The Eternal Flame Dies Out: Rome Loses The Siege of Veii

Ok, so here's a really large update to make up for the delay. :cool: A map of Baktria will be up soon.


Chapter V: Every Tyrant Is An Enemy To Freedom
Part V: Ptolemaios' Anabasis
ZJhgzLa.jpg


While chaos reigned in the west, Ptolemaios was not idle in Susiana. It had taken him a year of planning and gathering forces, but by late summer of 422 [355 BCE], he had managed to scrape together 30,000 men and was ready to depart east. Leaving from Susa, he had two major obstacles facing him. The first were the Uxians, a fearless mountain people who had not even been conquered by the Achaemenids. They chose to pay the Uxians for safe passage through their defile, and Jason had chosen to follow the same course when he passed through the lands. The Uxians expected the same from Ptolemaios, and indeed, the Makedonian strategos assured them he would meet them for payment.


In actuality, Ptolemaios intended to put his excellent understanding of the local geography and topography gained from just about anyone who could provide him with such information, to good use. Naturally, the Uxians, satisfied with Ptolemaios' reply, expected to meet him and his army along the normal road. Instead, only a token force led by Meleagros proceeded down that route, with Ptolemaios opting to personally lead his own picked band of men overnight around difficult mountain roads behind the Uxian's and their villages. He split this force, detaching men to occupy the higher ground where he expected the Uxian's to retreat to, while he laid waste to the Uxian villages at daylight. Much to their horror, they found their defile occupied, and then discovered the high ground to be similarly filled with hostile forces. Many were killed, but a sizable portion managed to fall back into a mountain stronghold, where Ptolemaios and his men came under heavy missile fire.


Locking shields in a tortoise formation, that managed to bring the ladders and other siege engines to bear against the walls, taking the walls soon after, leading to the surrender of the fortress and subsequent surrender of all the Uxians. In one swift maneuver, Ptolemaios had managed to accomplish what the Achaemenids could never do. His campaign was off to a fantastic start.


The second great obstacle facing Ptolemaios was once more the Persian Gates, where he expected a Persian army would be awaiting him. Aside from the military obstacles this trip presented, crossing the Zagros range at the approach of winter presented its own difficulties. Ptolemaios could not afford to be held up at any one point, and a strongly defended Persian Gate would threaten the viability of the entire campaign. So instead of play into the hands of the Persian defenders, Ptolemaios chose a different, southern route. This route was as difficult, if not more difficult than, the route through the Persian Gates, Ptolemaios wagered the Persians would not be expecting him to take it, and so hoped it would lead him into the heart of Persis and across the Zagros much quicker. There was a risk that the Persian commander, Spithradates, would use this opportunity to plunge into Susiana and cut off his communications, but he gambled on him instead chasing him back into Persis where he could engage and defeat him in battle.


The gamble almost paid off. Remarkably, it was not until Ptolemaios reached Shiraz in mid-December that Spithradates became aware of what was afoot, and began racing back to Persepolis. Having a far simpler and more direct route back to the city along the main road, Spithradates managed to cross the Araxes a day prior to Ptolemaios' arrival, but did not have enough time to put together an effective defense of the city. With Ptolemaios hot on his trail, he hastily looted the treasury and made way north to Ekbatana, having barely escaped the Makedonian's clutches. The sheer amount of wealth present at Pasagardai and Persepolis however meant that Spithradates could not hope to be able to haul off anywhere near the total amount of coin and maintain a quick enough pace to avoid Ptolemaios' clutches. Thus Ptolemaios and his men still stumbled upon more wealth than they had even found in Susa, which itself had a treasury more than 6-7 times that of Athenai's annual income.


Ptolemaios could not afford to waste time reveling in the wealth and extravagance of the Persian capital however, and did not remain there long after the city's surrender, wishing to maintain the pressure on his Persian foes. This move was a questionable one, because it was now winter and his men had just endured a grueling march over snow covered mountainous terrain. The entirety of Persia was far from subjugated, and various tribes such as the Mardians were very much independent from Ptolemaios' rule. It has raised many to question what exactly his goals were in this invasion, and perhaps whether he expected subordinates left behind to attend to the matter, or if he intended to attend to it himself later on. His troops needed some convincing to carry on in the dead of winter, for the march ahead was through terrain no less arduous than what they had just went through. He compromised by giving them a month's rest, setting out in February for Ekbatana, rather than leaving early in January as he had originally intended.


Media was governed by Astyages, a Median noble who had recently wrested control of the region from its Persian satrap. Spithradates was forced to cooperate with him, and the two drew up a defense of Ekbatana. The Persian however had other plans aside from working with a rebel. He contacted Ptolemaios during his march north, and offered to betray the city to him in exchange for being appointed satrap of Media. Ptolemaios agreed, and when he arrived at Ekbatana, the gates were opened the next night. Astyages was quick to respond to the treachery, repulsing Ptolemaios from the walls only to find Spithradates men turning on him. Fearing total defeat, he fled the city through the northern gate with a small bodyguard. Astyages retreated into the northern hinterlands of Media and along the Caspian, where he regathered his strength and held back.


Ptolemaios' men, now thoroughly exhausted from almost ceaseless campaigning since they left Susa, got some much needed rest. Aside from minor campaigns to subdue the region (with all attempts at bringing Astyages to heel ultimately failing), the troops were allowed rest until July, when they departed for campaign once more alongside new Median troops provided by Spithradates to supplement their previous losses. Astyages had astutely made sure to not block the Caspian Gates, the crucial pass east that led into Baktria. He recognized that Ptolemaios had no wish to remain in Media, and instead intended on heading even further east. This was fine for Astyages, whose main concern was re-gaining control of Media. If Ptolemaios wanted to leave to take on Artashata in the mountains, he was content to let him.


