Our United Nations
- Thread starter CountofDooku
- Start date
Yeah pretty much that so the cartels doesn't become a huge problem compared to OTL.
Easy as a law, not so easy to enforce overall, just look at Rockefeller...
Council of Europe and crisis in India
In the Crisis of the Dominican Republic Earthquake, the United Nations send all possible help they could, while in the Turkish Strait Crisis the Turks and therefore an ensured International Neutral Strait was backed, not deescalating the situation overall, but for the moment forcing the Soviet Union to back down for now. On September 2nd the new Indian Interim Government of Jawaharlal Nehru as vice president, begins the official transition from the British Raj to full independence for India and Pakistan. Because of differences between Unionists of both new nation states and immensely rivaling local Pakistani Muslims and Indian Hindus violence erupts in the streets of Bombay and later other places, threatening to escalate in local unrest, civil war, or war between both nations. Bulgaria gets rid of King Simeon II after a referendum, forcing him to leave and declare the Bulgarian People's Republic. On behalf of Winston Churchill, a so called Council of Europe is introduced as an idea to uphold democracy, human rights and the rule of law in Europe among the local nation states. In Australia the federal election of 1946 sees the Labor Government re-elected and George II of Greece returns to Athens as King of a constitutional Monarchy. Meanwhile some, especially from the Eastern Block questioned how the massive influence of companies and conglomerations on governments trough financial and other means could be limited, to lower the influence of non-elected, non-people oriented groups and individuals on politicians and elections, giving worst-chase scenarios from corporate nation states and influences from Nazi Germany to Imperial Japan.
Indian and Pakistan violence
A) Send UN forces to keep up the peace and peaceful solutions for the rivalries.
B) Back the Indians.
C) Back the Pakistanis.
D) Remain Neutral
Council of Europe
A) Support it as a peaceful cooperation aid throughout Europe.
B) Give only diplomatic and verbal support.
C) Let the Europeans figure it out themselves.
Cooperation and Company de-monopolizing:
A) Yes it is needed, prevent global, continental regional and even national monopolizing.
B) Oppose at least regional and even national monopolizing, but let global trade be free.
C) Prevent only national monopolizing, but let cooperation's and companies from different nations cooperate and rival one another freely outside of state borders.
D) Trough a neutral International Trade Organization.
A) Send UN forces to keep up the peace and peaceful solutions for the rivalries.
B) Back the Indians.
C) Back the Pakistanis.
D) Remain Neutral
Council of Europe
A) Support it as a peaceful cooperation aid throughout Europe.
B) Give only diplomatic and verbal support.
C) Let the Europeans figure it out themselves.
Cooperation and Company de-monopolizing:
A) Yes it is needed, prevent global, continental regional and even national monopolizing.
B) Oppose at least regional and even national monopolizing, but let global trade be free.
C) Prevent only national monopolizing, but let cooperation's and companies from different nations cooperate and rival one another freely outside of state borders.
D) Trough a neutral International Trade Organization.
Last edited:
A
A
Yes it is needed, but, no, the UN isn't the best place to establish such a system.
Instead I propose:
International Trade Organization - Wikipedia
True especially in America since those corporations will/is using us and the Cold War to get richer along with the oil/gas companies.
Also I'll add my vote now:
A.
A.
D. but without America having complete control cause as I mentioned above...
Sure that would be a good opportunity for cooperation among member nations towards a higher, common goal benefitting all of mankind.
Yup, we should start off with a space station as our first step of colonizing Earth's orbit.
