Case in point. There was an entire civil war over how at odds the concepts were.Antebellum USA.
Wow! These awful eugenicists are, in my eyes, one of the most horrifying settings posted in the map thread in a good while. It really speaks to the horror of the setting that the eugenics is seen as outright good, but the restriction on how many children can have plus the polygamy are considered necessary evils by the Angevines.Yes, they're humans from this Earth. They rose from Mocambique since its much easier to take over that than Germany or somewhere mode developed. And uhhhh, depends. They do use eugenics and genemodding to ensure the citizens are 'pure', and they also do work natives to death (on the first map, notice the disctinction between "citizen" and "inhabitant"). Otherwise, they're pretty egalitarian, somehow, given the main ruler is a woman. (in lore no one knows whether she's the clone or the original person who got cloned).
As for comparison with the Draka, well. I did take the Draka as inspiration, but they aren't really that alike. While the Angevines do commit crimes against humanity, they're temporary until they find a way to modify the genes of every guy into a true citizen. Thats why education is the same for both the slave in the weapons factory, and the CEO of whatever state-run conglomerate is allowed to exist.
On the darker side of things, each man has 3 wives and each wife has a 2-babies quota. Luckly for them, they can put the kids up for adoption/hand them over to state-run "orphanages", where they are given conditions that'd make a millionnaire today blush. And after the kids are born the girls can then resume whatever it is that they did/wanted to do. This is to ensure population growth once every 20 years or so.
Brilliant map! If I may interject: the Starks doesn't need to gain legitimacy and restoring the Boltons may be a way to lose it, not gain it. Sansa was an important and respected leader of the North during the Second Long Night, Roose Bolton was a damn traitor and Ramsay was one of the most monstrous men the North ever saw. Giving the Dreadfort to House Thenn would make more sense. For the Beyond, Jon never actually claimed the name of Stark or Targaryen, picking a new fancy House name when exiled among the Free Folk seems a bit out of character. Why would the wildlings follow a Lord? He may be the King beyond the Wall, and his sons could be important figures in the Beyond if you say the Free Folk start to confederate, but noble-household type of relations seems a bit not free-folksy. Maybe if he have a lot of progeny some of them could find the right group of loyal people and try something like that? Maybe instead of picking one of the names you pitched you could have multiple Jon Snow's descendants trying something like that and picking those various names for each.Working on something Game of Thrones/ASOIAF related. Using a basemap by @targy793, who may not be on the site anymore. The basis is a fusion of Show and Book, taking many things from book lore but arriving at a similar ending as seen in the show. This is a map that will feature the Kingdom of the North present at the end of the show. Given that 7 is a holy number (so much so that when Dorne joined as an 8th kingdom, it was still called the Seven Kingdoms) rather than call it the 6 Kingdoms, they simply formally count Dorne as the 7th Kingdom to offset the loss of the North and help build an identity that accepts Northern independence.
As I couldn't fit every house on here, and Westeros has a very vague hierarchy of houses, I opted for a "dominant House" system, based in lands a vassal House directly controls and lands of other Houses who defer to them (though all are pledged to House Stark).
As for what's going in the "The Beyond" (the new name for the Land of Always Winter now that it's... well not always winter anymore), I'm torn on which sigil to use to represent the children of Jon Snow, who I have dominating the still confederated clans of the Free Folk. As the only Westerosi nobility amongst them, they not only have their father's willpower and strength, but maintain connections to those in the 'South' who supported Jon Snow as a ruler (despite his own wishes)... I'm torn between a Blackfyre style inversion of the Stark sigil with a red eye for Ghost, or a Targaryen inspired sigil with a Ghost-inspired colorscheme, as I feel they would not be so hesitant to call themselves Targaryens since Daenerys is still a positive figure amongst the Freefolk.
Said informal 'House' still needs a name though, and beyond puns like House Whitefang and House Targstark, the best I've got right now is House Whitefyre, House Freestark, House Whitewolf, or House Freedragon.
I might be cutting the restored House Bolton (whose sigil I made by fusing show and book) with the idea that rather than let House Karstark and House Thenn contest Karhold, House Thenn is granted rule of the Dreadfort. It's an idea but honestly I'm just not sure who would replace House Bolton beyond House Thenn. The current restored House Bolton idea is to have it led by "Theon Bolton", the son of Jeyne Poole and (possibly) Ramsay Bolton, who seeks to restore the House's honor. My way of making show and book reconcile in regards to who marries Ramsay is that Ramsay marries Jeyne, but discovers who she is in this timeline, before marrying Sansa in a deal with Littlefinger. Sansa pleads for Jeyne to be spared, only resulting in her being tortured, before both Jeyne and Sansa are rescued by Theon.
