The Eternal Empire: Emperor Maurice dies before being overthrown

New to the tl, wondered if I could get some points of initial interest cleared-


So the Arab conquests didn’t reach Central Asia ittl- does this mean that Bactrian has survived as a literary community in otl Afghanistan? They use essentially the Greek script so could have become more prominent in trade through Roman influence, and would be a pretty solid core for the Sramanoi mentioned- Buddhist iranic speakers who use the Greek alphabet.

Has the official language of the Nestorian Turkic state been… syriac? Because of the religious prestige? Sogdian because of its pre existing commercial prestige, multi religious literature? Surely they’d write in Syriac at the very least, given that’s also almost the same script as the Pahlavi script used by the sasanians?

Regarding the modern Latin thing I saw where the author was like oh instead of Franci, they’d say Francoi- can I suggest this is very unlikely to happen as a borrowing from Greek. It is possible to happen simply as an evolution in Latin and indeed there was a phase in the history of modern Italian where the masculine plural was *oi - the Latin accusative plural os had its final s debuccalised to become a h, and then that made the diphthong Oi. Cf nos becoming noi, post becoming poi etc.

Perhaps the dialect of Italian romance this modern Latin standard is based off of simply didn’t participate in the next step where the oi simplified into i, which happened by the time old Tuscan is attested otl.

Also how romance speaking are the balkans? How divergent have provincial varieties of Greek gotten by 1300? Does Coptic still exist or has Egypt been well and truly hellenised?

What’s the ecclesiastical situation in the west with a fully Roman Rome- do all bishops still require papal approval? Does the bishop of Rome always toe the imperial line on doctrine and force the whole west to comply?
 
Last edited:
So the Arab conquests didn’t reach Central Asia ittl- does this mean that Bactrian has survived as a literary community in otl Afghanistan? They use essentially the Greek script so could have become more prominent in trade through Roman influence, and would be a pretty solid core for the Sramanoi mentioned- Buddhist iranic speakers who use the Greek alphabet.
Yes.

Has the official language of the Nestorian Turkic state been… syriac? Because of the religious prestige? Sogdian because of its pre existing commercial prestige, multi religious literature? Surely they’d write in Syriac at the very least, given that’s also almost the same script as the Pahlavi script used by the sasanians?
The official court language was Greek, because all of the early important men were connected by prior service in the Roman army. The religious language was Syriac. As time has gone on the court language has shifted more and more toward Persian. The Turkish successor states mostly use Turkish or Persian with a large number of Greek loanwords.


Regarding the modern Latin thing I saw where the author was like oh instead of Franci, they’d say Francoi- can I suggest this is very unlikely to happen as a borrowing from Greek. It is possible to happen simply as an evolution in Latin and indeed there was a phase in the history of modern Italian where the masculine plural was *oi - the Latin accusative plural os had its final s debuccalised to become a h, and then that made the diphthong Oi. Cf nos becoming noi, post becoming poi etc.
I don't quite remember that, but more likely it was more of a me thing as I was unsure what descriptors I wanted to use earlier in the story. I don't really know enough about the development of language to give a firm answer.

Also how romance speaking are the balkans? How divergent have provincial varieties of Greek gotten by 1300?
Eh...not very. Latin might be the official language of the modern court and Senate, but Greek is still widely-spoken in both, and pronouncements in Greek regions are still made in Greek. As for divergence of language, about what you'd expect from widely seperated such groups.

Does Coptic still exist or has Egypt been well and truly hellenised?
Coptic still exists.

What’s the ecclesiastical situation in the west with a fully Roman Rome- do all bishops still require papal approval? Does the bishop of Rome always toe the imperial line on doctrine and force the whole west to comply?
Bishops require papal approval...so long as the pope (nearly) always approves them. The bishop is Rome doesn't always toe the Imperial line, but does often. But the power of the papacy is far more limited than it was OTL. The centralization and increased power of the Gregory VII that happened in the OTL 1000s era did not happen here. He's the head of the Church, but of a far more decentralized Church. The Imperial Church is much, much more centralized than that in say Francia, a kingdom where bishops and priests are elected.
 
