I am of the opinion that there are only two ways to make China interesting to a mainstream audience: Balkanise, or wank. Tony used the first in this TL and in Cliveless World, the second in Monarchy World, and the China in Puritan World was basically just in the background. It's hard to make a continuous succession of Qing emperors interesting if nothing much happens on the borders.
Quing is unintersting, anyways. Maybe Im just projecting the modern image of "they failed" on them, but still - rather Ming, pseudo-Ming-again or a new dynasty. However, IMO, the problem with China is something else: If you make it successful, it is TOO successful. If it has economcial sucess, it has economcial success with just too many millions of people. And I personally dislike too large empires (and yes, that includes potential German Empires, like medieval uber-HRE). So, either indeed you wank it, but that will have global consequences if a potential supeprower like China is wanked, or it is balkanised or like IOTL obscured by funny ideologies. But since balkanisation is such a cliche (somehow the Chinese warlord time of the 20th century must have imprinted itself onw estern minds) I would prefer the third option, no matter how boring that is... hey, boring China at leats means one does not need to care too much about it, heh.
And okay, okay, youre right, Tony. But the other two points still stand