Assuming Jeyne is pregnant, there is a chance the baby is that of a Bolton soldier or of Ramsay, but for the purposes of bringing the remaining Bolton vassals and the smallfolk of the region into the fold, Queen Sansa gives the Dreadfort to Jeyne and House Poole with the notion that her son will be a Bolton and heir to the lands, to help bring more legitimacy to Sansa's reign. Buuuuut... Jeyne aborting her pregnancy makes sense given what she dealt with, so maybe just give it to House Thenn or Cassel. I'm thinking about it.
View attachment 632383
Well firstly the Boltons weren’t entirely without allies, and they had plenty of men. And the Boltons are one of the North’s oldest houses. The smallfolk respect such traditions, and Sansa can’t just kill every Bolton loyalist. The idea is that she originally gave it to House Poole, but Jeyne discovers she is pregnant, and in this proposal does not abort it, but instead gives birth and names the boy Theon. Some argue that he is a Bolton, but is effectively a Poole in upbringing and matrilineal line. He could stay Theon Poole, but given some people still remember the kind, charismatic, music-playing totally-not-a-Rhaegar-analogy that was Domeric Bolton, there is a chance to redeem the Bolton name and appease the traditionalist Sansa is sure to upset. I might keep him Theon Poole though.Brilliant map! If I may interject: the Starks doesn't need to gain legitimacy and restoring the Boltons may be a way to lose it, not gain it. Sansa was an important and respected leader of the North during the Second Long Night, Roose Bolton was a damn traitor and Ramsay was one of the most monstrous men the North ever saw. Giving the Dreadfort to House Thenn would make more sense. For the Beyond, Jon never actually claimed the name of Stark or Targaryen, picking a new fancy House name when exiled among the Free Folk seems a bit out of character. Why would the wildlings follow a Lord? He may be the King beyond the Wall, and his sons could be important figures in the Beyond if you say the Free Folk start to confederate, but noble-household type of relations seems a bit not free-folksy. Maybe if he have a lot of progeny some of them could find the right group of loyal people and try something like that? Maybe instead of picking one of the names you pitched you could have multiple Jon Snow's descendants trying something like that and picking those various names for each.
Well the Bolton's didn't have a lot of allies..Being an old House doesn't have anything with destroying a House and the small folk, could care less who rules them.. They care more for being left alone,than any Lord ruling over them. I don't see how feasible it is having House Bolton considering the crimes and infamy associated with that House..Well firstly the Boltons weren’t entirely without allies, and they had plenty of men. And the Boltons are one of the North’s oldest houses. The smallfolk respect such traditions, and Sansa can’t just kill every Bolton loyalist
This scenario is so cool! I wonder what might happen with language, given Dutch and English are so closely related. Maybe a unique "Amerikaans" creole language might emerge from the linguistic border zone? Is Dutch-English bilingualism very widespread? Or only in certain parts of the country?Courtesy of u/jjpamsterdam from Reddit, a series of maps depicting the Confederation of American States (Confederatie van Amerikaanse Staaten): an American union formed between a Dutch-speaking north and an English-speaking south. More than a dozen maps and graphics have been made for this series; don't want to clutter the thread too much, though, so I've picked out four of the best maps. The rest are listed below, with both thread and direct image links.
- Alternate North American Independence: A Multilingual Confederation of American States (1792) - Map
- Languages and Ethnic Background (1792) - Map
- Flag Ideas - Flags: 1 / 2 / 3 / 4
- Alternate War of 1812 - Political Map / War Map
- Territorial Development (1854) - Map
- Railroads and Population (1860) - Map / Population & Flags
- European Languages Spoken (1860) - Map
- Civil War (1861) - Maps & Writeup: 1 / 2 / 3
- Civil War (1862-1863) - Maps & Writeup: 1 / 2 / 3
- Map of New Netherland (Contemporary - Google Maps style) - Map
The First Anglo-Dutch War happens, just as OTL. After the end of the war the Self-Government in New Netherland, that was repealed at the start of this war, is re-established in 1654.
