Loving the series so far, keep it up.
Also what are the population figures in this world?
Loving the series so far, keep it up.
I'm not sure, I'm not really excellent at calculating population, but my estimate is:Loving the series so far, keep it up.
Also what are the population figures in this world?
Yes and yes actually! I had the basic idea earlier, but Down in the Bottomlands motivated the addition of the Stonemen.Nice! Are the Stone Men Neanderthals or equivalent? Was this inspired by Harry Turtledove's Down in the Bottomlands?
Hopefully the Argentinians didn’t invest too much in the war, especially if Acre here was grabbed from Brazil and split between Bolivia and Peru. Did Brazil and Argentina go to war with each other here or have neutrality on that front and mostly gang up on Chile? Ahhh wait, I looked it up and was surprised to find that Brazil apparently didn’t officially get that part of Acre until 1903. Peru certainly did come out well formmthis, getting land in plenty of places, while having Bolivia act as a limited barrier against revenge by Chile. Well, by land. Being bombarded by sea if always a problem, but Chile will have a bit of trouble doing it if they don’t have a steady supply of nitrates. What sides did the Americans, Brazilians, British, and French take on the war? And Chile keep their various Pacific Islands? Not much economic use for them back then after the blackbirding depopulated them, but people seized land for prestige before. Plus thy could probably use the money.
A map of South America to be used in my Boulanger TL, shortly after an Argentine-Peruvian-Bolivian victory in the Latin American War from around 1902-1904 ish (TBC)
Hopefully the Argentinians didn’t invest too much in the war, especially if Acre here was grabbed from Brazil and split between Bolivia and Peru. Did Brazil and Argentina go to war with each other here or have neutrality on that front and mostly gang up on Chile? Ahhh wait, I looked it up and was surprised to find that Brazil apparently didn’t officially get that part of Acre until 1903. Peru certainly did come out well formmthis, getting land in plenty of places, while having Bolivia act as a limited barrier against revenge by Chile. Well, by land. Being bombarded by sea if always a problem, but Chile will have a bit of trouble doing it if they don’t have a steady supply of nitrates. What sides did the Americans, Brazilians, British, and French take on the war? And Chile keep their various Pacific Islands? Not much economic use for them back then after the blackbirding depopulated them, but people seized land for prestige before. Plus thy could probably use the money.
Scrapped/Unfinished map : The Union of Esperanca
I've always disliked when people in the community delete/never share the maps/artwork they stopped working on, so I guess I shouldn't do the same..
It's a map I made over a year ago, but felt dissatisfied with, I've since tried 3 times to recreate it in a different style (similar to my New England map) but was never satisfied with it. Eventually i'm putting it on hold until can get time to make a collab on a similar "luso-draka" if you will. I'm also dissatisfied with the scenario of the map itself and since I made the map I've made enough research a lot of that would be removed.
The POD is probably a mixture of earlier, pre tordesilla portuguese exploration failling and so they don't have an idea of the location of brazil which would make them
negotiate for the move west of the tordesilla treaty line in 1494, and furthermore ITTL the portuguese decide to establish a fort at the cape in 1500 and do better in their war with the local khoikhoi in the following years.
An easy target for minor expansion for a Boulanger timelines. Though I am a bit surprised it only stays to the coast, as the French basically tried to get a big rectangle of land going under British and Dutch Guiana and getting two-thirds of the way to Venezuela. Suppose it would be impractical even getting through the jungle. Though come to think of it, my thing before about Acre was probably wrong. Didn’t it used to be independent for a while? Almost a shame it and some other states in the interior didn’t survive.French Guyana seems to have grown larger.
Brazil and Argentina fight a lot of skirmishes in the war but settle on a status quo antebellum, minus a few minor border changes along river inlets etc.Hopefully the Argentinians didn’t invest too much in the war, especially if Acre here was grabbed from Brazil and split between Bolivia and Peru. Did Brazil and Argentina go to war with each other here or have neutrality on that front and mostly gang up on Chile? Ahhh wait, I looked it up and was surprised to find that Brazil apparently didn’t officially get that part of Acre until 1903. Peru certainly did come out well formmthis, getting land in plenty of places, while having Bolivia act as a limited barrier against revenge by Chile. Well, by land. Being bombarded by sea if always a problem, but Chile will have a bit of trouble doing it if they don’t have a steady supply of nitrates. What sides did the Americans, Brazilians, British, and French take on the war? And Chile keep their various Pacific Islands? Not much economic use for them back then after the blackbirding depopulated them, but people seized land for prestige before. Plus thy could probably use the money.
French Guyana seems to have grown larger.