Predictably then, Ptolemaios left Ekbatana with Spithradates in charge with a mandate to finally bring down Astyages. He was surprised to pass the Caspian Gates without incident, reaching Hekatompyolos in short order and soon after invaded Hyrkania, wresting Zadrakarta from the control of those loyal to Astyages. After a brief but grueling campaign, the Tarpurians were defeated and forced to surrender. The offensive was going well, but Ptolemaios' forces were ever dwindling. Reinforcements from conquered natives were trickling in at small numbers, but his total force must have still at most not numbered more than its original 30,000, and the number was likely closer to the 20-25,000. A small reinforcement of 7,500 Hellenic mercenaries he had sent for after his capture of Persepolis reached him, by way of Armenia and the Kaspian Sea, at Zadrakarta[1]. Still, he could ill afford to spare many troops for garrisoning conquered lands, many times having to instead rely almost completely on Persian renegades or troops from the newly conquered locals, and hope they would not turn against him. His men began to grumble about their hardships what still lie ahead, and even Ptolemaios must have recognized he was ill prepared for a campaign in Baktria.

Still, he kept on. He was taking a massive risk, leaving the southern route completely un-touched behind him. There were 3 passes he could have taken south; the western Shibar Pass through the Bamian Valley, the central Salang Pass, and the eastern Khawak Pass, which led through the Panshir Valley. As he would have learned from guides and scouts, the Salang Pass was virtually impassable, and the easiest route, through the Bamian Valley, was likely heavily guarded by Artashata's men. The only feasible route then would have been through the Khawak and attempting either pass in the late fall and winter months was tantamount to suicide. As one modern historian of the region puts it, “In winter, the snow line descends to six thousand feet and blocks the passes; blizzards are common, and snow falls even during summer at higher elevations”[2]. It had been a mistake for Ptolemaios to wait so long to set out, for now the southern passes through the Hindu Kush were out of the question, since he could not afford to wait until late spring when the passes could be safely attempted.

lkmuVVt.jpg

Hindu Kush
He was thus forced to take the northern route, and was surprised to find Margos[3] relatively undefended. Artashata instead preferred to defend the Baktrian interior, which was far more kind to a defender than the open plains in Margiane and Khorasmia. The route was very much a desert, and another grueling and arduous march towards Zariaspa[4], the famed city where Zoroaster had supposedly first preached his new religion, and where he is reported to have died (hence its name, which derived from the Zoroastrian fire temple, Azar-i-Asp). Ptolemaios' guides advised him to only travel by night, and all extra baggage was left behind at Margos in order to hasten the journey. To further ease the jorney, Ptolemaios traveled in a more southerly direction, keeping along the river for as long as possible before force marching his army across to the small Saripul then Baktros River.


It was now late October-early November as Ptolemaios approached Zariaspa. Although Artashata himself was not present in the city, having opted instead to gather more forces north in Sogdiana and prevent a crossing of the Oxos, the eldest son of the deceased Shahanshah Tiribazos, also named Tiribazos, was left in command of the city's defense, while his younger brother Xerxes took command of the Baktrian cavalry in the province. Ideally, Artashata would not have wanted to defend the region south of the Oxos at all, but he understood that it was necessary if he was to keep the Baktrian cavalry on his side[5]. In this way they would not be able to slip away or, even worse, join Ptolemaios.


Ptolemaios was now once more in a precarious position. He could not afford to ignore Zariaspa, yet at the same time, the city would take some time to besiege. With Xerxes and the Baktrian cavalry loose in the countryside, remaining stationary at Zariaspa was a risky businesses. After a brief but failed attempt at taking the city in one fell swoop, Ptolemaios refused to simply winter outside Zariaspa, and instead split his army, taking a picked force to snuff out and destroy Xerxes, while Meleagros remained with the rest of the men at Zariaspa conducting the siege. A high ranking noble who had surrendered him, a certain Spisamithres, was appointed satrap of Baktria (not that there was much of Baktria under Ptolemaios' control at this time) in order to showcase the rewards those who surrendered received. Yet his Baktrian foes also had the example of the still at-large Astyages as evidence that those who opposed Ptolemaios were hardly doomed to failure. Unsurprisingly then, this move did not necessarily have the desired effect.


Instead, Ptolemaios conducted a lightning military campaign, putting on display the tactical and strategic brilliance he was sometimes capable of. Spreading himself dangerously thin, he began systematically occupying all the strategic locations in the region, hemming Xerxes in and denying him crucial logistical hubs to spend the winter. Having the tables turned on him so quickly, Xerxes was forced to seek an engagement. He opted for a lightning raid of his own at the forces besieging Zariaspa. A messenger attempted to get through to the city in order to coordinate a combined assault, but after being caught by Melagros' men, divulged the plan to his officers. Ptolemaios had also learned of Xerxes ploy, and had hastily gathered his forces back together and followed him to Zariaspa. The result was the annihilation of Xerxes' force on January 17th, with many Baktrians taking flight early. Xerxes himself was killed, and now Ptolemaios could direct his full attention to taking Zariaspa over the winter.




Much to his frustration, Tiribazos defied all his attempts at taking the city. As Ptolemaios dug in for the siege, he continued to lead a picked force around Baktria, bringing to heel those tribes that refused to support him, and signing treaties with those that did. In this way he brought 2,500 Baktrian cavalry to his side, a much needed force for his chronically undermanned army. Finally, sometime in April, sensing that Artashata was not going to cross the Oxos and come to his aid, Tiribazos was ready to deal. He agreed to surrender the city as long as he remained its governor, and Ptolemaios was quick to accept. Instead of maintain his side of the deal however, the Makedonian, perhaps influenced by his advisers, promptly arrested and executed Tiribazos. Ptolemaios could not trust the man to remain loyal, and so had dispensed with him before he could cause more trouble. It was a logical move, but it showed terrible foresight. It would be much harder to force surrender among the Baktrian warlords now that Ptolemaios had shown how willing he was to renege on the deal. It was a serious miscalculation.

