2) Something similar was done by the captain of the Brittanic, with the same results.
To be fair to the captain of the Britannic had people kept the E-deck portholes shut, she probably would have made it to shore.
2) Something similar was done by the captain of the Brittanic, with the same results.
To be fair to the captain of the Britannic had people kept the E-deck portholes shut, she probably would have made it to shore.
Actually, no. She was hit by only four fish, IIRC. It was a matter of not all the adjustments having been made since her sea trials had not yet been undergone. It's watertight doors below the waterline MAY have all been installed, but they had not yet been properly calibrated and quality controlled for water tightness and ability to withstand shock damage (1) in combat conditions. Also, AIUI, the captain foolishly continued onward, (2) rather than stopping to check for internal damage and flooding, thereby causing the pressures of the sea while the ship was underway to be magnified manyfold.*glug-glug*
1) When you are unable to secure and close said doors, you basically have a Little Dutch Boy Effect all over the ship, with water pressures shooting in that are beyond the limits of human strength alone to hold back.
2) Something similar was done by the captain of the Brittanic, with the same results.
Good commanders they had. Good fish too. But with only ONE sub, you'd need 100% of the fish to strike, and that's pretty damn near-ASB.
Remember, any time the RN has the temerity to sink anything historically sunk by the USN I get accused of a Brit-wank.
Its like some aquatic form of Historical Inevitability...
Equally if anything of the USN gets sunk, even if it was sunk in OTL, you will be accused on an Ameri-screw. And if you even think of suggesting any member of the US armed forces (bar perhaps MacArthur) wasn't an utterly perfect military genius...Remember, any time the RN has the temerity to sink anything historically sunk by the USN I get accused of a Brit-wank.
Its like some aquatic form of Historical Inevitability...
usertron2020
While steaming on after an attack has dangers I would suspect that stopping when you're just been attacked by a sub is probably at least as dangerous? Especially if you're poorly escorted and there might well be other subs about.
Steve
What if we promise to leave the Musashi for the US?
Remember, any time the RN has the temerity to sink anything historically sunk by the USN I get accused of a Brit-wank.
Its like some aquatic (1) form of Historical Inevitability...
If the Shinano were a naval vessel fully crewed and having finished her sea trails, I would agree with you completely. But the very fact that it only required those four fish to sink her showed what a vulnerable condition she was in in the first place. Poor command decision IMVHO.
Who CARES who sinks the Yamato!? Just sink it!
HEY!!
Why is it that anytime a poster has the temerity to just discuss the sinking of anything that was historically sunk by the USN said poster gets accused of charging Brit-wank? I never said there was anything wrong with the RN sinking the Yamato, or any Yamato-class battleship. I even suggested a death ride for the IJN in the DEI that could potentially very well doom the Yamato before the guns of the Royal Navy.
I merely questioned the concept of one little submarine of ANY nation pulling off such a monumental feat as sinking the Yamato by itself. Yet once again, out you come implying the presence of "American Exceptionalism"...
Its like some marine form of Historical Inevitability...
1) Astro, you DO know the proper term is "marine", not "aquatic", right?
Marine is salt water
Aquatic is fresh water
A distinction every American knows from the War of 1812, a war in which you kicked our asses with the most routine regularity, except on the aquatic field of combat on the Great Lakes!
Well apart from taking every comment personally even when it was quite clearly was directed at other people.Wasn't talking about you, Usertron, you've always been very reasonable.
Wasn't talking about you, Usertron, you've always been very reasonable.
Its nice to hear that, thank you. There are more than a few people who would disagree with you on that score, even vociferously.
Well, reasonable isn't the same as correct....
Given the effect of the Allies counterattack, the Italian High command makes two decisions. First, the western part of Sicily will be abandoned, and the forces there used to reinforce the centre. The non-mobile and poorly equipped coastal formations will also be withdrawn to help build a defence line and to generally aid the more mobile defenders. Second, additional troops will be moved south in Italy. The bulk of these will be held in Italy, but two divisions will be moved to Sicily to bolster the defences. This will include an armoured division, as it is clear the Italian forces are currently overmatched by the Allied armour.
Astrodragon said:The reduction of artillery support due to shortages was covered by naval gunfire, but once he advances north this will not be available.
Astrodragon said:General Kesselring meets with Mussolini to discuss the possibilities of sending German forces to aid the Italian defence.
Astrodragon said:The commander of the 15thPanzergrenadier division is refused permission for a full-scale attack against the US forces now facing him.
Astrodragon said:The Italian command wish to finish the reorganisation of their forces, which will take some days due to shortage of transport, not helped by the Allied planes currently treating Italian transport on Sicily as a training exercise in ground attack.
Astrodragon said:The German General Staff discuss the Italian situation with Kesselring. The state of the fighting in Russia makes them reluctant to reserve too many forces for Italy, although it is accepted that if the Allies land on the mainland something will have to be done to stiffen the Italian defence. The current hope is that one more push in Russia will allow the front there to be stabilised if necessary in a position of strength. In the meantime, some forces in France are put on alert and the Luftwaffe promises to move aircraft to Italy. They point out that they can reduce the fighter strength in Germany to some extent, although the bomber force is currently dedicated to the offensive in Russia. None of the staff are particularly happy with the situation.[/COLOR]
O'Connel's intention is to build up a stronger armoured force, then attack north/northeast in an attempt to break through and separate the Italian formations. He thinks this is much more likely to break the will of the cut-off Italian army, allowing a drive east to clear the island.