Our Blood we will give, for glory we only have

Our Blood we will give, for glory we only have

320px-Flag_of_the_United_Kingdom_of_Portugal%2C_Brazil%2C_and_Algarves.svg.png

An Alternate History of Portugal, Brazil, and the World

...

"Here, oh Most Excellent King
Are the sacred vows
That the honoured Lusians
Come freely, come freely proclaim
Come freely proclaim

For thee, for the Fatherland
Our Blood we will give
For Glory we only have
To win or to die
To win or to die
or to die
or to die."

- Hymno Patriótico

ArFWhSl.png

 
180px-Domingos_Sequeira_-_D._João_VI.jpg

Joao, Prince-Regent and later King in his own right

In 1817 a Conspiracy was discovered amongst the ranks of the masons of Portugal, aimed at deposing the Regency of King Joao VI and its perceived British puppet master, William Beresford, the Viscount Beresford. To an observer unaware of the situation the fact that Joao even needed a Regency would be surprising. The King was not too young to rule, nor was he too old, nor was he incapicated my madness, illiness, or wounds. He was in fact quite healthy, and would have been able to rule from Lisbon if he had so chosen.

However he instead held court in Rio de Janeiro, far across the ocean in the Portuguese colony of Brazil, or rather the former colony; it had been raised to the co-equal status of Kingdom in 1815. The very idea of a European monarch visiting a colony, let alone staying, would have been absurd in years gone by, but Napoleon changed that, as he did so many things. The emperor had demanded in 1807 that Portugal enter into his Continental System and place an embargo on the British. Joao, then still acting as Prince-Regent for his mentally ill mother Maria, refused citing the centuries old alliance between the two[1]. Napoleon ordered an invasion. Not fancying the idea of imprisonment or execution Joao, with help from the Royal Navy, loaded up the royal court and set sail for Rio de Janeiro.

Mid-course Joao shifted course and landed with his sons Pedro and Miguel at Salvador, the old capital. Eager to escape the cramped ships the royal family held a great procession into the town, the locals shocked to meet a royal. Joao promulgated the Decree of Opening the Ports to Friendly Nations, ending laws forcing all of Brasil's trade to go through Portugal and instead allow allies of the crown to enter Brazilian ports. This naturally favored great Britain, a fact that would become a sticking point on Lusophone Politics for some time.

A_Chegada_da_Família_de_dom_João_VI_ao_Brasil.jpg

A dramatisiced version of the arrival of Joao

Eventually Joao reached Rio de Janeiro and set up his government in the former Viceregal Palace. From there he remained, even as French forces were expelled from Portugal. Slowly but surely Brazil became less and less like a traditional colony, and more and more like a "proper" country. The transition was not always smooth, corruption skyrocketed, as did the national debt, but the royal family[2] found Rio de Janeiro far more to their liking then they had expected. Estates, titles, and knighthoods were handed out at rates unheard of in living memory, very few were given to those born in Brazil, but the simple facts of the situation meant that those of the white male property owning class rose far further up the food chain then they could previously.

In 1815, aiming to raise his weak bargaining position at the Congress of Vienna, Joao declared his mother Queen of the United Kingdom of Portugal, Brazil, and the Algarves[3], making Brasil co-equal with Portugal. That same year Napoleon's dreams of conquest died for good, yet Joao stayed in Rio de Janeiro. His mother died the next year, leaving him a kingdom he was already ruling. He was acclaimed Joao VI, but still did not return to Lisbon.

Instead he sent trusted agents to Europe, looking for a suitable wife for his son Pedro. There was some difficulty on this front, it was now generally accepted that the Portugese court would remain in Brazil for the foreseeable future and few were willing to send their daughters to a perceived backwater. Eventually a suitable match was found, Maria Leopoldina, daughter of the Austrian Empire. Arriving in 1817 she immediately got on well with her husband, although his persistent affairs could not have made her happy.

400px-William_Carr_Beresford%2C_Viscount_Beresford_by_Sir_William_Beechey.jpg

The hated Viscount Beresford

As the royals sat in Rio de Janeiro, continental Portugal had been won back under the auspices of the British Army of Arthur Wellesley, later the Duke of Wellington. His second in command, William Beresford, had been granted broad powers over the Portugese Army had not departed after the war. Indeed, he remained in charge of the Army, and used his position to favor British interests over those of the Portuguese. He clashed with the Regency established by Joao, and in 1815 sailed to Brazil to clarify what exactly how much power he had. When he returned the next year the people of Portugal were horrified to discover that the answer was: a lot of it. Joao had in fact expanded Beresford's powers, leaving him the most powerful man in Portugal and turning his homeland into a de facto British Protectorate.

