The Reconstruction of China: The Heart
“Would that there were no need for me to speak!... What does Heaven ever say? Yet the four seasons are put in motion by it, and the myriad creatures receive their life from it. What does Heaven ever say?”
— Confucius, Analects 17.19
In other religions, the divines speak and act like men. The Old Testament is a continuous dialogue with God, and the New takes the life of God-as-man as its central topic. The incarnations of Vishnu come time and again to play vital roles in the Hindu histories. But the difficulty in definitively labeling the Chinese intellectual traditions as “religions” or “philosophies”, to say nothing of “ideologies”, comes from the fact that in these traditions, the essence of the universe, its all-ruling impulse, defies personification. It does not come down to visit people; people must look for it themselves, and define what they are looking for. That different modes of striving do not wholly cancel each other out accounts for the extraordinary spirit of coexistence 三教合一 in Chinese society; but in the deep and enduring disagreements over the premises on which these systems are built, and their divergent goals for individual and social development, the limitless potential of the human mind (心, “heart”), which all the Chinese traditions affirm as the sole instrument of salvation but for different reasons, almost becomes a burden.
“The August Yuan received Heaven’s command, reached the end of earth and sky, where all accepted it as the ruler. The people grew numerous and the civilization prospered, and all war was ended. The officials under the Yuan upheld the principles of civilized rule, while the people rejoiced. The emperor bestowed benevolence onto the people and brought good government.”
China’s indigenous traditions saw a person’s work as something to be accomplished in the bounds of one life. One’s striving stopped at the moment of death; after this point, one’s spiritual welfare lay primarily in the hands of one’s descendants. Leaders of sufficient renown could look forward to having their memorial tablets placed in a public shrine and included in its ceremonies, or even having an entire temple dedicated to their memory.
But if the Buddhist cycle of rebirth or transmigration entailed suffering, it also granted a lot of leeway. It allowed a division of labor, a taking of turns. Only a miniscule proportion of the population, the sangha, could make meaningful strides toward nirvana at any given time; but by providing for the material needs of the sangha, and undertaking great works to glorify and propagate the faith, anyone could accumulate meritorious karma, which would raise one’s station in the next life. This in turn freed the majority of lay Buddhists from having to follow the rules of monastic conduct or hold themselves to the same educational standards, while necessitating the creation of monasteries as worlds-unto-themselves in which the same rules were viable. There is of course much more to say about the curious relationship between the lay and clerical spheres than this, but for now it is sufficient to say that a monk and a king could acknowledge the gulf that lay between their respective occupations. Each accepted the other party as the primary authority within their respective sphere, and only then worked toward a consensus on mutual oversight.
“Exoteric Chan,” the purported ideology of the Khitai Yaol (1012-1344), therefore maintained a healthy separation between the “Exoteric” and the “Chan”. The curriculum of the civil service exams was broadly the same as under the late Qi (620-867), with a subset of exams offered in the Khitai language. Rather than replacing the Confucian model of scholarship, Buddhist thinkers since the Liang (502-620) had augmented it through practices like panjiao 判教, or building periodizations and genealogies of texts and authors to give structure to vast corpuses of knowledge. The respect and support Buddhism afforded to the traditionally respectable may have paved the way for its massive growth under the Liang; in any case, the Yaol saw no need to fix what wasn’t broken. Their state was not a theocracy, much less a Chan one— the rise of the Chan school of Sudden Enlightenment over older predecessors was a product of wider trends in Chinese society, such as increasing familiarity with the doctrinal basics established by the Huayan and Tiantai schools and a demand for more authoritative statements to inform daily practice. This was not something the Yaol were at liberty to stage-manage, although the Yaol maintained a measure of control over the sangha by reserving, as did the Liang and Qi, the sole right to grant new monks certificates of ordination (a measure which helped maintain an imperial registry of monks, control their numbers through quotas, and charge miscellaneous fees).
“Exoteric” concerns about making the world “safe” for the Buddha-dharma involved the power of the state more directly, through grand and small construction, uneasy coexistence of private enterprise and state monopolies (generally favoring the latter), and encouraging interaction with the outside world while busily policing (and expanding) the borders. This was not the only option available to them. The Confucian discourse of a state that recognized where the genius of the people might allow them to preserve their own livelihood, without the state needing to exhaust the strength of the people and strain their resources in half-baked plans to “save” its subjects, would not have been unknown to the Khitai. Although Buddhism was judged to be the foreign tradition that coexisted most easily with their native shamanism and their Turkic-Iranic affectations, many Khitai were renowned for their depth of classical Chinese learning, and eulogized by close friends and political allies among the Chinese [2]. However, the senior Khitai aristocracy did not indulge this pattern, seeing it as the unlucky fate of those lower Khitai forced to interact with the Chinese on a daily basis by their professions. They also did not wish to see future emperors identify themselves with the Chinese as so many “reformist” Khitai or half-Khitai did or seemed to; the tutors of the emperors were chosen from venerable Chan abbots, who delayed education in the Confucian classics until later in adolescence. A third option for legitimacy, however unsophisticated, could have come from a personalist cult that unconditionally praised the emperor— this was the Uighur (867-1012) road, but it had not led the Uighurs to much success. The “Incarnate Holy King” Eltemish’s attempts at a sacred state failed to override the preceding religious diversity of the Khaganate, did not make Northern China any easier to govern, and ended shamefully with the “holy” title reduced to a plaything of brutish intrigues.
