CaliGuy
Banned
I completely agree with all of this; however, the crucial question is this--could the Anglo-American "alliance" (I am assuming that, despite its personal sympathies, France would be too weak to resist Germany in a meaningful sense) recruit Russia to be on their side?This would be a disaster for the French and British colonies. Both will fight harder to keep them as it's the only way to maintain economic competitiveness with the Germans.
I think the Mideast would have been a tinderbox. Either the Germans or Turks will attempt to swallow the Arabian Peninsula and the UK and Americans will contest it. Potential for limited or major war right there.
The US might have a different perspective on isolationism as the narrative would be different. By 1918, German atrocities in Belgium and France were well known and the "making the world safe for democracy" wasnt a sentiment that Wilson entirely invented. With no exposure to the horrors of the Western Front, I can see the US getting more involved internationally. Subliminal guilt for letting down democracies? Any future atrocities by Germans retaining their hegemony over the continent will amplify this.
Further, Germany will be more aggressive on expanding its economic influence. Just because it dominates the continent doesnt mean it wont expand its markets to Asia, mideast or Latin America. It doesnt need colonies to do this. Wealthy Mexicans and Argentinians may prefer to buy an exported Mercedes to a Cadillac. So, economic confrontation with the US is almost assured. And the US has always shown a willingness to militarize when its economic interests are at stake.
France will do everything in its power to ingratiate itself with the US. Yes, they'll still be shellshocked but they will want to retain their national pride and identity. And the Brits, after they get over being mad for the US sitting on the sidelines, will aggressively recruit the US. Suddenly, you have an Atlantic alliance to challenge Euro Germany.
Interesting TL potential.
Also, to elaborate on what I wrote above, would Russia be more interested in recapturing Riga and (if it hasn't already done so) Kiev than it would be in, say, expanding to the Indian Ocean (at Britain's expense and possibly with Germany's support, of course)?
Any thoughts on all of this?