*American GuianaAn easy target for minor expansion for a Boulanger timelines. Though I am a bit surprised it only stays to the coast, as the French basically tried to get a big rectangle of land going under British and Dutch Guiana and getting two-thirds of the way to Venezuela. Suppose it would be impractical even getting through the jungle. Though come to think of it, my thing before about Acre was probably wrong. Didn’t it used to be independent for a while? Almost a shame it and some other states in the interior didn’t survive.
Is American Guiana a territory or a state?*American Guiana
Though French beforehand. And yes you got me, tis a very easy area for the French to flex their imperial muscles with little effort. They didn’t venture much into the jungle interior due to obvious logistical difficulties of doing so, and the little gain/high expense for it.
A territory for a long while. But it does become a state later on in the 20th century, alongside the other American ‘colonies’.Is American Guiana a territory or a state?
Really good work! In what year did Napoleon III take power? OTL he attempted two uprisings (in 1836 and 1840). Had he succeeded, the Second Empire would have had a young and ambitious leader earlier.Vive L'Empire Français!The Second French Empire at the ascension of Emperor Napoleon IV. This is a map of a more successful Second French Empire than in otl. As you can see here France has annexed Luxembourg and the Rhineland. The main thing here is that Emperor Napoleon III is more successful here in foreign policy as he was in terms of domestic policy. Napoleon III after his ascension managed to broker a more peaceful solution to the rebellion and guerilla war being arranged in Algeria and managed to broker a peace where France annexes the coastal portions of North Africa while establishing a puppet Kingdom in the interior with its own autonomy and laws. France here manages to win in Mexico and install Emperor Maximilian as Emperor of Mexico. The US with a more drawn out Civil War is unable to directly intervene to aid Benito Juarez and the Republicans. Thus Imperial France gains prestige and makes it known that its still a major military power to be reckoned with. Napoleon III being part of the Cabonari in his youth, was sympathetic to cause of Italian nationalists. But the fall of the Papal states to Italy led to Napoleon III directly intervening to restore the Pope to the throne of St. Peter strangling the infant Roman Republic in its crib. The intervention led to relations between King Victor Emmanuel II and Emperor Napoleon III souring. As such France became more passive in its support of Austria. Meanwhile with the Kingdom of The Two Sicilies, the Bourbon Kings in an effort of self-preservation, initiate political and military reforms to combat the growing radicalism and unrest threatening their territorial integrity. Meanwhile in Germany the division of it into the North and South German Confederations had drawn the battle lines between and Austria and Prussia and in the resultant conflict Austria had been defeated and forced out of Germany. Anticipating the conflict, Napoleon III initiated a policy of Détente with Austria in anticipation of a future conflict with Prussia.
Thus the 1867 conflict with Prussia broke out over the crisis of Luxembourg over the issue of France purchasing Luxembourg from the Netherlands. The resulting war saw Austria joining France after it became public that Italy was receiving Prussian support to move against the French forces in Rome and Austrians in Venetia. The resulting war was a humiliating loss for Prussia which had overplayed its hand, with the incident now known as Bismarck's folly within Prussia. The combined Franco-Austrian force had overrun Italy and Germany. France using its veteran troops from the wars in Algeria and Mexico were easily able to overwhelm the Italians while overrunning the Rhineland. Austria maintained a defensive posture in Venice while it captured Saxony and Silesia. The Treaty of Paris saw France regain Luxembourg and the Rhineland while Austria regained Silesia with Saxony restored to its pre 1814 boundaries. While the North German Confederation was preserved to maintain the balance of power, Prussia was forced to reinstate the Kingdom of Hannover while also ceding Schleswig to the Danish King as part of a personal union in part of the Confederation further diluting Prussian Power. This division in Northern Germany stifled the rise of Prussia allowing for the French Empire to gain critical breathing room to secure its position and integrate its new conquests. While the South German Confederation is independent and jointly under Austria, and France's sphere, its more closely linked to France's economic interest as a result of the war affirming French hegemony in the continent. Similarly in Italy, the Savoyards were utterly humiliated with Northern Italy now reduced to a vassal in all but name of the French. Here Napoleon III gave the throne of Italy to his Murat cousins. Though the nature of this Kingdom is more of a federal structure with the Habsurg dukes restored to their thrones along with the Bourbons of Parma with the capital of the Kingdom established in Milan. The Savoyard Kings now hold a government in exile within the Island of Sardinia. Central Italy however was restored to the rule of the Papacy. and now most of the peninsula falls under the economic and political sway of the French. Though the health of Emperor Napoleon III had begun to fail with the Emperor abdicating to his son Emperor Napoleon IV on his 18th birthday in 1874. Here France is more of a semi-constitutional monarchy with the Emperor's position being more secure thanks to the added prestige from the military victories removing the need for Napoleon III to liberalize which gave the Republican opposition seats in Parliament.
What do you guys think of this map? I based on my Victoria II game where I tried to stay as close as historically possible to otl's France.