Yaol emperors and ministers promoted a utilitarian image of an ever-ready, ever-helpful state, uniquely suited to governing the largest, most populous, and most prosperous empire in the entire world. It was the product of the combined talents of all its people— although some contributed more than others. To a large extent, Yaol Exotericism and the conditions that made it possible arose from the interaction of the Khitai state with a very specific group of conquered Chinese. The absorption of the rich and urbanized kingdom of Wu (867-1123) on the lower Yangtze, one of the world’s great centers of craft manufacturing and trade, supplied the state with over half its subsequent revenues; meanwhile the North China Plain’s Khitai and Uighur monasteries and aristocratic estates colluded closely to claim and preserve tax exemptions. The curriculum for the Yaol realm’s civil service exams was designed with input from the former leading lights of Wu, for only here did the “universal” civil service exams introduced in the late Qi survive in any meaningful capacity. Precedent for the Qi policy was of course said to come from the Han dynasty, but in Han times examination was not open to all; and the sons of great aristocrats, generals, and relatives of the imperial family received easier examinations if they even had to bother with them at all. They treated higher offices as yet another part of their families’ extensive properties, and this attitude endured into the Liang and Qi despite the attempts of the later dynasty’s Confucian revival to assert the primacy of learning and merit. But when the Qi collapsed, the Uighurs and Khitai moved in to expropriate the grandees of the north and take their place. The detritus of the old order fled to Wu with belongings in tow, including great collections of books; but they could not bring their lands with them. Their only asset was their learning, and thus the primacy of learning was established in Wu.
Well into the 1100s, the lower Yangtze was still fertile ground for private and state-run academies: institutions to form up young men into… calling them “citizens” is to get ahead of ourselves, but there was certainly an ideal of productive, socially active life which these academies catered to. But the abolition of Wu's central government was not counterbalanced enough by the expansion of the Yaol government; the Yaol in fact instituted regional maximums, so that it would be impossible for many to pass the exams even if they invested years into studying. Instead, the many thousands of gentry who despaired of getting past the exams used their education to stand out within their communities, as great owners of property and investors in businesses, a literate class which existed not for the state but for itself. Those who did seek the calling of public office would find that not only did the ethnic hierarchy of the Yaol empire stall their upward climb, but it even bedeviled them in their efforts to happily govern in the lower levels. In theory, local governance since the Qin and Han was a matter of prefectures and counties 郡縣. The counties are sometimes treated as the essential atoms of this system, since throughout the centuries after the Qin they generally expanded in size, fusing together in core regions even as new colonies were established along ethnic and political frontiers. In practice, the counties relied heavily on the corporate structures of the clusters of villages (or in urban settings, precincts or neighborhoods), garrisons, and other settlements within them for information on population, property transfers, and daily matters of security. The prefectures, or commanderies, brought five to ten counties together into a unit that could coordinate comprehensive bandit suppression, local construction or recruitment of laborers for construction elsewhere, and the collection, use, and transfer of the large quantities of cash coins, silver pieces, cloth, and grain in which taxes were assessed. On top of this, prefects had the right to send memorials and notices to the court in Kaifeng, meaning that they could even go over the heads of the circuits, regional supervisory bodies which drew together information and resources from multiple prefectures. In theory a prefecture was the imperial state in miniature, but the prefectures of the Yaol state were riddled with enclaves such as the
ordo military estates. If a prefect complained about the parlous conduct of an Uighur garrison commander encamped in his jurisdiction, he was as likely to find himself out of a job as his enemy. Nor could the circuits meaningfully intervene on behalf of prefectures— these were not truly “provincial” administrations. The circuits came in several varieties (civil, military, financial) with different portfolios and affiliations with different central ministries, and circuits corresponding to the same rough region might include prefectures not included in another. Perennial reconstitution of circuits and prefectures, upgrading and downgrading units or putting new ones together out of the pieces of the old, meant that between the township and the capital there were no coherent political “regions” to serve as a platform for any sort of advocacy or sustained policy that the court did not call for. The Yaol state was only as Exoteric as it wanted to be, and it was very slow to own up to its failures.
“What Heaven confers is called [human] nature. Accordance with this nature is called the Way. Cultivating the Way is called education.”
All of this determined the dominant tendencies in lower Yangtze Confucianism, best represented by the establishment in Shifu, or Hangzhou. There was much they still wished for, but they were generally considered successful at making the leap from Wu to Yaol. They even drew students from the former state of Chu, traveling in search of teachers more renowned (and contacts more valuable for future advancement in the bureaucracy) than those of their home provinces. The outlook was broadly utilitarian, although this was not a point of principle— the radical Ouyang Zhen’s sympathetic commentary on the Han Feizi, placing front and center the Legalist philosopher’s notion that a wise man “does not assign truth to high antiquity, nor take any as law any constant… [but] assesses the affairs of the age and prepares himself,” was roundly criticized by most contemporaries in the late 1100s (although decades later Yaol Pusuwan, last great emperor of his line, would speak favorably of the copy he owned). The more popular opinion was to respect the classics of the Confucian canon, but opt for a less socially-focused reading of them. Remaining focused on one’s own learning and spiritual development in good and bad times was sound advice. But if one was then supposed to advise and transform one’s colleagues and ruler, and through morality above create peace below… the Yaol emperor was unfortunately insulated from such transformative advice by layers of Khitai and Uighur aristocrats and self-interested Chinese (both laity and Chan abbots), who would either delight in setting conscientious Confucians against each other, or declare some arbitrary grouping of them a “conspiratorial faction” and notify the emperor of the threat. The classics were still considered to hold great personal significance, but they were also practical means of acquiring the skills of fine writing and broad thinking. Perhaps it was best to keep one’s head down and focus on getting by, getting ahead.
This was the way of the inferior man.
