Chapter 79: Pope, Patriarchs, Pentarchy... and Schism
Until the mid-twelfth century, Chalcedonian Christianity remains as a unified Christian denomination, covering most of the Mediterranean world, at least most of the Greco-Roman world. While the ancient ideal of the Pentarchy was still considered valid, this ideal state had in fact many flaws and therefore could be considered to have been rather divergent of the de facto situation.
In theory, the institution of the Pentarchy meant, that the entire Christian world was to be governed by the Bishops of the most important Apostolic Sees, those being:
The original notion of the Pentarchy. Later, Macedonian and Dacia was tranferred under the jurisdiction of Constantinople
1. Rome, the former capital of the Empire, heartland of the Latin-speaking West to cover the lands of the borders between Dalmatia and Upper Moesia[1], as well as the northern parts of the Libyan continent to Sirte. The Patriarchate of Rome claimed to be the most senior Patriarchate, claiming its origins from Apostle Peter. In reality, the authority of the Pope had been challenged by Carthage, which was the See of the rather rigorous and strict sect of Donatists[2]; by the rival Patriarchate of Aquilea at the mouth of the Adriatic and by a rather independent Celtic Rite Christianity in the British Isles[3]. The authority of the Roman Patriarchate has spread throughout much of Europe under the conquests of Charlemagne in Germany, and further into the former Roman Pannonia (Hungary) and Dalmatia (Croatia), into Poland and Scandinavia, as well as to the Canary Islands and Madeira. The Roman Pontiff has acquired much moral authority, and has become to be regarded as the ultimate arbiter in the disputes between the various kings and lords within his sphere.
2. Constantinople, or the Second Rome, has been, by the virtue of becoming the new capital, been elevated to the second highest position. Being placed on the Bosphorus Strait, enabling contact between the Pontic and Aegean Basin, it has become the capital of the Greek world. Its formal jurisdiction borders were defined to include most of the Balkan Peninsula as well as Anatolia up until the Taurus Mountains; the ultimate jurisdiction of the Constantinoplian Patriarch have expanded to include also Wallachia, formerly known as Dacia, then Taurica[4] and the surrounding Steppe, Alania and the various principalities of the Rus´. In praxis however, the Rhomaic possessions in Southern Italy and Sicily, while de jure belonging to the Patriarchate of Rome, have been placed by the Emperor under the authority of the Patriarch of Constantinople, with the instalment of Greek bishops and Greek Rite even in Latin-dominated places such as western Sicily or the newly conquered Duchy of Salerno. A similar process happened also in Dalmatia. Unlike in the West, the Patriarch of Constantinople is not a fully independent and supreme canonical hierarch; rather the Patriarch looks to the Emperor as the sovereign authority[5].
3. Alexandria, in Egypt, by tradition founded by Mark the Apostle, was to encompass Egypt, Cyrenaica and the entire Nile Valley. However, the Melkite Patriarch of Alexandria[6] is the religious head of only a fraction of the populace – mainly of the Alexandrian Greeks, the Cyrenaican Greeks and perhaps a few merchant sin the coastal towns. Full stop. This is because the gross majority of the Christians in Egypt, the Copts and also some Arabs adopted the Miaphysite theology, and have formed their own church, the Coptic Church, led by the Coptic Pope[7]. Therefore, this ancient see has lost a large part of its importance. Recently, the issue was to be tackled by the Komnenian Emperors, who detached the island of Crete from Constantinople and put it under the jurisdiction of Alexandria.
4. Antioch, formerly the most populous city in the Roman East was to cover the central and northern Levant up to the Taurus. While Antioch was a Hellenophone city, most of Syria consisted of Aramaic-speaking hinterland; differences between the two communities[8] resulted in the formation of a separate Syriac Jacobite Church, in communion with the Coptic one. By the twelfth century, the Syriac Church was in decline and much of western Syria (under active support of the emperors) now belongs to the Greek Patriarchate. Autonomous are churches in Cyprus, Lebanon[9] and Georgia.
5. Jerusalem is the smallest Patriarchate, consisting only of the Holy Land and Arabia (including the Sinai). Chalcedonian Chrisitianity has not expanded much beyond the borders of the former Roman Empire.
Outside this theoretical Pentarchic arrangement were already extant centres of Christendom in Mesopotamia (Qtespon), Armenia (Etchmiadzin), Aghbania or Ethiopia (Axum), as these were outside the borders of the Roman world.
By the mid-twelfth century Constantinople and Antioch were to be found within the borders of the Rhomaic Empire; the Church in Alexandria was also dependent on Constantinople. The different political situation (with the Emperor seen as the ultimate arbiter, with the right of calling ecumenical councils in the East, while the Pope´s image as the ultimate arbiter in the West) caused the two to grow more and more apart; of course a form of the language barrier may have also helped to channel up further misunderstandings, as Italian or Latin was the language of the Pope in Rome, while the remaining Patriarchs (except Jerusalem) all spoke Greek.