The official court language was Greek, because all of the early important men were connected by prior service in the Roman army. The religious language was Syriac. As time has gone on the court language has shifted more and more toward Persian. The Turkish successor states mostly use Turkish or Persian with a large number of Greek loanwords.
Modern Persian with greek rather than Arabic influence sounds very interesting. I wonder how this proximity to Roman Greek influences perceptions of Alexander the Great. The Shahnameh refers to him as a warlord who conquered the Persian Empire as his own... I wonder if Persian historians here try to declare him as a greek who became Persian
 
Part 106: That Which Contracts Must Expand
Part: CVI: That Which Contracts Must Expand​

In the popular narrative around John V it is often imagined that no sooner was his father dead that he began plotting his war against the Arab Caliph. This, as you likely gathered from the discussion about Manuel IV is ahistorical. In fact, his father had long dreamt of undertaking just such a military campaign, and the groundwork for the war had been laid by the Imperial army for years. Another point that is often held true of John V’s reign was that invading Syria was his first act as Emperor. This also is a myth.

His first act as Emperor was a swift, and thorough purge of his father’s government. Manuel had never had the power or authority to undertake such a widespread action, but John and Leo had worked behind the scenes for years to put together the circumstances they needed. Too much of the government had been involved in the plots which had seen the throne withheld from their father, the rightful heir of Katarina, and given to his brothers. While thorough this purge did have the balancing point of just how many officials were left in place. Most of the men who had put puppets, as Leo and John saw it, in place on the Imperial throne were old men already and could be replaced by underlings loyal to the two brothers. Most of the others were simply dead. Of old age, plague, or some other cause. The important aspect was the very clear message that Imperial succession was extremely important, and meddling with it would be done at the peril of those who interfered. This would have ironic consequences when Leo died and left a man thoroughly unfit for the purple as his heir.

For now however, as the months passed John’s generals were readying for a full-scale offensive into Syria. At their head of Bohemund the Briton, Domestic of the Scholae.

Bohemund was technically the fourth son of a lord from Alba, where he had been left with few prospects after his oldest brother was made the sole heir, his second brother went into the Church, and his third brother apparently ran off into the wilderness of the Baltic coast as a Crusader and vanished from history. Not quite as adventurous as his older brother Bohemund had instead departed his homeland and headed for Italy, where the losses from plague had left a myriad of openings amongst the local nobility, and more to the point a lot of wealthy widows or unmarried heiresses. He had been unsuccessful in such pursuits, and so had moved on to Constantinople.

Here his boyhood training in arms and leadership, as well as education in Latin, Greek, and Francish made him excellent officer material, and he was accepted into the Roman army. He became friends with John while the young man was still Caesar, and had served in a number of small skirmishes fought along the Taurican border, as well as putting down a number of minor revolts in Dacia and North Africa. While in Africa he had been one of the men who negotiated a peace with the revolting Berber tribes which saw Roman control lessened over their favorite sport of raiding, so long as it was along the Caliphate’s border, that is to say, into Arabic Egypt.

It wasn’t mentioned last time, but this raiding had been one of the catalysts for the revolt there, and will eventually cause another, significantly larger revolt in the province of Africa when Egypt is brought back into the Imperial fold.

Now Bohemund was given the important duty of putting together the invasion force that would strike south from Roman positions in Syria, aimed at retaking Thomopolis before the Emperor himself arrived to lead a follow-up attack south the retake Jerusalem, and with it all of Palestina. John seems to have had ideas of reconquering all of Mesopotamia as well but was unsure of the resources that would be required, and so did not commit himself to such an attack. Had other events not intervened he likely would have tried to recreate all of Leo’s conquests so many centuries before.

The Arabs were not blind to these Roman preparations, and threw themselves into work preparing defenses and readying for the assault. Walls were repaired, fortresses were built and strengthened, men were trained and readied for the coming war. The cost was hard to bear with the falling tax revenues, and ongoing fiscal problems that had followed the war with Turkia, but as that Empire fell apart in the East the Caliph was able to shift more soldiers from garrison duty there to face the oncoming Roman onslaught.

Marwan’s preparations would likely have been sufficient to hold back a Roman army from any point at the height of the Thalassans. His defenses were strong, and the terrain was far more favorable to him than say southern Gaul had been when Manuel had invaded the Francish Empire so long before. But he was facing a force that, while less numerous and less well-trained than the Thalassan troops, were backed up by a more powerful and more terrifying weapon.

