16:51 Service to (Rail in the UK, mk2)

Devvy

Donor
Coming back to this after a busy few weeks with work & family!

Any chance of a map now showing the Network South East lines that are electrified.

I don't have a map for NSE (it's too big, complicated and unwieldy!), but the Chiltern Lines will be the only major non-electrified route. I'd see that being done somewhere around 2030 if we were to continue.
 

Devvy

Donor
Chapter 12: Intercity in 1990s

The 1980s had been a difficult time for Intercity after the birth of it's business sector. However, hard work, grit and determination had meant that it had managed to turn an annual operating loss into a small profit by the end of the decade, despite set backs such as restrictions on the purchase of extra Intercity 125 trains, and the continual refusal for major infrastructure works to improve main line running. By 1989, the situation could no longer be ignored (helped in Westminster by Intercity's financial revolution), and British Rail commissioned it's now famous Intercity 250 project team.

The Intercity 250 team was a broad team of people, in order to develop Intercity's "Railway of Tomorrow". Engineers for building a new 160mph-capable train (operational speed at 250km/h - or 155mph, leading to the name) and the signalling infrastructure to go with it, looking how to run it at the high speeds, and other specialists on how to develop the concept into a success story. The result was somewhat controversial at the time, but obvious looking back. 250km/h trains could not co-exist on the existing lines with the existing services. Dedicated high speed lines, similar to those successfully used in France by the TGV system would be needed, and this meant the route could bypass smaller stops and focus on the profitable long-distance express services.

Recognising the realistic limitations of Treasury accountants though, BR refined the proposal. Large amounts of existing track would be dedicated to Intercity - mainly in urban areas where trains were likely to be slowing anyway for station stops, and the route would make large use of the historic Great Central Main Line, closed during the 1960s. The route would initially focus on the Birmingham, Manchester and Leeds routes, although the system was designed for later extension if the project proved successful. An extension from Birmingham to Wolverhampton was later added by the Labour Government in 1992, keen for urban regeneration, but meant that most of the stretch from the London-Nottingham trunk route to Birmingham would be new build rather then on an existing dismantled alignment (more precisely; the stretch between Rugby and Solihull would be new build). The route would run via a rebuilt Birmingham Snow Hill station, and on to Wolverhampton Low Level station, via dedicated lines, and making use of the Chiltern Main Line alignment on the Birmingham approach, as the route had been constructed for quadruple track.

hs90.jpg

The initial route map.

The resulting design for what are now the first generation of Intercity high speed trains borrowed heavily from the design of the Eurostar train (itself a derivative of the French TGV), but geared for a slightly slower operation with a marginally better acceleration and optimised for various British sensibilities. The higher platform enabled step-free access (and thus direct wheelchair access), the signalling system was completely different, designed with only "actual" colour light signals on approaches to stations, and in-cab signalling for the rest of the route with signal & speed information relayed via radio signal into the cab. Test runs with the Intercity 125 had highlighted the difficulty of drivers seeing signals at high speed, therefore the colour light signals were only installed where trains would definitely be running at low speed.

Overall, the project would bring journey times heavily down: London-Birmingham would be just over an hour (01:05), London-Manchester would be 2:00, and London-Leeds would be 1:45, smashing existing journey times, with a clockwork-like 30-minute service frequency to match on each route.

ic250.jpg

Initial concept art of the Intercity 250 train.

The project was also closely linked to the Manchester 2000 bid for the Olympic games, which was ultimately successful, and would play an important part in ferrying athletes and spectators between the capital and primary international gateways in London with the Olympic Village at Manchester. The route in to Manchester would make use of the historic Woodhead Line, last used only a few years previously in 1981. The main tunnels had already been built for overhead electrification, so it was the ideal route in, although the now Manchester commuter service to Hadfield and Glossop would be pruned somewhat. Some of the small and lesser used newer stations would be closed to create capacity, with the commuter service only running to Glossop in order to fit in with the express services.

