As the father of two sons and two daughters, President von Lettow-Vorbeck had a personal investment in this cause, and would soon bring the Bündische Jugend (Federal Youth), the leading youth association, under the wing of the government when he created the new Reichsministerium für Bildung und Kinderschutz (Reich Ministry of Education and Child Protection), whose job it would be to monitor not only the schools of the Reich, but indeed all facilities and programs geared towards children to ensure both quality and safety. Light pushback came from several of the Free States who claimed that this interfered with previous precedent which left the running of schools mostly to the individual states (within a few restrictions), but they were quickly assured that this new ministry did not have the power to control school curriculum, focusing mainly on the staff and disciplinary measures. Its power over the youth organisations would be more extensive, directing funding and numbers towards groups with Conservative leaders and promoting activities like hiking, canoeing, and shooting. The goals were twofold: To increase the public health and fitness of the next generation and to properly prepare young boys for a potential future in the military. In 1935 this ministry would absorb the Jugendamt (Youth Office) and from then on would be the nation-wide authority on childcare and the front line against child abuse.
Since youth organisations feature so prominently in this chapter, how is the Jungdeutscher Order doing? I seem to recall that it was the largest organisation of its type untill its forced merger into the Hitlerjugend.

Speaking of organisations in general. Does Von Lettow-Vorbeck support any non-German groups on the continent? Groups that could be considered usefull allies in the future?
 
Since youth organisations feature so prominently in this chapter, how is the Jungdeutscher Order doing? I seem to recall that it was the largest organisation of its type untill its forced merger into the Hitlerjugend.

Speaking of organisations in general. Does Von Lettow-Vorbeck support any non-German groups on the continent? Groups that could be considered usefull allies in the future?
As far as I am aware, they were more of a paramilitary group that happened to have a youth wing than a true youth organisation. They and the other Far-Right groups have largely stopped operating because of the new Reichspolizei absorbing a lot of those sort of people, though they are still lurking and are loosely tied to the Far-Right groups who want to overthrow the Republic and Lettow-Vorbeck to establish a fascist dictatorship.

What do you mean by non-German groups? Like the Ukraninan nationalist group?
 
though they are still lurking and are loosely tied to the Far-Right groups who want to overthrow the Republic and Lettow-Vorbeck to establish a fascist dictatorship.
On that note, what far-right party is more prominent right now? The now-fascist DNVP or the more "revolutionary" NSFB that exists ITTL?
 
On that note, what far-right party is more prominent right now? The now-fascist DNVP or the more "revolutionary" NSFB that exists ITTL?
The DNVP is not technically fascist yet, at least in their own definition, but they are the closest parallel to what we would consider "fascist" a la the Nazis. They are also the strongest of the Far-Right parties and saw a slight boost following Lettow-Vorbeck's restricting of Junker finances following the Eastern Aid Crisis. Hugenberg still calls for toppling Lettow-Vorbeck, but the DNVP as a whole is sort of... waiting to see what L-V does. They like a lot of his aims so far but they disapprove of his willingness to compromise and work with Catholics and Socialists. They keep to the sidelines for now because they worry that an active push against L-V without good reason might cause another group fracture which would basically be the death of the DNVP.

The NSFB remains very fringe and mostly has its following in the Eastermost parts of Germany. They are the ones calling for an annihilation of Poland alongside the Soviet Union, which makes L-V dislike them because he hates the Soviets more than he does the Poles.
 
The NSFB remains very fringe and mostly has its following in the Eastermost parts of Germany. They are the ones calling for an annihilation of Poland alongside the Soviet Union, which makes L-V dislike them because he hates the Soviets more than he does the Poles.
On that note, I do wonder what LV could do against the Soviets, and how that could fit with a hypothetical war with Poland. The countries where the Soviets could credibly expand are Romania, Poland, the Baltics and Finland.

The Soviets pressuring Romania into giving up Bessarabia is not much of an issue for Germany, in fact it could be beneficial if it scares Romania enough to go looking for a protector.

The Baltics are much more important, but there are some complications for Germany to intervene there. They have the Memel dispute with Lithuania, and Estonia and Latvia were wary of Germany due to their own German landowner class. Getting them into a mutual defense agreement might not be trivial.

Finland could be supported with military stuff, but they would also be reluctant to commit to much before the Soviets attack, and without foreknowledge it would be hard to predict how well they could do. I wouldn’t expect to be a central part of German planning, but they could easily be a factor in an eventual conflict.

And then you have Poland, which is both the most important avenue to block Soviet expansion and the hardest one to deal with politically. If Germany ever happened to go to war with Poland, it would be extremely hard to stop the Soviets from just occupying Eastern Poland in the chaos. Poland could perhaps agree to give up Danzig, but they are never giving up the Corridor willingly, and LV doesn’t sound willing to compromise on this. At some point there will have to be some planning on whether going to war with Poland at the risk of ending with the Soviets at the Vistula is really worth it.
 
