Senator John Kerry (D-MA) voted for the Cuban War and would see no Republican file to run against him. Two other party candidates would emerge to attack him from the left and right. Libertarian activist Carla Howell (REF-MA) made a name for herself when she lobbied the public to help defeat a state income tax increase in 2001. She would use that as a springboard for her Senate campaign, but would be blindsided by the state party agreeing to endorse the Green Party candidate. She would run on the Libertarian Party line and received endorsements from people like Senators Sam Rankin (REF-MT), Chuck Hagel (REF-NE), and Wes Watkins (REF-OK), former House Oppositions Leader Ron Paul (REF-TX-22), and former Speaker Bob Barr (REF-GA-7). Howell would run her attack ads as though she were the Republican candidate, going after John Kerry as “the worst tax and spend liberal in Washington” and would position her platform as for Republicans, moderates, and people sick of “manicured politicians with their phony promises.” The other candidate would come from the Green Party and attack Kerry from the left. Randall Forsberg (G-MA) had been a lifelong peace activist, academic, and government official. In 1995, she was appointed by President Clinton to the Advisory Committee of US Arms Control and Disarmament Agency. In 1999, she would co-found the national Green Party and chaired Ralph Nader’s campaign in the state of Massachusetts, where he won 4.1%. She had passed on running against Senator Ted Kennedy in 2000, but wanted to run against Kerry. John Kerry had narrowly defeated then Republican Governor Bill Weld (REF-MA) in an election year. Forsberg believed Kerry was vulnerable and, without a Republican in the race, she felt comfortable going after him. She would have the endorsement and strong backing of the Massachusetts Reform Party, and its leading members, Governor Bill Weld (REF-MA) and Congresswoman Elizabeth Warren (REF-MA-5).
Despite being a recognizable figure and running a tight campaign, Forsberg had no real chance until John Kerry voted for the Cuban War. She found this indefensible and would campaign fanatically against him. She would bring a projector to campaign rallies and play video footage of Kerry arguing against the Vietnam War. “How do ask a man to be the last man to die for a mistake? But we are trying to do that, and we are doing it with thousands of rationalizations, and if you read carefully the President's last speech to the people of this country, you can see that he says, and says clearly: But the issue, gentlemen, the issue is communism, and the question is whether or not we will leave that country to the communists or whether or not we will try to give it hope to be a free people. But the point is they are not a free people now under us. They are not a free people, and we cannot fight communism all over the world, and I think we should have learned that lesson by now.” At one event, after presenting this, she got up on stage and would say “Senator Kerry, did you bump your head and forget?” She and her volunteer staff would pass out millions of pamphlets and run dozens of attack ads focusing on Kerry’s indefensibly centrist voting record. Despite all of this, Senator John Kerry never acted like he was in any electoral danger. He thought he would easily cruise to re-election with polls in November showing him at 50%, and Howell and Forsberg evenly splitting what was left. This would not last. Without the fear of a Republican taking office, and with the hard campaigning, Forsberg got more attention. People in the liberal state of Massachusetts began breaking for Forsberg in droves, supporting her anti-war, progressive platform.
Paul Wellstone was a progressive Democrat first elected in 1990, defeating incumbent Senator Rudy Boschwitz. Wellstone had won with support from union organizations like the AFL-CIO, along with progressive groups like the Americans for Democratic Action and the American Civil Liberties Union. He would oppose the Gulf War, voted against the repeal of Glass-Steagall, and, after facing criticism for voting for the Defense of Marriage Act, asked to be educated on the issue and then came out in favor of gay marriage. He was planning a run for President in 2000, until he was diagnosed with multiple sclerosis. He would endorse Bill Bradley and helped him win Minnesota in the primary.
Tim Penny (REF-MN) polled extremely well at the beginning of the campaign, mainly coming in second but occasionally tying with incumbent Senator Paul Wellstone in polls during the Spring. Tim Penny had a wide swathe of tacit support, with most people saying they’d vote for him being Democrats not committed to Wellstone's progressivism and Republicans who thought he had a better shot than their candidate. As the Cuban War became a central issue, it all fell apart. Tim Penny was broadly anti-war but thought it’d be smart to position himself as a “pragmatic realist” who understood the war couldn’t just stop now, though should “at an appropriate time in the near or not too distant future.” This position was unappealing. Minnesota was sharply divided on the war, and began polarizing around the candidates who were strongly pro and anti-war. By the end of September, Penny was regularly polling under 30% and began to fear his whole campaign would collapse. Nothing that dramatic happened, but Penny’s third place finish was fairly distant.