This, at last, returns us to the conspiracy unveiled in 1817. A group of Masonic officers in the Portuguese Army, some of whom had originally served Napoleon, were discovered to have formed a secret society Supreme Regenerative Council of Portugal aimed at forcing the return of the king and creating a liberal constitution. However the group was betrayed, and quickly captured and executed. This stoked the fires of resentment against Beresford, whose reputation as a butcher was increasing by the day.

Beresford however felt that his control over Portugal, which was considerable, was not enough and petitioned the King a few years later for more power and resources. It is probable that he considered going to Rio de Janeiro himself to make his request[4], but it seems he was confident enough in his relationship with the king to make his request via an envoy.

This was just as well for Beresford, as in 1820, while his envoys made their case in Brazil, revolution again reared its head in Europe. In January Spanish troops, bound for the bloody wars in Spanish America, mutinied in Cadiz. They declared themselves in favor of the discarded Constitution of 1812 and began to prepare for a March on Madrid. And in Porto, Portugese Liberals took inspiration.

__________

1: Dating to the Treaty of Windsor in 1386
2: Joao's mentally ill mother, him, his 6 daughters and his two surviving sons, Pedro and Miguel. His wife, Carlotta, is brought along as well, but is estranged for her numerous affairs and tendency to plot to get herself power over Spain and Spanish holdings.
3: The Southernmost part of continental Portugal, there for historical reasons and has no autonomy, nor does it expect any.
4: As he did IOTL.
 

Bison

Banned
As a tangentially related question, why is it that it took 300 years for a monarch or royal family member to visit their overseas possession? Why was it, as you say, a taboo?

Timeline starting off very well, I'm excited see where you take it.
 
As a tangentially related question, why is it that it took 300 years for a monarch or royal family member to visit their overseas possession? Why was it, as you say, a taboo?

Timeline starting off very well, I'm excited see where you take it.

During the American Revolution the future William IV was stationed in New York for a bit, although few expected him to be King at that point.

In general the colonies were backwaters, fit only to provide labor and resources to support the motherland. Visiting would be like visiting a slum, and in an era of absolutism the King being months away decapitated the leadership. Also an Atlantic crossing wasn't fun, even if you're a royal.

Thanks for the praise
 
A interesting premise (especially because involves my country!). Until now you are basically telling what happened IOTL, so i want to see when the butterflies began.
 
Marechal_Beresford-Coudelaria_de_Alter_%28Pt.%29.jpg

Beresford on Horseback

One could be forgiven for thinking that a liberal revolt in Portugal would begin in Lisbon. After all it had lost its status as capital to Rio de Janeiro and, being the seat of regency, bore the brunt of William Beresford's unwelcome presence. And indeed the city itself was primed and ready to resist. However Beresford's personal presence meant that conspiracies were much more difficult to organize in Lisbon, meaning that, at least in 1820, the primary uprising occured in Porto.

Revolutionary sentiment had been building in Porto for some time by 1820. Porto had been hit hard by Beresford's favoritism towards British interests, leaving her merchants out competed by ships from London and Liverpool. Porto had also suffered from Joao's opening of Brazil to non-Portugesse trade, the end of the colonial pact. As such the city was open to a revolt. It was not, as both opponents and later admirers would try and portray it, republican in sentiment. The conspirators behind the Porto Junta, as the rebellion would eventually be called, primarily sought a constitutional form of government with a Cortes ruling beside the King. In addition they saught the return of the Court to Lisbon and a restoration of Brazil to her "proper" colonial status.

These to final two goals of the Portuguese Liberals killed any hope of collaboration in the long term with those in Brazil. Although the arrival of the Court to Brazil had brought benefits to Brazil, not everyone was satisfied. Some resented the continued disproportionate power of Portugesse born officials, others were slaves who, understandably, desired freedom, still others saught constitutional government in the same vein as the Portugesse Liberals, only they wanted the Cortes to sit in Rio de Janeiro instead of Lisbon. In 1817 a group of such men had launched a revolt in the north, with the aim of establishing a truly Brazillian republic. Needless to say this failed utterly, but it does demonstrate that Brazil was not lockstep behind the absolutist views of Joao VI.

