The Return of the Bear with the Crown: A Timeline of the Russian Empire

Is this a good timeline?


  • Total voters
    77
Nevertheless, in the same period, the Mensheviks, led by Trotsky, who succeeded Martov, who resigned due to his poor health, witnessed a rise in their popularity, along with the joining of members such as former criminal Joseph Dzhugashvili and members
This is actually problematic, from what we saw in the Russian OTL civil war and the death of Lenin, Trotsky was probably a better general than a politician.

Some Mensheviks led by Trotsky would suffer from major internal problems, such as Trotsky's form of leadership (who had trouble dealing with people), factionalism and his own cult of personality, etc.

There is a reason why many Trotskyist organizations are often divided and why Trotsky lost the power struggle after Lenin's death.
 

ahmedali

Banned
This is actually problematic, from what we saw in the Russian OTL civil war and the death of Lenin, Trotsky was probably a better general than a politician.

Some Mensheviks led by Trotsky would suffer from major internal problems, such as Trotsky's form of leadership (who had trouble dealing with people), factionalism and his own cult of personality, etc.

There is a reason why many Trotskyist organizations are often divided and why Trotsky lost the power struggle after Lenin's death.
Trotsky never became a Bolshevik, he remained a Menshevik because the main reason for his conversion to Bolshevism was the 1905 Revolution, and with the absence of the Russo-Japanese War, the 1905 Revolution became completely different.

The main reason for the revolution in 1905 was the assassination of Grand Duke Sergei Alexandrovich (uncle of Nicholas II).

Here, this revolution took a similar curve to the Persian constitutional revolution, which took place in the same year as the Russian Revolution, i.e. 1905, and with the emperor at the time Michael II, Michael agreed to submit a constitution.

Therefore, the social contract between the tsar and the people was not destroyed, Russia became a constitutional monarchy, and most of the political parties that initially did not want to end the monarchy (Mensheviks, Royal Democrats and others) became participants in the State Duma. (So Trotsky did not become a Bolshevik and here he became the leader of the socialists in the Duma)

The only party that remained dedicated to overthrowing the monarchy was the Bolsheviks led by Lenin (they are weaker here because a large number of political parties did
not take their side)

After Lenin's death, the Bolshevik faction died with him, as most of the Bolshevik cadres who did not find a reason to continue moved to the Mensheviks.

But do not forget that Trotsky was a good politician, but the reason for his downfall and death was mainly Stalin
 
But do not forget that Trotsky was a good politician, but the reason for his downfall and death was mainly Stalin
I did not say nothing about the rest.

But you are reducing Trotsky's problem too much.
Stalin was a factor in the downfall of Trotsky, yes. But doesnt mean he was the only one or the only major one.
One of the first major fails of Trotsky was the trade union debate in the early 20s for example.

And other personal problems that we know.

Also...a good politician that gets out of the country because he can't make a strong coalition...doesnt sound like a good politician.
 

ahmedali

Banned
I did not say nothing about the rest.

But you are reducing Trotsky's problem too much.
Stalin was a factor in the downfall of Trotsky, yes. But doesnt mean he was the only one or the only major one.
One of the first major fails of Trotsky was the trade union debate in the early 20s for example.

And other personal problems that we know.

Also...a good politician that gets out of the country because he can't make a strong coalition...doesnt sound like a good politician.
It did not come out more precisely, it was denied


The man, despite his faults, was the most legitimate to be the leader of the communists, and this made the Stalinists worried about his presence.


And do not forget his inability to form a coalition was due to the growing opposition to him due to the bias of some of the old guard to Stalin. The mistakes of the man cannot be denied, but the circumstances in 1925 were not in his favor in order to ascend to power


Trotsky here has been present as a main party for a relatively long time (since 1911) and a leader at an earlier time and not as a deputy of Lenin, so things will be completely different, where Stalin will come and Trotsky in his position is almost firmly established.
 

ahmedali

Banned
This is actually problematic, from what we saw in the Russian OTL civil war and the death of Lenin, Trotsky was probably a better general than a politician.

Some Mensheviks led by Trotsky would suffer from major internal problems, such as Trotsky's form of leadership (who had trouble dealing with people), factionalism and his own cult of personality, etc.

There is a reason why many Trotskyist organizations are often divided and why Trotsky lost the power struggle after Lenin's death.
And things like personal worship were not possible in this situation because with the emperor the personal worship of anyone except the emperor would be forbidden


But I will agree that driving will have problems
 
The man, despite his faults, was the most legitimate to be the leader of the communists
Debatable.

Lenin Collected Works, Progress Publishers, [1976], Moscow, Volume 35, pages 275-276:
"P.S. Trotsky has sent in a silly letter. We shall neither print it nor reply to him."

