Is this an alternate ethnolinguistic map? If so, what are the details?
The linguistic map is here, with more details on post 156: https://www.alternatehistory.com/fo...ve-timeline-dunes-of-the-desert.457532/page-8.Is this an alternate ethnolinguistic map? If so, what are the details?
Wouldn't the Western US also be more likely to be dominated by powerful Native American states? The US collapsing after the Constitutional Congress would, among other things, allow for the Cherokee and Muscogee empires to consolidate and expand.
EDIT: it's also important to note that all things considered you didnt make a bad map. The concept is sound, some of the choices you made are very interesting, and you seem to know what you're doing. I'm just pointing out stuff like this more to show "but what about THIS cool thing?" Rsther than to nitpick.
Kentucky applied for statehood in 1787, with Virginia's blessingIn this scenario, I doubt Virginia would ever allow Kentucky to split off.
I just went with modern boundaries rather than trying to decide whether to use the British or American claims.Yes but size too large since part of state was controlled by Britain till war of 1812
I know. Barring the OTL settlements of Kentucky, Cumberland (Central Tennessee) and Franklin (Eastern Tennessee) everything west of the Appalachians is Amerindian.Sorry but for 1788 that is way far west. They were simply upto the Appalachian mountains. Plus Maine was very low population and part of Massachusetts
In 1788 the only people are natives and the borders have nothing to do with the native tribes.Yes. Not all of the countries are ex-states and barring Cumberland and Franklin in OTL Tennessee, all non-Thirteen Colonies territories are Amerindian Confederations.
Kentucky applied for statehood in 1787, with Virginia's blessing
I just went with modern boundaries rather than trying to decide whether to use the British or American claims.
I know. Barring the OTL settlements of Kentucky, Cumberland (Central Tennessee) and Franklin (Eastern Tennessee) everything west of the Appalachians is Amerindian.
Yes. Not all of the countries are ex-states and barring Cumberland and Franklin in OTL Tennessee, all non-Thirteen Colonies territories are Amerindian Confederations.
Kentucky applied for statehood in 1787, with Virginia's blessing
I just went with modern boundaries rather than trying to decide whether to use the British or American claims.
I know. Barring the OTL settlements of Kentucky, Cumberland (Central Tennessee) and Franklin (Eastern Tennessee) everything west of the Appalachians is Amerindian.
Map of A United States of Europe, but only with countries in both the Eurozone and Schengen Area:
You're welcomeUm actually, both Latvia and Lithuania also are EU member states who both use the Euro and are within Schengen, while Poland isn't using the Euro.
First complete ATL map I made. I think it turned out well for a paintjob.
Backstory coming soon.
Plus, why do most of the states look exactly like they do IOTL?
Because it's mapchart
Hail to the Emperor, Brave and True,
Hail Montezuma!
Defender of the Mexican nation!
He who repelled the invaders!
View attachment 477875
Lithuania is ridiculously wanked. I am almost certain the area they gained is majority Polish, or at least a plurality, with Blantyre of Belarusian as well. I don't see th Polish borders going that way to wrap around it. Either they get the more land the Russians originally offered the Poles or they have the Lithuanians take up the burden of guarding themselves, instead of acting as human shields for them.
I wonder who'd win. At a glance, I'd think that Rome who'd have the natural advantage, but the remains of the islands would hold such a supreme technological advantage over the Romans that I just can't imagine them winning over the ISOTites.
In which case the entirety of New England plus the Maritimes plus South-of-the-St.-Lawrence Quebec plus northeastern NY and far eastern NY are all one big islandThe Peloponnese is only an island if you consider the Corinth Canal.