The British nations fall into civil unrest following Oliver Cromwell’s death in 1658 as his son Richard is not competent enough to retain the power of the Lord Protector. Charles II doesn’t return to England in 1660.
Due to internal unrest in the British nations, the Second Anglo-Dutch War is more decisive. The Treaty of Breda looks a bit different and readjusts several colonial borders. This includes readjustments to the colonial borders in North America, setting the border at the Versche Rivier (Connecticut River), establishing the small colony of Connetikock with mixed English, Dutch and French settlers already present. The Dutch obviously hold on to New Netherlands and also gain recognition for their rule over the territory of New Sweden (Nieuw-Zweden). With a significant Lutheran Swedish (and Finnish) population there, the New Netherland administration decides to set up a separate colonial administration there, allowing for local autonomy, although the language of administration remains Dutch in both of these colonies.
The unrest in the British nations only ends after William of Orange becomes King of England, Ireland and Scotland in 1689. Mary II doesn’t die from Smallpox in 1694. Instead of several miscarriages William and Mary have several children. The Dutch and British remain politically aligned for the next century.
The French and Indian War still takes place, but this time pits the French against a joint Anglo-Dutch front in North America. Just as OTL, the superior navy cuts off the French from effectively reinforcing their troops in North America. Eventually the Anglo-Dutch alliance occupies New France. The territories south of the Ottawa river is handed over to the Dutch, the area north and east of that river is handed over to the British. The British create the new (mostly French-speaking) colony of Quebec. The Dutch set up a new colony of Merenland (“Land of Lakes”) in what is known as Southern Ontario OTL. The boundary between British and Dutch zones of influence further west is defined as the Ohio river, although neither side of the river is densely populated (by Europeans) at this point in time.
In the years following the French and Indian War, the British and Dutch governments want to share the cost burden with the American colonies, leading to growing unrest there. Much like OTL, the colonies are declared in rebellion and troops are dispatched to restore order. This takes place in both the British and Dutch colonies, although with different levels of intensity. The British colonial forces manage to hold on to most of the areas in New England and Quebec, but lose power over the southern colonies. The Dutch also lose control over most of their holdings in North America. By the early 1790s and due to the French Revolutionary Wars the British and Dutch can’t afford to continue the conflict in North America. The colonies of New Netherland, Connetikock, New Sweden, Merenland, Chesapeake (Virginia, plus what’s left of Maryland), North Carolina , South Carolina and Georgia are recognised as independent. Resistance to British rule continues in New England, but many supporters of independence start moving into the newly independent states to the south and west.
The Continental Coordination Council, which had previously led the war effort against the colonial powers, comes together in 1792 to agree on the Articles of Confederation, forming the Confederation of American States (Confederatie van Amerikaanse Staaten). The individual states retain internal autonomy, especially in terms of language (English or Dutch), their religious policy (Puritan, Reformed, Lutheran, etc.) and the economic model (pre-industrial or plantation-based). The area to the west is subject to overlapping claims from different states but is in practice largely administered as territory. Areas north of the Ohio river generally have Dutch-speaking administrations, whereas territories further south are English-speaking.
In a different version of the War of 1812, the Confederation of American States fights the British for control over North America. The British believe this to be a minor theatre of the Napoleonic Wars. The Americans see it as the first time to truly assert their new sovereignty. The official casus belli is the impressment of New Englanders into British military service, despite the previous peace treaty granting them an exemption from this duty to the crown. The significant number of New Englander exiles living in the Confederation are also a factor, pushing their new home states for a liberation of the provinces that also rebelled against colonial rule but ultimately were retained by the British.
The war is quite similar to OTL, as the British simply lack the numbers in North America and have to rely heavily on Native American allies. On the flipside, the American militia forces are disorganised and can hardly sustain much of an offensive operation. Contrary to what New England exiles want to make, the American government believe the independence movement from Massachusetts to Maine is much weaker than in the late 18th century. Many New Englanders strongly opposed to the crown have already moved south and west. The reminder of the population is largely apolitical, with independentists not numerous enough for a major uprising. Additionally, the mostly Catholic Frenchmen in Quebec are also not too keen to become part of the strongly Protestant Confederation.
In the end, the war ends with a draw and no border changes. Both sides can claim symbolic victories. The British manage to seriously threaten the capital of the Confederation in Christina. The Americans can claim a major victory in the newly-acquired Louisiana towards the very end of the war. The main losers of the conflict are the Native Americans, whom Britain no longer regards as worthwhile allies, instead focusing their efforts on empire-building in other regions of the world.