And this is ignoring the obvious ideological debates within the party itself.
Trotsky widely underestimated the peasantry and believed in the idea of the Permanent Revolution, in opposition to the construction of socialism in the USSR (defended by Stalin and with arguments from Lenin himself, which we must analyze in the context of his time), militarism and other positions of Trotksy.

Mostly Lenin about Trotsky:

"Lenin insulted Trotsky in his letters, telegrams and articles 219 times. How did Lenin call him? "Pustozvon" ("bell", man who talks much and does nothing), "svin'ya" (pig), "podlec iz podlecov" (scoundrel of scoundlers), "iudushka" ("Judas"/traitor), "politicheskaya prostitutka" (political prostitute) and his most elegant phrase concerning Trotsky that became Russian proverb - "pizdit kak Trotskiy" - "to lie/bitch/bullshit like fu**ing Trotsky"."
"Trotsky has never yet held a firm opinion on any important question of Marxism. He always contrives to worm his way into the cracks of any given difference of opinion, and desert one side for the other. At the present moment he is in the company of the Bundists and the liquidators. And these gentlemen do not stand on ceremony where the Party is concerned."
(Lenin, Collected Works, Vol. 20 p. 448, 1914).

"Trotsky behaves like a despicable careerist and factionalist of the Ryazanov-and-co type. Either equality on the editorial board, subordination to the central committee and no one's transfer to Paris except Trotsky's (the scoundrel, he wants to 'fix up' the whole rascally crew of 'Pravda' at our expense!) – or a break with this swindler and an exposure of him in the CO. He pays lip-service to the Party and behaves worse than any other of the factionalists."
(Collected Works, Vol. 34, p. 400).

"The struggle between Bolshevism and Menshevism is... a struggle over the question whether to support the liberals or to overthrow the hegemony of the liberals over the peasantry. Therefore to attribute [as did Trotsky] our splits to the influence of the intelligentsia, to the immaturity of the proletariat, etc, is a childishly naive repetition of liberal fairy-tales.
...
Trotsky distorts Bolshevism, because he has never been able to form any definite views on the role of the proletariat in the Russian bourgeois revolution.
...
Therefore, when Trotsky tells the German comrades that he represents the 'general Party tendency' I am obliged to declare that Trotsky represents only his own faction and enjoys a certain amount of confidence exclusively among the otzovists and the liquidators.
"
(The Historical Meaning of the Inner-Party Struggle in Russia, Collected Works, Vol. 16 pp. 374-392).

"What a swine this Trotsky is – Left, phrases, and a bloc with the Right against the Zimmerwald Left!! He ought to be exposed (by you) if only in a brief letter to Sotsial-Demokrat!"
(Collected Works, Vol. 35, p. 285).

"There is also a letter from Kollontai who... has returned to Norway from America. N. Iv. and Pavlov... had won Novy Mir, she says,... but ... Trotsky arrived, and this scoundrel at once ganged up with the Right wing of Novy Mir against the Left Zimmerwaldists!! That's it!! That's Trotsky for you!! Always true to himself, twists, swindles, poses as a Left, helps the Right, so long as he can..."
(Collected Works, Vol. 35, p. 288).

True, it was not Lenin's job to choose his successor, but Trotsky simply never had much of a chance of being THE Soviet leader.
A good comparison that I have are Castro and Che, Castro was a statesman and Che a revolutionary. Stalin was a statesman and Trotsky was a revolutionary.
Both Castro and Stalin ended up ruling, the difference is how and by whom Trotsky and Che were assassinated (but they were assassinated, without ever being state leaders as strong as Castro or Stalin).
And do not forget his inability to form a coalition was due to the growing opposition to him due to the bias of some of the old guard to Stalin. The mistakes of the man cannot be denied, but the circumstances in 1925 were not in his favor in order to ascend to power
They never really were.
After his assignment in Brest and the Red Army, Trotsky had many problems in his duties as a civil servant during early Soviet Russia.

He already mentioned one example, the 1920s union debate.
Trotsky supporting the militarization of the trade unions, Bukharin with his own ideas and the 10-point list (Lenin and others).

And things like personal worship were not possible in this situation because with the emperor the personal worship of anyone except the emperor would be forbidden


But I will agree that driving will have problems
To some extent I can see that, but pseudo-sectarianism would exist in various groups.
 
Last edited:
In my own TL I have Trotsky as a leader of a more democratic Russian Empire, but it is only of a minor left party that includes Trotskyists, agrarian socialists and Old SRs XD.

