Interesting infobox and very interesting politics. I really like the way the future ideologies and compass position is laid out. The divide is highly on social issues, but what are the major issues there?
Hey lord, why DC still receive delegates on Electoral College if now Denver is the capital?
I assume inertia. But if the White House is a seafront property, it'll be a bit difficult to defend that.
Hey lord, why DC still receive delegates on Electoral College if now Denver is the capital?
Credit goes to GeorgePatton for making the infobox and the beautiful artwork. This is why we're not allowed to have nice things.
Agreed.I would like to revise my retirement plans in JNDverse, please.
Interesting infobox and very interesting politics. I really like the way the future ideologies and compass position is laid out. The divide is highly on social issues, but what are the major issues there?
I would like to revise my retirement plans in JNDverse, please.
One issue what should be done in the aftermath of climate change. Reclaimationists hold that humanity should work to restore the biosphere to its pre-climate change state, even if it takes centuries of concerted effort. Adaptionists hold that while humanity should continue its efforts to reduce the impact of climate change, that ultimately humanity must adapt to the new biosphere.
Another issue is Human Engineering, the introduction of Genetic and Cybernetic modifications to the human body. Techno-Progressives are in favor of such technology, and believe it can better mankind. Bio-Conservatives are more cautious, and believe that society should limit its consumption of such technology. Deep Ecologists could be considered to be reactionaries in this regard, as they believe that such modifications are a form of hubris and are an affront to the nature order.
A third issue is whether or not rights should be granted to intelligent synthetic beings, such as robots and AI, which have been noted to have varying degrees of intelligence and self-awareness since the late 2040s. Transhumanists (who almost always also Techno-Progressives) believe in an extensive definition of personhood, and believe that rights should be extend to synthetic intelligences. Anti-Transhumanists (who are not just Bio-Conservatives) believe that such rights should not be extended. Deep Ecologists take a stronger stance, and are against the proliferation of any sort of synthetic intelligence.
Another, age-old issue, is that of Ethnicism vs. Multiculturalism. Ethnic nationalists believe that nation-states should represent homogenous societies, and that separatism is justified in this pursuit. Multiculturalists, of course, believe that heterogenous nation-states are viable.
And of course, there are still other issues. Abortion has never really been resolved in the US, and it has become a bigger issue in Europe with the emergence of natalist policies in certain countries. The role of religion in society is still a question in some countries, such as in China and Russia.
"Dive Chairty Beach"? Is that a deliberate mispelling? A local variation?
Those issues are solely social issues. Is there any specifically economic ones? People do vote with their wallet as much as their heart.One issue what should be done in the aftermath of climate change. Reclaimationists hold that humanity should work to restore the biosphere to its pre-climate change state, even if it takes centuries of concerted effort. Adaptionists hold that while humanity should continue its efforts to reduce the impact of climate change, that ultimately humanity must adapt to the new biosphere.
Another issue is Human Engineering, the introduction of Genetic and Cybernetic modifications to the human body. Techno-Progressives are in favor of such technology, and believe it can better mankind. Bio-Conservatives are more cautious, and believe that society should limit its consumption of such technology. Deep Ecologists could be considered to be reactionaries in this regard, as they believe that such modifications are a form of hubris and are an affront to the nature order.
A third issue is whether or not rights should be granted to intelligent synthetic beings, such as robots and AI, which have been noted to have varying degrees of intelligence and self-awareness since the late 2040s. Transhumanists (who almost always also Techno-Progressives) believe in an extensive definition of personhood, and believe that rights should be extend to synthetic intelligences. Anti-Transhumanists (who are not just Bio-Conservatives) believe that such rights should not be extended. Deep Ecologists take a stronger stance, and are against the proliferation of any sort of synthetic intelligence.
Another, age-old issue, is that of Ethnicism vs. Multiculturalism. Ethnic nationalists believe that nation-states should represent homogenous societies, and that separatism is justified in this pursuit. Multiculturalists, of course, believe that heterogenous nation-states are viable.
And of course, there are still other issues. Abortion has never really been resolved in the US, and it has become a bigger issue in Europe with the emergence of natalist policies in certain countries. The role of religion in society is still a question in some countries, such as in China and Russia.
I was figuring as much, but still interesting. How are we doing vis-à-vis space?
Those issues are solely social issues. Is there any specifically economic ones? People do vote with their wallet as much as their heart.
Credit goes to GeorgePatton for making the infobox and the beautiful artwork. This is why we're not allowed to have nice things.
Diving Buddies, Inc., is the largest of these travel agencies, and is the only one that provides packages to all twelve of the Twelve Sisters.
You people disgust me. Tell me more, so I may continue being offended.I would like to revise my retirement plans in JNDverse, please.
Hey lord, why DC still receive delegates on Electoral College if now Denver is the capital?
I assume inertia. But if the White House is a seafront property, it'll be a bit difficult to defend that.
Because D.C. receives it's electoral votes through a constitutional amendment. Well, technically, it grants them to the district constituting the seat of government, and I doubt Colorado would let Congress walk away with Denver and I doubt the Democrats would give up three free EVs.
Funny thing is, I actually know people who know Jane Rease. She comes up on my Facebook "suggested friends" from time to time. Quite odd that she ends up POTUS on AH.com
Credit goes to GeorgePatton for making the infobox and the beautiful artwork. This is why we're not allowed to have nice things.
<snip>