"... Adenauer’s moral convictions would not be enough to save the Republic..” - Excerpt from The Life and Death of Konrad Adenauer by Anne Frank, 1967
Gloomy foreshadowing here. Nothing in the narrative through this chapter seems to point to the fall of the Republic.
...Anne Frank, 1967 (Youngest-ever winner of the Goethe Prize for Literary Excellence with her autobiography “Child of a Jewish Soldier”, published 1948
OTOH, this implies that the fall of the Republic does not lead to particularly bad things.
 
the SPD’s majority in the Reichstag
ITYM "plurality"; there are 597 seats in the Reichstag. A majority would be 299, but the SPD has only 215. The SPD is by far the largest party (the Zentrum is second with 137), but that doesn't get control. Vide OTL 1932-33, when the NSDAP had a plurality but could not form a government.
 
Gloomy foreshadowing here. Nothing in the narrative through this chapter seems to point to the fall of the Republic.

OTOH, this implies that the fall of the Republic does not lead to particularly bad things.
The fall of the Republic will be, in many ways, just as much of a surprise to the people who bring it down as it is to the average citizen.
ITYM "plurality"; there are 597 seats in the Reichstag. A majority would be 299, but the SPD has only 215. The SPD is by far the largest party (the Zentrum is second with 137), but that doesn't get control. Vide OTL 1932-33, when the NSDAP had a plurality but could not form a government.
That's a good point, thanks, I should've remembered that! Will go fix
 
What do you mean by non-German groups? Like the Ukraninan nationalist group?
Yes. In Belgium for example Leon Degrelle got quite a bit of aide from the Nazi's for his electioneering. The Flemish Movement in general was quite positive towards the Germans (they treated us fairly last war). The two exceptions to this were explicit socialists/communists (for obvious reasons) and Joris van Severen, but with Germany not having a pan-Germanist attitude towards the Low Countries, he may be cool with Germany as well
 
Yes. In Belgium for example Leon Degrelle got quite a bit of aide from the Nazi's for his electioneering. The Flemish Movement in general was quite positive towards the Germans (they treated us fairly last war). The two exceptions to this were explicit socialists/communists (for obvious reasons) and Joris van Severen, but with Germany not having a pan-Germanist attitude towards the Low Countries, he may be cool with Germany as well
Hmm, I really have not thought about it much beyond the Auslandsdeutsche and the Ukranians. You are right than Pan-Germanism won't be anything he cares about (though he would favour the Flemish by nature of them not being French-speaking). If anything, interest in non-German groops might be where Göring shines through. To be honest I cannot think of any major ones besides the famous ones like the Catalonians and the more visible minorites like the Germans in the East.

The issue with too much minority secessionism is that it sets a dangerous precedent, especially if Germany succeeds in expanding and acquires more of its own minorities beyond the Poles.
 
Hmm, I really have not thought about it much beyond the Auslandsdeutsche and the Ukranians. You are right than Pan-Germanism won't be anything he cares about (though he would favour the Flemish by nature of them not being French-speaking). If anything, interest in non-German groops might be where Göring shines through. To be honest I cannot think of any major ones besides the famous ones like the Catalonians and the more visible minorites like the Germans in the East.

The issue with too much minority secessionism is that it sets a dangerous precedent, especially if Germany succeeds in expanding and acquires more of its own minorities beyond the Poles.
It honestly makes little to no sense for Von Lettow to try and establish diplomatic contacts with some niche minorities. Why would Von Lettow care about Catalonia for example? Why build an upstart regime that won't have a big majority of the population on its side, depend on your support to not get conquered, and involve you in a conflict you don't care about? Remember this isn't Hitler we are talking about, this is a German conservative who has no dreams of world domination. His objectives aren't furthered by aligning with niche minorities which put him into conflict with bigger countries.
 
Last edited:
It honestly makes little to no sense for Von Lettow to try and establish diplomatic contacts with some niche minorities. Why would Von Lettow care about Catalonia for example? Why build an upstart regime that won't have a big majority of the population on its side, depend on your support to not get conquered, and involve you in a conflict you don't care about? Remember this isn't Hitler we are talking about, this is a German conservative who has no dreams of world domination. His objectives aren't furthered by aligning with niche minorities which put him into conflict with bigger countries.
That was sort of my feeling. With the exception of a specific few such as the aforemntioned Ukranians and maybe the Hungarians if he targets the Czechs, there is not much to gain. There is basically no chance of him pushing to annex Belgium so, unless the situation miraculously ends with a Belgian invasion of Germany, he is content to be friendly with both sides of Belgium.
Speaking of which, what plans do you have for Romania and Bulgaria for all this? Might as well ask.
I don't want to spoil it too much, but I will give a teaser. Not much will change for Romania for a while, but for Bulgaria... Bulgaria will become the centrepiece of a tug-of-war for Mediterranean influence between Germany and Italy.

Next chapter is the one on Austria and the Balkans, though it is mainly just a briefing on the overall situation so far without any massive changes.
Can he build The Big building in Neu Alte Berlin? :p
I've actually been having a desire to place it somewhere near but not in Berlin proper, like perhaps Potsdam, to sort of emphasise that Germany isn't the centralised "Everything in the capital" place like France. But we shall see.