Finally, when it opened, the services would be branded "Intercity Velocity" - representing the big step forward in speed, with the trains branded as "Velocity 1", the first in a new generation of trains for the UK. The name was intended to make a clear break from the older Intercity services - these trains ran on a largely dedicated network, at high speed, and between key cities.

--------------------------
Notes: So Intercity 250 eventually in more detail. OTL, the IC250 project entailed 250km/h capable trains, and also called for the express WCML services to be diverted on to the GCML south of Rugby. In this TL, due to the non-electrification of the ECML in the 1980s, the longer GCML has been used, in order to also cater for faster ECML services. The vast majority of the route will be on abandoned rail alignments - keeping costs much lower, and allowing focus to be on the actual rail infrastructure to support 250km/h operation - of which the GCML was built with a minimum 1-mile curve radius which comfortably allows 200km/h operation, and the vast majority of it (at least the trunk line area south of Nottingham) appears to have gentler curves allowing faster operation to around 250km/h.

The prime areas where new alignments are needed are between Tring and Aylesbury where the Euston services cross to the GCML - very short. From Rugby to Solihull to allow Birmingham services to access the city - mainly along the side of the A45 & Coventry Airport where possible to keep it uncontroversial. And the last bit through Nottingham city centre as the original GCML alignment has been lost - here I see a new station built in the rail triangle, with Intercity Velocity platforms under the main "conventional" rail platforms.

For those who want to see the detailed map of the route(s):
http://www.scribblemaps.com/maps/view/APjpBVcZsu/

Also; Manchester manages to get the 2000 Olympics. Sadly this means that it's highly unlikely for London to get the 2012 Olympics ( :( - I went to London 2012!).

As some people will inevitably ask why it's routed to Manchester Victoria rather then Piccadilly:
a) Victoria has much more spare capacity
b) Victoria has more through tracks along the entire alignment (6-track capable, rather then 2-track through Piccadilly)
c) Piccadilly has an insanely busy junction right outside it that all trains have to cross; Victoria has enough capacity for dedicated tracks for IC250.

We've obviously killed off the long distance Midland Metro as well!

Boo! You gave me false hope that there had been an update! :D

Ask and ye shall receive!
 
Last edited:
Well, there's room for four tracks in most places between Solihull and Birmingham, don't think there is between Birmingham and Wolves, but I suppose this scuppers the Snow Hill Lines concept.

That expensive boondoggle the Metro goes away, perhaps it will be replaced by proper trams.
 
Hmmm... yes, wonder why infamous?

Edit: is there any way to get from eg Birmingham to Manchester, without going through london?

Stour Valley line from Barad Dur Hbf, then up through Dudley Port to Wolves, probably not enough Brum-Manchesterford traffic to justify it otherwise.
 

Devvy

Donor
Hmmm... yes, wonder why infamous?

Edit: is there any way to get from eg Birmingham to Manchester, without going through london?

Infamous....that was a typo. For some reason I had it in my head that infamous=famous like inflammable=flammable. Will correct!

And there is still the usual "classic" Intercity service available from Birmingham to Manchester, but there is no option to use the Intercity Velocity service to do it. Yet....

Well, there's room for four tracks in most places between Solihull and Birmingham, don't think there is between Birmingham and Wolves, but I suppose this scuppers the Snow Hill Lines concept.

That expensive boondoggle the Metro goes away, perhaps it will be replaced by proper trams.

As you say, the whole Solihill - Birmingham alighment is quad-track capable, it's just had platforms built on it, or double track slewed across to slightly ease curves that has used up the space OTL. It does kind of scupper the Snow Hill Lines, although trains from Kidderminster can still run into New Street, and then through and switch to the Chiltern Main Line.

Expensive? I suspect it's a bargain compared to Edinburgh. :D

Used it last week on Friday. Was quite impressed; was quick, convenient and reasonably priced. My only complaint is the narrow seats (and I'm not overweight at all!).
 