157px-Manuel_Fernandes_Tomás%2C_Manuel_Borges_Carneiro%2C_e_Joaquim_António_de_Aguiar_%281926%29_-_Columbano_Bordalo_Pinheiro_%28Palácio_de_São_Bento%29.png

The revolutionaries found themselves isolated and without rural support

5th Dimensionalists[1] may speculate on what might have happened if the various liberals in the United Kingdom had managed to unite behind a common platform. But our narrative does not turn in this fashion and instead the liberals of Brazil stood firmly separate from those of Portugal.

William Beresford had long suspected that Porto would cause him trouble, and so he little trouble being convinced when word came of a plot against him in the city. Combined with his ongoing awareness of how events in Spain were spiraling out of control this caused him to begin preparations of loyal troops to quash any uprising. This naturally led to the conspirators panicking about being discovered and a few jumpy soldiers involved mutnieyed faster then expected, forcing the rest of the liberals to move the date forward. On August 10, 1820[2] Porto was seized by a coalition of disatisifed bugeouises, who proclaimed the Provisional Committee of the Supreme Government of the King, the titutuler Junta of the Porto Junta. The Junta expected, not entirely unreasonably, to receive support from across the country[3]. Unfortunately for them, by the time the rest of tbe country had heard of the rebellion in the north Beresford was marching at the head of a royalist force to retake Porto. He was not so foolish as to leave other areas of unrest unguarded and indeed was successful in capturing many liberal leaders. As for the rural peasantry, there was indeed significant opposition to a Briton marching on Porto, but they had no love lost for the liberals especially as rumors spread that they were in fact French Republicans. So, as Beresford approached Porto on the 19th, the Porto Junta found themselves not a national group of revolutionaries, but a local group of rabble rousers holed up in their own city.

Despite this, the Junta perhaps had reason to hope. Beresford had cast his lot in favor of a direct attack on Porto, which could come back to bite him. If his assault was repulsed, other cities might rise as well, spreading his forces thin. The Junta also had the theoretical advantage of geography. Between Porto and Beresford flowed the Rio Bouro, a barrier against the advancing army. The sailors of Porto were sympathetic to the Junta's complaints and seized the ships and boats in the town, including British vessels for fear of then allying with their countrymen. Such action would probably have provoked an international incident, had it not been for subsequent events.

Bereford.jpg

The Battle of the Rio Bouro

With a navel action out of the cards Beresford was forced to look towards the bridges into Porto as a possible route in. Plans were put in place to blow the bridges to kingdom come, yet plans were also made to keep the bridges and defeat Beresford on the south bank. The Junta was divided on what to do. A decisive victory could inspire rebellion elsewhere, and some reasoned that eventually Berseford would just summon the Royal Navy (either British of Portuguese) and so total control over the river was needed. Others argued that the benefits of the barrier the river formed were too great to be surrendered and believed that simply delaying Berseford would inspire others to form Juntas. In the end this infighting only ruined the Junta's chances, a small force sent south was easily swept aside by Berseford and, crucially, he managed to seize a bridge before the gunpowder meant to destroy it could be lit. This was the killing blow, as loyalist troops poured across the bridge, and Junta forces were caught off guard. Fighting lasted a few days, with a few desperate soldiers who faced execution for desertion holding out in a church until the end of the month, but by and large the rebellion was crushed by August 24th.

Naturally when word of the rebellions defeat reached Rio de Janeiro Joao confirmed all of Beresford's requests, leaving him de fact regent of Portugal. The raised some eyebrows among the Brazillian liberals who distrusted foreigners meddling in the royal government, but for now they accepted the settlement, glad that Brazil remained the seat of power.

The Junta conspirators were either captured and executed, captured and imprisoned (by far the most numerous group), or fled. This latter group typically fled to liberal areas in Spain. The Spanish liberals were not eager to anger their neighbors in the midst of their own crisises, but at the same time were unwilling to condemn fellow revolutionaries to the arbitrary hand of Beresford. So the Portuguese exiles milled about awkwardly, hoping for an opportunity to strike. This ironically turned some of the apolitical populace of Portugal against them, as instead of becoming martyred they were perceived as puppets of Spain, the arch-enemy of Portugal.