In the years before and during the war, several new states were formed and admitted to the Confederation. This follows a decision by the Council of the Confederation to rescind all existing States’ claims on territories further west and allow emerging States there to apply for membership. The balance between English- and Dutch-speaking states as well as (some time later) between industrial- and plantation-based economies in these new states will lead to further conflict. For now, all new western States north of the Ohio river are Dutch-speaking and all States south of it are English-speaking.
Louisiana, the southernmost portion of the territory acquired from France, is also admitted with French being the official language there, but English becoming more prominent in practice with southern settlers moving in. For now it remains the Confederation's only officially French-speaking state.
Admitting Vermont - a state with a mixed population and many French and Dutch speakers in an officially English-speaking state - was solved by compromise. Vermont never formally decided on an official language. In practice this means that English, French and Dutch are used to different degrees throughout the State for now.
The language map illustrates the spread of European languages in the CAS, as of 1860. As in OTL, the issue of slavery is leading to a showdown between the Southern states, which rely on plantation-based economies, and the more industrialised North. The majority of immigration, mainly German, Polish and Irish at this point, went into the north and passed through Nieuw Amsterdam. This is reflected in the more “spotty” Dutch in the northern states, compared to the solid blue in the south. German immigrants in particular have an easy time picking up the new language, though, as it’s quite close to what they natively speak.
There has been some migration towards the western coast, mainly starting in western Mizoeri and following a few semi-established trails. The two new western states of Schuyler and Washington (located in OTL California) are a last-ditch effort to find a compromise in the slavery issue by extending the Ohio Line all the way to the Pacific, finally admitting Washington as a slave state and Schuyler as a free state in 1858. After being admitted as a state, the House and Senate of Washington immediately set forth to abolish slavery there, as the majority of voters there are opposed to the institution, despite there being very few slaves in the state at this point. They succeed in 1859, amending Washington’s constitution and leading to ever-worsening tension between free and slave states.
In this timeline, the additional issue of language adds to the difference in culture between the states. Although the division is not as clear, with English-speaking abolitionists in Vermont or Washington and Dutch-speaking proponents of slavery in Mizoeri or (parts of) Texas, the line can generally also be drawn according to the language.
I’d say, based on actual medieval Europe, that peasants weren’t nearly so apathetic. They aggrandized and deified their lords, especially in times of plenty, and could be leery of “foreign” lords who have no knowledge of the people there. The name does a lot, especially in Westerosi society, which is highly fixated on bloodties.Well the Bolton's didn't have a lot of allies..Being an old House doesn't have anything with destroying a House and the small folk, could care less who rules them.. They care more for being left alone,than any Lord ruling over them. I don't see how feasible it is having House Bolton considering the crimes and infamy associated with that House..
One thing you can consider, if you haven't already, that apparently in the North it was customary for usurpers of a chiefdom or lordship to take the old family name. Apparently the Starks in the novels isn't the same family as the original Starks, though they may well descend from them in a female line. Could be the same for Boltons, and all the others.I’d say, based on actual medieval Europe, that peasants weren’t nearly so apathetic. They aggrandized and deified their lords, especially in times of plenty, and could be leery of “foreign” lords who have no knowledge of the people there. The name does a lot, especially in Westerosi society, which is highly fixated on bloodties.
House Bolton’s crimes aren’t nearly as bad as the Freys. The Boltons were traitors, but so were the Karstarks technically, and every other House in rebellion. Meanwhile, the Freys were the ones who actually broke guest right. Additionally House Bolton is seemingly very small as Roose has no mentioned cousins or living siblings. Roose and Ramsay committed crimes, but they were the two remaining members of the House. House Targaryen certainly did worse when you look Aerys, and people still supported Daenerys and even Viserys. Tywin Lannister murdered two entire Houses for rebelling, drowning one in their crypt, and yet he’s still respect and House Lannister would never been judged as a whole for his actions.
Well I’ll think on it given everyone’s feedback. I might have an idea or two for improving it all.
I was thrown by the name at first, but I have to say that (speaking as someone of Jewish descent myself) giving more prominence to Jewish organized crime is actually a pretty neat idea.Welcome to Cuba.