Confucianism was born in the unhappy age of the Warring States. In their day jobs, China’s first distinct class of scholars 士 extracted their lord’s share from even the smallest villages, and ended lives with their pens. But they were raised on tales of a better age. Their histories started from the legendary origins of civilization, the Golden Age of humanity: the rule of the Three Sovereigns and Five Emperors, sage-kings who arose to distinction or were appointed by their predecessors, and the Three Dynasties of the Xia, Shang, and early Zhou. Collectively the sages were associated with writing and editing the genre of classic 經 texts, laying out foundational concepts in fields as diverse as music, numerology, history, mythology, religious ritual— and beneath the already profound outer meanings, it was said, lurked oceanic wells visible through the allegories and metaphors on the surface. The rule of the sages was perfect, and achieved without compulsion; their arts were the fount of civilization in its myriad forms. The Confucian contribution was to say that all of this was connected— all of it, from the histories of great kings doing great things to the meditative poetry of the Book of Odes, and the divinatory glyphs and formulas of the Book of Changes— and together it embodied the truth that a beautiful society was not just the gift of the immortals and gods, but something that people could create, lose, and recreate. Engagement in society did not come at the expense of individual self-actualization, but was an essential component of it.
Wherever people knew their proper roles and relationships with each other, wherever they were educated into a fuller awareness, and wherever force did not compel them to act against this understanding— there, the truth of the sages would be manifest. There was no lay/clerical distinction, as there was in Buddhism, whereby some people declared themselves central to the struggle for perfection and other people (even the ruler!) were content to be peripheral. The struggle would involve every person, even if they had different occupations and roles to play. But the necessary precondition of this was openness; the reaffirmation of hierarchy and the bonds of respect were to be the foundation of dialogue. This was why the head of the most insignificant prefecture deserved the right to have their appeals heard, why a king needed his ministers to be as strict as their station allowed. If the ruler was convinced he already knew everything there was to know and that everything would turn out exactly as he planned, and his greatest subjects refused to correct him— for fear of punishment, or out of despair that no one would ever listen to them, or simply because they were really quite ignorant and had nothing to say— then the misery of the Warring States, the Hegemonic Way 霸道 that cannibalized society for its hollow victories, was the only result.
The Analects, the recorded conversations of an official often disappointed but always resolute, speak simply of superior 君子 and inferior 小人 men. Words abstracted from the vocabulary of social hierarchy were used to describe closeness and distance from the sagely ideal, and to create a progression toward that ideal, toward the apex of moral and spiritual development. This begs many questions, including the questions of where the capacity for perfection dwells and why it is so rarely manifested. The debates over human nature 性 should be seen in this light— Xunzi’s argument was that an innate conception of order and orderliness did not dwell within people, and so they would have to be socialized into it. Although this perspective would seem desirable, as it minimizes the need for metaphysical conjectures into what cannot be observed, it could not dispel the fear that the essential teachings on which socialization relied could be revised by society or even lost entirely in the event of some great disaster. The mainstream of Confucianism would therefore trace its lineage through Confucius’s pupil Zengzi and his grandson Zisi to Mencius, wherein each link of the chain gave a fuller and more thorough statement of the principle that goodwill 仁 and principles 義 are imparted by Heaven but exist within people 仁義内在. Even if the textual record of this concept is lost and the teaching forgotten, it is immortal and can be rediscovered.
The Han dynasty enshrined Confucianism as state orthodoxy but pitted its scholars against its eunuchs, allowing the latter to persecute and kill their betters in order to preserve their own privileged access to the emperor. The Confucians of later eras, burdened by the enormity of the task ahead of them, sought a false peace first in Daoist circles and then in the monasteries, eating food provided by slaves at the table of vagrants who left their families behind. Clearly, Confucianism needed to be a system of ardent passion, of tireless drive to investigate the myriad things and cultivate oneself. If the imperial exams were used to domesticate it, then the spirit in which these exams were prepared for and taken had to change. Where before there had simply been “superior men”, now there would be open talk of cultivating inner sageliness; and Heaven as previously conceived was now placed at the root of a great system of existence, reaching outward to embrace a pantheon of principles led by the Dao. Where this kingdom of axioms met with the everyday was in Mencius’s concept of the original mind 本心, a proper nature imparted by Heaven but buried in the course of life by clutter. The pursuit of the profitable and easy, the ethic of mere utility and prudence, all this came at the cost of one’s integrity— if that was lost, one would never reclaim one’s original nature, and there was no guarantee of a second chance after death. All this could never have been thought of or propagated by a single mind; this was the work of an entire fellowship of scholars, who went by the simple name of Great Learning or Daxue 大學, after a chapter in the Book of Rites. Leading figures followed their proclivities and exercised their individual strengths to the fullest, their careers leading them to new audiences in the provinces or into the halls of power in Kaifeng. Members recognized each other by displaying particular turns of phrase in examination essays, following codes of conduct unique to their private academies, or delivering eulogies at the funerals of teachers and students. They were recognized from the outside by their imitation of ancient dress and manners, their increasing coherence in the lower officialdom and courting of influential figures in the capital, and their willingness to march on against blacklists and prohibitory edicts. By the early 1300s the combined membership of the Great Learning’s constituent schools was a little over three thousand, a small fraction of the literati as a whole but the largest organized faction within it.
“Article 2: The Ten Abominations.
The first is plotting rebellion.
The second is plotting great sedition.
The third is plotting treason.”
— Law Code of the Great Ming
For the moralists of the Great Learning Fellowship, the rise of the New Policies military clique 新政閥 was an inevitable result of Yaol intolerance for dissent and laxity in self-assessment. For the relatively apolitical gentry of Shifu, the descent into military rule was really quite of a surprise, but those on the frontiers had seen it coming for decades. The militarized frontiers between hostile states tend to be marginal areas, by nature or by design— the military would inevitably be the largest institution there, and its demand for provisions would absorb much of the local economic activity as well. In the wake of the Flowering Flesh in the early 1200s, the ordo of the frontiers, tribes of northerners resettled as far south as Cao Bang, took over administrations of prefectures hit hard by the plague almost by default. From the mid-1200s the term “army” 軍 was used synonymously with “prefecture,” and these hybrid administrations sent memorials to central military and civil authorities depending on their needs.