For the moment however, Ptolemaios was at the peak of his power and prestige. The lands south of the Oxos had been pacified, and now he could turn his attention north and finally come to blows with Artashata. He marched through the 50 miles of desert from Zariaspa to the Oxos surprisingly without incident; an advance party was sent forth to dig wells, and his main force travelled by night, with water being brought to them from the wells up ahead along the river. Ptolemaios was frustrated in his attempts to cross it however by the presence of a significant missile force led by Artashata's commander Spitamenes guarding the northern banks. As such, he could not cross quickly as he would have liked, and instead had to spend days building makeshift rafts and ships so that his army could be prepared to cross all at once so that the enemy archers would end up facing more targets approaching them than they could shoot. He employed a novel tactic, placing catapults and other artillery pieces on some of the makesthift ships to bombard Spitamenes' cavalry and force them back from the river.

CCXWo3U.jpg

Oxus River

Out of range of Spitamenes' bowmen, Ptolemaios and his men could now cross the river unmolested. Wanting to prevent the Sogdians from retreating and living on to fight another day, Ptolemaios sent a force of spearmen far ahead of his main force as bait. Surprised at what he saw as a blunder, Spitamenes pounced on the isolated detachment, surrounding and charging them. The spearmen held out valiantly however, understanding their mission. They gave Ptolemaios enough time to arrive with his own force. He hit Spitamenes from the front with archer fire and on both flanks with cavalry, shattering the Sogdian cavalry and forcing Spitamenes to flee with a much reduced force.


Pressing his advantage, Ptolemaios divided his force into five columns, one for each of the strategic valleys in the region. One column marched up to the Panj River, another through the Vakhsh, two more through Kafingern and to the Surkhan River, and Ptolemaios himself leading a detachment west to Marakanda[5]. He knew Artashata would not be able to guard against all his columns at once, and so hoped to slip by him and deliver a swift coup de' grace. It was a sound strategy, but Ptolemaios had stretched himself dangerously thin, and it backfired spectacularly. Artashata was a far superior strategist and tactician than any Ptolemaios had encountered thus far, and he pounced on the opportunity. Sending Spitamenes as a diversion to distract Ptolemaios, he himself led his cavalry force, now supplemented with Skythian tribes to the north, against Meleagros' contingent heading through Kurfingan. Completely outclassed and unprepared (to say nothing of being seriously outnumbered), Meleagros' army was annihilated in a skillfully laid ambush, with Meleagros himself killed in the fighting. Artashata made sure the news spread to the other camps; he deliberately allowed some stragglers to escape so they would arrive in the other camps with the news of their destruction, and sent Meleagros' head to Ptolemaios.


Ptolemaios, who had been dealing with what he thought was the main force under Spitamenes, now found himself in the worst possible position, with his army spread out all across Sogdiana. The entire campaign was on the verge of unravelling before his eyes, and under intense pressure, he made a fatal but understandable error. Realizing the army needed to re-unite as hastily as possible, he opted to attempt a daring forced march through enemy territory at breakneck speed to try to reach at least one of his spread out columns. Artashata had planned for just such a manuever.

tamerlanes_gates_1062x796_ap1.jpg

Iron Gates

Following his defeat of Meleagros, Artashata had raced to rejoin Spitamenes. While everybody was under the impression he was still near Kafingern, he had was now laying in ambush at the Iron Gates[6] alongside Spitamenes. Ptolemaios, in his haste to reach his column alongside the Surkhan River before Artashata, stumbled right into the trap. A small force behind a makeshift wall blocked the road, and when Ptolemaios attempted to force a passage, he was beset on all sides by troops storming from the hillside. There are conflicting reports on when he was killed, but the general consensus seems to be it occurred early on in the fighting. Regardless of when he died, the important fact is that at some point, Ptolemaios was killed in the ambush and his men had to fight tooth and nail to extract themselves and his body from the death trap.


Now they truly found themselves in dire straits. Separated from the rest of the army, stranded in a far away and unknown land, and now without their king, the morale of the Makedonians and Hellenes in the army plummeted. They had barely escaped annihilation, but had no means of being able to escape Artashata a second time. The Baktrians in the column deserted that night, and Artashata surrounded the camp the following morning. Fearing the worst, the soldiers were surprised by his conciliatory tone; he promised them to treat them respectfully and as if they were his own soldiers if they surrendered, but threatened to slaughter them if they resisted. Unsurprisingly, the soldiers gracefully accepted. This was repeated across all the columns once word of Ptolemaios' death spread. The few contingents that chose not to surrender were harassed, hunted down, and destroyed, but most readily accepted what they saw as generous terms.


Artashata put his captives to good use. He wished to put a plug on the porous border along the Jaxartes with the Skythian nomads, and the nearest strategic town, Kyropolis, was 25 miles from the river. Too far to fit his needs. He needed a new city closer to the river to act as a defense against the Skythian nomads, and to populate that city, he settled Ptolemaios' former soldiers there. The city, named Artashatopolis[7], was surprisingly not unique in Baktria. The Persians had been known to settle rebellious Hellenes from Ionia in Baktria in the past, the furthest place away from their homeland they could place them. The most prominent among these groups were the Branchidai of Miletos, but they were far from the only Hellenes that made up a moderately sized Hellenic minority in Baktria. Knowing this at least provided some small consolation to the demoralized ex-Ptolemaian soldiers, who could take some solace in the understanding that they were not the only Hellenes in this far away land.






[1] Orontes had reached a deal with Ptolemaios prior to his invasion which had included the lending of a 2,500 Armenian cavalry and allowing the safe passage of any reinforcements through Armenian territory. Orontes accepted in order to prevent Ptolemaios from invading Armenia instead of going easy.
[1] This is actually taken directly from Into The Land of Bones, written by Frank L. Holt, a book solely dedicated to analyzing Alexander's invasion of Baktria.
[2] Later to be called Alexandria and eventually Merv.
[3] Also known as Baktra. Modern day Balkh.
[4] This was Bessus' undoing. He completely abandoned everything south of the Oxus, and instead opted to defend Sogdiana. The result however was that the Baktrian's less inclined to simply abandon their homeland, simply slipped away and returned home, leaving him chronically short on troops.
[5] Also known as Samarkand
[6] Also known as The Gates of Tamerlane
[7] I'm using the Hellenized version since I'm not versed in Iranian city naming conventions. If someone can provide the Iranian equivalent, I will happily use it.
 
