Britain orders the 16 tonner Mk III tank into Serial production - how does this change British AFV development

marathag

Banned
The ring overlaps the tracks, even if the turret basket doesn't.
main-qimg-5b605274c8552007d831ea11248810d4
Panzer III vs Panzer IV hull and deck. Note Dimensions.
See on the Mk IV how the upper superstructure kicks out for more clearance?

The Mk IV turret basket floor was smaller than the turret ring, it tapers
HvH2.jpg

The drive shaft was under the turret basket, with fuel tanks on either side of the shaft
ET6cRQC.png
 
What imperial policing couldn’t be done with armoured cars? The armoured cars could then double as scouts in a continental commitment. There is still need for universal carriers. Use the Abyssinian crisis as a driver for tanks capable of desert conditions.
Given good roads in Europe, there's an argument to be made to favor heavily-armed armored cars over tanks to begin with.
 
The Guy Light Tank (Wheeled)


1583537711944.png
 

marathag

Banned
The Guy Light Tank (Wheeled)


View attachment 528312
450px-Ba-20_armored_car.jpg

Soviet BA-20 armored car: less armor and RWD. still made over 4000 of them

It's useful for convoy support
 

SwampTiger

Banned
Does anyone have the turret ring diameters of the Medium Mark II and Medium Mark III? Why was the Mark III turret crew reduced to two crew? The loader in the Mark II also operated a MG turret. The webpagee https://www.jaegerplatoon.net/TANKS2.htm stated the inside of the turret of the Finnish 6 Ton tanks (not turret ring diameter) was 132 mm (52 inches) for a two man turret. This not far from the 54 and 57 inch turret rings of the next generation of British tanks. The 6 Ton had plenty of space on the top of the superstructure to fit a larger turret. It may be tight front to back though.

Why didn't the Royal Tank Corps list a three man turret as one of its requirements when requested in 1926? They requested a radio and armor piercing gun.
 
The Vickers Type E 6 Tonner was a private venture commercial product built for export. The British Army had no say in its design other than to foolishly turn it down when they were offered it. All medium, cruiser and all but 1 of the infantry tanks built to official specifications had three man turrets. Valentine like the 6 tonner was a private venture commercial design meant for export. (The British Army bought Valentine because it was available and they were desperate)
 
If you need a bit more turret ring clearance
A38 Valiant Infantry Tank
I'm not sure the Valiant should be used as an example for anything, other than how not to build a tank.
It has also been used (much more successfully) on all Soviet medium tanks and MBTs since the T-44:
post-war-tank-hull-comparison.jpg

Source

Those wedges are also part of my hypothetical ideal WW2-1950's era tank. They give the same room as sponsons for a bigger turret ring, but they don't extend along the entire hull (or even half of it like the Chieftain), which would be an inefficient use of armor.
 
It has also been used (much more successfully) on all Soviet medium tanks and MBTs since the T-44:
Those wedges are also part of my hypothetical ideal WW2-1950's era tank. They give the same room as sponsons for a bigger turret ring, but they don't extend along the entire hull (or even half of it like the Chieftain), which would be an inefficient use of armor.

A bit higher resolution:
 

Attachments

  • myLittleTank.jpg
    myLittleTank.jpg
    111.2 KB · Views: 261
Top