Cities like Shifu and Kaifeng were not immediately germane to the New Policies, whose designers were primarily focused on transforming the rural majority of China. They hoped to achieve this through unchecked expansion of the army itself, and the creation of a militia that would in theory encompass the entire working male population. The “guard and tithe” 保甲 system would provide the men and the means of provisioning them: every ten to thirty households, their locations determined by census, would serve as the basic unit of tax collection or resource provision, and every ten households would also form a small militia, to be integrated into larger formations as needed. This of course cut right across the existing county and prefecture system, especially with regard to tax collection— a few mishaps of attempted double collection in Huguang were enough to set off the first major campaigns of tax evasion and open revolt against the New Policies in the otherwise optimistic (at least compared to what came after) decade of the 1290s; but as crimes by one member of a guard or tithe unit were to be met with punishment on all members, the seeds were sown for an escalating cycle of extralegal punishment and vicious revenge attacks. Shifu’s initial role in all of this was to bankroll it— taxes on the city’s commerce, and profits from the city’s voracious consumption of state monopoly products like salt, together provided over a fifth of the empire’s revenues, and this proportion would only increase as overall revenues decreased.
By the 1310s refugees from the provinces sought shelter behind Shifu’s walls, and behind them followed government agents who looked for coded messages of the New Policies Clique’s downfall in speeches and writings down to the smallest brochure. Increasingly contrived synonyms for “new” 新 were devised to avoid beatings or worse over an unintended reading. The next move was not immediately clear, and public or private meetings to discuss the matter were bedeviled by nosy neighbors. But all the alleyways of this gargantuan city could not be policed all the time— nor, it turned out, could all of its poetry circles. A popular topic were the works, poetic and prosaic, of
An Juyi and
Lu Qiji, two past administrators of Shifu; elaborations on these works would spread from cell to conspiratorial cell and finally escape Shifu entirely over the 1320s.
An let his deeds speak for him: his commitment to learning about the rules and habits of Indian guilds to figure out how Shifu society could benefit from them was an excellent demonstration of what a man of strong character and broad learning could achieve. Lu was more inclined to wax philosophical; formerly a student of Ouyang Zhen’s school of utilitarians, his most famous work would in fact be a response to Ouyang. The old radical once wrote on the subject of rural reform that the basic unit of governance ought to be a community of 110 households, where every year one of the ten wealthiest household heads would be the village chief 里長 who represented the community before the magistrate and tax collector and organized other activities like carrying the mail, fighting crime, and publishing state proclamations. The remaining 100 would be divided into ten sets of ten, each taking care of their tax responsibilities collectively under a similar annual rotation of leadership. Everyone in a group would of course be responsible for the welfare and good conduct of the other members [1]. Lu’s response was to say that this system actively worked against what was good about it. Although it meant to make individuals responsible for the good order of their locality, for nine years a household head would have to accept that his opinion officially did not matter, and a given year’s “chief” might not be the best negotiator or the most astute organizer. And while this structure of tens-in-tens was very good for extracting resources and making sure everyone paid their share, without any control over what would be done with those resources the whole exercise would seem hollow to its participants, and without their interest proper practice would not be maintained for long. It would be better for everyone if the “higher ten” remained invested in all years through collegial decision-making as practiced by the Indian guilds of Shifu, which would give the best man for the job the support and confidence of his fellows. It would be even better for this rigmarole to actually involve something pertinent to the well-being of the whole community. Even if 110 was too small a number to achieve that, who could say that there should not be additional layers of tens-in-tens— that ten village heads should not form a township association, and ten townships should not form a county? Lu would revisit these themes in later writings. Against a reader’s remark that collegialism would only encourage families to split their households 分家 in order to produce more “household heads”, working against the ideal of a harmonious extended family under one roof, Lu suggested that perhaps the basic unit of collegialism should not be the household but the working man 成丁, which would give large households an incentive to avoid splitting up. This concession to Confucian sensibilities was actually sincere— Lu himself belonged to a harmonious extended family, kept solvent by the government salaries of his uncles and the cabbage wholesaling operation run by his father. But there were enough hooks in Lu’s ideas that Shifu’s poetry circles could embellish them with further notions, including the irreverent Buddhism of the “White Turban” incarnation.
But in the end, the most influential product of the White Turban movement was not a merchant or an official, a poet or philosopher, but a soldier. In 1331, Jiankang [Nanjing] fell to a peasant army after a Turbanist-led conspiracy of gentry and guard captains opened the gates from within. At this stage “Foreman Kang” 康工頭, real name Kang Yi, was a former cannonner in the Yaol army who defected, like most of his peers, for a parcel of land. His participation was of little consequence until the rebellion marched to the sea, to Shifu and Jinshanwei. Here he became renowned as a tireless evangelist for the Panyuepao (盤越炮, “Pandyan gun”) [3], a breech-loading cannon with a length equal to a little over forty times its bore diameter on average, and the accompanying corned powder. Yaol gun designs had proceeded slowly from vase to tube for some time, but the
independent branch of gunpowder experimentation established in India since the late 700s had since worked its way through similar problems (and there were centuries’ worth of problems, as gunpowder first arrived in India when it was still considered a failed immortality elixir) at a slightly faster pace amid the constant war of the subcontinent. To this, however, Kang contributed the genius in fortification that earned him his nickname, placing Panyuepao at intervals atop works of earth and stone, with acute-angled barbicans jutting out of the corners to minimize blind spots. The defense of Jinshanwei for thirteen months against eight thousand besiegers became an enduring legend— and imagine the surprise of the nascent rebel movement along the Yellow River when the architect of this legend appeared in their midst, having escaped the bloody Yaol sack of Jinshanwei by hiding in a barrel on the deck of a Japanese merchantman. The war of the new “White Banner” movement against the Yaol was mostly a war of offense, in which the unquestioned leader Xu Zhenyi leaped from strength to strength; but Foreman Kang’s defensive works were present to ensure that any White Banner reversals did not involve the handover of cities. He was not the only former Turbanist to take up the Banner— but of the hundreds who did the same, Kang was the highest-placed, and enjoyed the greatest proximity to Xu Zhenyi, the Jianwen Emperor of the Qing Dynasty.