Skirmishing and border conflicts had started even before Manuel IV died ,but the war did not kick off until the following spring, in April. John was present, leaving Leo to handle the ongoing reorganization back in the Capital. However, the Emperor remained in Antioch where he readied a second force, larger than Bohemund’s before striking south in July. He met up with Bohemund’s army outside Thomopolis, and brought the massive siege guns of the Imperial army to bear on the city, blasting holes in its walls over the course of mere hours. As their defenses crumbled the city surrendered without further resistance. Relying on the population to be thoroughly cowed John raced south, as fast as his heavy ignifera would carry him, blasting apart defenses as he went. He finally arrived at Ace in August, and the Caliph was ready to meet the Roman army. On paper the Arab army was actually reasonably prepared for the battle they expected to fight.

John only had about 20,000 men with him when the Caliph attacked. This amounted to about half his total force, while the remainder were fanned out into a number of smaller screening forces. One had been surprised a few days before and destroyed without getting word out, leaving the Emperor blind to the advance of the Caliph. John was thus only aware of the threat when he woke up and was preparing the army to toward Jerusalem, bypassing the Arab capital.

Instead, he rushed his troops into combat formation, forming up ten thousand of his infantry into a square with crossbowmen at the corners, positioned to retreat back through to the phalanx’s center. Roman infantry at this point mostly consisted of men armed with long spears and a scutum, a deliberate reference to the Roman legionnaire shield of old, but actually a smaller version. Normally the men also wore chainmail a padded jacket called the gossipion, but because of the nature of this battle few of the men were wearing their heavier mail. The crossbowmen carried a heavier version of the scutum, designed to be driven into the ground and allowing men to crouch behind it while reloading. The crossbowmen were divided into groups of three assigned to an individual shield, so one man could reload while others fired. His cavalry was set as a screen on the flanks, but was both fewer in number and lighter than their Arab counterparts. The most important group was placed behind the cavalry on the right flank, the Palatine Guard.

This was a unit organized by Manuel during his reign, and was the heaviest unit in the Roman army. Made up of the best Italian troops the Palatine Guard, later called the Palatine Legion and in the west called the Clockwork Legion, was similar to the Kataphractoi of old, being armored head to toe, in what was then very new armor. Full plate armor with additional heat treating, giving it a distinctive blue color. These men were armed with polearms and heavy crossbows, and unlike the Kataphractoi they fought on foot.

Against John’s army was Marwan’s army of thirty thousand, twenty-thousand infantry and ten thousand cavalry. The Arab infantry were a mix of archers and spearmen. The infantry were very similar to their Roman counterparts in equipment, but with lighter shields and shorter spears. Marwan knew he needed to attack and scatter the Emperor’s army, then fall on the smaller detachments. If he could manage this then he could race north, retake his lost territory, and maybe occupy Roman Syria. Such a victory seemed achievable.

The Arabs thus launched their attack as the Romans were still forming up, but quickly ran into problems. The Roman adoption of firepowder was far greater than the last war fought between the two sides, and Roman engineers opened up with a barrage of fire arrows launched from Roman Vespidae, these were bundles of fire arrows loaded into artillery pieces. They also made a horrible roaring sound when fired, and terrified the Arabs who had not be exposed to such weaponry before. The barrage held off the Arab infantry until the Roman infantry was formed up, and the crossbowmen added their bolts to the ongoing rain of projectiles. The two infantry lines met. The Roman left was pushed back by the Arab cavalry on the right. The Roman right however seemed to immediately break, and began falling back through the Palatine troops. The Arabs pursued but ran into the solid line of infantry. The Guard loosed a volley of fire arrows at point blank range, hitting the Arab charge hard, and then they grabbed their polearms and advanced.

The Roman cavalry meanwhile circled around the rear of the army, and joined their comrades on the left. After significant fighting the Arabs facing the Palatines were forced to retreat, and the Guard advanced. Arab reserve forces saw the coming flank attack, and moved forward to intercept. They launched a volley of arrows. The only contemporary account is from an Arab source, who was an officer at the battle. His description of the battle describes how the Arab arches loosed their arrows into the core of the Palatine Guard, and watched in horror as their arrows collided with their armor, and quite literally bounced off.

The Palatine kept coming, barely even slowing down, and soon the Arab reserve threw down their weapons and fled, the combination of fire arrows and these men broke their morale. The Palatine silently executed a turn into the Arab center, and the rout began.

