were the Malta integration talks, headed by the Maltese Dom Mintoff, who was frequently unpredictable. Much of the discussions were financial & economic in subject; Mintoff's desire for economic parity with the UK met with British hesitance over writing a blank cheque every year to Malta. Social programmes would be expensive to fund in Malta due to demographics, whilst the tax earned would be far smaller. However, in light of nationalisation of the Suez Canal, as well as rejection of the "international status" of the Suez (implicit in efforts to cut Israel off), there was a greater requirement for British security in the Mediterranean, and towards Egypt. The British, despite not taking part directly, did quietly allow the French to use British air bases in Cyprus in transit.

Outline agreement with Malta was therefore found in late 1956, and the Maltese national referendum on the matter backed the proposal; just roughly 75% of voters did so to join the UK. In terms of the electorate, just over 51% voted to join the UK, 15% voted against integration, and just over 34% didn't vote - either not caring or abstaining. Integration would see Malta become part of the UK along similar lines to Northern Ireland; a full part of the country, electing MPs to Westminster and a local "Maltese Assembly" taking care of local affairs. In light of the experiences of Northern Ireland, several powers were reserved to Westminster, primarily around the economy given the expected expense of Maltese integration. The Maltese pound would be technically withdrawn and replaced by UK Pound Sterling directly, although an sub-agreement between the Maltese and British Government enabled a new "Royal Bank of Malta" to print their own bank notes under the same terms as the Scottish and Northern Irish banks. In lieu of this and the possible expense of Malta, British Rail saw it's requested budget for modernisation slashed, forcing it to concentrate on a limited amount of new traction and electrification, as well as further closures of unproductive routes, whilst reconsideration of British air force projects brought about a reconsideration of future interceptor aircraft to utilising Avro for their connections with the Canadian Arrow project and cost savings. Reductions in the air force industry had been long expected due to the overly large amount of small manufacturers, but the choice for Avro put many smaller manufacturers out of business or forced to merge.

Although Eden had been forced to not take military action in Egypt regarding the Suez Canal, the affair had laid clear the separate interests of the United States and the United Kingdom, the former of whom had made abundantly clear it's rejection of any military action and hinted at counter-action if Britain did so. The failure to back the United Kingdom, in the view of the British Government, was perceived as yet another split following the failure to share the fruits of nuclear weapons research, taking the relationship between the wartime "closest allies" to a new low, despite the public image as close allies within the NATO alliance.

The events of the Suez, now known as the Suez Affair in Britain, highlighted the requirement to be prepared for conflict either in the Atlantic or in the Mediterranean as needed. This would see the imperial presence East of Suez maintained to secure use of the canal and force it open if needed, as well as maintaining a US-friendly but more independent international stance. A home base in Malta, outright owned and operated by the Royal Navy would tie in with this objective well, whilst also sitting not far from Egypt where a conflict could quickly arise over transit rights in the canal. This set of a series of steps which would transform the British armed forces over time, with a greater focus on an independent power projecting force and dovetailing in to NATO where Eden retained Britain's role within the integrated command despite the French partial withdrawal - remaining in the core of NATO continued to be perceived as essential for the defence of Europe and implicitly Britain.

And so in 1959, Malta acceded to the United Kingdom - then a historic event, and unparalleled since 1801 when Ireland was merged in to the United Kingdom alongside Great Britain for better or worse. Over the next 15 years, Malta would be gradually invested in and economic parity targeted with at least the lower UK regions. The 1958 Act of Union, passed in both Westminster and Valetta merged Malta in to the United Kingdom, although for the first time since the English-Welsh legal union in the 16th century, the flag would remain unchanged. Malta was assigned three constituencies for the sake of elections to Westminster; Gozo, Malta West and Valletta, and a 12 year transition period (having begun in 1958 with the Acts of Union) would work to economically integrate Malta in to the United Kingdom and achieve rough equivalence with Great Britain (in terms of purchasing power parity).