As you say, the whole Solihill - Birmingham alighment is quad-track capable, it's just had platforms built on it, or double track slewed across to slightly ease curves that has used up the space OTL. It does kind of scupper the Snow Hill Lines, although trains from Kidderminster can still run into New Street, and then through and switch to the Chiltern Main Line.

Well, it's effectively four track to Tyseley anyway and then I think you'd just have to re-skew and maybe do something at Olton station - both Solihull and Acocks Green were designed as 4 platform.

The problem is, will this stop the North Warks and the Solihull's being a 20 minute service.

The number of people who actually use the services to cross Birmingham is actually fairly low. A few hardy souls changing at Smethwick Galton Bridge and shoppers for Touchwood in Solihull.
 
Used it last week on Friday. Was quite impressed; was quick, convenient and reasonably priced. My only complaint is the narrow seats (and I'm not overweight at all!).

Haven't had a chance to use it yet. However when I've seen trams they do look busy.

On a slightly related topic I'm now the proud owner of Train Simulator 2014, which is massive fun. However it has brought out a slightly destructive side in me - I've deliberately crashed three trains. :D
 

Devvy

Donor
Haven't had a chance to use it yet. However when I've seen trams they do look busy.

On a slightly related topic I'm now the proud owner of Train Simulator 2014, which is massive fun. However it has brought out a slightly destructive side in me - I've deliberately crashed three trains. :D

You fiend!
 
An extension from Birmingham to Wolverhampton was later added by the Labour Government in 1992, keen for urban regeneration...
As is the way. If Birmingham gets something transport related or funding then the other cities in the region get the hump if they don't also. IIRC Iain mentioned it as one of the things that made Centro committees so much fun.


Overall, the project would bring journey times heavily down: London-Birmingham would be just over an hour (01:05), London-Manchester would be 2:00, and London-Leeds would be 1:45, smashing existing journey times, with a clockwork-like 30-minute service frequency to match on each route.
Hhmm, maybe not for Leeds or Manchester but that would put Birmingham squarely within semi-decent regular commuting time to London. What if any intermediate stops were you thinking of? Wouldn't help with travel times if there were too many but some could probably help drum up support for it, although the arguments over who gets them could get nasty. Was this route looked at in our timeline as an alternative for HS2? Wondering why it lost out if it did. Shame that it's only a double track from the looks of it since there was talk of using it as a freight route at one point IIRC which is incompatible with high speed trains, quad might have allowed a pair of lines for freight and a pair for Intercity.


Finally, when it opened, the services would be branded "Intercity Velocity" - representing the big step forward in speed, with the trains branded as "Velocity 1", the first in a new generation of trains for the UK. The name was intended to make a clear break from the older Intercity services - these trains ran on a largely dedicated network, at high speed, and between key cities.
Out of interest is this your idea or something they really came up with? It certainly has the air of the nonsense that marketing and PR firms would likely come up with.


We've obviously killed off the long distance Midland Metro as well!
And verily, there was much rejoicing. ;)
 

Devvy

Donor
And hop back on after having my hopes crushed by Uruguay....

As is the way. If Birmingham gets something transport related or funding then the other cities in the region get the hump if they don't also. IIRC Iain mentioned it as one of the things that made Centro committees so much fun.

Yep, the West Midlands has had Wolverhampton and Birmingham connected to London, but Yorkshire also has Sheffield and Leeds connected to London at speed, as is Manchester. Probably semi-fair all round, only losers are Scotland, Tyneside & Liverpool; take a guess where we'll be heading next....

Hhmm, maybe not for Leeds or Manchester but that would put Birmingham squarely within semi-decent regular commuting time to London. What if any intermediate stops were you thinking of? Wouldn't help with travel times if there were too many but some could probably help drum up support for it, although the arguments over who gets them could get nasty. Was this route looked at in our timeline as an alternative for HS2? Wondering why it lost out if it did. Shame that it's only a double track from the looks of it since there was talk of using it as a freight route at one point IIRC which is incompatible with high speed trains, quad might have allowed a pair of lines for freight and a pair for Intercity.