Casualties of the Second Battle of Neapolis, deliberately named despite the battle taking place significantly further north, were relatively light. Six hundred Roman dead to about three thousand Arab. But the effect was clear enough. Marwan simply did not have an army anymore. His cavalry deserted him, and soon the leaders were in talks with John to switch sides. His infantry had largely thrown down their weapons, were going home, or both. Looking at his options Marwan did the unthinkable. He surrendered.

Riding into the Roman camp in full regalia, and allowed in by sentries who saw only a lone rider in expensive clothing and so assumed he was just some local lord coming to do homage to the Emperor, not exactly unheard of, they waved him through. No one in John’s camp even knew what Marwan looked like apart from a few Arab lords who were actually there to pay him homage.

When he threw the tent of the Emperor’s tent open these men went quiet, and John soon realized something odd was happening. He did not realize who had entered until the man announced himself, and presented the Emperor with the Arab Diadem, signet ring, and jeweled purple robe of office.

John was seemingly stunned at the development, but soon overcame his shock and accepted the gesture, even having Marwan sit at his table beside him and treating him as he would any other royal visitor. In exchange for his surrender Marwan asked only for himself and his family to be spared, and John agreed. The former Caliph would be sent to Italy with his wife, son, daughter-in-law, and three daughters. He would live there for the next thirty years, on an estate in Campania granted to him by the Emperor. In doing so he will outlive both John, and his brother Leo, as well as see his granddaughter become Augusta. He would entertain dignitaries and nobility from across Europe, playing up the image of an exotic foreign king.

So that’s it right? The Caliph has surrendered. At his word Acre and Jerusalem threw open their gates, and the war was over. Right? Well, not so much. Palaestina was now open the Romans, but the remainder of the Arab empire was far from dead. As word spread of events happening there other events were transpiring in Mesopotamia, where another Roman general was looking to mimic the success of Konon Isauria. Another John, this one John Laskaris, a general from a relatively minor family in Cappadocia, had risen to prominence and was offered command of a second army, which John had intended, as Leo did before him, as more of a screening force than one of conquest. But he dreamed of bigger things, so even as the Emperor was accepting Marwan’s surrender Laskaris launched an invasion of Assyria. However, instead of glorious victory he met colossal defeat.

Without the firepowder weaponry which made the Emperor’s forces so destructive Laskaris launched on a slog into the heavily fortified, and still recovering Mesopotamia and was met with frustration on every side. His supplies were raided, he could gather little forage from the countryside, and local strongmen refused to throw open their gates to a mere Roman general. Over the course of 1371 he lost large numbers of troops to desertion as men abandoned the ill-fated campaign and went home. Finally as the year was drawing to a close Laskaris was lured into a battle near Babylon, and his army was destroyed. He lost a full ten thousand men, and soon his opponents were raiding into northern Syria.

John raced north, and scattered the raiders, but was unable to push onward into Anatolia as his great prize still eluded him, Egypt. Instead he concluded a peace with the leader of Babylon, allowing him to crown himself Basileos of Mesopotamia, a deliberate insult to the Turks most likely, and returned to Palestine to try and get Egypt back into the Empire.

This would be a difficult proposition however as the Egyptians were deeply angry about raids from Roman Africa, and were going about setting up their own kingdom after throwing out the Arabs with no Imperial reinforcement. Leo was in negotiations, but John was ready to charge in, and reconquer Egypt completely. But he wouldn’t do it. John went out hunting in December 1371, cut himself on an arrow, and soon it became infected. By Christmas Day he was dead. He was 25 years old, and had been Emperor for 2 years.

If we are judging John there is only one person who really qualifies as a point of comparison, the Emperor Aurelian. His brother Leo even declared John to be the Restitutor Orbis, as Aurelian had been, giving his brother most of the credit for reconquering the East, and somewhat undeservedly. He had won a single major battle, and then then had scattered some raiders who didn’t have much interest in fighting a major battle. In truth, the hardest part was yet to come. Because John could have conquered Egypt. It would have been a long, bloody, and vicious slog. One which would have alienated Egypt, and led to it becoming a hotbed of problems in the future.

Leo had the harder job. He wasn’t much of a soldier, and had little interest in such a campaign. Therefore he would undertake the more difficult task of getting Egypt back into the Empire not through force, but through diplomacy. He wanted Egypt back in the Empire for the same reason Italy had put the Empire back together, because it would be in the best interests of those making the decisions.

It would not be without cost, however. Because while he gained Egypt, he laid the groundwork to lose Africa.
 
Ooof! Glad to see you back!