Also ideas for this new building are welcome. At the moment I am thinking of it being a modern twist on one of the grand civilisations of old, like Egypt or Greece or maybe even China. Also, unlike the Eiffel Tower, I'd like it to serve a purpose as a museum or something, as an extra one-up on the French.
 
Last edited:
I've actually been having a desire to place it somewhere near but not in Berlin proper, like perhaps Potsdam, to sort of emphasise that Germany isn't the centralised "Everything in the capital" place like France. But we shall see.
If it’s something that’s meant to serve as a very distinguishable icon of Germany, then being in the capital makes a lot of sense, since it’s the place that most people will visit and that represents the country the most.
 
I am interested in German Finnish relations. My memory is that the Finns viewed Germany as a counter balance to the SU.

"After the 1917 February Revolution, the position of Finland as a part of the Russian Empire was questioned, mainly by Social Democrats. The Finnish Parliament, controlled by social democrats, passed the so-called Power Act to give the highest authority to the Parliament. This was rejected by the Russian Provisional Government which decided to dissolve the Parliament.[60] New elections were conducted, in which right-wing parties won with a slim majority. Some social democrats refused to accept the result and still claimed that the dissolution of the parliament (and thus the ensuing elections) were extralegal. The two nearly equally powerful political blocs, the right-wing parties, and the social-democratic party were highly antagonized.

Finnish military leader and statesman C. G. E. Mannerheim as general officer leading the White Victory Parade at the end of the Finnish Civil War in Helsinki, 1918
The October Revolution in Russia changed the geopolitical situation once more. Suddenly, the right-wing parties in Finland started to reconsider their decision to block the transfer of the highest executive power from the Russian government to Finland, as the Bolsheviks took power in Russia. The right-wing government, led by Prime Minister P. E. Svinhufvud, presented the Declaration of Independence on 4 December 1917, which was officially approved on 6 December, by the Finnish Parliament. The Russian Soviet Federative Socialist Republic (RSFSR), led by Vladimir Lenin, recognized independence on 4 January 1918.[61]

On 27 January 1918 the government began to disarm the Russian forces in Pohjanmaa. The socialists gained control of southern Finland and Helsinki, but the White government continued in exile from Vaasa.[62][63] This sparked the brief but bitter civil war. The Whites, who were supported by Imperial Germany, prevailed over the Reds,[64] and their self-proclaimed Finnish Socialist Workers' Republic.[65] After the war, tens of thousands of Reds were interned in camps, where thousands were executed or died from malnutrition and disease. Deep social and political enmity was sown between the Reds and Whites and would last until the Winter War and even beyond.[66][67] The civil war and the 1918–1920 activist expeditions called "Kinship Wars" into Soviet Russia strained Eastern relations.[68][6"
 
Another question to the group: The abdication of King Edward VIII. Obviously there were a lot of reasons for the man's forced abdication, not the least of which his flagrant indiscretion with his mistress and his unwillingness to really uphold the rules of kingship which were long-enshrined. However, one contributing factor was also certainly his closeness to Hitler, who was already seen as iffy.

Now, Edward will not stay king. It just isn't realistic without a bigger change and honestly I find it a bit done-to-death when there is a much more interesting potentisl to explore with the IRL royals. But I am wondering how much the lack of Hitler would affect his perception, and if it might have any small effects on his fate after the abdication. Thoughts?
 

TheSpectacledCloth

Gone Fishin'
Another question to the group: The abdication of King Edward VIII. Obviously there were a lot of reasons for the man's forced abdication, not the least of which his flagrant indiscretion with his mistress and his unwillingness to really uphold the rules of kingship which were long-enshrined. However, one contributing factor was also certainly his closeness to Hitler, who was already seen as iffy.

Now, Edward will not stay king. It just isn't realistic without a bigger change and honestly I find it a bit done-to-death when there is a much more interesting potentisl to explore with the IRL royals. But I am wondering how much the lack of Hitler would affect his perception, and if it might have any small effects on his fate after the abdication. Thoughts?
I imagine he and the rest of the British establishment will be more fond of the new German government and will be less likely to oppose them on their expansionist actions.
 
Another question to the group: The abdication of King Edward VIII. Obviously there were a lot of reasons for the man's forced abdication, not the least of which his flagrant indiscretion with his mistress and his unwillingness to really uphold the rules of kingship which were long-enshrined. However, one contributing factor was also certainly his closeness to Hitler, who was already seen as iffy.

Now, Edward will not stay king. It just isn't realistic without a bigger change and honestly I find it a bit done-to-death when there is a much more interesting potentisl to explore with the IRL royals. But I am wondering how much the lack of Hitler would affect his perception, and if it might have any small effects on his fate after the abdication. Thoughts?

If you can avoid EVIII's abdication much wouldn't change beside one big scandal is avoided. Perhaps queen Elizabeth II is more fine for idea of abdication after she turns 90 or at least soon after prince Philip's death (assuming that they still marry and Philip still lives as long as in OTL).
 
Top