A geographical representation of the schism. Yellow is now Catholicsim, under Rome, and Orange is Orthodoxy. the Nestorians and Maronites claim communion with both.
Theological disputes, mainly with the Rhomaic Emperor´s tricks in solving Christological problems, with the Latin position (if ought to be defined) was very close to that of the Nestorian one (however, as long as one does not call it that way), have also contributed to further misunderstandings, as well as the filioque issue.
The most direct cause was however the Rhomaic rearrangement of canonical borders, simply attaching all previously Roman-administered territory in Sicily, Croatia and Salerno, under the authority of Constantinople, and totally replacing the Latin Rite with the Greek Rite in those areas.
The result was the Great Schism. “And so it was that due to the arrogance of the Rhomaic Emperor, as he expelled bishops from Palermo, Salerno, Spalato and dozens of other places, as if they were commanders of his army, that he bestowed upon himself the wrath of Rome” wrote an Italian chronicler from Florence. The wrath of Rome materialized in its guarantee of all Italian states to its south, especially Benevento, but more importantly, by sending envoys to Constantinople, politely, but boldly asking the Emperor to und his policies in Croatia and Italy.
This, could, however not accepted by the Emperor, as he was regarded as the universal authority, and the notion of a Church structure legitimately challenging legitimate imperial authority was completely alien to the mentality in Constantinople at the time. Subsequently, at the residence of Patriarch of Constantinople, the debate resulted in opening all kinds of disputes, with the end result being the breaking of the Communion between the two Churches. Alexandria chose[10] the Constantinoplian side, while Antioch was more moderate, but ultimately chose that side as well. The Patriarchate of Jerusalem declared to remain in communion with both parties, claiming that the whole issue has no real theological basis.
[1] Roughly on the Drina River separating Bosnia from Serbia.
[2] Who were however confined to the Berberophone regions of the Sahara and then established this variant of the faith in Sub-Saharan west Africa
[3] These should however not be viewed as schismatics. Rather, they continued to develop independently, since the links with Rome were lost.
[4] Crimea
[5] Or perhaps said in American terms, imagine the Rhomaic Emperor as the President, and then the Patriarch of Constantinople as his Secretary of Religious Affairs.
[6] Or the Greek Patriarch of Alexandria, or Chalcedonian, as you wish to call him
[7] The Coptic Pope claims to be Patriarch of Alexandria, but resides in Kashromi (Cairo).He is the primus inter pares of the Miaphysite communion, or the so-called Oriental Orthodox.
[8] And the Indo-European and Afro-Asiatic mentality and structure of languages, I suppose
[9] As a compromise with the Maronites
[10] Given the Melkite Patriarch´s dependence on Imperial support, it appears he didn’t have much of a choice , however.
In theory, the institution of the Pentarchy meant, that the entire Christian world was to be governed by the Bishops of the most important Apostolic Sees, those being:
The original notion of the Pentarchy. Later, Macedonian and Dacia was tranferred under the jurisdiction of Constantinople
1. Rome, the former capital of the Empire, heartland of the Latin-speaking West to cover the lands of the borders between Dalmatia and Upper Moesia[1], as well as the northern parts of the Libyan continent to Sirte. The Patriarchate of Rome claimed to be the most senior Patriarchate, claiming its origins from Apostle Peter. In reality, the authority of the Pope had been challenged by Carthage, which was the See of the rather rigorous and strict sect of Donatists[2]; by the rival Patriarchate of Aquilea at the mouth of the Adriatic and by a rather independent Celtic Rite Christianity in the British Isles[3]. The authority of the Roman Patriarchate has spread throughout much of Europe under the conquests of Charlemagne in Germany, and further into the former Roman Pannonia (Hungary) and Dalmatia (Croatia), into Poland and Scandinavia, as well as to the Canary Islands and Madeira. The Roman Pontiff has acquired much moral authority, and has become to be regarded as the ultimate arbiter in the disputes between the various kings and lords within his sphere.
2. Constantinople, or the Second Rome, has been, by the virtue of becoming the new capital, been elevated to the second highest position. Being placed on the Bosphorus Strait, enabling contact between the Pontic and Aegean Basin, it has become the capital of the Greek world. Its formal jurisdiction borders were defined to include most of the Balkan Peninsula as well as Anatolia up until the Taurus Mountains; the ultimate jurisdiction of the Constantinoplian Patriarch have expanded to include also Wallachia, formerly known as Dacia, then Taurica[4] and the surrounding Steppe, Alania and the various principalities of the Rus´. In praxis however, the Rhomaic possessions in Southern Italy and Sicily, while de jure belonging to the Patriarchate of Rome, have been placed by the Emperor under the authority of the Patriarch of Constantinople, with the instalment of Greek bishops and Greek Rite even in Latin-dominated places such as western Sicily or the newly conquered Duchy of Salerno. A similar process happened also in Dalmatia. Unlike in the West, the Patriarch of Constantinople is not a fully independent and supreme canonical hierarch; rather the Patriarch looks to the Emperor as the sovereign authority[5].
