sorry should have been more specific a current political map of Europe in this timeline
Last edited:
sorry should have been more specific a current political map of Europe in this timeline
The problem with that, as sensible as it is, is that the only people who'll have suffered internal economic damage, are the Romans, AGAIN - the argument stands that unless the Germans start to feel the pain, they'll not be averse to any war in the future. There needs to be a genuine punitive expedition, and a cost to this war. Theodor must be destroyed for his "arrogance" if you will, and that defeat burned into German and Latin history the same way as Smyrna is a valid strategic objective not just for Long Term Vengeance, but Short Term Vengeance, and to grant prestige to the Sideros name separate from Timur.
Further, we want to prevent this even happening again. Better borders are worthwhile, and the best borders for a Roman-Latin division are the Alps to the western reaches of the Carpathians, and the easiest route through that gap (and a major Latin city) is Vienna. Taking Vienna, and resettling it (and other cities on the Danube) really restricts the land routes into the Empire and provides (for now) a HUGE defence in depth, and a string of fortresses that are easily supplied via the Danube. Fortify the Carpathians and there isn't really an easy route INTO the Empire by land.
Would the Romans ever want to go further? I doubt it. Besides punitive expeditions going any further risks major overextension. But having Vienna become Siderosopolis? That is basically this Empires Carpathian-Vistula border. It would create a frontier robust enough that the army can be better positioned on softer borders.
I think took if the Triune contingent in this war is annihilated, since it makes up so much of the artillery train, that could significantly weaken Triune military ability to the extent that Arles, Spain, and the Empire of All North could be emboldened on land-based combat. This would be especially true if some smashing of Triune navy in the Caribbean can be done, in order to reduce maritime threats and damages that a war with the Triunes could cause to those states.The one check on the Triunes is that if move focus too much on the Rhine there’s the Spanish and Arles ready intervene. Splitting the Triune forces just enough would give all parties a fighting chance, a widen the scale of the war.
Germany is likely to suffer tremendously on their home turf. At the hands of the French and possibly other opportunists. And possibly internal division. I doubt anyone will miss the point that that is the direct consequence of Theodor's overreach and megalomania.
Theoretically, it might be a nice bonus if the Romans showed that attacks on the Empire will also result in additional retribution, but is that really worth the cost? Taking Vienna sounds nice, but how would that work in practice? The Balkans are already completely exhausted and thus unable to support any armies marching through. That will only get worse when the remnants of the allied army try to get home and leave as much scorched earth as possible in their tracks. Once the Romans reach Vienna, they are essentially in the same crappy supply situation as the Allies are in right now.
And the borders you describe might be somewhat favorable geographically, but I don't think their are suitable as a Roman-Latin divide. For one thing, you'd suddenly have massive amounts of Catholics inside the Empire: Hungarians, Croats, Germans, Slovaks etc. I don't think the Romans could feasibly hold that amount of land with more or less hostile subjects. Holding those borders would also be a huge drain on resources and manpower, as you are surrounded by hostile, strong Catholic powers of Lombardy, the HRE, and Poland.
Given how much they would have to spend to achieve all that, I think it's much smarter to just have Hungary, Serbia etc. as buffer states.
I do find it kind of funny that the Latin Aggression rhetoric and anti-German sentiment hasn't had notable effect on the Latin minorities currently residing in the empire, be it the Germans mentioned in the update living in the Taurus, the Nile Germans, merchant enclaves, Latin-rite Eastern Christians, Croatians, Catholics in Sicily, or any other group of Catholic people scattered about the empire who came for one reason or another.
I wouldn't be surprised if one is already in the works or at least being considered. This update was more about introducing the concept, so I think B444 is already planning to demonstrate how it manifests in practice for future updates.That is interesting - I'd find an update on those groups really interesting, especially their perspective on the war and that rhetoric
I do find it kind of funny that the Latin Aggression rhetoric and anti-German sentiment hasn't had notable effect on the Latin minorities currently residing in the empire, be it the Germans mentioned in the update living in the Taurus, the Nile Germans, merchant enclaves, Latin-rite Eastern Christians, Croatians, Catholics in Sicily, or any other group of Catholic people scattered about the empire who came for one reason or another.
It's the evil papist influence and the barbaric hereditary aristocracies that go along with them not the peoples themselves! The people when removed from that evil influence make perfectly happy imperial subjects!
Can't be, Asia itself is named after Anatolia.If Rhominia holds onto Anatolia will that be considered part of Europe in the future?