I actually wrote for no intermediate stops; and no stations bar the marked ones on the Velocity network. I'd see local support being drummed up as banishing the express trains from the local routes, meaning much more capacity for local trains. Freight becomes a lot easier to route as well.

I don't think HS2 really looked at it; although I'm obviously interesting in HS2, I can't help but feel they've plotted almost the worst route possible for it, and the obsession with 400km/h running has demanded a challenging alignment. There's been a lot said about the alternatives to HS2 in OTL; the GCML is frequently trumpeted as an alternative. Only problem is it ends at Aylesbury, and needs a route into London (we've done that here by continuing to use the WCML tracks into Euston, which also sacrifices going anywhere near Heathrow). It's also been heavily built over from Nottingham northwards, and reused for the Robin Hood line already. Personally I wouldn't do HS2 (shock-gasp) - mainly because although I like it, I think it's too controversial and will be held up forever by court cases and NIMBYs.

Out of interest is this your idea or something they really came up with? It certainly has the air of the nonsense that marketing and PR firms would likely come up with.

Intercity Velocity is all my idea :winkytongue: - glad it's convincing!
 

Devvy

Donor
Chapter 13: Intercity in 2000s

The 1990s had seen Intercity pour their heart and soul into their new trunk line (now formerly known as NTL-1) from London to the Midlands and North. Trains initially ran at 200km/h for the first 3 months, in order to avoid the type of PR disaster that had occurred previously when the APT (Advanced Passenger Train) had promised much, and delivered little, and thus a gentle start promised the capability to get going on the line when services started on 1st February, before ramping up for the summer period. By the time that 2001 had come around, the full 250km/h operation of trains brought journey times down further then previous promised, allowing Intercity a second wind in advertising; London - Birmingham was 1:00, - Manchester was 1:50, and - Leeds was 1:35)

apt.jpg

British Rail's new Velocity services were banishing the failure of the earlier APT attempt from memory with it's successes.
Credit: Ben Gamble

The rapid adoption by the public of the new Intercity Velocity services provided the springboard for just that. Post-2000, passenger numbers soared on the rail network generally, ironically due to the rapid adoption of the car which now caused increasing congestion. On the other hand, the speed, comfort and reliability of the new services provided a vivid contrast to the car and appealing mode of transport; revenue consequently soared at Intercity, with the London - Manchester route experiencing rapid growth in particular. The public impression of the services was that of a fast, sleek and comfortable express, with the London-Manchester route in particular being an early British Rail adopter of Wifi technology for passengers as standard. Catering was also carefully looked after, and fried breakfast proved extremely popular on early morning services; other catering was also popular, with analysts pointing to the longer train trips taken as well as longer runs between stations (and so less risk of losing your seat when grabbing some food!).

The growth and popularity of the services led to the backing by Prime Minister Michael Portillo of number of extensions to the network, although critics would flag it as an ailing attempt to woo northern voters as opinion polls showed a swing away from the Conservative Party. Several new additions to the network were authorised:
- A new branch from Wakefield to York to connect to Newcastle; mostly re-engineering the Dearne Valley Line.
- A new line from Birmingham to Nottingham, to allow a new generation of CrossCountry services to operate from Birmingham north, which would also feature a station at East Midlands Airport.
- The extension from Leeds to Carlisle using the existing Settle-Carlisle route (which longer distance Leeds services rerouted via Burnley & Preston to Blackpool), which would be dedicated to Intercity usage to connect to Edinburgh and Glasgow.
- 2 new stations to be built; the first at Leeds Holbeck to allow IC-V services to run through Leeds on their way to Scotland (linked to both Leeds and Bradford by the above Metro), and a new combined station at Birmingham Moor Street with platforms for both Intercity Velocity services and NSE terminating services on the top level, and "classic" Intercity services and other New Street bound services on the lower level. The Intercity Velocity service from Birmingham was popular, but there were concerns from both the West Midlands County Council and British Rail that the separate stations severely impeded interchange at the "Rail crossroads of England" and acted to handicap patronage of the services.

