I wonder what Elias Disney (Walt Disney's father, born before the POD) was up to ITTL.
I don't think we're able to be that loose. The federal government would still be tied to the crown.
Only if they voted for independence (ironically they did around this time historically in OTL). Legally it would be pretty iffy to shed the crown and still be part of Canada unless there was an overhaul of how they were attacked to Canada (autonomous region?) so that's an issue.
Just wanted to chime in and say that this TL is totally awesome.
I want it to go on to the present day.
I've read the entire thing over three durations of time lasting 22 hours in total.
Also, I don't think things will look for China when war likely comes. It will likely be turned to mincemeat the way Japan/India was earlier.
But you might very well have something down your sleaves...so I'm not saying this will happen for sure.
Some questions:
Are demographical trends hurting the Motherland party at the ballot box?
How is the Scottish nationalist movement fairing? Does the slower pace of decolonization hurt it IOTL?
What is the primary alternate history site in IOTL?
I wonder what Elias Disney (Walt Disney's father, born before the POD) was up to ITTL.
This kind of regional polarisation has a great risk of degenerating into civil war.1) Yes, faster growing population in the non-Russian parts of the IEF are hurting the Motherland Party. This has been partially counteracted by growing support from an increasingly larger percentage of Russian voters. In other words, the Motherland Party does will inside Russia but in the other IEF regions it is often hated.
This is indeed worrying.This kind of regional polarisation has a great risk of degenerating into civil war.
Gentlemen, I tend to agree. I don't see Quebec staying in Canada if it loses the Monarchy. For now, its either Canada, the Monarchy, and the Commonwealth or a republic and the LAR. I think its possible though that the LAR may drop the no-monarchies rule. The republic/monarchy divide in the world has probably lessened lately.
Would Belize, Guyana, and the Caribbean want to join the LAR for commercial reasons? Or are they better of stating in the British Commonwealth.
This certainly sounds plausible.I could see Canada and the Caribbean Commonwealth states pushing for some kind of free trade zone between the LAR and Commonwealth or similar arrangements. Possibly pressure for double memberships being allowed.
This certainly sounds plausible.
How are relations between the IEF and Japan?
I think that you could see things more sour after a likely war against Technocratic China than currently because Japan will likely be more militarily powerful.I predict that they're not great because of their competing interests and historical rivalry in the Asia-Pacific, but with China on the rise I think they're trying to undergo a rapprochement to better contain it and secure themselves from technocracy making even further inroads.
Gentlemen, I tend to agree. I don't see Quebec staying in Canada if it loses the Monarchy. For now, its either Canada, the Monarchy, and the Commonwealth or a republic and the LAR. I think its possible though that the LAR may drop the no-monarchies rule. The republic/monarchy divide in the world has probably lessened lately.
Would Belize, Guyana, and the Caribbean want to join the LAR for commercial reasons? Or are they better of stating in the British Commonwealth.
Well allowing for dual membership would bring the best of both worlds for everyone I think. Less sticky issues on membership and increased economic benefits for the members of the Commonwealth in the western hemisphere.
As to whether Belize, Guyana, and the Caribbean islands want to join the LAR, I imagine it would have to do with the economic activity within the respective alliance. I'm not an economist but I'd be willing to put money on the idea that the LAR is much better off economically than the Commonwealth post Pacific War![]()
It very much depends how good economies LAR nations have. But economically LAR might be better than Commonwealth.
What are the latest advances in military technology?
Also, wouldn't it be a fair observation that given the ire towards Motherland in the outer regions of the IEF, it would be better for the state of the Rodina if the incumbent government lost in 1998?
This kind of regional polarisation has a great risk of degenerating into civil war.
This is indeed worrying.
At worst, you see what happens in OTL happen to large extent, except in the manner of what happened in Yugoslavia in the 1990s, with some undertones from the Scottish independence campaign.
At best, this is little more than noise that quiets after Motherland loses 1998 in the large part.
I could see Canada and the Caribbean Commonwealth states pushing for some kind of free trade zone between the LAR and Commonwealth or similar arrangements. Possibly pressure for double memberships being allowed.
This certainly sounds plausible.
Almost guaranteed since even in OTL the US is Canada's, and North America's in general, biggest trading partner and it would be even more overwhelmingly dominant with a larger internal market, not to mention the sheer size of a Pan American market.
Well allowing for dual membership would bring the best of both worlds for everyone I think. Less sticky issues on membership and increased economic benefits for the members of the Commonwealth in the western hemisphere.
As to whether Belize, Guyana, and the Caribbean islands want to join the LAR, I imagine it would have to do with the economic activity within the respective alliance. I'm not an economist but I'd be willing to put money on the idea that the LAR is much better off economically than the Commonwealth post Pacific War![]()
It very much depends how good economies LAR nations have. But economically LAR might be better than Commonwealth.
That would be my guess. The US and various LAR countries probably have better economies and finances when it comes to lending and have been untouched by war for well over a century.
How are relations between the IEF and Japan?
I predict that they're not great because of their competing interests and historical rivalry in the Asia-Pacific, but with China on the rise I think they're trying to undergo a rapprochement to better contain it and secure themselves from technocracy making even further inroads.
I think that you could see things more sour after a likely war against Technocratic China than currently because Japan will likely be more militarily powerful.