But Xu Zhenyi was not his friend, nor anyone’s. The opening salvo came in 1348; the targets were the Uighurs of Quanzhou, a lapsed ordo whose constituent occupational groups (smiths, guards) had translated well to civilian trades from horse breeding and bronzeworking to retail of imports from old contacts on the docks. Like most other Uighurs of the 1300s, the few tens of thousands that still identified as such after three and a half centuries of residence in Khitai-ruled China, they were aloof from the religious mainstream— they were descended from the Nestorians of Central Asia, and were recontacted by the Asorig in the 1160s. Choosing spiritual preceptors, especially ones from outside the Yaol realm, and paying for the propagation of their teachings was an exercise in autonomy among peoples that the Yaol treated as mere army units. Not for nothing did the Vajrayana Uighur communities refer to their Tibetan preceptors as ataliq, a title which would have described the tutor of a khan if there were any Uighur khans. This interfered to some degree with the Qing policy of assimilation but need not have posed an immediate problem. The predicament of the Quanzhou Uighurs was that as intermediaries between the native population, the merchants from across the sea, and the military cliques of the interior, they had become de-facto rulers of the city since the 1320s. That they had the temerity to negotiate with the appointed Qing intendant over keeping some of this influence, even unofficially, was enough for Xu to declare a root-and-stem policy of deportation. The imperial bodyguard corps worked with the previous government’s turncoats to confiscate rolls of membership held by the churches and identify nearly all the core members of the community; half their number, four thousand in total, were sent to frigid Yongmingcheng and the rest were scattered through Huguang and Lingnan. The message to any other ambitious “sects” in other cities, Shifu for example, was clear.
Next on the hit list were the monasteries and the armies. The Buddhist monastery had for eight hundred years been the backbone of social support in China. They increased their wealth through donations, and invested in business ventures like inns for travelers, grain mills, and oil presses. They even charged interest on loans made to farmers and entrepreneurs, and confiscated the debtors’ belongings if they did not pay in time. This put monasteries in the strange position of ruthlessly demanding fifty-percent interest or more on loans of seed grain to farmers, but offering charity to the homeless and the hungry; of doing more for the destitute of the empire than state agencies, but never failing to claim and preserve their tax exemptions. All in all, the monasteries were very easy to criticize and impossible to replace. The ten monasteries which had received the greatest amount of donations from the Yaol were shut down entirely; the sangha as a whole was informed that the Ministry of Rites would take greater charge of their conduct, including enforcement of rules against allowing children aside from orphans to be recruited as novices; but after this Xu made it clear that there would be peace. Guarantees like this of course relied on Xu’s mastery of military force, and no Emperor before or since would be as passionate as he was about keeping the military under his personal control. Xu had built his armies from scratch, starting with only twenty good men from his home village of which only five still lived; his sense of personal responsibility over his creation was as strong as his distrust of the “criminals and deviants” in the ranks. Xu would gut the Ministry of War, splitting its former responsibilities into five regional commands over which the sole coordinating office would be the emperor himself and a staff of secretaries to help manage the paperwork.
War hero status aside, there was little Foreman Kang could do to lead some sort of White Turban revival. He could expect no help from the bureaucracy, which had little priorities at the time aside from reintroducing itself to public affairs after six decades in the shadow of military authorities. At any rate the leading officials, such as Chancellor Duan Hong, were affiliated with the Great Learning fellowship and suspicious of “heterodoxy”. The popular base of the White Turbans was nothing spectacular. Many loyalists were killed in the Yaol suppression of the 1330s revolt, and in the generation since what was mostly remembered about their rule in Jiankang, Shifu, and Jinshanwei was botched land redistributions, fanciful attempts at community granaries and model urban precincts, and a revolving door of leaders who never quite seemed to be in charge. In fact, Kang himself would publicly state that his true pride was participating in the prelude for the establishment of the august Qing; but whatever criticisms he made of the Turbanist revolt did not directly concern Lu Qiji or his ideas, only the fact that the revolt itself was somewhat underwhelming. As the hero of two movements, he genuinely did not wish for them to come to blows. If they did, if he or another Turbanist unwisely provoked the emperor or the emperor openly came after them… the best outcome would be for the emperor to win, and quickly. If the row between former comrades lasted longer than that…
In 1350 Kang suggested that, even if the armies were divided, the knowledge and experience gained through shared struggle ought to be preserved by a single body— a civilian body, namely the Ministry of Public Works. There was, after all, much resemblance in the use of mathematics, geography, and
feng shui geomancy in large-scale architecture and in modern war: an officer needed to be able to accurately assess his resources and those of his enemy, and to assess the terrain itself both with regard to its physical characteristics and the flows of spiritual energy. Upcoming projects like the renovation of the Great Wall would require the expertise of artisans, bureaucrats, and officers; although Kang’s use of the phrase “a common Dao” seemed presumptuous to some, it easily evoked the idea of something that ought to be cultivated and preserved. The Ministry of Works was long regarded as one of the weakest agencies in the central government, its role often taken over by circuit heads or the private enterprises of court favorites; it responded enthusiastically to this chance to expand its portfolio. Neither Chancellor Duan nor the emperor objected; Duan was content to see that the balance of power among the ministries would not change too much from this, and the emperor was glad to see Turbanists retire from active military duty to seek refuge in the weakest civilian ministry.