The new alignment to connect to the ECML at York would diverge just north of Sheffield, where the new branch would run along a newly Velocity dedicated Dearne Valley Line, crossing past Ferrybridge Power Station on a new viaduct to maintain grade separation, and then some new stretches of lines before merging into the ECML just south of York next to the A64 ring road. The 2 trains per hour service to Newcastle was to be maintained, with both trains stopping at Nottingham, Pontefract Parkway (next to the M62/A1 junction, following the closure of Pontefract Baghill station), York and terminating at Newcastle, but with alternating trains stopping at either Darlington or Durham (1tph each).

ntl2.jpg

The new NTL-2 route would interlink to East Midlands Airport, allowing a new generation of passengers to train & fly.

The new Birmingham to Nottingham line (named NTL-2) would stretch from Birmingham, diverging from the Birmingham-Wolverhampton line at Wednesbury, and using the remains of the South Staffordshire Line to run through Walsall (with a station stop), and then to Lichfield using the disused alignment again. The Birmingham Cross City Line would be pulled back to terminate at Lichfield City, with the route north of it dedicated to Velocity services, which would run through Burton on dedicated tracks without stopping and then running east using existing lines (dedicated again), and a new alignment running through the East Midlands Airport. Although Birmingham and Manchester Airports had been successful, authorisation was given by Westminster for a large expansion to East Mids Airport - it was an airport with little surrounding residential areas, close to a motorway. Intercity would link the airport with fast services to Birmingham, Nottingham, Sheffield, Manchester & Leeds - all large cities with a travel time to the airport less then an hour. A new "Plane & Train" marketing arrangement was signed with air operator BMI, who would be able to sell Intercity tickets to their air passengers and receive commission on the sale. This would be operated via a new Crosscountry style service operating from Birmingham to the East Midlands Airport and then on northwards to either Manchester or Leeds.

One of the biggest changes was the new station in West Yorkshire, with the building of the new Leeds Holbeck station to allow through services via the Settle-Carlisle line which would be temporarily closed for engineering works in order to upgrade it to 90-100mph running throughout (and faster where possible), linking to the West Coast Main Line at Carlisle. The Ribbehead Viaduct in particular would need significant engineering works (hence the temporary closure) in order to make it completely structurally sound again after years of neglect and adapt it for at-speed operation. As part of the works, the Scottish line from Carstairs Junction on the WCML to Edinburgh would finally be electrified, and the Scottish capital would finally welcome London expresses under electric power. The Scottish Government was in the initial processes of planning for a new high speed line between Edinburgh and Glasgow which could eventually be used by Intercity Velocity, but for the time being it was much slower, with London-Glasgow at 04:30 (down from 05:15), and London-Edinburgh at 04:45 (down from 05:30).

The Leeds Holbeck station, just to the west of the existing station would feature elevated platforms for the Velocity services, preserving grade separation, and lower platforms for the conventional trains running through the junction, allowing the maximum level of interchange. There would also be funding for a Leeds Underground system, which would involve the transfer of portions of the Leeds-Bradford urban railway network to a new metro system, in order to free up capacity between Leeds and Skipton, as well as the junction to the west of Leeds Central station. The new Holbeck station would also be a stop on the new "White Rose Metro", which would bring in quick and frequent connections from across Leeds (including the central station) as well as from Bradford. The Metro system would later informally become known as the "Tyke Train" or "The Worm", as the formal name "White Rose Metro" didn't particularly roll off the tongue.