Why do I get the feeling the core territory of the Empire is going to contract and leave the Empire leaner but stronger in the long run?
 
The Eastward pull continues. God help Rome, cause it'll leave them without an Atlantic port in which they can expand into the Americas.
Don't worry. I'm sure that a sudden collapse of the monopoly on international trade and no way of breaking back in won't have any negative impact on the Roman economy. 🤞
 
Maybe an Chinese Colonization attempt
Or an Indonesian or Indian colonization attempt? And speaking of Indonesia and India, one interesting implication could be that modern-day Bengal probably remains mainly Buddhist without the Islamic conquests while Indonesia is more-or-less Hindu-Buddhist.
 
Or an Indonesian or Indian colonization attempt? And speaking of Indonesia and India, one interesting implication could be that modern-day Bengal probably remains mainly Buddhist without the Islamic conquests while Indonesia is more-or-less Hindu-Buddhist.
I dont think India can make it but maybe the polynesians in SE Asia
 
Part 107: Talk it Out
Part CVII: Talk it Out​

John’s death was a shock to his army, and they refused to march into Egypt with the Emperor’s sudden death hanging over them. Bohemund ordered a withdrawal back to Thomopolis, leaving behind a strong garrison to hold Jerusalem. Leo for his part did not learn about his brother’s death, and his own elevation for nearly a month afterward, and the news seems to have thrown him into something of a panic.

He'd always been one more for a behind the scenes role. Doing paperwork, running the bureaucracy, maybe speaking to the Senate. But now he was Emperor. He was also both childless and unmarried. The end of the dynasty loomed if anything happened. But after a few days he calmed down, and returned to what he’d always done, worked through the problem. He had his brother’s body returned to the city and held a grand funeral, framing John V’s reign as a glorious act of reunion, bringing down the Second Caliphate and conquering the Roman East. This is…rather overstating the case.

John marched into Palaestina, won one battle, and took a few cities. The Caliphate probably shouldn’t have been finished, but with the long war against Turk, followed by the plague, the loss of Egypt, a major defeat and loss of Palaestina, and what was quickly becoming a major revolt in Mesopotamia there just as no political will to try and unite behind a single Caliph once again. John has long been held up to nearly legendary proportions, nearly to those of Aurelian a millenia before. But…he just doesn’t really deserve it. It served Leo to pretend otherwise however. And the new Emperor ultimately recalled Bohemund’s army to Antioch before departing himself for that city.

Leo paid out a reasonable donative, then set out into the East. His initial goal was simply to take Dara and reestablish the Eastern frontier. As he did so however locals complained about raids from Mesopotamia, so Leo made an expedition into Assyria. He didn’t do much here, other than march around, and blast holes in a few fortresses. The local strongman got the message, and soon was negotiating for client king status with the Romans. Leo wanted the East quiet, but had little interest in a full campaign. Restoring client kings seemed to him to be a better way of maintaining order far from the capital, and far from normal Imperial control.

There will eventually be two client kings who will effectively reestablish the old Mesopotamian themes, the Kingdom of Assyria, and the Kingdom of Babylon. The actual job duties of these men were minimal. Keep the peace, keep raiders out, and send some men to the Romans to serve as soldiers. And not to fight with one another too much. By the time Roman control over the East once again breaks down and the Emperor is pulling forces back Assyria will be the only client king left standing, and will eventually prove to be a major thorn in the side of first the Romans, and then their Baetican creditors. That, however, is many centuries hence.

For now Leo returned to Antioch in 1373 and dispatched envoys to Egypt to discuss unification. Egypt was not particularly receptive. Their last experience under Roman rule you will recall had been under Romanos the Mad, and then they had been conquered by the Arabs. In that time Egyptian culture had drifted even further away from the Roman norm, the elites were eager to rule themselves, and their economy was booming. While the plague had hit the population hard, it had ironically also boosted the economy. Egypt had been very densely population before the plague, and much of their crops had been exported to Arabia, for free. The sudden decline of population, and freedom to simply sell the excess raked in major profits for the average Egyptian farmer. One-third of the population was still dead, but that had little bearing on the roaring economy. Gold flowed into the land, and they didn’t have to pay taxes on it to some far away capital.