The 1960 election would be the first to elect 3 MPs from the Maltese constituencies. Eden had recognised early on that Malta would likely be Labour leaning, and the alliance of the Maltese Labour Party with the UK-wide Labour party did little to temper this. The electoral fight was for Eden's successor, Macmillan, to conduct however, and the booming economy in the late 1950s led the electorate to return the Conservative Government - but with a far reduced majority, with 3 Labour MPs elected from all three Maltese constituencies as expected. Harold Macmillan duly retained the role of Prime Minister, but with a very slim majority in Parliament, an unwelcome hark back to Attlee's Premiership following the 1950 election.

------------
Notes:
Welcome back to a hopefully more thorough telling of the UK overseas regions timeline I did a few years ago, with more detail in it and consideration of other butterflies. What started out for me as a rewrite of the Overseas Regions timeline I did, spun out quickly in to the UK pursuing a somewhat more independent foreign policy aim and becoming increasingly close to France to replace it's US Special Relationship.

The PoD is here is Eden not having botched surgery; here he has had successful surgery which hasn't left him addicted to a cocktail of drugs and the inevitable irritability. He's been able to approach Suez with a better mindset, and this time correctly read the US feeling over potential Suez action. The Israeli invasion has still gone ahead with French support; an Israeli-Nasser showdown was on the cards anyway, but this time it's with tacit British support rather then explicit support. This has led to the integration of Malta, as a close major naval base for projecting power towards the Suez and keeping the canal open for British interests, and a far more "Frenchy" - or in the end European - United Kingdom is on the cards.
 
I'm not much familiar with this part of history, but the idea of the UK being more aligned with France with instead of the UK looks to be interesting. Watched.
 

Devvy

Donor
I'm not much familiar with this part of history, but the idea of the UK being more aligned with France with instead of the UK looks to be interesting. Watched.
Linky

The OTL referendum in Malta in 1956 voted for integration, with the problem of widespread "no" voter boycotting. Even so, the referendum resulted in 45% of the electorate voting for integration - it's not a far shout to get this over the line even with a boycott, as some of the negotiations were multi-faceted but substantially aligned with the MoD strategy for Malta. Post Suez humiliation however, those desires rapidly disappeared.

OTL, Malta remains the only colony/territory to ever be offered a true opportunity to integrate to the United Kingdom, despite many others professing some desire to.
 
Linky

The OTL referendum in Malta in 1956 voted for integration, with the problem of widespread "no" voter boycotting. Even so, the referendum resulted in 45% of the electorate voting for integration - it's not a far shout to get this over the line even with a boycott, as some of the negotiations were multi-faceted but substantially aligned with the MoD strategy for Malta. Post Suez humiliation however, those desires rapidly disappeared.

OTL, Malta remains the only colony/territory to ever be offered a true opportunity to integrate to the United Kingdom, despite many others professing some desire to.
There have been some throwaway comments on various threads in the past about Overseas Regions/colonies wanting integration with the UK IOTL but aside from Malta, which ones do we know really wanted this?
 
This is definitely interesting, especially would like to see what other strategies piece of land the British would try to keep this time around. Also can you give the link to the old TL
 
Huh...didn't quite expect you to visit the Overseas Region TL....do you intend on basically making a more detailed version of the previous TL...like the 12:08 TL, there would be some major differences (based on the last sentence, which it will probably will....)

Since the next Premiership would definitely extends well passing 1962, I would like to add my two cents in regards to the conversation in the previous version of this timeline in regard to Malaysia in general, with Brunei and Singapore in particular South East Asia(oh dear...it's look like I went too deep in this) NVM, I f*cked up

Considering the POD(1953) and more importantly the fact that Malta somehow is now integrated with UK... I do wonder if the butterfly is flapping enough that the Konfrontasi with Indonesia would have some different developments partly due to...