Westeros is not actual Medieval Europe. If you have read the books then you know a House's reputation is judged on the actions of it's members.. Tywin is not respected, he is feared those are different things and we see how his way of doing things led to his death.. Remind me again, which Westerosi Lord supported Dany and Viserys? The Bolton's crimes are much worse than the Freys, the Freys aren't the only one's to break guest right, something people are not quick to forget, Ramsay forcefully married and starved the Lady Hornwood, he hunted girls for sports in the Bolton lands, I don't see how the smallfolk would diefy and worship someone that regularly hunted their children for sport, we know of how Ramsay was conceived. If Roose and Ramsay are dead, House Bolton is finished, a hypothetical child would be better off not bearing that name..I’d say, based on actual medieval Europe, that peasants weren’t nearly so apathetic. They aggrandized and deified their lords, especially in times of plenty, and could be leery of “foreign” lords who have no knowledge of the people there. The name does a lot, especially in Westerosi society, which is highly fixated on bloodties.
House Bolton’s crimes aren’t nearly as bad as the Freys. The Boltons were traitors, but so were the Karstarks technically, and every other House in rebellion. Meanwhile, the Freys were the ones who actually broke guest right. Additionally House Bolton is seemingly very small as Roose has no mentioned cousins or living siblings. Roose and Ramsay committed crimes, but they were the two remaining members of the House. House Targaryen certainly did worse when you look Aerys, and people still supported Daenerys and even Viserys. Tywin Lannister murdered two entire Houses for rebelling, drowning one in their crypt, and yet he’s still respect and House Lannister would never been judged as a whole for his actions.
Well I’ll think on it given everyone’s feedback. I might have an idea or two for improving it all.
i mean, its not a restriction as much as a quota. You can have more or less than 6, if others have less or more, respectively. This whole thing is cause at one point I did a basic math, assuming that every 20 years the population grows, and assuming advanced medical tech that can mostly remove the dangers of child birth (we already have some of it IRL but I think we're not quite to the point where its as good as is in this timeline).Wow! These awful eugenicists are, in my eyes, one of the most horrifying settings posted in the map thread in a good while. It really speaks to the horror of the setting that the eugenics is seen as outright good, but the restriction on how many children can have plus the polygamy are considered necessary evils by the Angevines.
Er, good job...!
1. Speak the Empire's language or one of the Accepted Languages (Auld French or French/Latin, respectively)What constitutes a "pure" citizen?
Firstly, you notice that upon Tywin’s death everything didn’t fall apart in the Westerlands. No one was rebelling or uprising because there was more than just fear of Tywin himself. We’re talking about the smallfolk here. Tywin’s schemes fell apart, his own dominion did not. We rarely ever get a view of the smallfolk period. Many want to be left alone, but several times characters are asked who they fight for and its clear that the wrong answer could mean a negative reaction.Westeros is not actual Medieval Europe. If you have read the books then you know a House's reputation is judged on the actions of it's members.. Tywin is not respected, he is feared those are different things and we see how his way of doing things led to his death.. Remind me again, which Westerosi Lord supported Dany and Viserys? The Bolton's crimes are much worse than the Freys, the Freys aren't the only one's to break guest right, something people are not quick to forget, Ramsay forcefully married and starved the Lady Hornwood, he hunted girls for sports in the Bolton lands, I don't see how the smallfolk would diefy and worship someone that regularly hunted their children for sport, we know of how Ramsay was conceived. If Roose and Ramsay are dead, House Bolton is finished, a hypothetical child would be better off not bearing that name..
As for what's going in the "The Beyond" (the new name for the Land of Always Winter now that it's... well not always winter anymore), I'm torn on which sigil to use to represent the children of Jon Snow, who I have dominating the still confederated clans of the Free Folk. As the only Westerosi nobility amongst them, they not only have their father's willpower and strength, but maintain connections to those in the 'South' who supported Jon Snow as a ruler (despite his own wishes)... I'm torn between a Blackfyre style inversion of the Stark sigil with a red eye for Ghost, or a Targaryen inspired sigil with a Ghost-inspired colorscheme, as I feel they would not be so hesitant to call themselves Targaryens since Daenerys is still a positive figure amongst the Freefolk.
Said informal 'House' still needs a name though, and beyond puns like House Whitefang and House Targstark, the best I've got right now is House Whitefyre, House Freestark, House Whitewolf, or House Freedragon.
View attachment 632383