3. Alexandria, in Egypt, by tradition founded by Mark the Apostle, was to encompass Egypt, Cyrenaica and the entire Nile Valley. However, the Melkite Patriarch of Alexandria[6] is the religious head of only a fraction of the populace – mainly of the Alexandrian Greeks, the Cyrenaican Greeks and perhaps a few merchant sin the coastal towns. Full stop. This is because the gross majority of the Christians in Egypt, the Copts and also some Arabs adopted the Miaphysite theology, and have formed their own church, the Coptic Church, led by the Coptic Pope[7]. Therefore, this ancient see has lost a large part of its importance. Recently, the issue was to be tackled by the Komnenian Emperors, who detached the island of Crete from Constantinople and put it under the jurisdiction of Alexandria.
4. Antioch, formerly the most populous city in the Roman East was to cover the central and northern Levant up to the Taurus. While Antioch was a Hellenophone city, most of Syria consisted of Aramaic-speaking hinterland; differences between the two communities[8] resulted in the formation of a separate Syriac Jacobite Church, in communion with the Coptic one. By the twelfth century, the Syriac Church was in decline and much of western Syria (under active support of the emperors) now belongs to the Greek Patriarchate. Autonomous are churches in Cyprus, Lebanon[9] and Georgia.
5. Jerusalem is the smallest Patriarchate, consisting only of the Holy Land and Arabia (including the Sinai). Chalcedonian Chrisitianity has not expanded much beyond the borders of the former Roman Empire.
Outside this theoretical Pentarchic arrangement were already extant centres of Christendom in Mesopotamia (Qtespon), Armenia (Etchmiadzin), Aghbania or Ethiopia (Axum), as these were outside the borders of the Roman world.
By the mid-twelfth century Constantinople and Antioch were to be found within the borders of the Rhomaic Empire; the Church in Alexandria was also dependent on Constantinople. The different political situation (with the Emperor seen as the ultimate arbiter, with the right of calling ecumenical councils in the East, while the Pope´s image as the ultimate arbiter in the West) caused the two to grow more and more apart; of course a form of the language barrier may have also helped to channel up further misunderstandings, as Italian or Latin was the language of the Pope in Rome, while the remaining Patriarchs (except Jerusalem) all spoke Greek.
A geographical representation of the schism. Yellow is now Catholicsim, under Rome, and Orange is Orthodoxy. the Nestorians and Maronites claim communion with both.
Theological disputes, mainly with the Rhomaic Emperor´s tricks in solving Christological problems, with the Latin position (if ought to be defined) was very close to that of the Nestorian one (however, as long as one does not call it that way), have also contributed to further misunderstandings, as well as the filioque issue.
The most direct cause was however the Rhomaic rearrangement of canonical borders, simply attaching all previously Roman-administered territory in Sicily, Croatia and Salerno, under the authority of Constantinople, and totally replacing the Latin Rite with the Greek Rite in those areas.
The result was the Great Schism. “And so it was that due to the arrogance of the Rhomaic Emperor, as he expelled bishops from Palermo, Salerno, Spalato and dozens of other places, as if they were commanders of his army, that he bestowed upon himself the wrath of Rome” wrote an Italian chronicler from Florence. The wrath of Rome materialized in its guarantee of all Italian states to its south, especially Benevento, but more importantly, by sending envoys to Constantinople, politely, but boldly asking the Emperor to und his policies in Croatia and Italy.
This, could, however not accepted by the Emperor, as he was regarded as the universal authority, and the notion of a Church structure legitimately challenging legitimate imperial authority was completely alien to the mentality in Constantinople at the time. Subsequently, at the residence of Patriarch of Constantinople, the debate resulted in opening all kinds of disputes, with the end result being the breaking of the Communion between the two Churches. Alexandria chose[10] the Constantinoplian side, while Antioch was more moderate, but ultimately chose that side as well. The Patriarchate of Jerusalem declared to remain in communion with both parties, claiming that the whole issue has no real theological basis.
[1] Roughly on the Drina River separating Bosnia from Serbia.
[2] Who were however confined to the Berberophone regions of the Sahara and then established this variant of the faith in Sub-Saharan west Africa
[3] These should however not be viewed as schismatics. Rather, they continued to develop independently, since the links with Rome were lost.
[4] Crimea
[5] Or perhaps said in American terms, imagine the Rhomaic Emperor as the President, and then the Patriarch of Constantinople as his Secretary of Religious Affairs.
[6] Or the Greek Patriarch of Alexandria, or Chalcedonian, as you wish to call him
[7] The Coptic Pope claims to be Patriarch of Alexandria, but resides in Kashromi (Cairo).He is the primus inter pares of the Miaphysite communion, or the so-called Oriental Orthodox.
[8] And the Indo-European and Afro-Asiatic mentality and structure of languages, I suppose
[9] As a compromise with the Maronites
[10] Given the Melkite Patriarch´s dependence on Imperial support, it appears he didn’t have much of a choice , however.