Leo’s argument though was a good one, and he did at least win a hearing with the magnates of Alexandria. He entered that city in 1375, and was given a spectacular welcome, but pointedly one reserved for a foreign ruler. The Egyptian king, who isn’t super relevant for reasons we’ll get to later, met him, and the two did have some productive talks about trade, and the duties on Italian shipping, but the king wasn’t willing to give up his position.

So Leo began meeting with other important men, under the guise of state business and laying out his pitch. The first and most important was that taxes under the Romans were lighter than the taxes under the coalescing Egyptian kingdom. If taxed at average rates Leo would charge about a fifth less, as he had the taxes on shipping to make up for that shortfall. Second, Markuria was reforming as a kingdom to the south as the Caliphate broke apart, which would leave Egypt badly overstretched as it needed to defend itself against the south, as well as to the East, West, and North where the Romans still would be looking to retake the rich land. Third, he would call off the Berber raiders. These men, mostly pirates really, launched attacks from what were, theoretically at least, Roman cities, and attacked Egyptian shipping and coastal towns. While the Emperor didn’t have much he could do to control them, he could at least come down on their chieftains and offer payment to halt the raids. Finally, he proposed to repair the Pharos Canal. This was a major desire of the Italians, who wanted to cut down the cost of shipping goods from the Red Sea to the Mediterranean and would be an enormously expensive project. One Egypt probably couldn’t afford to do itself.

The magnates gave Leo a hearing and promised to think about it. Disappointed, the Emperor left Alexandria and returned to Constantinople, to plot a possible conquest. Then a stroke of luck occurred for the Emperor. A foreign king passed through Egypt, King Maghan of the Mandan Empire, far to the south across the desert from Africa. This king was spectacularly wealthy and brought an enormous amount of gold with him on his trip. He was a Christian and wished to visit the holy cities of Jerusalem, Rome, and Constantinople. Leo did not hear about this until well into the trip, but Egypt was hit hard by his enormous generosity. Maghan controlled some of the most productive gold mines in the world, and it showed as he passed money out frivolously throughout the trip. But especially in Egypt.

The result was what we would see as predictable, but at the time wasn’t well understood, inflation. Prices skyrocketed, and the Egyptian economy crashed. Suddenly the magnates who had been rather dismissive of the Emperor’s offer started to rethink their decision. By the time Maghan passed into Palaestina his funds had, because of his generosity, started to run low, and he was forced to cut spending. That was fine however, because the Emperor himself was racing toward Jerusalem to meet this wealthy foreign king.

Maghan’s trip proceeded relatively smoothly from there, with Leo carefully preparing the way as the king visited Jerusalem, worshipped there, and then traveled to the Hagia Sophi, and finally to the Vatican. What is important is that by 1377 the Egyptians were properly negotiating for entry into the Empire, out of a hope that Constantinople could help them rebound. Negotiations would last another four years, but in a major ceremony in 1381 the current king of Egypt, son of the one mentioned previously, formally abdicated his title, and Egypt brought back into the Roman Empire.

However, a major side-effect of the admission had been overlooked. Many Egyptians had a lot of gold, and you will recall that gold quite literally bought power. Voting power. The new Egyptian provinces bought a massive amount of influence in the Imperial Senate, immediately making them the second most powerful regional faction after only Italy, which was forced to purchase additional votes simply to keep their spot as the men who most controlled the purse strings of extra Imperial taxation. There was outrage amongst other parts of the Empire, but none more so than the Greeks of the Empire, who had now suddenly lost their position as the second-most powerful faction and were even now imagining the ongoing Imperial neglect of their cities becoming worse.

They weren’t the only ones outraged by the Emperor’s peaceful integration of Egypt either, not by any means. The Berbers of North Africa had been quite happy to raid into Egypt, where they’d usually been paid to go away. When the Emperor’s decree removing their right to raid arrived, they objected vigorously, sending delegations to Constantinople. Now, this is usually depicted as an unreasonable demand that the Emperor rightly rejected. Which it kind of was, but the primary Berber demand was not actually to continue raiding.

Rather, they wanted tax exemptions on their land and flocks. In exchange they would provide further soldiers for the Imperial army. This deal was reasonable, as much of the cash the Berbers paid to Imperial tax collectors was in the form of gold stolen from their foreign neighbors, particularly Egypt. Without the ability to raid the region the Berber method of gathering the needed coins was being taken away.

