Liking the California posts.
More details about California's history and its members will be on their way. For now, here's a little map of Clarence.
Out of curiosity, how much of California's history/current situation has been already planned out? I have dozens of much more specific questions I want to ask, but I don't want to get ahead of myself.
Ben and I worked most of it out in PM over the past few days, I could tell you everything you want to know; just shoot me a PM!
Wow. I must say the California updates are quite interesting. Great Job!
The maps are especially nice!
Out of curiosity, how much of California's history/current situation has been already planned out? I have dozens of much more specific questions I want to ask, but I don't want to get ahead of myself.
Also, I might pitch in with a Lakota Confederacy that's allied to the ASB if not a de facto (but nor de jure) part of the ASB.
San Francisco: The State of San Francisco began when militia from New Netherland seized the Presidio in 1860, sparking the Gold Wars. In the aftermath it was established as a condominium run by New Netherland and Massachusetts Bay.
[FONT="]Perhaps San Francisco is able to break off by trying to woo the English with offers of SF becoming a ally/protectorate? At the very least, it would certainly lead to the creation of tensions in NN/MB and English relations. [/FONT]The two states proved not to be particularly good at ruling a colony, and SF became a chaotic Wild West. It achieved a measure of stability after disconnecting itself from the East Coast, but its 20th century politics have been turbulent as well.
Based on this description, I could easily see this version of San Francisco as a sort of “Bread and Circuses” corporatocracy (that supports Unionism simply for the sake of market access) that could possibly be summed up as a mix between the stereotypical images of OTL San Francisco, New Orleans, Las Vegas, and Weimer Berlin.From the 30s to the 70s it was under military rule, and a quick burst of separatism in the 70s unleashed a libertine impulse that later unionist governments could not contain. Today the threat of Union military takeover coexists with world-famous nude beaches and a nightlife catering to the full spectrum of lifestyles.
[FONT="]Perhaps instead of being a protectorate, it got spun off* as a separate duchy or something under a minor Mexican noble?[/FONT]Alta California: This was the portion of the coast left to Mexico at the end of the Gold Wars. It included the southern half of the Central Valley, an area with no gold fields where many Mexicans had already settled. Officially it is still a Mexican protectorate today, but the role Mexico plays today is very small.
[FONT="]What are the domina[FONT="]nt[/FONT] groups that immigrate to MC between 1900-1920?[/FONT]Media California: The basin around Santa Barbara and Los Angeles started to attract non-Mexicans in large numbers around 1900. It seceded from Alta California around 1920 or so.
[FONT="]Since Mexico was able to originally keep Alta California, wouldn’t Baja have officially been made a protectorate/ colony of another foreign power instead of controlled directly by the C.U.?*[/FONT]Baja California: The strategic but barren peninsula was detached from Mexico and included in the California Union as part of the treaty at the end of the Gold Wars.
[FONT="]What are the domina[FONT="]n[FONT="]t[/FONT][/FONT] languages of the CR? [/FONT]The California Republic: The Republic is the original nucleus of the Union. The Union in its original form was simply a meeting of the colonial powers with the Republic to negotiate land and mining issues. The Republic remains the steadfast center of unionist sentiment, since its economy would fall apart if it became detached from the coast. Later discoveries of gold and silver in the Sierra Nevada led to an expansion of the Republic’s borders.
[FONT="]How similar are the demographics of Dalekoterra to Oregon? If they’re similar enough, then I could easily imagine a small but dedicated movement on both sides of the border promoting the unification of Dalekoterra and Oregon.[/FONT]Dalekoterra: Almost immediately after the Republic’s creation, it was split in half to reflect the two main gold-mining regions at the time. The new state got the name of Dalekoterra, a name that began with Dalyekiy (Russian for “distant”), and modified it after the pattern of Inglaterra (the Spanish place-name for England). The linguistic mishmash was appropriate for the cultural mix that lived here. Russian land companies gradually took control of a greater and greater part of the territory, and it was de facto a Russian economic colony until mining slowed down in the early 20th century. Today it is mostly a backwater.
[FONT="]Hmm, any idea of what the state of the Mayan people in Mexico from 1880 to 1900 is? I would imagine that the treatment of the Mayans would play a big role in the Hopi/ Diné decision to leave Mexico. [/FONT]Hopi and Diné: These vibrant native societies voluntarily left unreliable Mexican protection for associate membership in the California Union around 1900; California was seen as a surer guarantee of autonomy for both peoples. Hopi is a pueblo society, while the Diné or Navajo were traditionally nomadic.