So I found a ridiculously detailed map of ancient Greece which I'll post here so you guys have a reference when I mention some minor towns that you may have never heard of:

ancient-greece-map-1200.png





On another note, I'm trying to get a new update up tonight.
 
Chapter V: Every Tyrant is an Enemy to Freedom
Part VI: The Intrigues of Andronikos


IYzuq9s.jpg


Nikostratos, son of Kallikrates was chosen by the Boiotian League to lead their thrust into Thessalia in 424 AE [352 BCE]. The principle object of the campaign was ousting Andonikos and installing Demetrios as regent in Pherai. They were joined by the Phokians and the Aitolians, who already had garrisons guarding the Thermopylai pass. In conjunction with the land invasion, the Athenians hired a mercenary army with the intention of landing in northern Thessalia, where they could take the coastal town of Meliboia for themselves and threaten Larissa more inland. In this way, Andronikos would be caught in a pincer, where he could either be decisively defeated or avoid battle and lose all popular support.


The commander of the Athenian mercenaries was a certain Artemidoros of Miletos. A soldier of fortune as he was, he was both a hardened soldier and always ready to answer to the highest bidder. Andronikos, being aware of his inclinations for he had fought under him a year before, attempted to bribe him into joining his side upon landing. With his treasury running low (unlike his eastern counterparts, Andronikos did not have access to the vast wealth of the Achaemenid Empire that they had inherited from Babylon and Susa), Andronikos did not have much ability to fulfill these promises, yet it appears Artemidoros was won over anyway. While the ships were refitting at Skione on the Chalkidian Peninsula, Artemidoros agreed to betray the Athenians.


The Athenian navy under the command of Chabrias (who was also overall commander of the expedition), soon ferried them across near Meliboia, where they intended to lay siege. Artemidoros however had a falling out with Chabrias, arguing that it was foolishness not to march straight for Larissa and put the pressure on him, rather than waste time besieging an unimportant coastal town. Chabrias had strict orders to take Meliobia, and besides was looking out for Athenian interests first and foremost, rather than the interests of the coalition as a whole, and dismissed Artemidoros' complaints, as he knew he would. Artemidoros feigned anger, declaring if Chabrias would not march on Larissa, then he would himself, and warned him of his intention to leave with his men the following morning. Outnumbered 5-1 (10,000 mercenaries to 2,000 Athenians)by the mercenaries, Chabrias was in no position to stop him, and allowed him to march away to besiege Larissa. Of course, he had no intention of doing such a thing, and instead when he felt he had established a sufficient distance between himself and Chabrias, changed course and marched south to link up with Andronikos.


His diplomatic coup a success, Andronikos turned south to face the Thebans and Demetrios. The Thebans, not expecting him to have an extra 10,000 men (which was just as well for Andronikos, who was himself struggling to raise troops from a much depleted Thessalian manpower base), were completely caught off guard when he appeared before them near Ekhinos. Indeed, when they encountered his forces, they were still not aware of Artemidoros' defection and the 10,000 more men Andronikos possessed. This is the only way to adequately explain why Nikostratos decided on engaging the significantly more numerous Thessalian army when offered battle.

Thorakitai.jpg

Greek hoplites like those of Artemidoros' mercenaries

Not surprisingly then, Andronikos won the day and swept the field. Adopting the echelon formation, he stacked most of his mercenary forces and the majority of his cavalry on his left flank, thus overwhelming the Theban right opposite him. After rolling up their flanks, he was unsuccessful in pursuing the Aitolians, who had anchored the Theban left and withdrew in good order after witnessing their right flank collapse. Thus he was unable to complete his victory, and push on south, for the Aitolians were able to withdraw to the Thermopylai pass, sending and receiving reinforcements to assist in holding it. Andronikos knew that for the time being he simply did not have the manpower to force the pass, and was thwarted once more from finishing off his opponents for good.


The trouble with the Theban-Athenian coalition now dealt with, Andronikos turned his attention back north. His diplomatic prowess and mastery of intrigue had so far paid off handsomely. He had successfully weathered the storm in the early days of the conflict by siding with the Hellenic revolt, had retained his position by murdering Kleitos, and had fought off a formidable expeditionary force attempting to oust him by bribing away one leg of the invasion and using it to destroy the other. Unable to push south until he either got ahold of more men or built a fleet, his covetous eyes turned towards the Odrysian King Kotys, who was himself leading an invasion of Makedon. Andronikos feared another tripple alliance between Kotys, Alexandros I or Epiros, and the Theban-Athenian coalition forming against him. Knowing he could not afford to risk a field battle with Kotys, he instead resorted once more to intrigue.


Kotys had three sons, the oldest being Kersobleptes, the youngest Amadokos, and the middle son Berisades. It was clear to everyone that Kersobleptes was the favorite of Kotys, for he always shared command with the king in his campaigns, and received the most prominent independent commands whenever Kotys himself was unable to attend to them personally. Indeed, Kersobleptes was the one leading the army in its invasion of Makedon, with Kotys spending an extra week in Kotopolis to attend to important domestic matters that sprang up, before joining him later on. This was not so much resented by Berisades, who did well for himself under his father's tutelage too, but Amadokos was boiling in resentment, always feeling left out of important matters. He had a falling out with Kotys early in 424, a development that Andronikos was almost certainly aware of through informers in Kotys' court. Their relationship had apparently not improved by 425, when Andronikos approached Amadokos about assassinating Kotys.


Promising his complete support for Amadokos' bid for kingship if he were to murder his father, Andronikos convinced him to go through with the plot. Amadokos was unwilling to do the deed himself however, and instead bribed two of Kotys' guards to do the killing for him. So it was that on March 13th, the night before Kotys was to leave to join Kersobleptes on campaign, the two men (history records them as two Hellenes by the names of Eutropios and Simonides) murdered Kotys in his sleep.


