Emperor RyRy
Banned
The Republicans can win 535 - just attach all the inconveniently hyper-Democratic areas to DC.
Here you are, not sure where those last 7 are coming from.
The Republicans can win 535 - just attach all the inconveniently hyper-Democratic areas to DC.
San Francisco and DC.
San Francisco and DC.
Are there enough voters in this election to gerrymander at least 1 state in favor of a non-Democrat/Republican party? (like the Libertarians)
Well, seeing as only Clinton and Trump won counties, you'd have to delve into individual precincts to give any third party a state, which this tool doesn't allow you to do.
No. To win a state a party has to have won at least one county.Are there enough voters in this election to gerrymander at least 1 state in favor of a non-Democrat/Republican party? (like the Libertarians)
Obama won all threeSome doodles.
50 states plus DC, with Trump winning 535-3 (thanks to DC covering the southwestern half of California)
Remove just enough counties from each state, excluding Hawaii and Massachusetts, to turn them Republican (Trump beats Clinton 446-92)
All state borders are the same, yet Clinton wins unanimously
No. To win a state a party has to have won at least one county.
Say County A went 4k for Clinton, 3k for McMullin, and 1k for Trump, while County B went 1k for Clinton, 3k for McMullin, and 4k for Trump.
Combine County A and B together and you have 5k for Clinton, 6k for McMullin, and 5k for Trump.
I fail to see why California-New England conglomeration would have only one representative. Hell, how would they even divide the hundred Representative slots emptied for this?Can you screenshot it? Google Chrome doesn't display the maps in their finalised form for some reason.
EDIT: I have succeeded!
The District of Columbia (which is the jurisdiction that has been expanded to cover all the blue areas) is constitutionally prohibited from having more electoral votes than the smallest state (i.e. 3). Actually, it doesn't have any Representatives.I fail to see why California-New England conglomeration would have only one representative.
Congressional apportionment isn't based on "a district should have X people in it"; each state population is divided by a series of divisors to generate an infinite list of quotients, and then they assign the districts to the states that produce the 435 highest values there.Hell, how would they even divide the hundred Representative slots emptied for this?