Elizabeth Dole was a familiar face within the Republican Party. She was a North Carolina native, but moved to Washington D.C. as a young adult. She would meet Senator Bob Dole in 1972 and they married in 1975. They are perhaps one of the more lowkey political couples because Elizabeth Dole's career didn't really start until Bob Dole was near the end of his final term. She had served a full government career, but never in an elected position. She was Commissioner of the Free Trade Commission from 1973 to 1979, having been appointed by Richard Nixon. She would then serve in the Cabinets of Presidents Reagan and Bush, as Reagan's Transportation Secretary from 1983 to 1987 and Bush's Labor Secretary from 1989 to 1990. In 1991, Dole became President of the American Red Cross and would serve until 1999, when she retired to run for President. Her presidential run was encouraged by her husband, who ran in 1980 and 1988, but sat out 1996 and regretted it. He felt as if the party's disastrous result in 1996 was his fault and he believed that he or his wife could have won the nomination that year. When she approached him about running for office, he was supportive and when she jumped into the presidential race, he knew she'd either win or the field was strong enough that the party wouldn't be embarrassed that November. After the presidential run, Elizabeth Dole wanted to run for a more attainable office and decided to run for Senate in her home state of North Carolina when longtime rightwing Senator Jesse Helms (R-NC) announced his retirement.
Sean Haugh (REF-NC) was a libertarian member of the Reform State Party Council and a pizza delivery man who became famous for that fact when he ran for Senate in 2002. He would find himself raising millions of funds and decided to tour around the state in a car he rented with a giant plastic pizza on top. He ran on abolishing the Federal Reserve, the IRS, income and sales tax, ending the Cuban War, and getting corporate money out of politics. He would not be invited to any of the debates, but would actually host a debate against a congressional candidate, Green-aligned progressive Brad Miller (REF-NC-13), which was watched by a decently size TV audience. In the end, Elizabeth Dole easily won the Senate seat, but Haugh walked away with a respectable 19.95% of the vote.
Scott Moore had a long career in politics, beginning in 1980 when he was 20. He worked as a legislative aide until he won a seat in the legislature for himself as a 26 year old Republican. Eight years later, he was elected the Republican Secretary of State, and ran for re-election as an independent in 1998, having won the endorsements of the Republican and Reform Parties. When Mike Johanns (REF-NE) became governor, Moore joined the Reform Party. He endorsed Senator Dick Lamm (REF-CO) in his presidential campaign and, in 2002, would run to succeed outgoing Senator Chuck Hagel (REF-NE). Hagel did not seek a second term, but did not publicly disclose why he was leaving office. It would become clear in January of 2003. Moore ran to succeed him but, unlike Senator Hagel, ran as an anti-war libertarian candidate with the advice of Senator John Driscoll (REF-MT) and Governor Jesse Ventura (REF-MN). His platform included decriminalizing all personal actions that do not harm others, like euthanasia, loitering, prostitution, and the War on Drugs, and a Constitutional Amendment that would directly tie spending cuts to tax cuts. This was a surprise to many, as Moore had been a fairly mainstream Republican before this transformation. His nomination was opposed by Governor Mike Johanns (REF-NE), outgoing Senator Chuck Hagel, and Congressman Tom Osborne (REF-NE-3). All three of them were part of the conservative-maverick faction of the party, having supported the war and generally being more socially conservative than the national party. The Nebraska State Reform Party was staffed by people aligned with them and in the primary they would convince David Boren to run.
The former Democratic Oklahoma Governor and Senator moved to left office in 1995 as someone politically adrift. He had increasingly felt himself grow more distant from the Democratic Party and, after much consideration, decided to switch to the Reform Party in 1996. In the same year, Boren moved to Nebraska to take a new job as President of Creighton University in Omaha, Nebraska. He served in that role for two years when he was approached by Mike Johanns (REF-NE) to run with him in the gubernatorial election. He had enjoyed his work at the school, but would decide to accept Johanns' offer and run for Lieutenant Governor two states over from where he was once governor. After their victory, he settled into his role with few responsibilities. In 2002, he would be drafted to run against Scott Moore whose libertarian platform was seen as too far to the left. Boren ran a pro-war, moderate conservative campaign, positioning himself as the reasonable centrist and claiming that Moore was a radical. With the endorsement of the state party and all of its major figures, it was believed that David Boren would have it. Boren would start off far ahead and spent a good part of the campaign not treating Moore as a proper threat. Scott Moore would run an intensely grassroots campaign, appealing to nonvoters and people unexcited with Boren to “not vote for politics as usual.” Each candidate would also rack up a number of national endorsements, with Senators Richard Mahoney (REF-AZ), Sam Rankin (REF-MT), Bob Smith (REF-NH), and Wes Watkins (REF-OK) and Governors Eunice Groark (REF-CT), Frank Fasi (REF-HI), Bill Weld (REF-MA), Gary Richardson (REF-OK), and Jim Justice (REF-WV) endorsing Boren. Moore received the endorsements of Senators Jerry Brown (REF-CA), Richard Fink (REF-KS), John Driscoll (REF-MT), and Ed Garvey (REF-WI) and Governors Jesse Ventura (REF-MN), Gary Johnson (REF-NM), and Donald Bailey (REF-PA). Moore was also one of the handful of Reform Party candidates to receive the endorsement of Ralph Nader (G). In an incredibly close primary race, the Secretary of State narrowly defeated the Lieutenant Governor.
