On June 21, 1934, Floyd Olson, Fiorello La Guardia, Huey Long, and numerous other public figures, all gave speeches about the events which occurred in Asheville, North Carolina, a year before. Under the direction of Olson, all Progressives and allies who gave speeches did so without any reference to ISA, which was in the Supreme Court, or any partisanship. He swore to personally endorse a future primary challenger to any politician who attempted to use the anniversary of the tragedy for anything other than commemorating the victims. Olson's speech that day was considered politically moving; even some of his staunchest conservative enemies were stirred, as they remembered the events that occurred at Galahad College.
Seven days later, large portions of the Internal Security Act were struck down by the Supreme Court in the cases of
Buchanan vs. Long,
Williams vs. Long, and
MacDonald vs. Long, barely less than a year after it was passed. Chief Justice Miller, writing the opinion of the majority of the court, wrote that calling any crime committed to advance a political cause to be a too broad interpretation of "unlawful insurrection" (specifically, the case where Huey Long arrested someone for unlawful insurrection due to bribery to get a tax lowered). They ruled that only if a crime was violent, and if the political goal was the toppling of the existing US government or of the structure of US society, could it be considered unlawful insurrection. Furthermore, they banned the use of military tribunals to try alleged rebels. A minority of the justices wanted to totally strike down the entire act, but were unsuccessful.
Many Americans expected Long and Olson to be very upset over the damage done to ISA. However, the Attorney General gave a speech shortly after, deeply regretting any "mistakes committed by lower-level members of the FBI in their honest desire to see the United States rid of dangerous madmen", and saying that he believed that ISA had accomplished its purpose and broken the far-right paramilitaries (some might say that it also accomplished its secondary purpose of breaking the Conservative Party).
A couple days later, Huey Long gave a speech in Mississippi. There, he confronted southern racists who demanded to know why he stayed in the administration of someone opposed to segregation like Olson. Huey Long responded by saying that while he was outraged by some of the things that Olson desired, that his job was to enforce the law of the land, not to challenge the President on political matters. Long said that all disputes should go to Congress, and pointed to the fact that the Commonwealth Party voted against the Equal Wage Act, and that all of its representatives supported "Separate But Equal" as a sign of their commitment. He remarked that those Southern Progressives loyal to "true Southern values" had already defected to the Commonwealth Party, and that he hoped that the voters would vote Commonwealth and drive the Progressives out of the South. Then, his tone shifted. He said that no matter what Olson did, as Attorney General, he was the man in charge of crushing the Christian Party and other extremist organizations. He proclaimed that "if it be a sin to want to be the man to personally destroy those Silver bastards, then I call every true American man a sinner!" The crowd got wrapped up in anti-Pelley bloodlust, and cheered for the man to crush the remnants of Pelley's gang.
Some conservatives in the United States were happy to hear that the French government fell on September 13, 1934. The numerous left-wing parties could not cooperate, and enough moderate socialists quit the Popular Front for it to lose a vote of no confidence. The French Right swept the election, and ended all support for the slowly collapsing Iron Front. Both the US and USSR realized that the Empire of Germany would win the war, especially after it negotiated a return to a separate "sub-monarchy" for Bavaria, along with more autonomy.
However, while the Left in France was defeated, the Progressives in the United States was not so weak. True, they failed to accomplish much of their agenda. True, they were wracked with infighting. True, many moderates had been alienated, and were going to the Republican Party. However, Floyd Olson had anticipated this. Deciding not to waste the person of his Vice President, he made Fiorello La Guardia's primary mission in the first two years of the Olson presidency to be the setting up of a massive Progressive Party apparatus. In 1932, they had been barely organized in many states in the Northeast and Midwest. After La Guardia's efforts, well-organized Progressive parties existed in every state outside of the South. Coupled with dramatically improved party organization was the economic improvement. The massive public works projects, the banking regulations, the lowering of tariffs, and the end of the gold standard had worked. The US economy had clearly turned around, and was at its highest point since the middle of Calvin Coolidge's brief presidency. More than half of the formerly unemployed were now employed, with the unemployment rate dropping to "only" 15%. People had more money to give to charities, and the lives of the unemployed were improved. It was clear to most Americans that the Depression was over, and the recovery was well under way.
The Progressives suffered a minor net loss of seats to the Republicans in the North, not enough to shake things up, but enough to show that the Republican Party was not about to collapse. 20 Progressives switched to the Commonwealth Party for their reelection bid, and numerous Progressives and Conservatives were defeated across the South in a massive Commonwealth sweep. Meanwhile, while the Socialist Party lost a couple seats in the Northeast and Midwest to more moderate Progressives or to Republicans via vote-splitting, they gained 6 seats in California. While Olson knew that Hiram Johnson was unbeatable, he had made it his goal to break Johnson's machine's dominance over California politics, and with the successful election of Upton Sinclair as governor of California, he was successful.
Some things to note about the infobox/map:
- It may look like the Commonwealth Party really swept the Upper South in comparison to the Lower South, but that is because a lot more Lower South Progressives switched parties, while in the Upper South they stayed loyal and were defeated.
- There is one ex-Progressive independent in Missouri still, so that is why the numbers do not line up.
- The Socialists lost a single seat in Connecticut, Illinois, and New York
- When the at-large Progressive for Illinois decided to run for governor instead, Parley Christensen switched to his seat and allowed another Progressive to fill the 10th district