[FONT="]Upvoteanthology had messaged me this part earlier, but based on what else you’ve written, I’ve made some modifications to my analysis.[/FONT]Supremacist States (Supremacia and Pietas): In the 1860's, one of the members of the ASB takes over San Francisco, forcing the ideology of the ASB onto the people of California. This doesn't work, and due to the far area, outlaws flood in from all over, with people even having slaves and doing crazy things in the colony. After a canal is built somewhere in Central America, the ASB states are better able to communicate, and basically implement systems of semi-independence in order to stop the madness. After this, a lot of the people who think they're doing the right thing make a trek inland, with the former slave-holders moving to Supremacia and Pietas. The former slaves, still segregated in San Francisco, move to form their own state as well. This new state becomes a haven for the African people, but it's heavily racist as well as unstable. They eventually turn to a harsher governmental system, to keep the protests at bay.
[FONT="]Could slavery possible last that long? I could see apartheid legally lasting that one, but I would be surprised that the ASB, Mexico, and PIC, wouldn’t put pressure on California to do something decades ago. Or is it more a case of it being on the books, but not actually practiced? [/FONT]Meanwhile, the supremacist states aren't doing too well either. Both have extremely corrupt governments, as well as pressure coming from all sides to allow blacks residence. Slavery was outlawed in the 1990's, but chaos still reigns.
[FONT="]Does the PIC include Hokkaido? If anything, I could see the Russians trying to use the Ainu to try to take control of the island from the Japanese instead of exiling them from their lands. [/FONT]New Kuril was founded by Ainu refugees losing land to Russian, Korean, and Anglo-American settlers in Sakhalin and Ezo.
[FONT="]What kind of land reform? Admittedly, I would be surprised that an imperial Russia would target ethnic Russians whose economic state was created by imperial land reform.[/FONT][FONT="]Kulakja was established by Kulaks hurt in a land reform.
Probably pretty amicable, truth be told. But definitely not that close.[FONT="]It’s interesting to see New Netherland become an aggressive player on the world stage. What’s New Netherland’s (and to a lesser extent, Massachusetts and the English’s) relationship to the ‘Old’ Netherlands? It would interesting to see the Netherlands involved in the Gold War – or even just be more influential on the world stage itself.[/FONT]
I must say False Dmitri and Upvoteanthology, I’m extremely impressed with the progress you two have made. Bravo!
[FONT="]Still, I do have some questions and thoughts. Apologies for it being a bit much!
[/FONT]
[FONT="]It’s interesting to see New Netherland become an aggressive player on the world stage. What’s New Netherland’s (and to a lesser extent, Massachusetts and the English’s) relationship to the ‘Old’ Netherlands? It would interesting to see the Netherlands involved in the Gold War – or even just be more influential on the world stage itself.[/FONT]
[FONT="]Perhaps San Francisco is able to break off by trying to woo the English with offers of SF becoming a ally/protectorate? At the very least, it would certainly lead to the creation of tensions in NN/MB and English relations. [/FONT]
Based on this description, I could easily see this version of San Francisco as a sort of “Bread and Circuses” corporatocracy (that supports Unionism simply for the sake of market access) that could possibly be summed up as a mix between the stereotypical images of OTL San Francisco, New Orleans, Las Vegas, and Weimer Berlin.
Or perhaps “Brave New World” might be a better example.
Instead of trying to use more traditional efforts to instill control, the ruling elites (old money, corporations, and maybe crime families) rely on a super tolerance or even promotion (another way to earn profit) of “hedonistic” activities in order to distract the masses from the inherently undemocratic/economically unfair state of the current system.
Of course, there will be periods of time (such as economic downturns) where pleasure isn’t enough, at which point you can still cases of police brutality, military crackdowns, etc.
[FONT="]Another interesting possibility of this San Francisco would be its art scene. The “mainstream” portion would constantly be pushing the envelope – to the point that by the modern day, it might be globally stereotyped as purely “shocking for the sake of being shocking” with little of it being politically/socially relevant or at least relevant in fields that would conflict with the ruling. [/FONT]
[FONT="]The politically charged underground art scene though might be viewed as one of the best in the world.[/FONT]
[FONT="]Perhaps instead of being a protectorate, it got spun off* as a separate duchy or something under a minor Mexican noble?[/FONT]
[FONT="]*Due to Mexico at some point wanting to wash its hands of the mess that California develops into.
