And "Soyuzny Alliance" makes no sense, since "Soyuz" already means "alliance" or "union". They'd basically be calling it the "Allied Alliance".
'Sahara Desert' makes no sense either. Translations can get lazy sometimes.
And "Soyuzny Alliance" makes no sense, since "Soyuz" already means "alliance" or "union". They'd basically be calling it the "Allied Alliance".
'Sahara Desert' makes no sense either. Translations can get lazy sometimes.
Why does Belarus never get autonomy?
Does anyone have a list of South African PMs for this timeline?
Why does Belarus never get autonomy?
In that case, I did some of the work for you:No, but I would love to see one. The current Prime Minister is Niles Mbete of the Liberal Federalist Party.
In that case, I did some of the work for you:
1. Pieter Visser (Afrikaner Bond) 1910-1918
2. Sir David Miller (Federal) 1918-1929
3. John Warner (Citizens' Bond) 1929-1934
4. Hendrik de Graaf (Federal) 1934-1936*
5. Willem Jansen (Federal) 1936-1941
6. Nicolaas Dekker (Citizens' Bond) 1941-1949
7. Sir Michael Parker (Federal) 1949-1956
8. Jan van Leeuwen (Citizens' Bond) 1956-1967
9. Niles Mbete (Liberal Federalist) 1967-present
*assassinated
Hmm. ITTL Japan only has the lower four Kurile Islands. Is this intentional, or an artifact of using an OTL map?
Very cool! Any thoughts as to the parties positions? Also would an Afrikaner be the first PM right after the defeat of the Boers?
It's not intentional. Thanks for pointing it out. It never has really been discussed ITTL who owns the Kurile Islands. What do y'all think?
The Citizens' Bond is a right-wing party that is a standard conservative party*. The Liberal Federalist Party is a left-wing party that came into being with the merger of the Liberal and Federal parties**.Very cool! Any thoughts as to the parties positions? Also would an Afrikaner be the first PM right after the defeat of the Boers?
to the left of OTL American liberalismTo the right of what kind of liberalism? Because that ideology covers virtually anything depending on who you ask. Most definitions of liberalism can be neatly summarised as centrist to centre-right, which makes your claim that a party to the right of liberalism is left-wing seem a bit odd.
to the left of OTL American liberalism
Put it this way: Citizens' Bond is right-wing, Liberal Federalist is left-wing. End of story.Sorry, I misread that. My point's even more valid now though - libertarianism is a pretty right-wing ideology, and I fail to see how a party could be to its right but to the left of American "liberalism".