More comments? Well, then, that means more responses!
What were the Best Pictures for 1975/76 and 1976/77 then? Jaws, Nashville, or One Flew Over the Cuckoos Nest? Rocky, Network, Taxi Driver, or Bound for Glory? All the President's Men isn't on the list of nominees for those years because it was never made ITTL and Barry Lyndon isn't on there because Stanley Kubrick filmed Napoleon, which used several elements that Kubrick used on Barry Lyndon IOTL. Could a picture that wasn't nominated for the Oscars IOTL fill in the empty spots there ITTL and probably win?
You
will find out the answers to all of these questions, and you'll find out in this cycle!
While Star Wars without Darth Vader is certainly an interesting idea, I wonder if it would have been quite as popular without him: he was clearly a breakout character at the time and this strongly influenced the next two films (as has been pointed out, Vader only has eleven minutes of screentime in the first Star Wars a.k.a. Episode IV).
Darth Vader is a classic example of the
Breakout Character, especially since, as noted,
Tarkin was the main villain in the original film, and was clearly Vader's superior (note the famous scene in which Vader chokes a disbeliever with the Force, only to relent on Tarkin's orders). That's proven... tricky to reconcile with later canon IOTL.
1017 comes from the fact that it was previously a Ranger class or was 1017-B but came in an age when there wasn't a number added or when numbers were reused after a ship with it left serve *convoluted nerd explanations* *grumble* *grumble*
But since you changed it, you've removed my nerd need to explain things away.
Our pleasure, Your Imperial Majesty! Trust us, it's better this way
Good update.
Loved the JTOF, hope JOTFII will be better!
Thank you, Professor! I think it's pretty much inevitable that there
will be a sequel, but
when is a very big question.
IOTL
Star Wars was one of the films to establish the
Evil Brit trope - even Vader was played by
David Prowse, although not voiced by him. Since TTL's version won't be filmed in the UK, and so have mainly American actors on the Death Star, this trope might not be established until later.
As I mentioned before, we're looking at an all-American major cast ITTL. Any non-Americans would be Canadians.
I've lost trace of so many things but pretty certain that TTL there's been no Taxi Driver so that definitely won't get an award. From what I remember being mentioned of TTL I wonder if Napoleon might be one of winners?
Don't feel too bad, Steve; THE OBSERVER has either forgotten or overlooked that I've already said there would be no
Nashville ITTL, either
Now that is going to have interesting, even
intriguing impacts on popular culture. Has he been written out completely or just assumed a minor role?
I would say that his role is perhaps slightly less significant than IOTL, with the *Tarkin analogue correspondingly more prominent.
stevep said:
You mean someone else has noticed I tend to over-use that word. Seems to be a personal habit I've fallen into. At least you guys don't know about the human sacrifices, slave trading and handling of 2nd hand nukes yet.
Trust me, Steve, you are
far from the only person who overuses that word on
this thread!
stevep said:
I think you mean "
Here's lookin' at you, kid"
stevep said:
I agree. Found it very interesting how much of a role she played.
I'm glad you thought so! Perhaps now that He with the Flannel and the Beard no longer owns Lucasfilm, her good name might be properly restored to the history of
Star Wars.
stevep said:
That could be one of the problems. They would seem to be an obvious leader in use of computers for other roles but its possibly that because of the Syzygy role that would be a dumping ground for any people who take an interest in this new tool.
However sooner or later there's bound to be some interaction. Someone moaning about the difficulty of getting a certain shot or effect and a computer nerd pipes up with "why don't you". Especially since a certain WR seems to have a keen eye for new ideas or ways to cut costs.
Maybe, but That Wacky Redhead, however much of a pioneer she may be from a technological perspective, also has an appreciation for what already works - consider how many established cinematic techniques were brought to
I Love Lucy. Granted, these techniques were
applied in creative new ways, but it didn't involve innovation on the sheer
scale that the development of CGI would. Remember, it took over a decade to get from
Tron to
Jurassic Park - and still, that latter film (like many of the early-1990s "computer graphics" blockbusters) had extensive use of practical effects. My point is, it's a
very long-term investment, and until it bears fruit, practical effects will remain far superior.
So, are the Lucases going to sue over Hollywood accounting? Probably won't change much long term in the industry - Peter Jackson's suit against New Line for LOTR profits doesn't seem to have stopped the practice OTL.
I won't elaborate on the particulars of the case at this time, obviously, but I
really appreciate your analytical analysis, Maltaran
. When the time comes, I'll lay the facts before you with regards as to how this parallel situation - which, it should be noted, is taking place
much earlier - might turn out differently (or might
not!).
Napoleon won Best Picture for 1971. Took "A Clockwork Orange's" place ITTL.
More specifically, the film exists instead of
A Clockwork Orange, but the Best Picture of 1971 was
The French Connection IOTL.
Question: how beneficial? IOTL, for the longest time, there were 108 episodes that were deemed "missing" due to the junkings. What's the number ITTL... or is there no number?
Welcome aboard, Clorox! As you can see,
e of pi already answered the question for me, and I couldn't have said it any better myself.
Fire up the cross-time train, Widget!
Welcome aboard, varyar! Now, you
are planning on picking me up on that thing, right?
Great update overall, but what's with the 'Star Wars' reversion in the update with regards to the toy blitz?
It's an 8000 word update, give us one major error--looks like the find-and-replace missed one or two.
Thanks for pointing that out.
I
knew that all of the name-changing would catch up with me eventually
That's a good eye you've got there, Glen; it's a good thing that you're a neurologist
Ooh, I love urban development. I am excited for this update. How long?
I'm glad to hear! Well, the Overview Update has to come first, so... sometime after that
Will this include proposed theme parks
Excellent question! There's only one way to find out!
One additional comment: I've been noticing extensive edits to my TVTropes page in the last few days, and though I don't recognize the username of the troper responsible, I just wanted to express my gratitude in a place where I know that he or she will be reading. It's really great to see that page filling up with examples