1.) The Dutch New Guinea dispute between Indonesia and the Dutch.
The UK only tacitly supported the Dutch position IOTL
If the UK decided to explicitly supporting to the Dutch to the point of providing military support(perhaps using units that aren't being used for the Suez affair...)for the Dutch in Operation Trikora, this could potentially open a can of worms due to...

2.) The Formation of Malaysia and the Subsequent Konfrontasi
Sukarno already had a very dim view to the British, since it view the formation of Malaysia (which British supported as a way to decolonize British Borneo) as a form of neocolonialism (read: taking away rightful Indonesia territory/s) and eventually launch an attack on Malaya and British Borneo in 1962 IOTL... ITTL Operation Trikora could go 2 ways
a. Pretty much like IOTL: Considering the relatively small majority of the next government, the likelihood of British troops set foot in New Guinea seems unlikely...so things will progress like IOTL...for now.
b. The British sending troops: Based on a previous discussion in regards to Operation Trikora, the Indonesia is stretching thin when doing this operation, and another unit or two could potentially wreck totally Indonesia plans to takeover West Papua. This is especially gam changing since this could set back the Indonesian Army enough to be not capable to even start the Konfrontasi, and more importantly, butterflying away Suharto (the one that is in charge of Trikora) ascendancy. (If you read this, @GSD310 , please correct me if I am wrong)

3.) The future of Brunei, Singapore and Malaysia (if Trikora went as IOTL)
a. In regards to Brunei, the only way for Brunei to even consider integrate with the UK is to throwing out the Brunei Royal Family out of equation, which could happen if the Brunei Revolt is severe enough that the entirety Royal family is kidnapped by the revolt organizers, and even then there is more probability that an subsequent aftermath of a different ITTL revolt (more severe or otherwise) involves Brunei being force to integrate with Malaysia rather than UK.
b. For Singapore, as mentioned in the previous version of the TL, Singapore desire for independence (and thus the need to merge with Malaysia) is strong enough that it is hard for Singapore to integrate with the UK before the merger with Malaysia. Meanwhile, as I mentioned in the West Papua thread, IMO, Singapore expulsion from Malaysia isn't really an inevitability until early 1965, and it has been long enough for things to changes even if Konfrontasi went as IOTL....so there are three ways things could go in the end of 1965(from the most likely to the least likely)...
i) Singapore could in the end as IOTL, being expelled from Malaysia and stayed independent (Most likely, due to the UMNO intentions to stay in power)​
ii)Singapore stays within Malaysia...for now....things could get seriously messy in 1969....​
iii)In a very odd move, Singapore being expelled from Malaysia, with somehow Malaysia giving Singapore back to the UK with the British being basically chosen as a guarantor of peace between the races (mostly due to a more severe racial riots in 1963-65))(The least likely...​
If Trikora went badly for the Indonesia, the equation for Malaysia could seriously change...and a permanent 15 state Malaysia (with Brunei and Singapore joined and more importantly, stays within Malaysia) when from an improbable outcome to a possible one,,,

I do wonder with ITTL there would be more calls to integrate PNG (read: becoming a proper state) into Australia, now the UK has set a precedent....as does other European nation (read: Denmark fully integrate Greenland which will stay in the EEC/EU unlike IOTL)



I'm not much familiar with this part of history, but the idea of the UK being more aligned with France with instead of the UK looks to be interesting. Watched.
Watched indeed
 
Last edited:
Linky

The OTL referendum in Malta in 1956 voted for integration, with the problem of widespread "no" voter boycotting. Even so, the referendum resulted in 45% of the electorate voting for integration - it's not a far shout to get this over the line even with a boycott, as some of the negotiations were multi-faceted but substantially aligned with the MoD strategy for Malta. Post Suez humiliation however, those desires rapidly disappeared.

OTL, Malta remains the only colony/territory to ever be offered a true opportunity to integrate to the United Kingdom, despite many others professing some desire to.
If Malta got that the precedent is set and its a whole different debate
 
If Malta got that the precedent is set and its a whole different debate
It's a whole different kettle of fish.