Except for my comments about Trotsky, nice TL.
I like the longer duration of the chapters (of 13 updates, 6 have more than 1000 words. Which in my opinion is good)
 

ahmedali

Banned
Debatable.

Lenin Collected Works, Progress Publishers, [1976], Moscow, Volume 35, pages 275-276:
"P.S. Trotsky has sent in a silly letter. We shall neither print it nor reply to him."

And this is ignoring the obvious ideological debates within the party itself.
Trotsky widely underestimated the peasantry and believed in the idea of the Permanent Revolution, in opposition to the construction of socialism in the USSR (defended by Stalin and with arguments from Lenin himself, which we must analyze in the context of his time), militarism and other positions of Trotksy.

Mostly Lenin about Trotsky:

"Lenin insulted Trotsky in his letters, telegrams and articles 219 times. How did Lenin call him? "Pustozvon" ("bell", man who talks much and does nothing), "svin'ya" (pig), "podlec iz podlecov" (scoundrel of scoundlers), "iudushka" ("Judas"/traitor), "politicheskaya prostitutka" (political prostitute) and his most elegant phrase concerning Trotsky that became Russian proverb - "pizdit kak Trotskiy" - "to lie/bitch/bullshit like fu**ing Trotsky"."
"Trotsky has never yet held a firm opinion on any important question of Marxism. He always contrives to worm his way into the cracks of any given difference of opinion, and desert one side for the other. At the present moment he is in the company of the Bundists and the liquidators. And these gentlemen do not stand on ceremony where the Party is concerned."
(Lenin, Collected Works, Vol. 20 p. 448, 1914).

"Trotsky behaves like a despicable careerist and factionalist of the Ryazanov-and-co type. Either equality on the editorial board, subordination to the central committee and no one's transfer to Paris except Trotsky's (the scoundrel, he wants to 'fix up' the whole rascally crew of 'Pravda' at our expense!) – or a break with this swindler and an exposure of him in the CO. He pays lip-service to the Party and behaves worse than any other of the factionalists."
(Collected Works, Vol. 34, p. 400).

"The struggle between Bolshevism and Menshevism is... a struggle over the question whether to support the liberals or to overthrow the hegemony of the liberals over the peasantry. Therefore to attribute [as did Trotsky] our splits to the influence of the intelligentsia, to the immaturity of the proletariat, etc, is a childishly naive repetition of liberal fairy-tales.
...
Trotsky distorts Bolshevism, because he has never been able to form any definite views on the role of the proletariat in the Russian bourgeois revolution.
...
Therefore, when Trotsky tells the German comrades that he represents the 'general Party tendency' I am obliged to declare that Trotsky represents only his own faction and enjoys a certain amount of confidence exclusively among the otzovists and the liquidators.
"
(The Historical Meaning of the Inner-Party Struggle in Russia, Collected Works, Vol. 16 pp. 374-392).

"What a swine this Trotsky is – Left, phrases, and a bloc with the Right against the Zimmerwald Left!! He ought to be exposed (by you) if only in a brief letter to Sotsial-Demokrat!"
(Collected Works, Vol. 35, p. 285).

"There is also a letter from Kollontai who... has returned to Norway from America. N. Iv. and Pavlov... had won Novy Mir, she says,... but ... Trotsky arrived, and this scoundrel at once ganged up with the Right wing of Novy Mir against the Left Zimmerwaldists!! That's it!! That's Trotsky for you!! Always true to himself, twists, swindles, poses as a Left, helps the Right, so long as he can..."
(Collected Works, Vol. 35, p. 288).

True, it was not Lenin's job to choose his successor, but Trotsky simply never had much of a chance of being THE Soviet leader.
A good comparison that I have are Castro and Che, Castro was a statesman and Che a revolutionary. Stalin was a statesman and Trotsky was a revolutionary.
Both Castro and Stalin ended up ruling, the difference is how and by whom Trotsky and Che were assassinated (but they were assassinated, without ever being state leaders as strong as Castro or Stalin).

They never really were.
After his assignment in Brest and the Red Army, Trotsky had many problems in his duties as a civil servant during early Soviet Russia.

He already mentioned one example, the 1920s union debate.
Trotsky supporting the militarization of the trade unions, Bukharin with his own ideas and the 10-point list (Lenin and others).


To some extent I can see that, but pseudo-sectarianism would exist in various groups.
interesting


Thank you for these sources, they are beautiful and compelling and will benefit this timeline


But I guarantee you that Lenin's legacy will be there (Trotsky will be something like Gabriel D'Annunzio and Che in this alternate reality)


But I guarantee you that Trotsky will not become prime minister


I am preparing for the rise of Alexander Kazambik to become the ruler of Russia Do you have resources to help me? (If you would like to contribute to the timeline)
 

ahmedali

Banned
In my own TL I have Trotsky as a leader of a more democratic Russian Empire, but it is only of a minor left party that includes Trotskyists, agrarian socialists and Old SRs XD.