Unfortunately, Leo was unwilling to entertain these demands, and so rejected them out of hand. He sent the Berbers home empty-handed, and soon the local leaders were gathering their tribal followers for another revolt. In 1383 they moved, going into revolt, and raiding the Roman countryside. This group, however, went further than the previous localized revolts, instead elevating one of their leaders to the position of King and declaring full independence from the Roman Empire. The local garrisons held them out of the major fortresses, but over the course of the year the revolt swept up much of the Berber population, and by the end of the year they had taken Caesarea, which they renamed Acherber and made into a capital of the new kingdom.

Leo belatedly dispatched an army and swept through the countryside, taking the city in 1385, but he was out of patience with North African revolts, so he simply threw up his hands and offered a compromise. In exchange for the Berber king giving up his throne and accepting Roman overlordship Leo would…give him back his crown as King of the Mauri, and his kingdom would be Mauria. The Romans would withdraw tax collectors and withdraw back to the recently refounded city of Icosium on the African Coast, leaving all land west of that to be administered by the Mauri.

The Romans would also defend Mauria from external attack. In exchange Mauria had to raise a legion of light cavalry and dispatch them to the capital, supplementing this force with five hundred men per year, to serve a term of fifteen years, in the Roman army. These men would be armed and equipped by the king but would be paid by the Emperor. Additionally, the Mauri would swear to leave Roman traders untaxed and defended. Other traders were fair game of course. King Alexios I was thus crowned by Leo in Saint Peter’s Basilica on Christmas Day 1386, turning what had been the provinces of Mauretania into the Kingdom of Mauria. Mauria will remain a Roman client kingdom until it was officially granted independence following the Peace of Melan in 1639, ending the Half-Century War. The subsequent Baetican conquest, and eventual return to independence in 1867 at the conclusion of the Renaissance Wars will not be covered by the main narrative of our history but is covered extensively elsewhere.

Leo’s reason for doing this has long confused casual scholars of Roman history, who mostly look at a map and see Leo giving up quite a bit of territory that would eventually cause all of North Africa to be permanently lost to the Roman state and criticize him for it, usually saying that John wouldn’t have stood for such a surrender of territory. But, as I’ve reviewed the sources and more modern scholarship, Leo had a point. The provinces he gave up were frankly more trouble than they were worth. The Berbers had been a near constant thorn in the side of the Roman state, requiring repeated deployments of troops to put them down, deployments which were very expensive. They were also unpopular with the army, which both hated the weather, but also hated that the possibility of plunder was virtually nonexistent. There were no wealthy cities to capture, nor even particularly wealthy men to ransom. The Berbers were all Roman Christians, so they couldn’t even fudge records and sell prisoners as slaves. This unpopularity meant more money needed to be paid out to deployed troops, making it even more expensive.

Leo thus solved the problem by just giving the Berbers what they wanted, a kingdom of their own, and letting them deal with the administrative headaches. He had his light cavalry force, and didn’t need to worry about whether there would be another revolt the next year.

And on that topic, Leo would face another revolt the next year, but this one much closer to home.

So join us next time as the Greek speakers of Anatolia and Greece proper rise in revolt to try and throw off what they saw as the Italian and Egyptian yoke and restoring the Empire as it had been under the Thalassans. While Leo might have been willing to grant a client kingdom the Berbers he had no such intention of letting the core Imperial territory go.
 
Oh I love it! And so Egypt returns to the Imperial fold... and Greece gets all salty over it. Sorry Greece. The Thalassans are dead and buried, and so is their way of running the Empire. Remember Romanos the Mad.
 
Oh I love it! And so Egypt returns to the Imperial fold... and Greece gets all salty over it. Sorry Greece. The Thalassans are dead and buried, and so is their way of running the Empire. Remember Romanos the Mad.
They do have quite a few legitimate grievances, as will be covered next time. Mostly related to who is bearing a the cost of the Empire vs who’s getting the most benefits and attention.
 
They do have quite a few legitimate grievances, as will be covered next time. Mostly related to who is bearing a the cost of the Empire vs who’s getting the most benefits and attention.
Oooh. Perhaps a little more understandable then. Maybe the Emperor is unwilling to listen...
 
Then a stroke of luck occurred for the Emperor. A foreign king passed through Egypt, King Maghan of the Mandan Empire, far to the south across the desert from Africa. This king was spectacularly wealthy and brought an enormous amount of gold with him on his trip. He was a Christian and wished to visit the holy cities of Jerusalem, Rome, and Constantinople.
A Christian Mansa Musa?
 
Top