[/FONT] [FONT="]Does Nahuatl maintain any presence as a spoken language in AC? [/FONT]
[FONT="]What are the dominate groups that immigrate to MC between 1900-1920?[/FONT]
[FONT="]Since Mexico was able to originally keep Alta California, wouldn’t Baja have officially been made a protectorate/ colony of another foreign power instead of controlled directly by the C.U.?*[/FONT]
[FONT="]
*Since based on the description below, it seems like the C.U. was still a talking club after the Gold Wars[/FONT]
[FONT="]What are the dominate languages of the CR? [/FONT]
[FONT="]How similar are the demographics of Dalekoterra to Oregon? If they’re similar enough, then I could easily imagine a small but dedicated movement on both sides of the border promoting the unification of Dalekoterra and Oregon.[/FONT]
[FONT="]Hmm, any idea of what the state of the Mayan people in Mexico from 1880 to 1900 is? I would imagine that the treatment of the Mayans would play a big role in the Hopi/ Diné decision to leave Mexico. [/FONT]
[FONT="]Upvoteanthology had messaged me this part earlier, but based on what else you’ve written, I’ve made some modifications to my analysis.[/FONT]
[FONT="]
[/FONT][FONT="]I’d assumed that Carolina might be the one that introduced slavery to California [/FONT][FONT="]since it’s still in under the English crown and still had slavery. Of course, I don’t believe it would be called slavery or be presented to the world as such.
[/FONT]
[FONT="]In order to bypass the presumed abolitionist sympathies of the Northern ASBians/English, I could see the Carolinians presenting it as a sort of Neo-Indentured Servitude – in which after x years, they would be set free – due to the lawlessness of this period though, that part gets quietly ignored, until of course more stable government is established. [/FONT]
[FONT="]Could slavery possible last that long? I could see apartheid legally lasting that one, but I would be surprised that the ASB, Mexico, and PIC, wouldn’t put pressure on California to do something decades ago. Or is it more a case of it being on the books, but not actually practiced? [/FONT]
[FONT="]
[/FONT][FONT="]Also, considering that the Supremacist states are still – well – Supremacist, might it be possible that they might be considered “suspended”* members of the California union?
[/FONT]
[FONT="]*In the sense that the world recognizes that the territory is legally Californian/the Supremacists are forbidden to currently participate in the national government, but due to the weakness of California on the national level, the national assembly is unable to exercise much power over those states?
[/FONT] [FONT="]Does the PIC include Hokkaido? If anything, I could see the Russians trying to use the Ainu to try to take control of the island from the Japanese instead of exiling them from their lands. [/FONT]
[FONT="]What kind of land reform? Admittedly, I would be surprised that an imperial Russia would target ethnic Russians whose economic state was created by imperial land reform.[/FONT][FONT="]
[/FONT][FONT="]Have any other groups like Russian Jews or Tartars tried to establish exile states in California?
It’s certainly interesting history I must say.The context for this is sort of explained in my other text post. NN's economic power and global reach were on the rise, but the ASB had not yet fully formed, at least not in terms of foreign policy. In later eras this sort of action on the world stage would not be possible.
The Netherlands proper by now was not on the scene, I think.
I like all of this! The underground art scene in particular was a thing I had thought about, but I like the way you put it.
Yeah, Nahuatl in Alta California is in the same situation as on the southern Great Plains. A lot of speakers got grants of land and settled there. I think that the language situation is pretty stable and regionalized, so you could probably draw a line in AC to show which places speak Nahuatl and which places Spanish.
I assume so, certainly in the 19th century. Whether it stayed connected to Mexico or not is something I am not sure of yet. (If you hadn't noticed, I prefer to be tentative about the world until I know that an idea is really working well.)
Unless there is an objection, English and Spanish are the official languages. A lot of minority languages have been spoken there over the years, but at present it is less diverse and dynamic than the coastal states because the Republic is no longer the economic hub.