In general the effect of Kang’s maneuver was something like the transformation of the Pure Criticism 清議 movement of the Han Dynasty into the later Pure Conversation 清談, its political ambitions blunted by deadly confrontations with the palace eunuchs and its spirit of inquiry diverted into metaphysical concerns. Kang would be a flawed hero, and perhaps not a hero at all, to the civilians across China who tried to print or hand-copy Lu Qiji’s works and discuss their implications for the new era. But the opening of several “works academies” 工院 by the Ministry of Public Works, intended to offer “postgraduate” courses to interested bureaucrats and officers who already possessed the foundational scholarly 文 and martial 武 learning, was a revolutionary event in its own right. Collectively the works academies were the highest centers of experimentation and congress for those interested in such subjects as mathematics and chemistry for their own sake and for practical ends. Teachers and students would work together to recover mathematical texts and Daoist pharmacopoeias from previous dynasties, and translate more recent Indian and Middle Eastern works on experiments in ballistics and architecture. Their labors were financed by direct infusions from the Ministry of Public Works’ share of the imperial budget. Even the officers who did not excel in these studies benefited, because from this point they could argue, ever more convincingly, that their field possessed true erudition, a sophistication beyond skill in archery, horsemanship, and the study of history. This was not to say that the Chinese martial tradition had never possessed heroes or sophisticated people— Zhuge Liang was of course both, and Guo Yaoshi was a more recent example. However, the Great Learning would generally view Zhuge Liang with some suspicion, considering his advocacy of the Legalists Shen Buhai and Han Fei a sign of the Han dynasty's overall failure to attain the sagely ideal; and Guo Yaoshi would be recast as a more earthy figure, a simple man with the righteous fury to fight and die for civilization [4]. These characterizations obviously wouldn't go unchallenged— but even besides that it became possible to accept that military service could offer something more than the wrong opinions or no opinions about the world, that it imparted a unique insight into the world’s spiritual and physical qualities which could be used to serve the empire with dignity. And the world would one day see what officers convinced of their insight and dignity could accomplish…
“It is wrong to say that the human mind is identical with human artifice, whereas the Dao mind 道心 is identical with Heaven’s principle. By the human mind is meant people’s minds in general… It is wrong to say that one is human desires and the other is Heaven’s principle. There are good and evil in man, and also good and evil in Heaven such as eclipses and evil stars. How can it be correct to ascribe all good to Heaven and all evil to man?”
— Lu Xiangshan
All other parties dealt with, there remained only the Jianwen Emperor and the Great Learning. On paper neither party needed the other: the ideas of the fellowship were quite agnostic as to who the emperor actually was, and there were plenty of other literati to whom the emperor might assign the task of rebuilding civilian government. In practice they were perfect for each other: the fellowship had in Xu Zhenyi a fiery Vajrapani to be their patron and protector; and the emperor had in the fellowship tireless and articulate partisans for a conservative vision of social stability, the sort of people who could make everyone believe that returning to their homes and carrying on was for the good of all-under-Heaven. But the basic relationship of the fellowship was that between teacher and student: their platform was an extended meditation on how education should be accomplished and why, and their public initiatives reflected this. Meanwhile, the emperor presented an image of untutored excellence, the penniless farmer with the world in his hand— and if the fellowship dreamed of overwriting his personality to create the sort of paragon of decorum they truly wished to see on the throne, they would be sorely disappointed. Neither could fully submit to the guidance of the other without giving up a cherished part of the image they presented to themselves and others; but for the time being they worked together well enough.
Education was not the only public sphere the Great Learning fellowship sought to revolutionize. As prefects and intendants in China’s south they sought to establish institutions like community granaries to lend seed grain to farmers or supply emergency aid, run by local literati and intended to compete head-on with the Buddhist monasteries. But the beating heart of their movement, the subject on which they spilled the most ink and to which they committed the most efforts, was right there in the name.
In eulogies to commemorate departed comrades, members of the fellowship would bemoan the loss to their faction 黨, to their Dao. This stemmed from the response given by one of the founding members of the school to Yaol Abaoji’s declaration that “gentlemen do not form parties,” that in fact parties were efforts by individuals to seek the common Dao and not merely platforms for scheming. This exchange was of course mostly symbolic, factions have existed in every human government— but the idea of a common way would remain important to Great Learning discourse. Their Dao was none other than the Dao of Confucius and Mencius, which they believed they understood as no one else did. In a curiously Chan turn of phrase, they asserted that this Dao was transmitted directly from the old Masters to the founding members of their own school, skipping over all the retrograde and unimaginative thinkers of the Han, Liang, and Qi dynasties (and their own contemporaries), by way of unique insights in the classic texts that lay buried until recently. Chief among these were the metaphysical unities of the mind, the Dao, Heaven, and sageliness— but these were essentially rhetorical strategies. It was a rhetorical strategy to claim that “true” learning, true self-cultivation, was not the absorption of ideas external to oneself, but the process of reaching into one’s own mind, rediscovering what one had always known. The great flaw of the civil service exams as they had existed so far was that they encouraged learning as a means of attaining status and wealth, things external to oneself, which degraded the content of the learning itself. No one, least of all the Chinese literate public that was larger than in any previous era, saw this as a reason to abolish the exams. But the vision of learning promoted by the Great Learning suggested a way to redeem them— to prepare students for the exams, while also ensuring they understood that high office was not an end in itself but a means to an even higher calling. But what self-cultivation really was, the process of it, was something that varied with teaching style— and in the private academies of the late Yaol, set up as an alternative to state academies that only cared about the exams and nothing else, different lecturers used the teaching styles that they believed in.