Now it was Amadokos' turn to play the outraged and mourning son, and he seized the two men and had them tortured and executed for their crimes, which of course he had bribed them to undertake. He made a fatal error, though, when he attempted to have Berisades also assassinated in order to remove a potential rival. Berisades, having already been suspicious of Amadokos' potential role in his father's assassination, was alerted to the plot and fled Kotopolis in the middle of the night for Seuthopolis in the north. Rather than facing one enemy in Kersobleptes (who was sure to return north to re-assert his authority over the Odrysian Kingdom), Amadokos was now facing two, and without the army present along the northern frontier to assist him. He sent a desperate plea for assistance from Andronikos, who responded in turn by launching his invasion of Makedon.


Although Andronikos is criticized for leaving Amadokos out to dry, there was no realistic way he could assist him directly without having to pacify Makedon first. He desperately needed to retrieve whatever gold and silver he could find to pay his mercenaries, and he had no navy that could stand up to the Athenians and allow him to sail around Makedon and land directly in Thrakia. Makedon had been in a state of near anarchy for more than two years now, and Upper Makedon, having dealt with Illyrian and Paionian raids on a frequent basis, had increasingly become independent minded once more. Subduing it required a lot of time and effort, especially if he was to do so before Alexandros I of Epiros threw his hat in the ring, and so he could not afford to plunge further north and come to Amadokos' aid, despite his previous promises. That said, this does not mean he ever had any intention of doing so. The chaos in the Odrysian Kingdom was exactly what he had needed to relieve pressure on his realm, and so it was in his interests to let it play out for as long as possible.

zzJHUuU.jpg

Seuthopolis

With no aid from Andronikos forthcoming, Amadokos' situation was practically hopeless. He had hoped to rely on using the army stationed in Seuthopolis to defeat Kersobleptes with Andronikos' help, but now the former army was marching against him under Berisades, and the latter never had any intention of making an appearance. Amadokos did manage to scrap together a small force of a few thousand men, but that force melted away when Kersobleptes arrived with his much larger battle hardened army, and Amadokos and his son Teres were handed over and executed. If that was supposed to be the end of the power struggle, then it was a disappointing let down, for Barisades, now in possession of a strong army himself, was not willing to submit to Kersobleptes. Instead, he staked out his own claim for the throne.


After a series of inconclusive engagements, a much weakened Kersobleptes incited the Getai in the north to revolt, forcing Berisades to focus his attention there, and paving the way for a temporary truce. Kersobleptes used this respite to begin shopping around for an alliance over the winter of 425-426, and he found a willing partner in the Athenians. Having more or less secured their domination over the Aegean for the time being, the Athenians had set their gaze on controlling the Bosporous Straits, which were vital for maintaining a steady flow of grain to the city. Particularly, they were interested in regaining control of Byzantion, and in this, Kersobleptes could either prove an enemy or a useful ally. Recognizing Athenian fixation on capturing the city, Kersobleptes dangled the offer of providing assistance to the Athenians in its capture, if they would assist him militarily in his civil war against his brother. The Athenians consented, and prepared an expeditionary force once more under Chabrias to sail north and link up with Kersobleptes at Kotopolis as soon as the campaigning season began.


Their ability to support this expedition-which came on top of a more pressing expedition taken on by Chares to defend the Chalkidian Peninsula against the ambitions of Andronikos-is a strong testament to the Athenian military and economic revival. They were now arguably as powerful as they had been at the height of the Peloponnesian War, and were relishing their regained role of power broker in the region. Chabrias arrived with 10,000 men (mostly mercenaries once more) to assist Kersobleptes in the early spring, and the two men marched north, where they encountered and defeated Berisades, forcing him to retreat back into the walled citadel of Seuthopolis. His mission accomplished, Chabrias turned back south to go besiege Byzantion, while Kersobleptes wrapped up things in the north. Berisades was captured and executed alongside his son Ketriporos, thus ending the destructive Odrysian civil war.
 
Last edited:
Chapter V: Every Tyrant is an Enemy to Freedom
Part VII: The Second Delian League


ACROP6.jpg




With Kersobleptes' assistance, the Athenians led by Chabrias would capture Byzantion the following year, thus opening up the Bosporous Straits to Athenian grain shipments. Athenai had reached her high tide moment, and the next couple of years would see a slight decline in her power as she dealt with revolts in the Aegean in resistance to her subjugation. These revolts would ultimately transform the Athenian empire, but more will be said on that at a later time. For now, the Athenians were at their highest point since the height of the Peloponnesian War, and stood as masters of the Aegean.

Meanwhile, the death of Mausolos back in 425 [351 BCE][1], had provided an opportunity for Antipatros to expand his power at the expense of his sister Artemisia, who was now ruling Karia from Halikarnassos. Forces loyal to Artemisia were defeated at the Maeander River, and all of Karia except except the coastal cities of Didyma, Myndos, and of course Halikarnassos had fallen to his forces. Artemisia shut herself in in Halikarnassos, preparing for a siege, and Didyma and Myndos appealed to Athenai for assistance. For the moment, the Athenians were unable to send more than a token fleet, being more preoccupied in the Chalkidike and in Thrakia, but more ships were promised for the following year (427). Lacking a fleet strong enough to take on both Artemisia's and the small Athenian fleet, Antipatros was stymied in his efforts to take Halikarnassos. Neither could he take Didyma, its proximity to Miletos allowing the Milesians, under Athenian direction, to successfully reinforce the city. The only city that would fall to him that year was Iassos, taken by Antigonos, a small victory for a campaign that had started off so successfully.


MxCkpK1.jpg

The Mausoleon at Halikarnassos, started by Mausolos and finished by Artemisia.


