With any early modern PoD unite England, Hanover, and Saxony under a single monarch.
I suppose technically that would satisfy the OP, but I feel that wouldn't really meet the spirit of it, given that Prussia is liable to extinguish the royal titles of Hanover and Saxony.Does it matter how each of these states are included?
For example, is it ok to have a Hohenzollern UK, in which Prussia has annexed Hanover and Saxony?
This meme was made by Welf Gang.Unless you include Westphalia, Oldenburg, Holstein, Bremen, Hamburg, Brunswick and the North-Eastern Netherlands, you are not king of all the Saxons by a long shot.
Westphalians are Saxons?"King of all the Saxons", my arse.
Unless you include Westphalia, Oldenburg, Holstein, Bremen, Hamburg, Brunswick and the North-Eastern Netherlands, you are not king of all the Saxons by a long shot.
In contrast to the people from the modern state of Saxony Westphalians used to speak low German, and were part of the original stem duchy. The horses on the coat of arms of Lower Saxony and of NRW are actually the same horse. Widukind is allegedly from Westphalia.Westphalians are Saxons?
Most of northern Germany are saxonsWestphalians are Saxons?
"King of all the Saxons", my arse.
Unless you include Westphalia, Oldenburg, Holstein, Bremen, Hamburg, Brunswick and the North-Eastern Netherlands, you are not king of all the Saxons by a long shot.
Most of northern Germany are saxons
They would be mixed and if it walks like a saxon and talks like a saxon, it's a saxon.East Elbians are not Saxons. They originally Sorbs, Veleti, and other tribes. They Christianized and Germanized later.
The Transylvania Saxons feel awfully left out of this discussion thus far.
"King of all the Saxons", my arse.
Unless you include Westphalia, Oldenburg, Holstein, Bremen, Hamburg, Brunswick and the North-Eastern Netherlands, you are not king of all the Saxons by a long shot.
Saxe-Coburg Gotha is an Ernestine branch of the house of Wettin.Maybe get the Wettins to the throne of England, somehow.