Wonder if GiB will integrate the same way as it did in the previous timeline.

Also wonder what other possible candidates could be as well integrated to the UK?
 

Devvy

Donor
There have been some throwaway comments on various threads in the past about Overseas Regions/colonies wanting integration with the UK IOTL but aside from Malta, which ones do we know really wanted this?

Well it's no spoiler considering the original version, so here's a rundown:
Malta - requested integration in OTL, discussions were serious from both sides about it, but fell apart over referendum boycott and MoD wind down in the Med.
Gibraltar - had a political party which ruled 1969 -1972 in Gib, linky
Seychelles - James Mancham apparently requested independence and pursued in in the late 1960s, but was rebuffed like GIbraltar. Hansard - search for "integration" on the page to find the relevant parts.
West Indies - more difficult to tie down, but lots of remaining Overseas Territories or remaining Commonwealth Realms. Tiny populations, small islands - not too difficult to bring in, especially as lots of Windies people have migrated to the UK anyway OTL, and lots of family relationships.
Falklands - (post Falklands) - "more British then British", along with the other South Atlantic islands.
Belize - I think they more want independence, but scared of Guatemala, but also the mainland situation will worry those concerned about a de facto open border and illegal migration.
Channel Islands & IoM - not sure. OTL there's no desire, as they de facto have all the important advantages of UK integration (broadcasting, mail, little/no customs, Common Travel Area, full UK citizenship) with non of the drawbacks (they don't pay UK taxes, don't elect MPs to Westminster, don't deal with the Westminster clown show, etc etc).

The only other places:
Fiji - apparently explored integration with UK as a way of allowing full democracy without the Fijians being dominated by Indo-Fijians (I think I've got that right). Can't see this happening - it's just too far away.
Singapore - can't see this happening, it's too many people for the UK to swallow, and the UK has already demonstrated in WW2 it can't defend the place.
Hong Kong - would work theoretically if the lease was permanent, but realistically this can't work in OTL if the lease is up in 1997. There's no way for the UK to force China to the table to renegotiate it either.

This is definitely interesting, especially would like to see what other strategies piece of land the British would try to keep this time around. Also can you give the link to the old TL
Link to the original.
Very intriguing, watched
:)
Huh...didn't quite expect you to visit the Overseas Region TL....do you intend on basically making a more detailed version of the previous TL...like the 12:08 TL, there would be some major differences (based on the last sentence, which it will probably will....)

Considering the POD(1953) and more importantly the fact that Malta somehow is now integrated with UK... I do wonder if the butterfly is flapping enough that the Konfrontasi with Indonesia would have some different developments partly due to...

<snip>

Watched indeed

There'll be some differences - as noted, I think the way I had Suez play out in the original was little to no Suez Affair, and everything continued roughly OTL in foreign affairs. That's one thing that I've rewritten - the Anglo-French relationship is far stronger as a result here; Eden hasn't been annihilated by Suez like OTL, but he's had his fingers burned by the USA, and is happy to keep the Americans at arms length and grow closer to the French.

If Malta got that the precedent is set and its a whole different debate

Oh I remember this it was a fun read last time I’m looking forward to seeing what changes.

It's a whole different kettle of fish.

Wonder if GiB will integrate the same way as it did in the previous timeline.

Also wonder what other possible candidates could be as well integrated to the UK?
Exactly as you all say - as soon as Malta joins, it provides not just a precedent on integration, but a template and model on how to accomplish it, it's pretty open to negotiations and discussions for most places.[/spoiler]
 
West Indies - more difficult to tie down, but lots of remaining Overseas Territories or remaining Commonwealth Realms. Tiny populations, small islands - not too difficult to bring in, especially as lots of Windies people have migrated to the UK anyway OTL, and lots of family relationships.
Would that includes Trinidad and Tobago? Keeping a source of oil under British Control out in the Caribbean would be disiriable given the navigational difficulties getting into Belize.
 
