WI: Paper and printing press invented in the Roman Empire?

Let's say paper and movable type printing are both invented in Rome at some point between 0 and 100 AD, would they see wideapread use? Would there be an impact on society as a whole/
 
well the new testament books would have been copied way earlier and be widespread so we would solve some issues like dates , if " interpolations" are truely interpolations or just author vs scribe , because they did differ but still told the same thing ,if the author is who they claimed , early sources of the pre pauline creeds and the original source where mark got the passion narritive and more
 
It is invented in the Library of Alexandria what could help to expand its knowledge probably in a few years a lot of its knowledge will expand through the Empire maybe Rome can live longer?
 
This would unlock the following:
- Mass Literacy among the merchant class
- University Education System
- Double Entry Book Keeping
- Newspaper Companies
- Documentation and Publishing of Scientific Studies


In terms of affects this could have:
- Better accounting for the Roman Treasury
- A Imperial Banking System
- Roman Joint Stock Companies
- Quicker spread of Christianity but a possible earlier fracturing of Christianity.
- More unified political movements/proto political parties
- Imperial University System
 
This would unlock the following:
- Mass Literacy among the merchant class
- University Education System
- Double Entry Book Keeping
- Newspaper Companies
- Documentation and Publishing of Scientific Studies


In terms of affects this could have:
- Better accounting for the Roman Treasury
- A Imperial Banking System
- Roman Joint Stock Companies
- Quicker spread of Christianity but a possible earlier fracturing of Christianity.
- More unified political movements/proto political parties
- Imperial University System
Several of them are still partially or completely unviable due to the technology and conditions at the time. Paper didn't save the Han dynasty. And several of the OTL causes of the fall of Western Rome is still there.
 

GeographyDude

Gone Fishin'
I’m impressed at how big an art form pamphlets were — which are kind of a hybrid between books and newspapers.

(will try to pull example from Martin Luther)
 
Last edited:

GeographyDude

Gone Fishin'
‘ . . . Andrew Pettegree argues in his book Brand Luther that Martin Luther was not only a great communicator, but the world's first mass-media figure. Luther’s ideas were soon heard in local taverns and bakeries, according to a 2011 article from the Economist, “Social media in the 16th Century: How Luther went viral.”

‘The materials are the tangible evidence of a lively public debate. The original pamphlets could be considered the medieval equivalent of a Twitter war. Through them, we can witness a conversation that continues even to this day. The materials also include the Papal Bull from Pope Leo X to excommunicate Luther from the Roman Catholic Church, King Henry VIII’s Defense of the Seven Sacraments Against Martin Luther, and documents from the resulting counter-reformation.’
Martin Luther seems like quite the figure!

With earlier printing, Christianity has its tremors, earthquakes, upheavals, and downheavals. After all, it’s a major religion. Eventual schisms are likely, but not 100% hardwired in.
 
Last edited:
Several of them are still partially or completely unviable due to the technology and conditions at the time. Paper didn't save the Han dynasty. And several of the OTL causes of the fall of Western Rome is still there.

Also, some of the things (double-entry bookkeeping, literacy amongst the merchant classes, universities) existed IOTL without the printing press, whilst others (scientific studies) would require an intellectual POD, not a technological one.
 
Top