How's the situation with the Battleships? Is gonna be as OTL?
+
Will they also built the Centaur-class light fleet carriers?
+
Will they also built the Centaur-class light fleet carriers?
Battleships have been OTL for now.How's the situation with the Battleships? Is gonna be as OTL?
+
Will they also built the Centaur-class light fleet carriers?
yeah couldn't find a proper logo otherwise. Thanks though!This timeline has been a really good read so far keep up the good work and I really like the inclusion of some good old New Zealand politics in this thread even if it’s just the logo of the British “National Labour Party”.
even if it’s just the logo of the British “National Labour Party”.
couldn't find a proper logo otherwise. Thanks though!
Despite this however the formation of the Commonwealth Council in 1935 was a pretty clear move towards better cooperation between all Dominions and to heal the ties that had been severed in the Great War, most especially for the Canadians and Australians. This news caused a great deal of anger in the United States; who was just now starting to recover from the Great Depression; as this clearly meant that the British had won in the long run for the competition over Canadian markets. However the simple fact was that with the increased shipping being done to accommodate increased trade, and with the advent of air travel for cargo and goods, the British had been exploiting every avenue they had to make their influence in Canada and the Canadian economics highly prevalent in this manner; and now Britain had won the metaphorical race to the Canadian markets; much to many angry muttering in the United States, as the American nation diverted their attempts to Central America and the Caribbean deeming the Commonwealth Nations, finally as a part of the British sphere of Influence.
Meanwhile the entire coalition was starting to fall apart and seeing the chaos, the monarch and sovereign of Great Britain, King George V moderated the crisis and instead advised the polity of the British government to instead form a national government between all the major parties involved.
This was accepted by Ramsay MacDonald, however many in the Labour Party themselves did not wish for this to happen, and after a tense few months, the Labour Party split up into the National Labour Party under Ramsay MacDonald who supported being a part of the National Government and the Labour Party itself, which did not support it. Negotiations with the Tories continued and the Conservatives largely accepted the proposal for a national government and the National Government was thus composed of three parties – Conservative, Liberal and National Labour.
The 1935 General Elections of Great Britain was thus largely divided along the lines of the National Government and the Labour Party. In other news, largely due to the strife of the breaking of the coalition, Lloyd-George officially retired from politics, and position of Prime Minister was taken over by the Liberal Politician Herbert Samuel.
suspicious of this Austrian claiming to be a nationalist Socialist for the Austrian people
Barefoot tribesmen don't do well when mustard gas is used against them, and even the regular Ethiopian Army wasn't any better protected against it.One must hope that the Ethiopians do better ITTL since that may well weaken Mussolini's power
Barefoot tribesmen don't do well when mustard gas is used against them, and even the regular Ethiopian Army wasn't any better protected against it.
Be made advices like these OTL which were accepted by the politicians largely. Besides the general elections were slated to happen this year (,1935) anyways.Nice chapter but i think this part is kinda strange. I dont think King George would advise a national goverment at that point. The UK is standing strong and at that point no major incident happend. I think he would advise for general elections. After the election with no clear winner, no coalition in sight and the italian<->ethipia war breaking out he could call for it.
Also i think the second Austrian should have been German or the this world has taken a strange turn.
I assume you are meaning trade dominance of goods not produced in Canada? Canada is not so much a market as a producer of resources and goods. For example Canada was the second largest auto manufacturer in the world post ww1 until 1923, there is a pretty large industrial complex in place and growing. Remember that OTL Canada produced over 800,000 military vehicles during ww2, over half of the Empire production, and than Japan, Italy and Germany combined. That industry was built up during the 20's and 30s. There were also many tool manufacturers etc. Goods "Made in Canada" were pretty prominent. at the time As i mentioned many manufacturers had been bought by American Parent companies but Ford of Canada trucks still have "Made in Canada" printed on them. I guess ITTL some of these companies could be British owned instead. Given the relatively small size of the Canadian market and large internal production the way Britain could increase trade would be the way they did OTL. When the Americans passed the Smoot-Hawley act they tariffed the resource imports from Canada so resources were directed more to Europe, especially to Britain. So buying more resources from Canada to support increased industrialization in Britain, which is probably happening anyway, seems a more realistic path than trying to out compete American imported goods in Canada that are already dominated by Canadian produced goods anyway.
That's what is basically happening in terms of economics in North America.I assume you are meaning trade dominance of goods not produced in Canada? Canada is not so much a market as a producer of resources and goods. For example Canada was the second largest auto manufacturer in the world post ww1 until 1923, there is a pretty large industrial complex in place and growing. Remember that OTL Canada produced over 800,000 military vehicles during ww2, over half of the Empire production, and than Japan, Italy and Germany combined. That industry was built up during the 20's and 30s. There were also many tool manufacturers etc. Goods "Made in Canada" were pretty prominent. at the time As i mentioned many manufacturers had been bought by American Parent companies but Ford of Canada trucks still have "Made in Canada" printed on them. I guess ITTL some of these companies could be British owned instead. Given the relatively small size of the Canadian market and large internal production the way Britain could increase trade would be the way they did OTL. When the Americans passed the Smoot-Hawley act they tariffed the resource imports from Canada so resources were directed more to Europe, especially to Britain. So buying more resources from Canada to support increased industrialization in Britain, which is probably happening anyway, seems a more realistic path than trying to out compete American imported goods in Canada that are already dominated by Canadian produced goods anyway.
Be made advices like these OTL which were accepted by the politicians largely. Besides the general elections were slated to happen this year (,1935) anyways.
Hm, true enough, will edit that part; thanks!I know but otl was vastly different to itl. They formed the national goverment in reaction to the crisis 1931 and never left it until after the war. Here they dont form it and since the election was slated for 1935 anyways i dont think he would go for the national goverment first. As i said i think he would just say: Since the elections are this year go for the general Election. And after that doesnt really work since noone has a majoritiy would he advise for the national goverment. Doesnt really change the endpoint but i think the way how to get there has an impact on the politics during the election and afterwards.
slightly yesYou have a bad habit of overusing "Meanwhile".
Some portion of what you ask is in the new chapter, though not all. The rest will come slowly; no worries. Any thoughts about the TL?I'd like to know how other countries are reacting to TTL's richer U.K. Are other countries copying some of the successful UK policies. It must be clear to most that not being on the Gold Standard and increased government spending on infrastructure where major factors in Britian coming out of the Great Depression earlier than most.
Certainly I'd expect calls from within the US for similar policies (however I can't see them coming of the Gold Standard). Also a UK that is richer, sooner is going to increase its trade both for exports and imports. This would have a positive effect on US production IMHO. would this allow the US and some other economies to start to recover earlier? Also the UK is investing in other countries. This would have a similar effect.
Finally what do the leaders of other countries feel about Britain and have their perceptions altered duevthe changes in TTL?