Except for my comments about Trotsky, nice TL.
I like the longer duration of the chapters (of 13 updates, 6 have more than 1000 words. Which in my opinion is good)
I'm glad you liked it


I apologize for any errors, if any, because this is the first timeline I have done
 
Thank you for these sources, they are beautiful and compelling and will benefit this timeline
Your welcome, is good to help.
But I guarantee you that Lenin's legacy will be there (Trotsky will be something like Gabriel D'Annunzio and Che in this alternate reality)


But I guarantee you that Trotsky will not become prime minister
Interesting.

To be expected.
I am preparing for the rise of Alexander Kazambik to become the ruler of Russia Do you have resources to help me? (If you would like to contribute to the timeline)
Kazembek would certainly be different ITL, without the Russian emigrant community and without the revolution as we know it.
The main thing about him is in Russian or German, there is a bit of the CIA about him (about how he helped Russian prisoners during WWII, because of his anti-fascism when the Nazis-Fascists obviously went against the USSR) .

"The ideology of the young Russians was distinguished by extreme contradictions and eclecticism, combining elements of monarchism, Russian nationalism, orthodox fundamentalism, corporatism," Eurasianism "," Smenovejovism ", anti-communism, sympathy for Italian fascism, National Socialism and the Soviet system. , which led to the appearance of the main slogan "Young Russians" - "Tsar and Soviets" "

I would recommend you take a little of the elements of these opinions.
* Left-wing populism or democratic socialism to appeal to the 'Soviet' side.
* Russian nationalism (which can include orthodoxy and monarchism).
* Eurasianism.

A clear example would be, for example, the 'third way' of the South American populists, who had left and right characteristics.
 

ahmedali

Banned
Your welcome, is good to help.

Interesting.

To be expected.

Kazembek would certainly be different ITL, without the Russian emigrant community and without the revolution as we know it.
The main thing about him is in Russian or German, there is a bit of the CIA about him (about how he helped Russian prisoners during WWII, because of his anti-fascism when the Nazis-Fascists obviously went against the USSR) .

"The ideology of the young Russians was distinguished by extreme contradictions and eclecticism, combining elements of monarchism, Russian nationalism, orthodox fundamentalism, corporatism," Eurasianism "," Smenovejovism ", anti-communism, sympathy for Italian fascism, National Socialism and the Soviet system. , which led to the appearance of the main slogan "Young Russians" - "Tsar and Soviets" "

I would recommend you take a little of the elements of these opinions.
* Left-wing populism or democratic socialism to appeal to the 'Soviet' side.
* Russian nationalism (which can include orthodoxy and monarchism).
* Eurasianism.

A clear example would be, for example, the 'third way' of the South American populists, who had left and right characteristics.
good ideas


Regarding nationalism, I did a chapter on the Balkans and the Ottomans, in which I developed a new nationalism called neo-Byzantine nationalism and made it a mixture of Panslavianism and Orthodox nationalism.


This nationalism made her stipulate that the Slavs and the Orthodox should be part of a single state representing them, with Russia being the heir to the Eastern Roman Empire, but with Muslims being a significant minority of Russia's population, she thought so. He made Islamic unity a component of Byzantine nationalism


In the First World War, Russia absorbed a large part of the Habsburg Empire and made it fully include the Ottomans. I'm thinking of making Russia more like a huge Eurasian Union with a chance to expand even more


Do you think neo-Byzantine nationalism is good?


For the Soviets, I'm thinking of a role for Stalin with the rise of the Maladurians, and that would be helpful because Emperor Kirill had a leftist personality besides being a conservative.


Regarding the style of government, I think of a mixture between the Soviets and Franco's Spain, and something similar to Italy and Japan


What are your suggestions?
 
Do you think neo-Byzantine nationalism is good?
Makes sense. Which is good.
Regarding the style of government, I think of a mixture between the Soviets and Franco's Spain, and something similar to Italy and Japan
The Russian Empire is different from all that but similar at the same time.
In the first place, it would be necessary to understand how the Soviet Union works and the proposals of the Soviets, democratic centralism, the Cadres, the party, the party officials and everything else.

An example is the collective meetings where formal nominations of a person to certain positions were presented (by anyone who had the right to vote), for example at the head of the NKVD (Stalin introduced Malenkov, but for Yezhov's replacement, Beria I win the position).

Franco's Spain is ... interesting.
They were a particular type of Spanish conservatism-fascism (strong Catholicism, anti-communism, etc).