In certain circumstances I could see the Falklands asking. On that note I am wondering if I'm this timeline St Helena or Ascension might be interested of course back in 1949 it's possible Newfoundland could have done this if things had gone slightly differently
 
Singapore - can't see this happening, it's too many people for the UK to swallow, and the UK has already demonstrated in WW2 it can't defend the place.
Could the UK get a similar agreement to that of Cyprus? To have a Sovereign base located in Singapore? Could be useful having a base and fueling point out east.
 
I have often idly wondered what would happen if the UK had an "Imperial Parliament" with representatives & equal citizens from all ( or at least the white parts knowing the bias of the times) of the Empire?

No taxation without representation!
Ok - elect your members and send them to Westminster.
oh...................................
 
Could the UK get a similar agreement to that of Cyprus? To have a Sovereign base located in Singapore? Could be useful having a base and fueling point out east.
Hmm...IOTL,I remember that Malaysia does was actually hold sovereign lands inside Singapore after the expulsion...(but for other purposes...)...well...I stumble upon this when looking on the foreign territories in Singapore...

From what I could inferred...the circumstances surrounding Singapore (which undergoes two transfers of sovereignty in a very short span of three years) meant that the actual status of the bases sovereignty a bit murky IOTL, perhaps a clause in the ITTL Malaysian Agreement (which is important since the colony of Singapore along with it bases is under the sovereignty of the British up until this point) would properly defined the sovereignty of the bases used as British, with the clause being grandfathered into the expulsion agreement (if the expulsion does happen)...
 
Last edited:

Devvy

Donor
Would that includes Trinidad and Tobago? Keeping a source of oil under British Control out in the Caribbean would be disiriable given the navigational difficulties getting into Belize.
Probably not - precisely because Trinidad and Tobago has a nice source of oil in their seas, I think they'd rather go their own way rather than try and stay within the UK. Also T&T is circa 1.5 million people now - even in early 1960s it was just shy of 1 million. I think that's probably too many people to swallow for the UK sadly.

Shame kinda would be interesting if Singapore decided to join the Uk.
Could the UK get a similar agreement to that of Cyprus? To have a Sovereign base located in Singapore? Could be useful having a base and fueling point out east.

Hmm...IOTL,I remember that Malaysia does was actually hold sovereign lands inside Singapore after the expulsion...(but for other purposes...)...well...I stumble upon this when looking on the foreign territories in Singapore...

From what I could inferred...the circumstances surrounding Singapore (which undergoes two transfers of sovereignty in a very short span of three years) meant that the actual status of the bases sovereignty a bit murky IOTL, perhaps a clause in the ITTL Malaysian Agreement (which is important since the colony of Singapore along with it bases is under the sovereignty of the British up until this point) would properly defined the sovereignty of the bases used as British, with the clause being grandfathered into the expulsion agreement (if the expulsion does happen)...

Yeah I get that, but Singapore is even more populated then T&T as above, and it's a massive way away from the UK. Can't see it integrating, but I'd note that the Royal Navy was in Singapore in OTL until the withdrawal in 1971 (I think, happy to take corrections!) from East of Suez. Whilst not a sovereign base, clearly the RN had some kind of privileged position in the docks. Either way, Singapore joined in to Malaysia in 1963 in OTL, and I can't see butterflies majorly affecting this as long as the RN retains the same kind of basing rights it had in OTL in this TL.

I feel this TL should have happened IOTL with Malta :)

Watched and eager for more

Thank you both! :)

I have often idly wondered what would happen if the UK had an "Imperial Parliament" with representatives & equal citizens from all ( or at least the white parts knowing the bias of the times) of the Empire?

No taxation without representation!
Ok - elect your members and send them to Westminster.
oh...................................

Probably a little outside this remit :)
 
Top