And so it was that the absolutists held their ground against the Portuguese liberals. They would find the Brazilian ones a much more formidable opponent.

__________

1: Alternate Historians
2: 2 weeks earlier then OTL
3: As they did OTL, in the absence of Beresford
 
Looking good so far. Just a little nitpick the river is called Douro not Bouro as I am sure my northern friends would say. Keep it up, although I hope Beresford is eventually swept aside.
 
Very cool idea! I've long wanted to read a TL that has the United Kingdom of Portugal, Brazil and the Algarves survive, so this looks very promising to me. Minor nitpick; the map on the first post is upside down.

As a tangentially related question, why is it that it took 300 years for a monarch or royal family member to visit their overseas possession? Why was it, as you say, a taboo?

Timeline starting off very well, I'm excited see where you take it.

Why would they want to do so? I mean transatlantic voyages were dangerous, the colonies comparable backwaters to the homeland and furthermore the people there were colonials, not full citizens. Of course this is more the POV of a Royal or aristocrat of the era, but basically sums up what the ruling class would think of the idea.
 

Bison

Banned
Very cool idea! I've long wanted to read a TL that has the United Kingdom of Portugal, Brazil and the Algarves survive, so this looks very promising to me. Minor nitpick; the map on the first post is upside down.



Why would they want to do so? I mean transatlantic voyages were dangerous, the colonies comparable backwaters to the homeland and furthermore the people there were colonials, not full citizens. Of course this is more the POV of a Royal or aristocrat of the era, but basically sums up what the ruling class would think of the idea.

But take the Spanish or Portuguese for example - the discovery of the New World was the greatest windfall ever to befall a nation-state. They increased the size of their realm, what, tenfold? Their income was dominated by American gold and silver mines - surely it is smart to project royal authority there in a more direct and personal manner.
 
But take the Spanish or Portuguese for example - the discovery of the New World was the greatest windfall ever to befall a nation-state. They increased the size of their realm, what, tenfold? Their income was dominated by American gold and silver mines - surely it is smart to project royal authority there in a more direct and personal manner.

Not to a 16th, 17th and 18th century mind it wasn't. That's what they had Viceroys for. I'm not saying your wrong, its just that such a journey to most would be a great risk with little reward.
 
Marechal_Beresford-Coudelaria_de_Alter_%28Pt.%29.jpg

Beresford on Horseback

One could be forgiven for thinking that a liberal revolt in Portugal would begin in Lisbon. After all it had lost its status as capital to Rio de Janeiro and, being the seat of regency, bore the brunt of William Beresford's unwelcome presence. And indeed the city itself was primed and ready to resist. However Beresford's personal presence meant that conspiracies were much more difficult to organize in Lisbon, meaning that, at least in 1820, the primary uprising occured in Porto.

Revolutionary sentiment had been building in Porto for some time by 1820. Porto had been hit hard by Beresford's favoritism towards British interests, leaving her merchants out competed by ships from London and Liverpool. Porto had also suffered from Joao's opening of Brazil to non-Portugesse trade, the end of the colonial pact. As such the city was open to a revolt. It was not, as both opponents and later admirers would try and portray it, republican in sentiment. The conspirators behind the Porto Junta, as the rebellion would eventually be called, primarily sought a constitutional form of government with a Cortes ruling beside the King. In addition they saught the return of the Court to Lisbon and a restoration of Brazil to her "proper" colonial status.

These to final two goals of the Portuguese Liberals killed any hope of collaboration in the long term with those in Brazil. Although the arrival of the Court to Brazil had brought benefits to Brazil, not everyone was satisfied. Some resented the continued disproportionate power of Portugesse born officials, others were slaves who, understandably, desired freedom, still others saught constitutional government in the same vein as the Portugesse Liberals, only they wanted the Cortes to sit in Rio de Janeiro instead of Lisbon. In 1817 a group of such men had launched a revolt in the north, with the aim of establishing a truly Brazillian republic. Needless to say this failed utterly, but it does demonstrate that Brazil was not lockstep behind the absolutist views of Joao VI.