Personally I think this would mean continuing with the creation of something 'Russian', different from Europe and Asia, but which retains many Russian characteristics (the usual authoritarianism, orthodoxy, pan-Slavism, etc).

Japan on the other hand has an element of a theocratic monarchy, Russia has the idea of the Tsar being the Little Father, a representative of God, but it does not go as deep as in Japan due to the differences between the religions-ideologies of those countries.
In addition to various forms in bureaucracy, for a long time the Japanese emperors were more like priests and not exactly emperors (many powers behind the throne or other people who de-facto ruled, this is how the Yamato dynasty survived so long).
 
If you want some of the Soviet model, I would suggest looking at the People's Republic of China.
* Deng Xiaoping's reforms are heavily based on Lenin's New Economic Policy (they are a NEP on steroids), a liberalized economy but with a policy still heavily led by the CPC central government (in short, they liberalized the economy without liberalizing the government, happening where Gorbachev failed).

ekgyud9u6qf71.jpg

The phrase comes from The New Economic Policy And The Tasks Of The Political Education Departments, Report To The Second All-Russia Congress Of Political Education Departments October 17, 1921.

* Unlike the Soviet Union, in China separatism is prohibited (they are still a unitary country).

Problematic, but could work under certain conditions.
You could also apply Stalin's ideas in this regard, where each entity would be part of the Russian Soviet Federative Socialist Republic('Autonomization', that is, an autonomous part of the same country).

* Each level in the hierarchy of Chinese administrative divisions has two important officials:
1-A figure that represents the CPC, the Party Chief or the Party Secretary, which is the policy maker (appointed by their superiors in the CPC).
2-The head of the local People's Government, elected by the people. Usually called a governor, mayor or magistrate, depending on the level in the hierarchy, this figure acts to carry out the policies and most ceremonial duties.

* Instead of specifically having Five Year Plans, you could use "Five Year Guidelines", recently the Chinese have done that.
Personally I have similar ideas for my TL: Five-year Development Plans (Пятилетние планы развития, Pyatiletniye plany razvitiya) or also called Five-Year Plans, Strategic Five Year Plans, Five-Year Guidelines and Strategic Guidelines.
But that is rather part of the future of my TL
 

ahmedali

Banned
Makes sense. Which is good.

The Russian Empire is different from all that but similar at the same time.
In the first place, it would be necessary to understand how the Soviet Union works and the proposals of the Soviets, democratic centralism, the Cadres, the party, the party officials and everything else.

An example is the collective meetings where formal nominations of a person to certain positions were presented (by anyone who had the right to vote), for example at the head of the NKVD (Stalin introduced Malenkov, but for Yezhov's replacement, Beria I win the position).

Franco's Spain is ... interesting.
They were a particular type of Spanish conservatism-fascism (strong Catholicism, anti-communism, etc).

Personally I think this would mean continuing with the creation of something 'Russian', different from Europe and Asia, but which retains many Russian characteristics (the usual authoritarianism, orthodoxy, pan-Slavism, etc).

Japan on the other hand has an element of a theocratic monarchy, Russia has the idea of the Tsar being the Little Father, a representative of God, but it does not go as deep as in Japan due to the differences between the religions-ideologies of those countries.
In addition to various forms in bureaucracy, for a long time the Japanese emperors were more like priests and not exactly emperors (many powers behind the throne or other people who de-facto ruled, this is how the Yamato dynasty survived so long).
The Yamato dynasty at this point is similar to the Hashemites, as the Hashemites were more religious than political, especially as they descended from the Prophet of Islam Muhammad (as most of this dynasty either became kings or became clergymen)


The map of Russia in this alternative reality will be very large (the map of the Russian Empire plus northern China, eastern Europe, the Middle East, excluding Iran, and the expanded Russian America) with the opportunity to include areas of India, Korea, Iran, Japan and parts of Africa as possible lands


Ethnically Russia this will be 70 percent Slavs (Russians, Serbs, Croats, Czechs, Bulgarians, etc.)


And 20 percent are Muslims (Turks, Arabs, Azeris, Muslim Slavs, Albanians, Greek Muslims, Kurds, and possibly Persians), and the rest are Asians, non-Slavs Orthodox, and non-Slavs Catholics (Greeks, Romans, Hungarians, Manchus, Assyrians, Syriacs, Chaldeans, and possibly Ethiopians and Koreans).



It made the Russian emperor have political power as protector of the Orthodox (where Russia controlled the Muscovite Patriarchate) and protector of Muslims (where the caliph came under the control of the Russian emperor)
I am thinking of putting Buddhism, Shinto, Hinduism, and Sikhs under Russian control.)