The dominant approach to self-cultivation was a gradual, guided progression through the classics and commentaries on them, uncovering the greater truth by turns. Residual questions mostly involved whose commentaries to use, and just how rigid the progression needed to be. The former question was resolved to the satisfaction of most of the fellowship by adopting the anthologies of introductory essays penned by Mu Cejian, the leading light of the fellowship in the 1280s by virtue of his Erudite Literatus degree (a higher honor than even the
jinshi degree awarded in the palace exams) and post of senior compiler in the Historiography Academy. Mu’s commentaries would become the basis of state-run academy curricula in the Qing era, and the “essential canon” as he saw it would heavily influence the civil service exams. The latter question would finally split the fellowship in two. Shu Ji, who claimed overall leadership of the fellowship by virtue of being Mu’s favorite student (also reminiscent of the Chan dharma-transmission), was a stickler for an emerging sense of orthodoxy. He was insistent, more insistent than Mu himself, that basic texts such as the Analects and the Mencius ought to precede studies of the other classics such as the histories, the Odes, and the Changes— and that the basic texts themselves needed to be preceded by introductory commentaries, enduring a correct general attitude was established early and endured through all subsequent learning. This was a rhetoric of forging the mind anew, for even though Shu accepted that all people had an ethical nature imparted by Heaven he held that this was distinct from the human mind. The ethical nature was a sort of endlessly duplicated schematic; the mind had to be reshaped in accordance with it, in order to consistently conform to it.
His influence was unquestioned amid the stresses of the 1320s, which drew in many new members but also brought persecution from above. But as the state’s capacity for persecution (and enacting its will in general) fell apart in the 1330s, so too did the aging Shu’s hold over the fellowship. A teacher in Nanchang, Xiong Shen, expected his students to uphold rigid rules of decorum but made a point of rejecting rigidity in the structure of learning itself. The point was not to complete a list but to read what one wished, thoughtfully and enthusiastically; to discern cause and effect, principles of right and wrong, and the implicit meaning beyond the literal. Furthermore, just as the minds of ordinary people could be clouded by desires, the minds of the intelligent could be clouded by strange theories; fixed opinions were the jailers of the open mind. Did the need for an “open mind” mean that all doctrines were the same? Definitely not, Xiong had nothing good to say about the “selfishness” he perceived in the Buddhist goal of liberation— but he also pointed out how Buddhism as he observed it also encouraged benevolent conduct and respect for family. What Xiong meant is that rather than needing to hammer the mind into shape, one could set it on the right path and allow it to proceed naturally toward the good, just as children naturally learn to show goodwill and adhere to principle, and Buddhists naturally tend toward central ideas of Confucianism while the Confucians absorbed only peripheral ideas from other teachings. All that self-cultivation really had to be was proceeding at one’s own pace, remaining sensitive to the stirrings of one’s mind; there was no need to maintain tight-fisted control of its progress.
This of course meant his image of the mind was very different from Shu Ji’s, and Xiong would confirm this by promoting a vision of human consciousness enjoying fundamental unity with the ethical nature and through it the mind of Heaven. This of course applied to every single human— Confucians, and also Buddhists, generally considered their statements on human nature valid for all people, but maybe illiteracy or a lack of leisure time to study held most people back from the real prizes. Xiong’s flexibility on book-reading theoretically lowered this bar, and he was willing to play with the idea further— he would say, not entirely as a joke, that the first sages couldn’t have learned their arts from books since they were the ones to invent writing, and that ironically there seemed to be less sages in the ages when more books were published (and by the time “commentaries on the classics” emerged as a genre of literature, there were no sages at all). The only indispensable readings for Xiong were the Five Classics traditionally held to be edited by Confucius, and the Four Books credited to his disciples; the point of reading them was to internalize them through experience and consistent practice, and not to spend one’s life wandering through a hall-of-mirrors by reading endless commentaries by people who only wanted to ride the coattails of their betters. Mu’s commentaries were exempt from this condemnation, but only out of respect for the fellowship; even then, Xiong would claim direct “transmission” from Mencius that skipped over even the founding members of the Great Learning. The inevitable debates with Shu— carried out through meetings and exchanges-of-letters— were inconclusive, but not acrimonious. Aside from some moments where each seemed interested in little more than scoring points, the two scholars considered each other as great men and as equals even if they were separated by twenty years. Their correspondence was generally friendly and continued until Shu’s death in 1345; Xiong would deliver a touching and conciliatory eulogy. The next generation, however, would be far less polite to each other. Shu’s “loyalists” were fond of comparing their opponents to Chan Buddhists, implying by this a glorification of unearned “sudden enlightenment”; coarser insults such as “wild men” 狂人 would have their debut in the coming decades.