157px-Manuel_Fernandes_Tomás%2C_Manuel_Borges_Carneiro%2C_e_Joaquim_António_de_Aguiar_%281926%29_-_Columbano_Bordalo_Pinheiro_%28Palácio_de_São_Bento%29.png

The revolutionaries found themselves isolated and without rural support

5th Dimensionalists[1] may speculate on what might have happened if the various liberals in the United Kingdom had managed to unite behind a common platform. But our narrative does not turn in this fashion and instead the liberals of Brazil stood firmly separate from those of Portugal.

William Beresford had long suspected that Porto would cause him trouble, and so he little trouble being convinced when word came of a plot against him in the city. Combined with his ongoing awareness of how events in Spain were spiraling out of control this caused him to begin preparations of loyal troops to quash any uprising. This naturally led to the conspirators panicking about being discovered and a few jumpy soldiers involved mutnieyed faster then expected, forcing the rest of the liberals to move the date forward. On August 10, 1820[2] Porto was seized by a coalition of disatisifed bugeouises, who proclaimed the Provisional Committee of the Supreme Government of the King, the titutuler Junta of the Porto Junta. The Junta expected, not entirely unreasonably, to receive support from across the country[3]. Unfortunately for them, by the time the rest of tbe country had heard of the rebellion in the north Beresford was marching at the head of a royalist force to retake Porto. He was not so foolish as to leave other areas of unrest unguarded and indeed was successful in capturing many liberal leaders. As for the rural peasantry, there was indeed significant opposition to a Briton marching on Porto, but they had no love lost for the liberals especially as rumors spread that they were in fact French Republicans. So, as Beresford approached Porto on the 19th, the Porto Junta found themselves not a national group of revolutionaries, but a local group of rabble rousers holed up in their own city.

Despite this, the Junta perhaps had reason to hope. Beresford had cast his lot in favor of a direct attack on Porto, which could come back to bite him. If his assault was repulsed, other cities might rise as well, spreading his forces thin. The Junta also had the theoretical advantage of geography. Between Porto and Beresford flowed the Rio Bouro, a barrier against the advancing army. The sailors of Porto were sympathetic to the Junta's complaints and seized the ships and boats in the town, including British vessels for fear of then allying with their countrymen. Such action would probably have provoked an international incident, had it not been for subsequent events.

Bereford.jpg

The Battle of the Rio Bouro

With a navel action out of the cards Beresford was forced to look towards the bridges into Porto as a possible route in. Plans were put in place to blow the bridges to kingdom come, yet plans were also made to keep the bridges and defeat Beresford on the south bank. The Junta was divided on what to do. A decisive victory could inspire rebellion elsewhere, and some reasoned that eventually Berseford would just summon the Royal Navy (either British of Portuguese) and so total control over the river was needed. Others argued that the benefits of the barrier the river formed were too great to be surrendered and believed that simply delaying Berseford would inspire others to form Juntas. In the end this infighting only ruined the Junta's chances, a small force sent south was easily swept aside by Berseford and, crucially, he managed to seize a bridge before the gunpowder meant to destroy it could be lit. This was the killing blow, as loyalist troops poured across the bridge, and Junta forces were caught off guard. Fighting lasted a few days, with a few desperate soldiers who faced execution for desertion holding out in a church until the end of the month, but by and large the rebellion was crushed by August 24th.

Naturally when word of the rebellions defeat reached Rio de Janeiro Joao confirmed all of Beresford's requests, leaving him de fact regent of Portugal. The raised some eyebrows among the Brazillian liberals who distrusted foreigners meddling in the royal government, but for now they accepted the settlement, glad that Brazil remained the seat of power.

The Junta conspirators were either captured and executed, captured and imprisoned (by far the most numerous group), or fled. This latter group typically fled to liberal areas in Spain. The Spanish liberals were not eager to anger their neighbors in the midst of their own crisises, but at the same time were unwilling to condemn fellow revolutionaries to the arbitrary hand of Beresford. So the Portuguese exiles milled about awkwardly, hoping for an opportunity to strike. This ironically turned some of the apolitical populace of Portugal against them, as instead of becoming martyred they were perceived as puppets of Spain, the arch-enemy of Portugal.

And so it was that the absolutists held their ground against the Portuguese liberals. They would find the Brazilian ones a much more formidable opponent.

__________

1: Alternate Historians
2: 2 weeks earlier then OTL
3: As they did OTL, in the absence of Beresford

Waiting for the next (if this series continues).
 
Top