With Russia controlling the holy religious sites of the three religions (Jerusalem in the Holy Land, Mecca and Medina in the Hijaz), the Russians have enormous religious influence.


Regarding the regime, I favored Franco of Spain, as the system was largely Soviet but centered on Catholic nationalism (I'm thinking to make Russia more like Spain under Carlos Duke of Molina) with characteristics from Saudi Arabia (Saudi Arabia is more like a Russian empire than a dictatorship with such as enlightened despotism) and characteristics of fascists


Add to it the cruelty of Stalin, but with some control by the emperor in order to prevent the huge damage caused by Stalin, host of some ambitious plans of the Soviets and czars.


What do you think ?
 
The Yamato dynasty at this point is similar to the Hashemites, as the Hashemites were more religious than political, especially as they descended from the Prophet of Islam Muhammad (as most of this dynasty either became kings or became clergymen)


The map of Russia in this alternative reality will be very large (the map of the Russian Empire plus northern China, eastern Europe, the Middle East, excluding Iran, and the expanded Russian America) with the opportunity to include areas of India, Korea, Iran, Japan and parts of Africa as possible lands


Ethnically Russia this will be 70 percent Slavs (Russians, Serbs, Croats, Czechs, Bulgarians, etc.)


And 20 percent are Muslims (Turks, Arabs, Azeris, Muslim Slavs, Albanians, Greek Muslims, Kurds, and possibly Persians), and the rest are Asians, non-Slavs Orthodox, and non-Slavs Catholics (Greeks, Romans, Hungarians, Manchus, Assyrians, Syriacs, Chaldeans, and possibly Ethiopians and Koreans).



It made the Russian emperor have political power as protector of the Orthodox (where Russia controlled the Muscovite Patriarchate) and protector of Muslims (where the caliph came under the control of the Russian emperor)
I am thinking of putting Buddhism, Shinto, Hinduism, and Sikhs under Russian control.)


With Russia controlling the holy religious sites of the three religions (Jerusalem in the Holy Land, Mecca and Medina in the Hijaz), the Russians have enormous religious influence.


Regarding the regime, I favored Franco of Spain, as the system was largely Soviet but centered on Catholic nationalism (I'm thinking to make Russia more like Spain under Carlos Duke of Molina) with characteristics from Saudi Arabia (Saudi Arabia is more like a Russian empire than a dictatorship with such as enlightened despotism) and characteristics of fascists


Add to it the cruelty of Stalin, but with some control by the emperor in order to prevent the huge damage caused by Stalin, host of some ambitious plans of the Soviets and czars.


What do you think ?
You have a long way it seems.
I am fine with most of it.
The TL sounds fun, a Russia-wank, but doesn't mean that is bad (more important is to have fun and be civil).
 

ahmedali

Banned
If you want some of the Soviet model, I would suggest looking at the People's Republic of China.
* Deng Xiaoping's reforms are heavily based on Lenin's New Economic Policy (they are a NEP on steroids), a liberalized economy but with a policy still heavily led by the CPC central government (in short, they liberalized the economy without liberalizing the government, happening where Gorbachev failed).

ekgyud9u6qf71.jpg

The phrase comes from The New Economic Policy And The Tasks Of The Political Education Departments, Report To The Second All-Russia Congress Of Political Education Departments October 17, 1921.

* Unlike the Soviet Union, in China separatism is prohibited (they are still a unitary country).

Problematic, but could work under certain conditions.
You could also apply Stalin's ideas in this regard, where each entity would be part of the Russian Soviet Federative Socialist Republic('Autonomization', that is, an autonomous part of the same country).

* Each level in the hierarchy of Chinese administrative divisions has two important officials:
1-A figure that represents the CPC, the Party Chief or the Party Secretary, which is the policy maker (appointed by their superiors in the CPC).
2-The head of the local People's Government, elected by the people. Usually called a governor, mayor or magistrate, depending on the level in the hierarchy, this figure acts to carry out the policies and most ceremonial duties.

* Instead of specifically having Five Year Plans, you could use "Five Year Guidelines", recently the Chinese have done that.
Personally I have similar ideas for my TL: Five-year Development Plans (Пятилетние планы развития, Pyatiletniye plany razvitiya) or also called Five-Year Plans, Strategic Five Year Plans, Five-Year Guidelines and Strategic Guidelines.
But that is rather part of the future of my TL
will take China Deng Xiaoping into consideration

Emperor Cyril would be something like Victor Emmanuel III and Alfonso XIII (he would be the emperor who established his dictatorship)

While his son Vladimir (he will be Tsar Vladimir III) I will make him a mixture of Juan Carlos, Umberto II and King Michael of Romania (he will be the king who will restore democracy to the people)

He also seemed quite liberal, unlike his father, who had swings between authoritarianism, socialism, and the ideals of freedom.