Things took a further negative turn for Antipatros in 427, when the Athenians finally arrived in force and docked a sizable force in Myndos. This expedition was led by Phokion, who despite having originally been opposed to an Athenian revolt from the Delphic League, remained well respected in Athenai, and regardless was still a talented military commander. He wasted no time in harassing Antipatros, driving him away from Halikarnassos and frustrating him with kiting tactics with his peltasts, while refusing to engage in hand to hand fighting. Antipatros was thus driven back as far as the Maeander, though garrisons placed in strategic places in Karia allowed him to maintain some control over the region despite his withdrawal.


Back on the mainland, Andronikos had made a serious miscalculation. Taking Alexandros' inactivity from Epiros as weakness, he invaded the country in 427, looking to deliver another knockout blow to his enemies. Alexandros' rule over Epiros had indeed been shaky when he first assumed the throne, and his inactivity had been a result of putting his house in order, but by 427 his position had been secured and he was prepared for the invasion that came. He responded to the invasion in force, surprising and defeating Andronikos at Orraon, before launching an invasion of his own into Thessalia. The mercenaries under Artemidoros changed sides once more, having already been disaffected with Andronikos due to his erratic payment.

Now with a demoralized and much diminished army, things turned even more dire for Andronikos as reports of the Thebans installing Demetrios in Pherai trickled in. He fled to Larissa, the only major city in Thessalia that was still loyal to him, allowing Alexandros to bypass his force and plunge into Makedonia. The Thebans meanwhile, having achieved their mission, promptly retreated south, leaving Demetrios without much of an army himself, and so unable to capitalize on Andronikos' weakness. This was mostly by design, for the Thebans did not wish to see a united Thessalia, but rather a divided one, too focused on internal squabbles to direct its power abroad. Such was the state of affairs in Hellas at the end of 427, with a divided Thessalia, a resurgent Epiros, and Kersobleptes re-consolidating his father's hold over his kingdom.



Having reached the zenith of its power, it should not be surprising then that the Athenian Empire was to deal with grumbling and revolts as it had in the past. It should not be surprising, but it apparently caught the Athenians off guard when governments loyal to Athenai were overthrown simultaneously in Byzantion, Abdera, Limnos, Lesbos, Chios, and Kos. They were supported in their endeavors by the Rhodians, who had grown alarmed by the resurgence of Athenian power, which they saw as a direct threat to their independence. The revolt did not spread to the Ionian cities under Athenian control who viewed Antipatros as the larger threat (and would be soon be proven right when he began making his move on them while the Athenians were preoccupied, but nonetheless it was a significant threat to Athenian power.

The Athenian response to the revolt started off well, with Chabrias being dispatched to Amphipolis to deal with nearby Abdera, which was quickly subdued. He followed this up by shoring up Athenian power on Thassos, and dispatched a message to Diopheites and Demades, who were operating to the south, to swing north and rendezvous with him at Lesbos. The ship delivering the message however was captured by the Chians, who, now in possession of the Athenian plans, prepared to deal with Diopheites before he could link up with Chabrias and combine their forces to crush them. Assisted by the Rhodians and what was left of Antipatros' navy, the Chians ambushed Diopheites off the coast of the small island of Ikaria, capturing 25 ships and sinking another 20 (out of a naval force of 90 ships).

5tSmBav.jpg


The defeat caused panic in Athenai, and the Athenian assembly ordered to cancel all operations for the rest of 428[348 BCE]. This was followed by the successful siege and capture of Didyma by Antipatros by the end of the year, a loss that stung even more because it put into question their ability to defend their Ionian possessions. Diopheites did not dare return to the city for trial, instead fleeing to Sardis where Antipatros welcomed his defection. Demades used this to his advantage, managing to avoid conviction largely by blaming the entire debacle on Diopheites' ineptitude.


It was around this time that the idea of a more inclusive confederacy was being first thrown around by Phokion, who saw, perhaps more than anyone else, the need to give those subject to Athenai a larger stake in remaining in her sphere. This had been tried previously, during the brief resurgence of the Second Athenian Empire (also known as the First Athenian Confederacy), but (in the views of Phokion), had not gone far enough. This was made clear by the revolts that had crippled the Athenians and brought an end to her second empire, and now threatened to bring an end to her resurgence once more. For the time being, this idea was loudly shouted down, most prominently by Phokion's intractable enemy Demosthenes, but it lingered in the minds of the Athenians as their civil war dragged on.


Another event happened over the winter of 428 that would have a profound impact on the direction of Athenai's civil war, and on its future role in the Aegean. That was the long awaited return of Timotheos, son of Konon, who finally made his re-appearance in the city after events in Aigyptos (which will be commented on later), forced him out. Resentment over his handling of the previous war had more or less resided, and the circumstances the Athenians were under led them to accept his return. He was elected one of the ten strategoi for the year, and, alongside Phokion (who was the most forgiving), he was dispatched in 429 to strike at the Chians in retaliation for their defeat the previous year.


The duo did not disappoint. After realizing the combined Chian-Rhodian navy was moving to capture Naxos, they followed in kind, and sent ahead a small reconnaissance force to lure the Chians their way. Believing they had yet another chance to deliver a body blow to the Athenians, the Chians duly took the bait, pursuing the small force into the narrow straits that separated Delos from the island of Mykonos. The rest of the Athenian fleet, which had been hiding behind Mykonos, split, with Phokion taking one half around to smash into the Chians from behind, and Timotheos tackling them from the front. The Chians were completely surrounded and annihilated, suffering 30 ships sunk and most of the rest captured. They followed this up by capturing Chios, which soon led to Kos seeing the way the wind was blowing and surrendering.


The following year, Phokion and Timoetheos were once more active in the southern Aegean, operating in Ionia against Antipatros, while Chabrias and Chares focused on more threats to Athenian interests with the Chalkidian League, who once more found themselves under threat from a continental power. The dynamic duo once more caught and crushed Antipatros' fleet, re-capturing Didyma and once again lifting the siege on Halikarnassos. They returned to Athenai heroes, and with much political capital to spend.


