I think I will change Philippines back to a republic it wasn't invaded by Japanese but became an ally after independence like Thailand. The military dictatorship ran by the army prevented the navy from having enough sway to expand the war into taking British or American holdings which would have easily crushed Japan in this timeline. For all the islands there probably are some errors I made there, but the general idea is the Japanese just took the Spratley islands and others. Midway, Guam, Hawaii and Samoa should all be American still I got a lil too hasty. But the general idea is yes most of the Pacific islands are Japanese and they are directly administered from Tokyo as it allows them greater defensive ability against the British or Americans as well as puts them close enough to their allies to make sure they stay in the Japanese sphere.At what point in history did the Philippines fall under the sway of the Japanese? I cannot really think of when there would be someone suitable for a setting up a Kingdom, with a Republic likely being just as easily swayable by the Japanese, due to business and military interests being able to threaten or bribe members of the cabinet or legislature. Or just be seen as supporting them, such as for claiming Sabah for the Philippines, even if it was based on the old claims of a Sultan. I am assuming that the Philippines used to be American here? As the post talked about invading American holdings, and I cannot see them having any outside of Hawaii (or the South Pacific) if they did not get the Philippines. Though I guess that would make having ports in China even more important, which they did not get IOTL (partially because they didn’t want official treaty ports, and partially because the Japanese prevented the Chinese from giving them one.). I see Midway has the same light shade of yellow as Imperial China, the Philippines, and Thailand. That an oversight or just meant to be with the Philippines since there was no war with the Americans? Are Hainan or the Spratley islands meant to be a part of Annam or the Japanese metropole?
Also curious about Burma. It have the same situation as Thailand in the modern day, with a Bhuddist monarch in top as a a symbol, while the Army runs everything? Presumably while also smashing any democrats, socialists, Muslims, Christians, minorities, like Myanmar currently does. Or did the British set up the Kingdom? My interest is partially because I noticed the Andaman and Nicobar Islands colored Burmese blue, though without being attached to their IOTL islands. They invaded and annexed them? Or did they just put them under a very long term occupation that nobody expects to ever actually end? I imagine the Royal Navy still wants at least the use there, though perhaps they are less needed for shipping or refueling at that point. Looking back at Thailand, I see they have not gained any land. Given them parts of Laos and Cambodia they had during WWII might be considered alright with the Cambodians and Vietnamese here, given how they are both under more Japanese control as well as how Annam got the rest of Laos, while Cambodia got Cochinchina. Also, any reason no Kazakh border is shown? I look forward to seeing what you end up doing with the Middle East and other regions.
Kingdom of Burma is a constitutional monarchy, and figurehead monarch. But there isn't a military dictatorship atm. Elections are somewhat free. The government was partially inspired by the ottoman government which saw great success after it partially federalized and gave local rule to their ethnic minorities while also keeping most of the power concentrated within the Turks. The reason for a monarchy rather than a republic is simply because in this world monarchies seem to be much more stable than republics. In world the three most powerful countries are seen as Germany, the UK and Japan. The only successful Republican country is really the US. Most of the rest are falling or have fallen to communism or in the case of France, seen as weak and more as a puppet of the UK than a great power in her own right.
As for the middle east check out my older maps I've posted an African and a Middle east map around 1940 ittl. But the general gist of the middle east is it's dominated by the Ottomans who are a liberal federal constitutional monarchy. Iran which is even further under the British boot trying to keep their precious oil away from the Turkish Petroleum company. Right now I also made a worlda for 1962 and I'm making a few different maps that show alliances, GDP, governments etc. that will be posted once I finish them.
Last edited: