An Age of Miracles III: The Romans Endure

Cryostorm

Monthly Donor
It would have been even funnier if he decided to pull another "Better than Antioch, Khosrow built this" he being a history buff and all.
Almost makes this funnier, even after two thousand years the guy is still naming cities after himself. Not to mention that Persia can claim a bit of Alexander's legacy themselves so this is just a gentle in-joke and a reminder that for all that Rome and Persia are separated by their shared history, they are also united to a degree.

Also, if Alexandria-on-the-Oxus is till going strong and vibrant, that shows that Iskander and his descendants strengthen their hold back over Central Asia and the Hindu Kush.
 
Last edited:
Rhomania's General Crisis, Part 16.1: The Other Fires, Part 2
Since Poland has regained some of its mojo, did a version of OTL's Union of Brest (Orthodox-Catholic union of churches) occur?


All we need now is Greek Massalia to come full circle
It did not. The political weakness of the OTL Orthodox isn't a thing ITTL, and also I'm pretty sure that most of the Orthodox were in the Lithuania part of the Commonwealth anyway, which is part of Russia ITTL.
It would have been even funnier if he decided to pull another "Better than Antioch, Khosrow built this" he being a history buff and all.
I admittedly didn't think of that, but Iskandar is trying to be somewhat diplomatic even while doing all this.

* * *
Rhomania’s General Crisis, Part 16.1-The Other Fires, part 2:

The Egyptians, after taking Gaza, proceeded north along the coastal highway. On the Mediterranean they were protected and supported by the Egyptian Mediterranean fleet. This was a small force with no heavy warships but it faced no opposition in Syrian coastal waters. Sophia’s naval assets were in the Aegean and Adriatic and could not be stretched further.

This gave the Egyptians a largely invulnerable and, by the standards of the time, highly efficient supply system for their army, but it had its weaknesses. This beneficent system would only last so long as they stuck near to the Syrian coast. Also, due to the rigors of a Sinai march and the watering demands, combined with the availability of sea transport, the Egyptians were fairly weak in draft animals. If they struck into the interior, the land segment of their supply lines would be tenuous. Requisitions from the locals could make up for the shortfall but this would also alienate the desired goodwill of the locals.

The forces defending Syria are decidedly motley. Fakhr al-Din II, the Megas Kyr of the Druze in the Roman hierarchy, is their commander per the agreement signed with Strategos Sarantenos. It is an unprecedented action. No minority commander has been given a posting of such importance and strength, one that includes Roman regulars and kastron troops. Many regular officers resent the placement.

At the beginning of summer 1662, there are not many of those regular officers. Sarantenos took the bulk with him on his march westward. Fakhr al-Din has more kastron troops, mostly reposted garrison soldiers withdrawn from the lands ceded to the Shah. However, the bulk are drawn from the various religious minorities of Syria.

This does not help the unity of the army. Many of the non-Druze minority troops, particularly the Maronites, resent having a Druze placed in command over them. Various Bedouin units also feel the same, especially the Anizzah. The leader of that tribal confederacy is also a Megas Kyr and his forebears have held that title appreciably longer than those of Fakhr al-Din.

By mid-June, the Druze Megas Kyr can muster an army comparable in numbers and military equipment, including artillery, to the Egyptians. (Syrian arsenals are quite well-stocked.) But given these tensions, he is reluctant to commit to a set-piece battle. Instead, he opts for harassing attacks. There aren’t big supply wagon convoys to ambush but Egyptian outposts, scouts, and flankers are attacked, while herds of sheep and goats that follow the Egyptian army as a mobile meat supply (a tactic common of Roman and Ottoman armies as well) are a juicy target for Bedouin raiders. Another advantage is that these raiding parties are small enough that they can be comprised of units from one minority group under a commander from said group, ensuring that they’ll stay cohesive during the mission.

Given the Egyptian weakness in cavalry, these raids are often successful and embarrassing and frustrating for the Egyptians, but since the bulk of supplies go by sea, they are not enough to halt the Egyptian advance. It continues, slowly but methodically. Coastal fortifications, given the lack of threat for so long, are in poor shape and Fakhr al-Din has extreme difficulties in garrisoning them. Anyone can see, given the state of the ramparts, that a garrison is being left to die in an effort to slow the enemy down.

Non-Druze are reluctant to take such orders from a Druze. He could use Druze or Roman soldiers who would obey such an order (Roman officers may grumble, but are more likely to appreciate the broader strategic situation and also follow orders). But if he fritters away those units, he’ll weaken the portions of the army he is certain will obey his orders in a crisis and around which he wants the rest of his army to cohere.

As a result, Ashkelon, Jaffa, and Kaisareia fall even more easily than Gaza. Thus, the Egyptians are feeling confident when they approach Acre. The city doesn’t surrender on the initial approach but the Egyptians figure, based on previous experience, that a show of force will be enough to cow the defenders. They make a demonstration but, neglecting precautions, move too close to the ramparts. They are suddenly met with a blizzard of gunfire that cuts down almost two hundred before the Egyptians withdraw out of range.

Acre is not going to capitulate easily like the coastal towns further south. Acre and Tyre are the two concentrations of Greek Orthodox inhabitants in central Syria. Unlike the minorities, whose attitude despite the agreement with Sarantenos is still largely ‘keep head down and wait it out’, the Greek population is more openly in favor of Sophia and wary of letting a Coptic army march through their city. The fortifications of Acre are also in somewhat better shape than those of the ports further south, which gives confidence to the locals in their ability to resist.

The siege of Acre proves difficult for the besiegers from the start, beginning with the ambush from the walls. A night raid into one of the encampments manages to spike two heavy guns, of which the Egyptians have a limited number. Still, they press the siege methodically, advancing their trenches and bombarding the ramparts, gradually inflicting damage faster than it can be repaired.

Problems for the Egyptians increase at the beginning of August, despite the worsening conditions inside the city, as they no longer have uncontested mastery of the sea. Kalomeros has arrived in the area, responding to Syrian appeals for naval support. He only has four ships under his command, two of which are converted merchantmen, but his flagship Salamis is more powerful than any other individual warship east of Rhodes at his arrival.

He delivers some desperately needed provisions into the city, evacuating some civilians on his way out. He also harasses Egyptian supply convoys which forces the Egyptians to rely more heavily on local requisitions and foraging expeditions. This angers the locals, frustrated by all these hungry Egyptian mouths consuming all the local foodstuffs, while the foraging parties are ideal targets for Fakhr al-Din’s raiders. On two separate occasions, the Salamis even bombards parts of the Egyptian siege lines. The noise and spectacle are more significant than the damage against the well-built entrenchments but they certainly improve the morale of Acre’s defenders.

Naval reinforcements from the Aegean, this time on the side of the Egyptians, at the end of August manage to drive Kalomeros away. His riposte, a scorching raid on southern Cyprus, is devastating for the targeted area but irrelevant from the perspective of the siege of Acre. But a far more formidable threat has emerged.

It is the Black Death, the dreaded buboes appearing on victims at the end of August. Some historians speculate it came from the Syrian interior, carried to the Egyptian camp by foraging parties. Its origins are unclear, but not the impact. It cuts through the Egyptian ranks, pressure against the city faltering as sick lists skyrocket. While the valor of Acre’s garrison, and of the sailors of Kalomeros’s squadron were important, it is Yersinia Pestis that breaks the Egyptian siege of Acre. They retreat back to Kaisareia, leaving over 10% of their ranks in plague graves.

Meanwhile, central Anatolia is, to use a technical term, an utter mess. The Army of Suffering had gotten a material and morale boost from ‘defeating’ the Syrian army as it passed through, but its strategic position is still tenuous. Leo Theosteriktos, Kastrophylax of the Cilician Gates, remains a redoubtable opponent, stymying all efforts to break into Cilicia. He also sallied out to cover stragglers from the Army of Syria, covering and reorganizing them. Most of the stragglers who were killed by the Army of Suffering were those who fell out further west, out of range of Theosteriktos’s efforts.

The Kastrophylax has the strength to block the Army of Suffering, and harass it in areas proximate to the Gates, but he doesn’t have enough men to go on the offensive, much as he would like to do. While understanding the need, he begrudgingly gives up the reformed stragglers to bolster Fakhr al-Din, who do much to invigorate Syrian defenses around Acre.

The Army of Suffering has operated around southern Anatolikon, with its one attempt thus far to expand operations failing miserably. As armies parry around Smyrna and Acre, the rebels cut north, devastating much of the Anatolikon theme that had thus far been relatively untouched.

It is practically impossible to maintain a coherent account of events. The Army of Suffering, due to rugged terrain and wretched logistics, is forced to scatter to survive, making discipline and coordination even more of a problem. Forces facing them are overwhelmingly irregular scratch forces and local nomads, hastily organized by local officials. Here as well, discipline and organization are notably largely by their absence.

The concept of a front line here would be a bad joke. Locations change hand repeatedly as bands ebb back and forth, sweeping through an area and then moving on. Land redistribution programs are enacted in some locations, with varying degrees of enthusiasm, but the Army of Suffering’s recruitment problems remain. Once local land is redistributed, local peasants lose interest in the further struggle. Those most willing to continue fighting with the Army of Suffering are thus those most interested in a lifestyle of looting and killing, hardly conducive to discipline and good behavior.

The Grand Karaman Andreas Karamanlis, the ex-Megas Dekarchos Stefanos Karamanlis, and Konon absolutely do try to form a more cohesive and orderly formation but they are only three men. Unlike the Tourmarches or Sophia, they lack an administrative structure and bureaucracy to widely enforce their will. Three men, even with Konon’s indomitable will, have extreme difficulty enforcing their will over the scattered Army.

It is an ugly and vicious war, marked with local atrocities and reprisals, with neither side looking good. In one village south of Gangra, tenants butcher and eat sixteen cattle owned by their landlord after he is chased from the area. It is the first time they’ve ever tasted beef, a meat whose price puts it out of reach to most of the poor across the Empire. When the landlord returns with a force he’s mustered, he selects sixteen villagers at random and hangs them. [1]

While most operations have little effect beyond devastating the area, in late summer the city of Ankyra is taken by treachery. With Andreas Karamanlis and Konon present, the occupation is relatively orderly with the territory garrisoned and the rebel program of economic redistribution more thoroughly implemented. Major operations cease after the fall of Ankyra. The leaders want to try and restore some discipline to the Army, build up its supplies of material, and prepare for more meaningful endeavors. Ankyra does, after all, lie on the main north Anatolian highway that westward extends to Chalcedon, just across the Bosporus from Constantinople herself.

[1] This is copied from an OTL incident in the Spanish Civil War.
 
Some form of divisions of power presumably, making the empire a hell of a lot more legalistic and formalized. An autocrat at the center but with clearly defined for civil servants and soldiers. Constitutional Autocracy?
 
Rhomania's General Crisis, Part 16.2: The Other Fires, Part 3
When are we going to see the reforms proposed by Sophia? It was mentioned a while ago by @Basileus444 that we would some reforms proposed by her, in order to gain extra support.
Winter of 1662-63. I'm catching up all the various areas up to that point first before proceeding.

* * *

Rhomania’s General Crisis, Part 16.2-The Other Fires, part 3:

The rebellion in southern Italy was a parallel conflict with the War of Wrath. By themselves, there was little direct connection between the two but the rebellion functioned in much the same way, albeit in reverse, as the continuing Ottoman war in eastern Anatolia. Despot Andreas III of Sicily supported Sophia but most of his resources were tied down dealing with matters in his own realm, unable to give aid further east.

The bulk of the Sicilian fleet was tied down blockading Naples. This was tedious and unglamorous work but a very important countermeasure against the rebels. There were already tensions between the two main rebel factions, led by Masaniello and the Duke of Maddaloni, Simone Galamini. The blockade adds another.

The blockade prevents grain from being imported into Naples by sea. Some of the city’s grain had come from Sicily, which came solely by water, but even some food grown locally was delivered by coastal craft. For estates near the coast, it was easier and cheaper to send grain to nearby local harbors and send it on small coastal craft, rather than carting it all the way to Naples. These small and ungainly coasters were easy pickings for light Sicilian warships standing offshore watching for them.

Even with small craft and undeveloped local harbors, this coastal traffic was still literally an order of magnitude cheaper than overland transport. Diocletian’s Edict on Prices listed sea transport as twenty times cheaper than land transport. The blockade thus massively spikes the cost of shipping foodstuffs into Naples. The spark that had lit the initial rebellion had been over food prices and Masaniello’s adherents demand cheaper bread. However, Galamini is the quintessential rural magnate who wants the highest price for the produce of his estates. Selling cheap when expenses are high is not what he and his colleagues want.

These internal tensions keep the Neapolitan rebels from expanding their rebellion, but their actions thus far still spark copycat outbreaks in other areas. The first though ends up being the one that fizzles.

Apulia is an exceptional region of the Despotate. Its urban population is heavily Sicilian-Greek and Orthodox in culture and religion. This by itself is not exceptional, but it also has a significant rural population that is the same way. In the countryside this is not dominant as in the towns, but the population here is highly mixed. Orthodox villages lie next to Catholic villages and many communities are mixed in their faith.

But what makes Apulia truly distinctive is the structure of land ownership. The rural upper class of the area had been annihilated during the early years of Andreas I, to a degree unparalleled even in neighboring territories. While there are a few large landholdings worked by tenant farmers, their numbers and sizes are dwarfed by their counterparts in Campania or Sicily proper. There are still many landless laborers and poor peasants eking out existences on marginal plots but there is a large swath of ‘zeugaratoi & mesoi’ landowners, rich peasants and middle-class.

As a result, when some do rise up in rebellion, there is a significantly wider swathe of the population benefiting from the current social order and thus willing to defend it. The flare-ups that do spark to life are quickly doused, none catching fire.

The situation is quite different in Calabria, the rebellion here showing the importance of socio-economic factors, rather than religious. Unlike the Neapolitans, the rising Calabrian peasantry have no interest in Catholic rights, because they are Orthodox. Calabria has little in the way of urban life, but the region is the most Hellenized of the Despotate of Sicily. Much of the population are of Greek ancestry, with Calabrian-Greek spoken in the villages having more in common with that spoken in Patras than in Bari.

The Calabrian peasantry are overwhelmingly poor tenant farmers working plots and paying rents to landlords. Those landlords are also mostly Greek Orthodox but that commonality hardly solves tensions. One key demand of the rebels is that rents be capped at one half of the tenant’s harvest. The rebellion here is more scattered and diffuse, with various peasant bands rising up and attacking their landlords, burning their houses and all the records which contain their owed rents and arrears. There is little coordination between bands, with the actions of one inspiring another to take up the example.

The next major area of rebellion doesn’t start within the Despotate of Sicily, as it begins with the Roman enclave that is the Kephalate of Rome. The Eternal City has clearly seen better days. In 1660 it is a rather seedy-looking city of 16,000. The image of sheep grazing amid the ruins of the Roman forum is hardly a new one but even medieval glories, paltry though they may be compared to ancient grandeur, have departed.

Rome has never developed much of an economic base. Its economy had come from being the seat of the Papacy, with all the wealth and services that conveyed, including a pilgrim traffic. The loss of the Roman Papacy and its consolidation at Avignon, which took all of the papal business and most of the religious relics in the process, and the transfer of the city to Orthodox control, has thus utterly gutted the city’s economy. One visitor describes it as a town of beggars, interspersed with wrinkled prostitutes and thieves too stupid to thrive anywhere else.

The Kephale of Rome, Theodoros Lazaros, has tried to improve the situation, hoping to attract a different kind of pilgrim than the religious. The glories of ancient Rome should certainly attract educated young noblemen, who tend to be heavy spenders. It is a project that will bear fruit as the concept of the Tour catches on, but by the 1660s little progress has been made.

Efforts to suppress news of events in Naples fail. While the initial riots are over increases in bread prices, due to the loss of grain imports from Campania typically shipped out of Naples, they snowball quickly. Lazaros, fearing that his small garrison will be overwhelmed if it stays in the city, retreats to the port of Civitavecchia. He is safer there, at least so long as the insurgents lack artillery to breach the port’s defenses, while the much smaller urban population can be kept in check by the small garrison.

The insurgents in Rome declare a Roman Republic but this is understood as a temporary gesture. What they really want is the return of the Papacy, which is expected to bring wealth and prosperity back to the Eternal City. The local landed families also want the Papacy to return. The countryside outside of Rome is actually part of the Despotate of Sicily and the notables here dislike being relegated to a provincial backwater as opposed to residing next to the heart of Latin Christendom, with all the opportunities for prestige and profit that offers.

The emissaries from Rome hit Avignon like a bombshell. The rebellion in Naples had already drawn some interest; the plight of Catholics could not, in good conscience, be ignored. Still, the Curia had been hesitant. Naples was an important part of the Despotate and interfering would certainly invoke the ire of Messina and Constantinople. It might be done, but support from Arles and Spain would be needed and that had not been secured.

But in terms of emotional pull, Naples is as nothing compared to Rome. Pope Callixtus IV, the Pope who had reunited the two branches of the Catholic Church and Papacy, died in 1654 to be succeeded by Pope Clement X. He has been working hard to revitalize the Catholic Church and to expand it, supporting wholeheartedly missionary efforts in Terranova and in the east. He, along with many in the papal curia, feel that the reunited Papacy’s proper place is in Rome. Avignon is not; the Papacy’s relocation here is what had started the problem in the first place.

Clement X isn’t willing to commit yet to a return since the area is not secure, but he immediately throws himself into supporting the Roman rebels in other ways. Four hundred Swiss mercenaries, along with some more money and military materials, are sent by ship to bolster the Eternal City’s defenses. The Sicilian navy, tied down either blockading Naples or trying to counter the Tourmarches’ fleet in the Adriatic and Aegean, is unable to stop them.

The Pope also sends a missive to the Grand Duke of Tuscany, asking him, as a faithful son of the Church, to do all he can to aid the Roman rebels. With the previous Grand Duke, this letter might not have worked. But the new Grand Duke, Galileo II Galilei, is not like his ex-pirate father, who’d gained his title in large part to Roman support. Galileo II feels much less gratitude to Rhomania for his rank and he is also much more religious.

He is not willing to invade central Italy, which is what he would do if he followed the Pope’s letter to the letter. But he does provide a small quantity of military material in addition to the Pope’s and allows his territory to be used to transfer more.

The Grand Duke hesitates to be more overt for the same reason that the Papacy had been hesitant when the matter was just over Naples. Intervening directly without more powerful support is just too risky. The aid of either Arles or Spain, or preferably both, is required.
 
Very interesting and I am looking forward to seeing how this develops. Is there any chance that the Pope might be able to return to Rome? Even if nothing happens in the next decade, I wonder if the papacy in say 2000 is still in Avignon or has it returned to Rome?
 
I don't think Rhomania is ready for the return of the Papacy in Rome. While it would've been a peaceful gesture and one the Romans could take advantage of in a couple of centuries, the Papacy still possesses considerable political and religious influence that would undermine Roman control over the Eternal City, especially with hostile Latins ready to retake it for the sake of the Papal States.

They either give it up or be forced to eliminate the rebels and the Papal mercenaries trying to take the city.
 
It is a project that will bear fruit as the concept of the Tour catches on, but by the 1660s little progress has been made.
Think this bit implies the Romans will be in control of Rome when this project catches on so I doubt the Pope's Schemes will be successful. But I do hope this serves as a big kick up the backside to Constantinople to force them to actually pay attention to Italy. Ever since Andreas Niketas defeated the crusade and the venetians and secured the Empire's western flank they have been extremely complacent in their management of italy and the rot that has set in is showing its face now with these rebellions. It is encouraging that the Kephale seems to actually care on a personal level though, improvement on the 7th century Exarchs who were basically just there to squeeze tax out of the population and piss them off while the Lombards burnt the house down
 
Well, not great Bob. I forgot the state of despotic army, I hope they can deal with rebellions.

Or even better, have victorious Sophia send reinforcements and force stronger integration. Core it! :p
 
Things continue to hamper Sophia. Spain should be in a fit state for war I would think. They haven't had any major fights recently that I recall. There was the business in the east with Rhomania, but that would have only been a hit to their treasury, not their manpower at home. Arles likewise I believe has avoided all the turmoil of the last couple decades. At the same time they've always been fairly friendly towards Constantinople if I remember correctly. They've also got the monster to the north to worry about. There's internal trouble ahead for the Triunes, but it hasn't hit yet and Henry took over Rhineland with considerably less claim to it than they would have to Arles as king of France.
 

Cryostorm

Monthly Donor
Things continue to hamper Sophia. Spain should be in a fit state for war I would think. They haven't had any major fights recently that I recall. There was the business in the east with Rhomania, but that would have only been a hit to their treasury, not their manpower at home. Arles likewise I believe has avoided all the turmoil of the last couple decades. At the same time they've always been fairly friendly towards Constantinople if I remember correctly. They've also got the monster to the north to worry about. There's internal trouble ahead for the Triunes, but it hasn't hit yet and Henry took over Rhineland with considerably less claim to it than they would have to Arles as king of France.
That depends, we don't really know what all is going on out west with Spain, Arles, Triunes, HRE, EAN, and Marinids, or the more minor powers. But considering they have all been relatively quiet as this all going on something tells me that they might be dealing with their own issues, at least enough that they aren't trying to get involved in Rhomania's most recent civil war. For all we know Henry also kicked the bucket and a general war in the west is also going on, ala Great Northern War and War of Spanish Succession.
 
The Kephale of Rome, Theodoros Lazaros, has tried to improve the situation, hoping to attract a different kind of pilgrim than the religious. The glories of ancient Rome should certainly attract educated young noblemen, who tend to be heavy spenders. It is a project that will bear fruit as the concept of the Tour catches on, but by the 1660s little progress has been made.

Think this bit implies the Romans will be in control of Rome when this project catches on so I doubt the Pope's Schemes will be successful. But I do hope this serves as a big kick up the backside to Constantinople to force them to actually pay attention to Italy. Ever since Andreas Niketas defeated the crusade and the venetians and secured the Empire's western flank they have been extremely complacent in their management of italy and the rot that has set in is showing its face now with these rebellions. It is encouraging that the Kephale seems to actually care on a personal level though, improvement on the 7th century Exarchs who were basically just there to squeeze tax out of the population and piss them off while the Lombards burnt the house down
Probably, but the OTL Grand Tour concept did not require that a country own all the visited areas. English nobles, for example, would probably visit Paris, Vienna, Venice, and Rome; the British didn't own any of them. Similarly, young Rhoman noblemen would still be interested in visiting Rome, whether or not Rhomania owned it. Heck, it might even be more interesting, because it would be a chance to see their origins and understand what foreigners are like.
 
That depends, we don't really know what all is going on out west with Spain, Arles, Triunes, HRE, EAN, and Marinids, or the more minor powers. But considering they have all been relatively quiet as this all going on something tells me that they might be dealing with their own issues, at least enough that they aren't trying to get involved in Rhomania's most recent civil war. For all we know Henry also kicked the bucket and a general war in the west is also going on, ala Great Northern War and War of Spanish Succession.
I imagine that the Mediterranean powers are also dealing with the consequences of the Little Ice Age. That said, if resources allow, a war would distract from internal troubles...
 
Rhomania's General Crisis, Part 16.3: The Other Fires, Part 4
I admit I'm undecided as to the long-term fate of Rome and the Papacy. There are several options. The status quo could continue indefinitely or the Papacy could relocate but have no political power outside of a micro-state (OTL-like). Given that Italy uniting into a single state isn't going to happen (unless I drastically change plans), I'm somewhat attracted to the idea of a smaller Papal State (Lazio but nothing east of the Apennines) being what controls Rome and its environs in the present day, with the Pope being a secular ruler of a small state in addition to his religious role. But this is an area where nothing is set for sure.

* * *

Rhomania’s General Crisis, Part 16.3-The Other Fires, part 4:

The King of Spain, Joao I, has been following the situation on the other side of the Mediterranean with a mixture of concern and interest. Opportunities present themselves but also dangers as well. The mixture makes it hard to be sure what is the right course of action.

He has several different motives, which certainly do not help in clearing the air. On the one hand, he is interested in the welfare of Sicilian Catholics, out of sympathy for his co-religionists. There is somewhat more to the matter than that alone too. With the end of the Catholic Schism, in theory the most powerful Catholic monarch is the Holy Roman Emperor Leopold von Habsburg. Joao concerns him an arrogant and ungrateful parvenu who should’ve been left in the Swiss foothills. The true power of the Catholic world, measured in terms of real power, is Spain, but such preeminence requires deeds. But on the other hand, the lure of returning the Papacy to Rome itself has no emotional resonance for him.

Joao is interested in shifting borders but in a peninsula much further away. The restoration of Malacca, once the jewel and anchor of Spanish authority and commerce in eastern waters, is an ambition of his. But he would prefer to accomplish this by diplomacy rather than war, on the grounds that diplomacy will likely prove to be more effective if he can organize it. But that means he can’t afford to antagonize the Romans too much on the Sicilian Catholic issue, lest he jeopardize his hopes regarding Malacca.

And looming over all of this is a far more pressing matter, the Arletian succession. With each passing day, the odds of the Kingdom of Arles falling by marriage and inheritance into the hands of the Plantagenets rise ever higher. Joao absolutely does not want that to happen. But to prevent that he will need allies, with the Romans being an obvious choice, again if he can organize that. But this also means he cannot push the Romans too much on other issues as he needs them sweet.

As a result, thus far the King has studied and observed and calculated, but made no move to intervene. He knows that the Romans will fiercely resent foreign meddling, particularly Catholic meddling. He will wait until he is approached, as he expects he will be, before acting.

The initial approach comes from Messina. Despot Andreas III wants to ensure no Spanish involvement on behalf of Catholic rebels and also desires to recruit Spanish mercenaries for his army. At this stage, Joao wishes to keep all his options open. He promises to be neutral and allows the Sicilians to attempt to recruit mercenaries, but also does nothing to hamper papal efforts to gather volunteers and supplies for the rebels at Rome. Doing anything else, after all, would not be evenhanded.

The Despot is also trying other strategies to combat the unrest riling the Despotate. The rebellion in Calabria is probably the least structurally-threatening, but smoke from the fires lit by it can be seen from the towers of Messina. This helps to concentrate the issue.

Andreas III has heard of many of the rebel grievances and demands and is sympathetic to many of them. A rent cap at half the harvest seems more than reasonable to him. He also is inclined to offer amnesties and perhaps even plots of land to own outright to those rebels willing to instead fight under the Sicilian banner against the rebels around Naples.

The landowners of Calabria are absolutely incensed at these Despotic proposals. The idea of amnesty and even land grants for those who’ve burned their manor houses and assaulted their families is sickening. They want revenge; they want reprisals. They want the peasantry bludgeoned and cowed so that they accept their proper place. And any effort to cap rent would be a restriction of their property rights, which is completely unacceptable.

Andreas listens but then remarks that if the peasants are to be ‘reduced to obedience’, that will require more troops that will need to be paid. Spanish mercenaries do not come cheap. Would the landowners be willing to contribute to the effort? Most balk, arguing that after their sufferings and losses it is not right to expect them to give up more. The Despot should pay what is needed.

An increasingly exasperated Despot then queries if the landowners would be willing to pay more in tax after their positions are restored, to pay down the resulting debts. That would also be unfair and unreasonable is the counter-claim. After the reprisals, necessary though they are for justice and social order, their incomes will be reduced. That is hardly a time when they should be expected to pay more in taxes.

Despot Andreas III decides that the revolt in Calabria can wait. After the alarm of seeing the smoke wears off, and after that whole experience, he doesn’t feel much urgency in dealing with this matter. He is going to concentrate on what started this whole debacle, the revolt in Naples.

The naval blockade of Naples has continued ever since the beginning of the revolt, but by summer 1662 little pressure has been placed on its landward frontier. The mainland tagmata had been understrength to save costs while what troops had been available had been distributed with a focus on preventing more rebellions from starting, as opposed to containing and reducing what had already begun. Notably, the two areas that had been largely devoid of troops, Calabria and Lazio, were where the copycat rebellions managed to find success.

With the situation in the rest of the Despotate seeming more secure, Andreas is ready to be more proactive against the Neapolitans. It is just in time. The Duke of Maddaloni, seeking to break the naval blockade of Naples, is marching on Salerno with an army. Salerno is the main support base for the blockade and while not irreplaceable, any alternative would be further away and more inconvenient. Furthermore, a victory that he does not have to share with Masaniello would significantly bolster his authority and prestige within the rebel movement, perhaps giving him the heft he needs to dispose of this annoying and presumptuous fishmonger.

As a sop to the Calabrian grandees, Andreas appoints the richest of their number to command the relief force that will reinforce the Salerno defenses, the Duke of Rende. It does not go as the Despot planned. The Duke thinks that the expedition should be redirected to northern Calabria rather than Salerno and does so. That most of his landholdings are in northern Calabria may have something to do with that choice. The Sicilian troops march through the region, easily scattering the rebels, hanging those who don’t flee into the hills fast enough. Within a month, the northern third of Calabria has been cowed into rough obedience, although many of the peasants who fled are rapidly transitioning into bandits.

Meanwhile the Duke of Maddolini overruns the undermanned defenses of Salerno, capturing a huge quantity of war materials and, more importantly, the stockpile of rations for the Sicilian fleet. The naval blockade of Naples is forced to pull back to Sicily in order to secure new lines of supply and while they eventually return, the blockade is weaker due to the new longer supply lines. Also, that window gives Maddolini the perfect opportunity to ship the captured foodstuffs, along with other provisions stymied by the blockade, into Naples in a very public and dramatic fashion. This is a crucial boon to the hungry city and massively raises the Duke’s stock in the eyes of the Neapolitans, particularly at the expense of their earlier favorite Masaniello who notably has failed to deliver on the demands for bread.

Simultaneously, the Despot in Messina is so enraged he is reported to have shredded a pillowcase with his teeth. The Duke of Rende is summoned back to the capital, where the Duke clearly expects congratulation for his pacification of much of northern Calabria. He requests more troops so that he can continue the work in southern Calabria. When questioned about the matter of Salerno, the Duke is clearly confused about why Salerno is considered important. Restoring the proper social order in Calabria, as well as his own property, clearly is the most urgent task. Alexios, whose mood is not improved by this display, has the Duke hurled into one of the basement cells of Mategriffon Castle, shocking treatment considering his rank.

After that emotionally satisfying moment, the Despot returns to the task at hand. More troops are to be recruited, mostly from Sicilian and Apulian peasantry. Notably the senior officers for the new units are disproportionately Catholic. Partly this is done to avoid creating the impression of a Catholic-Orthodox war, which would alarm and alienate the Catholics still supporting the Despotic government. But Alexios III is now highly suspicious of the Calabrian elites, removing them from consideration for military posts, and they are mostly Orthodox. Ironically, in the wake of a rebellion that had much root in Catholic animus for the Orthodox slant of the Sicilian elite, said Sicilian elite are becoming more Catholic.

The initial thrust, a direct landward assault on Naples from Apulia, is parried skillfully by the Duke of Maddaloni and driven back into Apulia. As the Sicilian casualties are relatively low, the Duke isn’t willing to press the attack into Apulia, especially as he lacks the naval support he would need to restore the key coastal positions. However, the capture of the artillery and much of the baggage again makes for a good show on the streets of Naples.

Alexios III is unable to quickly make up the losses in Apulia, small as they are. Troops are needed in southern Lazio to prevent the rebellions in Naples and Rome from linking up, although fortunately the two groups are focused on their own affairs and interests. Also, he cannot ignore what is happening on the other side of the Adriatic. Four Sicilian tourmai are dispatched to reinforce Sophia, which is one of the reasons why fresh recruitment drives are so important. Of the four tourmai, only two make it. The transports for the other pair are intercepted and captured by Constantinople-loyal warships operating out of Patras.
 
I admit I'm undecided as to the long-term fate of Rome and the Papacy.
I think a cool idea for the sake of long term reproachment with the catholics, and bringing back some much needed investment into the city (especially if realpolitik kicks in when the Romans consider relations with Spain and Sicily) would be the empire keeping Lazio and Rome but they let the pope back into the city in a Vatican like microstate (there would have to be provisions for the orthodox patriarch however), considering all the effort the Empire has put into reconquering it in this timeline, multiple times at that; it would be nice to see it work out for them long term.
 
Last edited:
I admit I'm undecided as to the long-term fate of Rome and the Papacy. There are several options. The status quo could continue indefinitely or the Papacy could relocate but have no political power outside of a micro-state (OTL-like). Given that Italy uniting into a single state isn't going to happen (unless I drastically change plans), I'm somewhat attracted to the idea of a smaller Papal State (Lazio but nothing east of the Apennines) being what controls Rome and its environs in the present day, with the Pope being a secular ruler of a small state in addition to his religious role. But this is an area where nothing is set for sure.

I think a cool idea for the sake of long term reproachment with the catholics, and bringing back some much needed investment into the city (especially if realpolitik kicks in when the Romans consider relations with Spain and Sicily) would be the empire keeping Lazio and Rome but they let the pope back into the city in a Vatican like microstate (there would have to be provisions for the orthodox patriarch however), considering all the effort the Empire has put into reconquering it in this timeline, multiple times at that; it would be nice to see it work out for them long term.
I think an independent mini-state that would separate Rhoman-dominated southern Italy from a more independent northern Italian state or states would be a better idea. For Rhomania to hold the Vatican is just a nuisance, since it is a clearly Orthodox state and is likely to lead to future wars. I note that while @Basileus444 has stated the current conflict is the last one between Rhomania and the Ottomans, IIRC there were no such assurances between Rhomania and the West.

Note, I do not expect it to be freely given up. I think it is more likely to come about as part of a peace settlement in the next European (not colonial) war between Rhomania and a Latin nation or alliance, probably the ITTL equivalent of the (OTL) Napoleonic wars.
 
Roman Empire not owning Rome will be an endless thorn in the side of Roman Nationalism, because the western Europeans will just point at the place and say that those guys are the actual Romans.

It should be kept as part of the Empire just for that reason.

EDIT: Also on another note, is the Plethon-Medici Family still around, @Basileus444?
 
Last edited:
I admit I'm undecided as to the long-term fate of Rome and the Papacy. There are several options. The status quo could continue indefinitely or the Papacy could relocate but have no political power outside of a micro-state (OTL-like). Given that Italy uniting into a single state isn't going to happen (unless I drastically change plans), I'm somewhat attracted to the idea of a smaller Papal State (Lazio but nothing east of the Apennines) being what controls Rome and its environs in the present day, with the Pope being a secular ruler of a small state in addition to his religious role. But this is an area where nothing is set for sure.
I am privy to the idea of keeping the Papacy in a Vatican City-like microstate on behalf of the Romans, but I doubt they're in a position to negotiate that kind of deal with the Catholic Church, especially with the former still enjoying some form of political and religious control over Latin Christendom (instead of being completely toothless).

Rome should ideally stay in Rhomania, but I'd also be perfectly okay if that position was untenable and they're forced to retreat to make way for a Spanish/Papal takeover. I'm sure the people would enjoy having the Papacy back to revitalize the city.
 
Top