While the rebellion was drawing to a close, it was not completely over, and regardless, the Athenians understood that a new, larger rebellion, could always break out anytime. Having been crippled by two previous large scale revolts, and nearly crippled from the most recent, it was clear that something had to be done to give the cities under Athenai's control some stake in this enterprise. The question, however, was how to go about doing that without curbing Athenian hegemony over them. In stepped the popular Phokion and Timotheos with their own proposal.

wXwB082.png

Athenian Democracy; This is (sort of) what Phokion and Timotheos based their vision for the Delian League off of


First and foremost, their idea for a new Athenian confederacy looked to build off that created during the Second Athenian Empire (or First Athenian Confederacy). From the Decree of Aristoteles that had signaled its beginning, they took the following:



  • All states involved were to have autonomy
  • Athenai was not permitted to own land in any of the member states
  • Athenai was not to inflict a garrison or cleruchy on any members, unless requested by said member
  • Each member state was allowed to choose their own constitution, which did not have to be a democracy


This of course had not completely been enforced, and that was what had led to the revolts that brought down Athenai's initially popular confederacy. On top of the above, they wished to expand the scope, and alter the makeup of, this new confederacy. Chiefly, they looked to the reorganization of Attika by Kleisthenes in 268 AE [508 BCE]. What they proposed, was to apply the system of demes, trittyes, and phyles to the entirety of the new confederacy. They proposed to double the number of demes from the 139 in Attika to 278, which would in turn also be divided into 30 ttyes, and 10 phyles. Each of these was to be administered in the same way that the demes, ttyes, and phyles in Attika were administered. That is, the demes were to be administered by a demarchos, and a pyle administered by a basileus (not to be confused with the kingly associations with the term. These were not kings obviously).


The main stepping stone however was representation. The Athenians were not willing to accept dividing up the archonships and strategoi among the Athenians and the other members of this confederacy, and so that was not a realistic option. Nor did they find it feasible to add 10 new strategoi for the 10 new demes, finding 20 strategoi to be far too large a number to be effective. Instead, they came up with a new position; the Deliarch (the name coming from the Delian League, which this new confederacy would be called). There would be two Deliarchs; from Attika, the other from the other constituent parts of the league. They would be elected by representatives chosen from each of the now 20 demes. All 20 demes would have a vote in electing both of the Deliarchs; so even though one Deliarch had to be Athenian and the other non-Athenian, the Athenian deme representatives could vote for the non-Athenian Deliarch, and the non-Athenian demes for the Athenian Deliarch. The treasury for the league would be held at Delos, hence it being referred to as the Delian League.


The debate over this new league went on for over a year, with Phokion and Timoetheos expending almost all their political capital on it. They brought in representatives from Athenai's subjects to speak at the Pnyx. Prominent Hellenes such as the pan-hellene Isokrates, who saw this as a grand-panhellenic venture, spoke in its favor. A former tutor of Hypereides, Isokrates managed to convince his former student to defect, removing a powerful ally from the opposition camp led by Demosthenes (who, to his credit, put forward his own alternative that also was an adjustment from the status quo, although closer to the Decree of Aristoteles). The proposal was assured passage in the Eklesia (Athenian assembly) when Aristophon, then one of the most influential men in Athenai, expressed his support. So it was in 431 [345 BCE], that the Second Delian League (also referred to as the Second Athenian Confederacy or Third Athenian Empire) was formed.

lJl4wHy.jpg

Ruins of ancient Delos, where the Delian League's treasury was placed.


[1] OTL, he died in 353 BCE


 
Last edited:
confused about andonikos

Chapter V: Every Tyrant is an Enemy to Freedom
Part VI: The Intrigues of Andronikos


IYzuq9s.jpg






[/SIZE][/FONT]
The Athenian navy under the command of Chabrias (who was also overall commander of the expedition), soon ferried them across near Meliboia, where they intended to lay siege. Andronikos however had a falling out with Chabrias, arguing that it was foolishness not to march straight for Larissa and put the pressure on Andronikos, rather than waste time besieging an unimportant coastal town. Chabrias had strict orders to take Meliobia, and besides was looking out for Athenian interests first and foremost, rather than the interests of the coalition as a whole, and dismissed Andronikos' complaints, as Andronikos knew he would. Andronikos feigned anger, declaring if Chabrias would not march on Larissa, then he would himself, and warned him of his intention to leave with his men the following morning. Outnumbered 5-1 (10,000 mercenaries to 2,000 Athenians)by the mercenaries, Chabrias was in no position to stop him, and allowed him to march away to besiege Larissa. Of course, Andronikos had no intention of doing such a thing, and instead when he felt he had established a sufficient distance between himself and Chabrias, changed course and marched south to link up with Andronikos.

[/SIZE][/FONT]


is there to many andronikos here

otherwise good update
 
A short update on the effects of the wars in greece on the population.

Chapter V: Every Tyrant is an Enemy to Freedom
Part VIII: The Hellenic Migrations

greek_colonies_550.jpg

Map of Greek colonies before the latest wave in the 5th century AE

It is now my intention to relate how the internecine warfare that had engulfed Hellas already on and off for nearly three decades (and would continue for almost as long), affected the population. Hellas was already heavily crowded when the wars of the 5th Century AE (370-roughly 330 BCE) broke out. This overcrowding had led many Hellenes to become soldiers of fortune, serving in the squabbles between Hellenic states, and abroad, where they fought the wars of the Achaemenid Kings and the Aigyptian Pharaohs. I have already related how this contributed to the transformation of Hellenic warfare, and the professionalization of Hellenic armies. Jason of Pherai was the first man to fully capitalize on this development, and before his military reforms the backbone of his conquests were the large numbers of mercenaries under his service. This had allowed him to claim hegemony over Hellas and plunge himself almost as far as Persepolis before his untimely death.