Scott Moore’s controversial win was protested by party leaders on the floor of the state convention. There were claims of fraudulent votes and, during lunch break, Boren’s delegates attempted to assemble in the hall to nominate him without most of Moore’s delegates being present. Thankfully, this nonsense would swiftly come to an end when National Party Chairman Russ Verney (REF-NH) stepped in. He lambasted the delegates for trying to steal the nomination and called on the state party leadership to resign. With the backing of the national party and a huge base of small donors, Moore was able to build a treasure chest and campaign infrastructure to rival either of the main parties.
The Republicans had originally given up on the seat held by Chuck Hagel, but when he announced he was retiring, everything changed. They were tripping over themselves to challenge Hagel’s successor. Moore or Boren, either would give them a chance to take it back. From a crowded field, Hal Daub (R-NE) would win the nomination thanks to having the most name recognition and endorsements. Daub had served four terms as a Congressman from the 2nd district in the ‘80s, ending that with a senate run where he lost to incumbent Senator David Karns (R-NE) in the Republican primary. In 1990, he would win the Senate nomination and lose badly to Senator Bob Kerrey (D-NE) when he was first taking office. In this election, Democrats struggled to recruit a candidate. They would end up with Charlie Matulka, a construction worker and political unknown, who defeated longtime perennial candidate Al Hamburg in the primary.
Moore and Daub were the frontrunners the whole race, with Matulka barely being a factor. Daub would run a pro-war, traditional, conservative campaign and lead for much of the campaign. Despite this, his efforts to sell Moore as an extremist never worked. Moore was a known element and his political positions, while a bit out of step with the average voter, came across as honest. The polls remained close throughout October, never moving more than 2-points in either direction. Despite that, the vast majority of people thought Daub would win. Basically everybody did really, including Moore. He admitted it in a radio interview days after the vote.
Senator Bob Smith (REF-NH) had always been a conservative-leaning senator. Before he switched from the Republicans, his record was more conservative than 24 of his caucus members. In the Reform Party, he had the third most conservative record, behind Richard Fink (KS) and Chuck Hagel (NE). This was a benefit for him in 2000, it's what made him Richard Lamm’s VP nominee. Unfortunately, in 2002, all it did was make Democrats really want to beat him. New Hampshire was, perhaps the most swinging swing state in the US. It went to Bush (R) in 1988, Clinton (D) in 1992, Perot (REF) in 1996, and Lamm (REF) in 2000. Their governor was a Democrat, Jeanne Shaheen, while their other Senator was a Republican, Judd Gregg. Their two Congressmen were John Sununu (R-NH-1) and Charles Bass (REF-NH-2), who both picked Lamm over Kasich in the contingency election. Smith had been out of place supporting the war and leaning so far to the right. Among voters, it was like the former Republican was still one, and polls began showing a high preference for a Democrat. Governor Jeanne Shaheen would run and face no challenge for the nomination. The Republican Primary would initially see Congressman John Sununu (R-NH-1) running, but he dropped out of the race to run for governor. Instead, the race would come down to Assistant Attorney General Thomas Colantuono (R-NH) and conservative activist and perennial candidate Mike Hammond (R-NH). Colantuono won by a large margin and entered the general election with a lot of enthusiasm, despite his place in distant third.
As a third party incumbent, Smith had to defend himself from more attacks from Shaheen and Colantuono than either ever had to each other. He would also experience severe fundraising problems, as many of his libertarian and centrist leaning supporters abandoned him. In his last weeks, while his campaign was flailing, he would apologize for confirming Kasich’s Supreme Court nominees and beg the public for forgiveness in a bizarre press conference just days before the election. This didn’t go over well with the people of New Hampshire. In an insanely close three-way race, Smith came in third as the incumbent, losing to Shaheen (D) by 3,287 votes and to Colantuono (D) by 1,409 votes. There were three full recounts held of the vote to arrive at this conclusion, with the previous counts having missed a few dozen, but not nearly enough to sway the results.