Few were unhappier about this widening rift than Chancellor Duan Hong. He was not some high-flying Erudite Literatus— he was Chancellor because he was effective, and because he made the emperor, formerly the illiterate farmer Xu Zhenyi, feel less insecure than someone like Shu Ji might have. But he was only effective because he had a faction behind him. Sure, he had a lengthy resume as intendant for the financial circuits of Huguang North and Jingdong East [Shandong], and he penned the occasional essay for the fellowship’s anthologies and various county gazetteers in his places of work. But no one can govern a state alone, and so where more idealistic scholars might see a big beautiful tent of different ideas, or an engine for the moral regeneration of civilization, Duan saw in the Great Learning a bureaucratic faction with the same fundamental strengths and weaknesses as any other. When a faction could be the face of support or opposition for a particular set of policies, it had strength to throw around; if it could no longer be identified with a particular attitude it would lose its coherence, and if it lost its social dimension (the ability to promote the like-minded, worthwhile marriage ties) then it was another dead label. It might spawn a successor, but that faction would do what it liked with the legacy of predecessors. Already the Great Learning maintained consensus on little else besides basing state-run academy curricula and the civil service exams on Mu’s commentaries and definition of the classic canon. When the exams were resumed in 1350 they would effectively have no further ideas to contribute— unless they could become the face of something else. And so, the Chancellor would begin drafting a memorial to the emperor that drew from the other aspect of the Great Learning— the side suspicious of a ruler’s unchecked power, the ill effects of which had been so clearly demonstrated by the previous six decades of Qin-dynasty policies under barbarian enforcers. If the current generation wished to surpass even the Han, it could at least do its part to prevent yet another Qin. Where Kang Yi leaned away from confrontation, Duan leaned into it.
Duan invited the reader to consider the fate of the Censorate, which once had three branches. The first reviewed the conduct, correspondence, and announcements of the emperor and Chancellery, and made suggestions and criticisms on the ground of moral propriety; the Uighurs and Khitai abolished this branch completely. The other two branches sent inspectors on missions to audit the finances of central and regional government agencies, and investigate for corruption and impropriety; these were turned by the Khitai into attack-dogs, bearing the name of the prior office but forfeiting the dignity earned by brave investigators and crusaders for justice since the Han. Why did the Khitai decide they could use part of the Censorate but not the rest of it? Duan proposed that because the “remonstrance” function of the Censorate only required officials to be familiar with a limited number of people (who were likewise familiar with the censurers), criticism could be squarely on-target and would not be taken as an insult or threat. In discussing people with the duty to admonish one who was falling into error, Confucius named ministers, officers, friends, and sons— all figures of great familiarity. The “inspection” function was of course a necessary complement, but historically it relied on sending officials to provinces strange to them, where they did not know local affairs and feared for their safety; the officials they investigated likewise feared that a censurer’s hasty judgement of them could cost them their career or their life, for even if a censor was found to be wrong he would not be punished. For Duan, this demonstrated that when it came to offices of advising and correcting the powerful, as opposed to offices of actually exercising power, the wisdom that had endured since the Qin— that officials be kept far from positions of power in their home locality— was in fact upside-down. If the Censorate as an institution was to recover from its mistakes, its powers would have to be strictly defined and widely distributed. “Remonstrance” 諫 and “inspection” 察, rather than radiating out from the central government, would have to be distributed to the provinces through independent bureaus at the circuit level, staffed by figures of local renown…
[1] This is a basic summary of the Ming dynasty
lijia system, introduced by the Hongwu emperor.
[2] For an OTL example there's
Shimo Yisun. I didn't want to get to into the weeds here but in future posts I do expect to bring up TTL examples of Khitan distinction (in the sense of "difference" or that of "honor") within a Chinese context, both during and well after the Yaol.
[3] The name Panyue is from
the Weilue.
[4] Guo Yaoshi is a TTL figure, a general who led the last stand of the Qi against the Uighurs. I imagine he's seen the way Yue Fei is OTL, but without the added gut-punch of being betrayed and executed by his own lord; this may mean he's a less compelling folk hero as well.
***
There is a lot I wasn't really able to get to: Daoism, women, the Lingnan/Daiya Tai, the economy. Those will get more focused, hopefully shorter posts.
There's also a lot of expies of Southern Song/"founding generation of Neo-Confucianism" people; really the main exercise here is to see how certain parts of Neo-Confucianism might become exaggerated or minimized to audiences of its time when the "historical background" is provided by the events of TTL instead of the events of OTL. And since Confucianism since the Song has largely been extensions of or responses to the Song, setting the context for later developments in a way that preserves the big ideas of the Song allows me to bring in Ming and Qing ideas in more original combinations down the line, all while making it clear where those come from. Oh yeah, and the White Turbans-- I've tossed out a lot about them but I do want a little of the confusion over what their exact genealogy and future alignments are to be "in universe" as well. Maybe they go in a more "practical statecraft"/"utilitarian" direction, maybe they go for some weird ruralist idealism, maybe they keep the kind of libertarian vibe and remain practical enough to produce some interesting critiques of government. But the thing is that for literally any direction I go with them, I can find a significant enough Chinese philosopher to help me make that case in a way that makes at least a modicum of sense (maybe sometimes it'll
really be a stretch) within the cultural context.
Credit where it's due: the two books that helped me the most were
Confucian Discourse and Chu Hsi's Ascendancy by Hoyt Cleveland Tillman and
Late Works of Mou Zongsan: Selected Essays on Chinese Philosophy, translated by Jason Clower. I'm not really sure which order I'd suggest reading them in-- I started with Tillman who is very much writing about the Southern Song alone, and gives exhaustive details and quotes... unfortunately a lot of it went over my head. Mou Zongsan is... well he was a New Confucian, a refugee from the Chinese Civil War who spent the rest of his life in Taiwan and Hong Kong. His essays are very much inspired by a sense of contemporary mission (and rage against pinko intellectuals) but he was able to express what X believed or what he disagreed with Y on in a way that made more sense in some cases... but in other cases this also went over my head. I would like to reread both works sometime after I've read more widely and see if I understand them better. On Buddhism and "Exoteric Chan" I found
Critical Readings on Tang China, Volume 4, ed. Paul W. Kroll helpful, but I only read the first two chapters of that.