Here the Russians will view Michael II as Paul von Heddenburg and Frederick III, Emperor of Germany, while Nicholas will be largely forgotten.

(He gave the people a constitution as Frederick III wanted, but caused, even if unintentionally, a dictatorial clique like Heidenberg.)
 

ahmedali

Banned
You have a long way it seems.
I am fine with most of it.
The TL sounds fun, a Russia-wank, but doesn't mean that is bad (more important is to have fun and be civil).
Russia's goal of dominating the Middle East, the Balkans, and Eastern Europe was achieved during World War I, and by the 1930s these lands were essentially under Russian control.


All that remains are parts of India and China plus Korea, Japan and Abyssinia (where Egypt became Russian).


In the second chapter, I summarize the events before 1903, when Alexander I was imperialist and expanded in America, Nicholas I planted the seeds of industry, while he discovered Alaskan gold during the reign of Alexander II, which led to the abolition of the Alaska sale, and then summarized the events of the world in a different way until It arrived in 1903.


This is the beginning of the story of this timeline
 
So Kirill.................
is The Soviet Tsar........
i wish stalin was secretary of soviet empire under tsar kirill

But vladimir kirillovich...........
 
Chapter Twelve: Building, but at a price

ahmedali

Banned
Chapter Twelve: Building, but at a price

The period between the two wars witnessed many economic and political achievements and the development of architectural and technological scenes, regardless of the political developments that ravaged this period.

Petrograd and Moscow, along with other Russian cities, witnessed many development projects that positively affected the Russian economy, such as the Moscow Development Plan of 1935.

Which built new buildings in Moscow in the Art Deco style with the expansion of the subway and skyscrapers, which led to making Moscow a city on the level of New York, London and Paris
1634570221965.png

moscow in 1935

But the new regions annexed by Russia are the biggest beneficiary of the growth of the Russian economy, and it is they who have pushed the wheel of development there.

Tsarigrad (Constantinople in Russian) witnessed a great development, as projects were built to modernize the city, where new buildings were built in the style of Art Deco and Neo-Baroque, as well as the renovation of Dolmabahcet Palace to make it fit

For the Russian emperor, where they became similar to the Winter Palace and Versailles, while preserving the Ottoman buildings, and Constantinople became a mixture between its Byzantine and Ottoman past and being currently a Russian city.
1634570477368.png

The Church of Hagia Sophia and the mosque similar to Hagia Sophia (where Muslims were compensated with a mosque similar to Hagia Sophia in exchange for converting Hagia Sophia into a church again)

Hagia Sophia was converted into a church, where the first mass was held there since the fifteenth century, although it is now a Russian church, unlike its previous status as a mosque and a Greek church

Anatolian lands witnessed the movement of Russian immigrants (mostly villagers and Cossacks) to the Anatolian countryside, in addition to the movement of some middle class to Smyrna and Saluynik
And Constantinople and Trabzon

In addition to Anatolia, the Balkans witnessed an economic and cultural recovery, as the Balkans and Anatolia were linked to Russia by railways, factories were built and modern agriculture was encouraged there.

Budapest, which was considered one of the capitals of the ancient Habsburg Empire, became a symbol of the greatness and might of the Russian tsar, as the Russian emperor was crowned as the Apostolic King of Hungary.

The Tsar being orthodox and the nation Catholic, but the Hungarian aristocracy, fearing the loss of the territory of Greater Hungary and the loss of what was left of their influence decided to tolerate the king's religion
1634570832780.png

The famous Hungarian crown where Tsar Kirill was crowned King of Hungary and the first Hungarian king from the Romanovs and the first non-Habsburg king
But an important resource came that made Russia a huge influence economically, which is oil

Besides Baku, huge quantities of oil were discovered in the Arab lands that were under Russian rule, especially in Kirkuk and Jubail
Where huge quantities of oil encouraged the acceleration of industrial and armament projects, linking new lands to Russia, and modernizing the Russian state and its lands.
1634572637917.png

The twenties witnessed the completion of the construction of the Bering Bridge, which will connect the Siberian Railway with Russian America, which was delayed due to the Russian Constitutional Revolution and the First World War, which will contribute to the expansion of trade between
Russia, the United States, and Canada significantly increased cooperation and close relations between Russia and the United States

That Athens became along with Belgrade, Bucharest, Thessaloniki, Sofia, Smyrna, Thessaloniki, Constantinople, Trabzon and
Warsaw, Budapest, Kaliningrad (Kenigsburg), Damascus, Alexandria, Erzurum, Hainan, Jerusalem, Helsinki, besides Moscow and Petrograd
Major cities of the Russian Empire

These cities have become the embodiment of the coexistence and cultural blending between local and Russian cultures and examples of tolerance and diversity that characterize Russia in a scene different from the former Russia.