By 2005 the Prime Minister Portillo had been replaced by Anthony Blair, and new Labour Prime Minister authorised initial work to begin in to extending the system to Liverpool, whose residents had fought a highly public campaign to be connected - "The only major city to not be connected!", "Liverpool Unplugged!", and "Merseyside Adrift" were all slogans banded about. The 2008 economic downturn took effects across the country, and the Merseyside extension was seen as a way to keep construction firms in business and continue improving the national infrastructure. The route would be extended from Manchester Victoria west to Liverpool Lime Street via a new and continued separated high speed line adjacent to the M62. Importantly, the NTL-3 at Wolverhampton would also be extended north, allowing an improved West Midlands service (to be 4 trains per hour) to be extended further north to Manchester and Liverpool (2 trains per hour each) in order to keep up with growing demand at Manchester.

brum-gc.jpg

The vision for the new "Birmingham Central" railway station.

Birmingham would also receive a new railway station, at the crossing point of it's two major rail corridors allowing passengers to easily interchange between the two routes. The station, largely built and extended out of the existing Moor Street station would also allow the closure of the Snow Hill station for Velocity services, which as a lightweight construction (needed in order to control costs at the time, when the Velocity project was still uncertain) was struggling with passenger numbers despite it's remote location compared to other rail services.

--------------------------
Notes: The name "New Trunk Line" is from Japan - it's the literal translation of "Shinkansen", upon which the famous Bullet Trains run. I was bloody impressed with those during my time in Japan.

So....
- Extension to Newcastle via the Dearne Valley Line (from Rotherham to York), with a flyover at Ferryhill Power Station....don't want those slow coal trains getting in the way. A new Pontefract Parkway station, fulfilling the same kind of role that Bristol Parkway does; a useful express station stop for those in the area (ideally situated next to the M62 & A1(M) ) on a route which would other speed through Yorkshire.
- A Birmingham to Nottingham line to take in CrossCountry services, part of linking the northern cities together to improve their economies. I swear I wrote this before Osborne starting talking about HS3 OTL! A rail hub at East Midlands Airport though, in part to centralise a "big airport" for the East Midlands which can also cater for several other nearby cities and relieve some pressure on London. I expect Birmingham Airport to rapidly downsize, as East Midlands has lots more space and importantly much fewer residents to peeve off. The fact it also has a Velocity station is icing on the cake. This would run from Birmingham north-west, diverging along the South Staff Line to run through Walsall, then Lichfield and via Burton-upon-Trent. Takeover of the freight route east that runs close to East Mids anyway, then across the countryside to link back into the main high speed route south of Nottingham.
- Dedication of the Settle-Carlisle route (Leeds-Lancaster services rerouted to Blackpool via Skipton & Burnley along a rebuild Skipton-Colne link) to Velocity services. The dedication means that signalling can be completely revamped from Skipton to Carlisle, although Leeds-Skipton will need to be shared with a few commuter trains along that stretch. The Metro will relieve a lot of trains from the corridor, so there should be enough capacity with Velocity trains running at up to 100mph to Skipton. The rest of the route is around 90-110mph depending on the curves, as it was built to be an express route.
- The station stop for Leeds is moved west out of Leeds Central station, to a new one at Holbeck - I'm imagining this as high speed platforms above the standard rail lines, above Holbeck junction which would have several sets of platforms built to create a station there. Next chapter we'll have a quick look at "The Worm".
- And finally Birmingham rebuilt as a large station on both routes; Arup proposed something similar a few years ago while as "Birmingham Grand Central" (although all online data referring to it seems long gone).
 
Actually, you've just pissed off all the West Midlands council with your little East Midlands stunt, they own BHX and get substantial revenue from it. You can expect teddies to be flung out of the pram on that one.
 

Devvy

Donor
Actually, you've just pissed off all the West Midlands council with your little East Midlands stunt, they own BHX and get substantial revenue from it. You can expect teddies to be flung out of the pram on that one.

Hmmmm. Researched EMA a bit and missed that. Rechecking....will amend if necessary.

Update; my sources still show that EMA belong to Manchester Airports Group from 2001, and National Express group from 1993-2001. I don't see how West Mids are involved?
 
Top