Western and Southern Arabia
Yemen in the fourteenth century was a prosperous, urban center of trade united under a single hereditary ruler, the Malik, a ruler who held ideological power based on a mixture of tribal bonds of loyalty and the ideology of sacred dharma-kingship, and who held practical power based on Sri Lankan financiers whose hands ran through every financial transaction in the realm.
But South Arabia - the Malik’s dominion - had its own indigenous claims to fame, and if it was subordinate to foriegn capital, it made up for it with the flowering of beautiful things. In the Hadhramut Valley, the city of Seiyun had become a great center of Buddhist scholarship, an isolated desert retreat nestled amongst the rugged, arid terrain. Composing poetry and literature in a sparse and impactful style, these monks and the laity that served them had a reputation as some of the most devoted and austere in all the world. Seiyun’s religious authority was unquestionable and deeply orthodox, not suffering the slight variations that the Nowbahar and Apasvanadi had contributed to the religion. These were unwarranted “innovations” from the path revealed by the accumulated canons of Buddhist scripture (to say nothing of the larger deviations of the Mahayana and the Khotadata). The Hadhrami sent a disproportionately large number of missionaries (called dawah or carikam) across the Near East and even into Eastern Europe and Siberia, hoping to persuade people to join them, taking as their creed this passage from the Pali Canon:
“Wander about on wanderings, monks. For the good of many folk, for the happiness of many folk, out of compassion for the world, for the good and the happiness of gods and men, don’t two of you go by one [road]. Preach the Truth, monks, which is lovely at the beginning, lovely in the middle, lovely at the end, in the letter and in the spirit. Demonstrate the purified holy life which is fully complete. There are beings with little dust in their eyes; they are falling away from the Truth because they do not hear it. There will be people who understand…”
Sana’a and Aden meanwhile vied for the title of most important city of the secular world of South Arabia, a world concerned less with truth and the dust in their eyes than money and spices. Sana’a was the royal capital, home to beautiful palaces and stupa with intricate mosaics. Thanks to an intricate system of water management, Sana’a was home to opulent gardens and fresh, clear fountains, as well as the famous tower houses - tall and densely packed dwelling spaces for families. Aden perhaps was less glamorous, but no less wealthy, as a major and bustling trading port, and one guarded by Lankan soldiers, despite being legally and politically controlled by its own indigenous guilds, and theoretically controlled by the Malik himself.
Qana [Al Mukallah], the major Hadhramut port, and Sabwa, a major administrative hub, round out our census of the five great cities of Yemen. These two cities enjoyed greater royal favor of late, since the Sri Lankan presence was lesser, and Qana in particular was often used by those who were rivals of the Sri Lankans, since the port authority there was less likely to turn away unwanted guests (even if it was happy to upcharge them).
West Arabia was dominated by the Malikate of the Hejaz, founded by Tayzig who had come down into the Hejaz in the twelfth century, establishing a petty kingdom around the port city of Jiddah and sacking the holy city of Al-Taif, carrying off a number of Saihist relics. Because the region was still populated by a mixture of Buddhist, Jewish, monotheist, and Saihist[1] tribes, the Tayzig, being a mixture of Buddhists and polytheists, sought to assert their dominance by bringing religious relics important to the indgenous Arabians, whether monotheist or polytheist, to Jiddah, hoping to strangle Al-Taif’s and Makkah’s roles as pilgrimage and trading towns in the interior.
Jiddah remained a key city, aligned more closely with the Tamil banking houses than the Sri Lankans, but able to play the two sides off where the Malik of Yemen had submitted. Within a century, the Tayzig had lost their essential Persianate characteristic, something now reflected more or less in the architecture of their palaces and public houses, but less so in their culture - to survive they had intermarried with local Arab tribes, and abandoned much of what might have once made them bakhtiyar-adjacent - a contrast with greater Syria, where the Tayzig culture was becoming increasingly predominant as an identitarian matter.
The Near East was changing. The Arab world, at the fringes of these immense cultural changes, is also very much a driver of them. Since the Eftal era, the Near East has always been a region of contrasts - defined by incredibly particularized regional identities and religious schisms while simultaneously being ruled by lofty universal monarchs whose attempts at unification under a single standardized creed usually simply added to the proliferation of identities and beliefs. The ascent of Buddhism has been slow and halting, and at many times and in many places, it seemed like Christianity would finally win out in the centuries long conflict for the hearts and minds of the Near East.
But that era is coming to a close in the fourteenth century. By the end of the Bakhtiyar era, Christianity is well and truly a minority faith across broad swathes of the Near East, and Arabia is the great center of Theravada scholarship whose influence will cast a long shadow over these religious transformations. Theravada Buddhism as preached by the Sri Lankans and Arabs is on the ascent after centuries of bitter religious conflicts between the Nowbahar and “pagans.” Other identities are hardening as well, as Iranian rulers seek to promote a vision of Iranian culture, and Tayzig rulers do the same in Syria.
Next, we will shift our gaze north and west to Egypt and Syria in the aftermath of Idirim ibn Mansur’s death, and then from there we will progress into North Africa and perhaps down across the Sahel. But that’s a post for another time.
[1] Pagans. These Saihist holdouts are a shadow of the former movement, but they will endure to modernity.