With the abolition of anti-Semitic policies, Jews in Russia witnessed a tremendous revival, a cultural and religious revival and a return to Jewish influence, along with the emigration of Jews from other countries to Russia
Because of Russia's encouragement and support for Zionism in order to benefit Russia economically

In addition to the economic development, the Russian Imperial Army has witnessed a huge increase in its military equipment and development and modernization projects, as it has become a force to be reckoned with greatly, although it
Still greatly dwarfed by the armies of the British Empire

But things were not quite nice for Russia, as there were rebellions here and there on their lands, especially the new ones.
So much so that there was a five-year crisis known as the Secession Crisis, as several open rebellions erupted there simultaneously in late 1917.
And it continued until 1921, when the rebellions were put down hard with concessions to the subjects of the empire. These rebellions played a huge role in the rise of the coalition to rule Russia.


The British Empire experienced further prosperity with the adoption of the Imperial Confederation, which made movement and trade easier and more equal throughout the empire.

But nevertheless, the tensions within the colonies began to ferment little by little, despite the attainment of Dominion status and equality within the empire.
However, the radical movements for complete independence began to brew little by little, especially in the two crown jewels of India and China

Where the independence movements rose under the leadership of the Indian National Congress led by Jawaharlal Nehru, Mohandas Gandhi famous for Gandhi and Subhas Chandra Bose along with Muslim leaders
Like Muhammad Iqbal, Muhammad Ali Jinnah, Hussain Shahid Al-Sahraudi and others

In addition, the Chinese independence movement witnessed a similar rise, as figures such as Sun Yat-sen and Chiang Kai-shek emerged as leaders of the Kuomintang party demanding the independence of China.
The 13th Dalai Lama, who was ostensibly a pro-independence advocate but co-operated with the British (and the Russians secretly) to preserve and protect his people from an independent Chinese state
Even if it cost him submission to a foreign power and made Tibet not independent
1634572976065.png

Sun Yat-sen and Mahatma Gandhi

In 1927, King Fernando VIII of Spain died and his son, Prince Carlos of Asturias, was crowned as Carlos VII. This new king will not know that he will be the last of his dynasty
Where all political factions hated the king for being too interfering in politics and trying to establish a new authoritarian rule and trying to play the factions against each other
1634573197581.png

Carlos VII and Miguel Primo de Rivera

To the extent that his support for the coup of Miguel Primo de Rivera made him hated in the eyes of the Spaniards to
The side of his scandalous life to the extent that the monarchy was almost abolished, but it was removed from power, and Spain was declared a kingdom without a king, ending the political stability and prosperity that Spain experienced since the sixties of the nineteenth century, to be crowned in the end
During the Spanish Civil War, he turned the page of the Spanish Hohenzollern
1634573417662.png

picture of Spanish Civil War

The civil war began between the republicans, communists, anarchists and separatist movements against the conservative forces, some of which wanted to restore Hohenzollern and the Karlist
And who wanted to restore the rule of the Bourbons with the support of the Empire of Mexico, whose ruler, Emperor Alfonso II, wanted to restore the rule of the country of his ancestors, where he negotiated with the nationalists led by Sanjuro
To make his son Juan, Duke of Guadalajara king of Spain, despite the nationalists' reluctance to do so, but they agreed anyway, and his title became Infante Juan, Duke of Barcelona
1634573545269.png


Juan, Duke of Guadalajara (king juan iv of spain after civil war)

The United Kingdom of Peru, Colombia and Bolivia, which gained independence from Spain in the late nineteenth century, had taken the same measure as Spain, where they declared themselves a kingdom without a king, despite the fact that there were calls to turn it into a republic
Or granting the throne to one of the princes of Brazil or Mexico, but these ideas were eventually avoided

The Second Republic, known as the People's Republic of France, had largely recovered from World War I, under the leadership of President Jean Jaures and his successor Sebastien Faure.
Many reforms and laws inspired by the French Commune and the First Republic, to the extent that there is a saying about France (From there human freedom was born, and from there nationalism was born, and now workers’ rights were born in France)

Despite the enormous legacy of the Second Republic, it will not live long to last as it was plagued by political violence, especially from conservative factions that would eventually culminate in the 1934 coup that heralded the Third Republic known as the fascist era.

1634573831824.png

The crisis of 1934 culminated in the end of communist rule and the beginning of the fascist era

Days will reveal what you have in store for the world


end of chapter​
 
Top