Oregon is now officially another country I’d love to see a linguistic map for.Huh, they are certainly similar enough, geographically. Oregon is a very diverse place with an idiosyncratic government. Each valley in many ways is a separate culture unto itself, so it's hard to generalize all that much. The rural areas of Oregon are probably very similar to Dalekoterra - some towns that are mainly indigenous, some English, some German, even some French. But the population today is dominated by the chain of cities that run between OTL Eugene and Vancouver. The cities have a very large Asian (Chinese, Japenese, Korean) population that does not really match anything in Dakeloterra.
I know that Mexico in TTL approached the northern Indians in a way closer to the OTL United States. A lot of land was taken in the Great Plains and California and given out to homesteaders. Some actually moved into ASB territory - the state of Dakota in particular drew lots of Indian immigrants from the south and east. I can't say whether this was done to the Maya as well.
I'm going to leave this for now. I also objected to slavery lasting that long, but then Upvoteanthology explained that she was using OTL South Africa as an analogue. I'm personally still torn. This whole world is not supposed to be perfect realism, but I don't want it to be totally crazy, either.
None of this means that New Kuril is set in stone. We want that part of the Basin to have some "odd" little states, and this was one we thought of. If there's a more interesting idea ...
It’s certainly interesting history I must say.
As for the old Netherlands, it might not directly be involved in California, but assuming it has a good enough relationship to powers in the ASB such as New Netherlands, then that could mean that the ASB could develop strong business interests in the Dutch East Indies – which could potentially lead to both California and the ASB later on developing a large Indonesian immigrant population.
IMO, I think it’s far more likely for the English or whoever to pull a Hong Kong on San Diego while leaving the rest of the peninsula under Mexico’s control. Initially at least…
Later on, Baja ~ as well as Alta and other territories out east ~ might be spun off from Mexico for various reasons such as Mexico wanting to wash its hands of Californian politics to limit any political liabilities, etc.
Within the State of San Francisco, it still does. But in the other states, its presence is small.I’d imagine Dutch might be given legal status early on, but that might change years later as the number of Dutch speakers declines.
Assuming Mexico goes the Bilingual cultural route – emphasizing the “glories” of both Mexico’s Indigenous and Spanish heritage – in creating a national identity, then what happens to the Mayan will probably depend on how the national leadership wants to incorporate the Mayans’ legacy and current status into the new National narrative.
Depending on how things go, the situation for different groups of Mayans could range from being left alone, to forcibly assimilated, exiled, etc. As such, you could have a situation were more rebellious Mayans either pull a Great Trek like the Boers or find themselves in their own equivalent of the Trail of Tears with both situations leading to a Mayan derived state in either California or the Northern Great Plains.
Honestly, it’s an interesting history and very original. Based on AH clichés and OTL immigration patterns, I would have placed my money on either a Chinese or Japanese established state instead of an Ainu state. So based on your explanation, New Kuril would be worth keeping.
As for other potential ideas, I think a self-imposed nationalistic Green Ukraine equivalent or a Roma homeland would be fascinating.
[/FONT]
If I can suggest something – looking at your map of PIC, I am seeing that the 'Volhynia' country doesn't include any of Volhynia. Perhaps it should be renamed to something like 'Podolia', or even 'Ukraine', which before 19th century meant just something like 'borderland'. I’m also skeptical of name 'Galicia', as it’s name popularised mostly by Austrians after 1st partition of Poland. Maybe 'Ruthenia' would be better.Today they have the autonomous areas of Volhynia and Galicia in Poland
If I can suggest something – looking at your map of PIC, I am seeing that the 'Volhynia' country doesn't include any of Volhynia. Perhaps it should be renamed to something like 'Podolia', or even 'Ukraine', which before 19th century meant just something like 'borderland'. I’m also skeptical of name 'Galicia', as it’s name popularised mostly by Austrians after 1st partition of Poland. Maybe 'Ruthenia' would be better.
Other that that, I absolutely love the world of PIC-ASB (and ’ve been lurking for few months), and I’m waiting for the further updates. Maybe because I’m a fan of such baroque (con)federalism.
Well, that explains some odd things about the map. And BTW, what’s the POD for Imperial Commonwealth?because I have not done a lot of the "required reading" on Muskovy and Poland-Lithuania that I'll need to do it justice.
Well, that explains some odd things about the map. And BTW, what’s the POD for Imperial Commonwealth?