The US Senate would see major changes to its membership and composition. The Reform Party would see a number of wins and loses that netted them 1 more seat, bringing their total to 17, and the Green Party would enter the chamber with two seats of their own. These two caucuses were closely aligned on some issues and would form a 19-seat block against something not discussed much yet, neoliberalism. Neoliberalism is a term a lot of people don’t really understand that we’re going to be throwing around quite a bit more from this point forward, so it’s worth getting into.
Neoliberalism is defined a few different ways by different people, but it is generally seen as a laissez faire fanatic support of the free market over everything else. Early neoliberal figures made this quite known. President Ronald Reagan is famous for saying “government is the problem” and Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher said “there is no such thing as society.” This is revealing about what matters to them and their ideology. They have total faith in the free market as superior to anything the government could do and legislated that way. When they came to power, Thatcher at the end of the ‘70s and Reagan in the early ‘80s, they mirrored one another as they attacked trade unions, eliminated price controls, deregulated business, took down trade barriers, instituted privatization, and, of course, austerity policies. This led to a hollowing out of social programs, a weakening of communities, and, I would argue, a weakening of democracy. The worst part is, they won. Not only are Reagan and Thatcher both well liked and remembered by this time, and their successors were unable or unwilling to challenge what they had implemented. Even though there has been a two-term Democratic President since he left office, the United States is still in the Reagan Era. Just like in the United Kingdom, where Neil Kinnock explicitly ran against austerity and won a massive parliamentary majority, but struggled to pass anything transformative.
That’s because neoliberalism by definition has to feel ubiquitous, as if the narrow set of options it gives the government are the only things it could do. To try to define what a neoliberal politician looks like, I would say it is somebody unable to think, behave, or legislate outside of market and result-focused priorities. This cannot remain in just one party and quickly became a shared set of values between the Republicans and Democrats. It’s why the Democratic Party aligned itself behind the North American Free Trade Agreement despite its unpopularity and the president who initially proposed it being voted out of office. The Reform Party is not the slightest bit immune to this, but are more like the UK’s Labour Party than the Democrats. There are members of the party, like Senators Richard Lamm (REF-CO) and John Driscoll (REF-MT) who could not put a name to it, but know they oppose it. There are other members of the Senate, like Jerry Brown (REF-CA) and incoming Senators Ralph Nader (G-CT) and Randall Forsberg (G-MA) who could tell you what neoliberalism is and oppose it. This conscious opposition to the ways the system has made itself more rigid, would result in plenty of political battles in the future.
The rest of the Senate saw very few changes in its composition. To summarize, the Reform Party would lose Senators Richard Mahoney (AZ), Richard Fink (KS), Chuck Hagel (NE), and Bob Smith (NH) and gain Senators John Binkley (AK), Wesley Clark (AR), Mark Yannone (AZ), Hunt Downer (LA), and Scott Moore (NE). The Democrats and Republicans would exchange blows, but result in no net gains or losses between them, but there were a number of high profile retirements. Senator and 2000 Democratic Presidential Nominee Bill Bradley (D-NJ) had initially entered the running for a fifth term, but decided to drop out and retire. He was replaced by billionaire Goldman Sachs executive, Jon Corzine, who ran as a Bradley-style liberal. Four Southern Republicans would retire this year. There was the already mentioned racist right wing Jesse Helms, who was replaced by the more moderate and approachable Elizabeth Dole. Dole's ascension to the Senate marked the first time a husband and wife served in the Senate together. This has happened twice in the House, with Andrew Jacobs (D-IN-10/11) and Martha Keys (D-KS-2) having served together for four years from 1975-1979 and Bill Paxon (R-NY-31/27) and Susan Molinari (R-NY-13/14) got married in 1994 and served together until Molinari retired in 1997. The other Senators were not as interesting. The extremely old former Dixiecrat Senator Strom Thurmond (R-SC) would retire and the more moderate Mark Sanford (R-SC) took his place. Senator Fred Thompson (R-TN), famous for acting in the occasional movie, would retire and see the more conservative Van Hilleary (R-TN) replace him. Senator and 1996 Presidential Candidate Phil Gramm (R-TX) would also retire and Attorney General John Cornyn (R-TX) replaced him.
So this is going to be at least three more parts, but I have something special planned for the end. To mark the end of this year being the halfway point of the story, I'll be going over a lot of the major changes that have happened in the US.