Economically, from Halil Inallik's book, the Ottoman Empire's GDP in 1913, was somewhere between £400 million to £1.2 billion.
It does depend on exactly what year that pound value is from.
Looking at Madison, Britain has a 1913 GDP of $224.618 billion in 1990 USD. The exchange rate to 1913 USD is 1: 12.5, giving us $17.96944 billion, which can be worked out as £3.74 billion given the prewar exchange rate of 4.8 dollars to the pound. However, UKPublicSpending has 1913 GDP as £2.497 billion, which is more in line with contemporary sources, which gives us roughly 1: 89.96
I tend to use Britain as a baseline in this era as there is so much data on it and it was still nominally the centre of world finance.
The available total for Turkey, Iraq and Syria for 1913 from Maddison is $23.5 billion in 1990 USD, or £261.23 million. I don't think a significant amount would come from the unlisted territories, but let us be generous and bounce it up to £300 million. That puts it behind the Netherlands, Argentina and Mexico.
It predicts that the Ottomans lost something like 35% of their total GDP in the Balkan wars due to the loss of the manufactories and textiles, as well as manpower in the balkan wars.
That sounds high, but not outlandish. Around 30% would still be a bit high.
Around 48% of the country's GDP came from agriculture, whilst manufacturing made by 22% of the total GDP.
There is manufacturing and
manufacturing. I would suggest on my readings that manufacturing in the Ottoman Empire was primarily light manufacturing and the majority derived from agricultural produce, such as tobacco. There is certainly an absence of the same amount of heavy industrial plant found in even second rank powers elsewhere.
In terms of its industry it was a net exporter of guns and artillery (it had no local indigenous companies, but instead license produced german, british and french and sometimes Austrian company's weapons).
I'd be very interested to hear of which countries the Turks exported artillery to. I'm less skeptical on the rifle side of things, as there were certainly manufactories in Constantinople and elsewhere, but as said before, even exports of licensed production don't quite stack up to a true domestic arms industry.
In 1913, they exported around £55,000 worth of weapons to Bulgaria, Albania, and Iran. Not a large amount, however for an empire walking wounded, it was a respectable amount.
£55,000 doesn't get an awful lot. An SMLE Mark III cost 3 pounds/15, so even if we say a Turkish rifle is an even 2 quid, that still gets us to 27,500 rifles if it was only that quantity, which I would think not. Divided among three buyers, it is three fifths of bugger all, even if (credit where it is due) it is a fair amount for the Turks. I don't doubt their capacity to build small arms, but I don't think they had what could honestly be considered a significant export industry.
Similarly, it's main strength lied in textiles, coal and chromium of which it was a massive exporter, amounting to altogether 70% of all Ottoman exports.
Definitely agree on chromium, but the majority of their coal trade was in the immediate area; I don't have anything on textiles immediately at hand.
According to Stuart Cline, the Ottomans bought 7 REN planes in 1912, and in 1913 during the start of the 2nd Balkan War managed to receive permission to start local license produce of some French planes. The Ottomans built a grand total of 2 planes during the 2nd balkan war before they halted the construction scheme due to financial difficulties. The expelling of French engineers in 1914 took the blueprints with them so the construction stopped indefinitely as war finances meant that the ottomans could not afford to construct planes during wartime. They just loaned the planes from austria and germany as a cheaper alternative.
The end result is that they still built none. They operated between 90 and 100 during the war, which was on the low side for a power on their level; however, to be fair, a large amount of their air support was provided by Imperial Germany.
The Ottoman credit sector grew by 43% between 1908 - 1914, with a small slump during 1912, mainly in part due to the explosion of the railroad and highway industries.
Yes, the Ottomans were certainly on the way up in terms of financial complexity. They just had a long way to rise from.
The ottomans had stopped building warships since 1906 due to the budgetary restraints and Abdul Hamid II's rather big disregard of the navy (which is predictable, he was afraid of a coup, no warships = no big guns = no large sailor officer class = less chance of coup), however continued to build civilian ships. In 1913, 6 merchant ships were build for example in Imperial Arsenals. The Ottoman slipways also continued to build torpedo boats and gunboats independently which were more than a match for enemy gunboats and torpedo boats during the balkan wars. i will have to dig in with my Turkish books to find more data, but this is it for now.
Definitely. The reasons for reduction in naval construction were political and financial rather than an inability to actually build modern ships, but the major measure of the time was the ability to build guns and armour domestically. In Europe, that counts in Britain, Germany, France, Russia, Austria-Hungary, Italy and Sweden. Even Spain was right on the bleeding edge of capacity, with their largest pre WW1 domestic gun being the 240mm built by Caracca Arsenal with assistance from Schneider. It is no knock on the Ottoman Empire that they were in the same boat, so to speak.
I know I was the chap who raised naval production, but it is one example of how the Turks didn't yet have the capacity for really heavy war industry/heavy arms production.
Turkey itself has the mainstay of useful minerals for industrial development through the eyes of a 1914 chappy, with the broader Levant providing oil and potential unrest.