Or.... You know, it is easy to look at things from this type of detachment when you are not the one 'picking up the bill' so to speak. Sort of like the people that are retroactively rehabilitating the legacy of the Mongol Empire and all of their mass killings by saying that they helped 'clear away the dead wood of history' by destroying the stagnant regimes that existed in East Asia and the Middle East at the time, and massively promoted international trade via the Silk Road.... While ignoring say... The
sacking of Baghdad as an acceptable price.
Relating back to TNO, over on the very first 'wholesome LibSoc Sablin' AAR that I have read over on another forum back when the mod was first released: I remember there being this Russian user who genuinely argued passionately that he considers Yockey to be the outcome that America 'deserves', and will be best for humanity in the long run... Saying that the United States, by not only being a nation founded upon genocide and slavey, but continues to be the same polity that committed all those crimes
(Unlike Russia, mind you. Since the Russian Empire, Soviet Union, and the Russian Federation all being different polities, hence cannot be held accountable for the crimes of their predecessors), means that the country is incapable of doing anything good on a fundamental level unless it was destroyed. With him saying that ever other POTUS from LBJ to Harrington to pro-Republican Bennett to Glenn to RFK were all automatically guilty of prolonging the existence of this irredeemably evil regime via their reforms.
In retrospect, now that more TNO content have been released, I would almost want to track down both that AAR and that Russian user, and honestly ask him (Even as someone like me who is not an American) how he would feel about say... A Polish person, a Ukrainian, someone from the Baltics, or a Chechen making the same argument about how they consider Taboritsky to be the best outcome that Russia 'deserves' as punishment for their history of imperialism and subjugation.