A concept which I've kicked around for awhile was the idea of an Italy that remains active, but ultimately neutral in WWII, and goes on to establish stronger economic ties to the other authoritarian regimes in Southern Europe. Portugal, for example, had issues with securing its interests, both strategic and economic, in the post-WWII era of increasing American hegemony in Europe. Would an Italy friendly to the Estado Novo, and particularly their economic and colonial concerns, have resulted in a more prosperous Portugal, and one in which the Estado Novo limps along for at least awhile longer?
Spain and Greece are the other two major parts of this union of sorts. Spain, from what I can gather, would greatly benefit from having a friendly face at the table when dealing with Europe. Greece, presuming ITTL that Italy decides to avoid invading in exchange for extracting concessions that draw Greece into its sphere, might benefit the least in this situation given that it was the recipient of substantial US aid and interests, but it would also have avoided the highly destructive war.
What do you all think? Could Mussolini or an alternate Duce have established themselves and Italy as the head of a Fascist, or at least authoritarian, bloc of countries in Southern Europe after the Second World War?
Spain and Greece are the other two major parts of this union of sorts. Spain, from what I can gather, would greatly benefit from having a friendly face at the table when dealing with Europe. Greece, presuming ITTL that Italy decides to avoid invading in exchange for extracting concessions that draw Greece into its sphere, might benefit the least in this situation given that it was the recipient of substantial US aid and interests, but it would also have avoided the highly destructive war.
What do you all think? Could Mussolini or an alternate Duce have established themselves and Italy as the head of a Fascist, or at least authoritarian, bloc of countries in Southern Europe after the Second World War?