If the overpopulation had not already made Hellas not the most attractive place to live, then the revival of internecine warfare that followed Jason's brief period of peace made it much worse. There was little stability; farmers often found their fields destroyed, and city dwellers witnessed their towns and cities change hands multiple times, sometime in the same year. This caused many Hellenes to increasingly seek new fortunes abroad, and there was no shortage of places for them to settle. In Mesopotamia and Syria, Nutesh was all too happy to encourage settlement as a part of his attempt to fortify his very flat and otherwise indefensible borders. The same could be said to a lesser extent in Aigyptos, where the Nile Delta saw increased Hellenic settlements. But by and large, the majority of those who looked to settle abroad, looked west.


The Hellenes had an extensive history of colonizing the western Mediterranean,where they frequently encountered, and came into conflict with, the Phoenicians. They had already colonized almost the entirety of Italy, giving it the name Megas Hellas (Greater Hellas). Eastern Sicily, parts of the west coast of Italy, Northern Sardina, Corsica, Southern Gaul, and parts of coastal Iberia had all received some form of Hellenic colonization. This new wave of Hellenic colonization saw much increased settlement in these regions, including the founding of two new important trading centers, Heraklea on the Safanite coast, and Dekeleia in Iberia.


The influx of settlers leaving Hellas for the west came at a fortuitous time for the Hellenes of Megas Hellas and Sicily, who found themselves on the losing end of a serious of wars with the Carthaginians and Italian tribes on their frontiers. The increased manpower it brought may have been enough to tip the scales in some of these conflicts, and nonetheless were welcome replenishments to their populations, which had also been depleted by war.


In the east, Hellenes made up a sizable portion of the colonizers that first settled in Nutesh's cities in Syria and Assyria. In addition to the four cities in Syria (Pieria, Ugarit, Alalakh, and Neapolis[1]), a significant Hellenic minority was to be found in the re-built fortress cities of Assur and Ninevah. They founded a cluster of small trading outposts in the Nile Delta, including the city that would soon overtake Naukratis, Artemisia[2]. It was founded (or more precisely, colonized; an Aigyptian city by the name of Rhakotis already existed there. The Aigyptians would continue to call this city Rhatokis) by settlers from Megara (one of the cities matron deities being Artemis), and it soon became apparent the settlers had chosen the perfect spot. With the patronage of the Pharaoh Nakhthorheb[3], successor to Tachos, the city fast great into the most important trading center for an Aigyptos that began orienting itself more towards the Mediterranean.






[1] Seleukia-Pieria, Apamea, Antioch, and Laodikia respective. The OTL Syrian Tetrapolis. I have no idea what the Chaldean/Aramaic names for cities might be. So I chose to give the two coastal cities Greek names (as they would have the largest Greek settlements) and the two more inland cities names of 2nd millenium BCE cities in the region that corresponded roughly to where Antioch and Apamea might be
[2] OTL Alexandria
[3] Nectanebo II
 
Last edited:
But by and large, the majority of those who looked to settle abroad, looked west.


Now I see. So the whole Jasonian Adventure was shown to us to let us realize that everything of Greek-Macedonian population that in OTL went to Iran and Central Asia ITTL would go to western mediterranean to cause pain to Carthago. With Iberian/Sicilian/Sardinian/Corsican Greeks threatening Carthaginian trade routes and politics their attention would be probably turned exclusively to them to prevent forming central Mediterranean Greek empire. It looks like Iberian (and Gallic) Greeks have a window of opportunity to build something that will bite the Punics in their collective back.

And I think that after fulfilment of this Pythian prophecy no sane tyrant would ever dream to conquer Asia or just parts of it. Stick to Europe or you will end like Jason and Ptolemaios!

PS. And you probably meant the effects of wars in Greece, not the "affects". Unless you want to show us more of Sacred Band of Thebes... ;)
 
Last edited:
Now I see. So the whole Jasonian Adventure was shown to us to let us realize that everything of Greek-Macedonian population that in OTL went to Iran and Central Asia ITTL would go to western mediterranean to cause pain to Carthago. With Iberian/Sicilian/Sardinian/Corsican Greeks threatening Carthaginian trade routes and politics their attention would be probably turned exclusively to them to prevent forming central Mediterranean Greek empire. It looks like Iberian (and Gallic) Greeks have a window of opportunity to build something that will bite the Punics in their collective back.

And I think that after fulfilment of this Pythian prophecy no sane tyrant would ever dream to conquer Asia or just parts of it. Stick to Europe or you will end like Jason and Ptolemaios!
Yes, Carthage will be facing problems with the Greeks in the near future as a result of this exodus. The east is not nearly as attractive now that the Persian Empire is dead and the last two men to lead an adventure in that direction died trying. The west on the other hand might be attractive to a certain adventurer though. ;)

PS. And you probably meant the effects of wars in Greece, not the "affects". Unless you want to show us more of Sacred Band of Thebes... ;)
Argh. Yes, nice catch. I can never tell when to use effects and affects. :eek: Thank you for pointing that out.
 
Apologies for no updates recently folks. My hard drive decided it had nothing to live for and committed suicide, so I'm waiting for a new one to arrive (and an external hard drive, since I'm not making the mistake of putting everything on the same hard drive that windows is on again). Unfortunately a new update (and some outlines for future updates) were lost with the hard drive so I'm running a bit behind. :eek:
 
"Never get involved in a land war in Asia"?:)
Ah, the old RISK maxim being applied to the ancient world. :cool:

Sorry for the lack of updates guys, I just got my hard drive back up and running and wanted to focus on updating the Nazarean Empire. Tuesday-Saturday I'll be in Disney World for my senior trip, so there won't be any updates then either. I'll try and crank out a couple before then.
 
Having spent more time than I wish at Disney World, get there early, remember where you're parked and after you get in go to the far side of the park and work your way back. That way the line will be a lot shorter for a good part of the day.
They also raised the ticket prices last week.
Have a good time and keep hydrated.
 
Having spent more time than I wish at Disney World, get there early, remember where you're parked and after you get in go to the far side of the park and work your way back. That way the line will be a lot shorter for a good part of the day.
They also raised the ticket prices last week.
Have a good time and keep hydrated.
Well its my senior trip (run by my school). Sooooo parking won't be an issue there (we're flying down from Philly and staying for 5 days).
 
Top