(Yay, the annoying user obsessed with late antiquity Iran asking for seemingly random events in Iranian history is back!)
I'm planning to write a TL here, which would be my first in AH.com, dealing with late antiquity Persia (hence the questions) for a while, and I've been wondering about Bahram Chobin for a while. Bahram Chobin, in a quick rundown, was a general from the House of Mihran (one of the seven Parthian clans) in Ray who was one of Hormizd IV's chief generals, was offended by him after a mild failure, was humilliated and then rebelled, crowned himself king and ruled for a year before Khosrau II came from Byzantium with an army lent to him by Maurice. This ended the Sassanid-Byzantine War of the 570-590 and would lead to the 602-628 one. It seems that Bahram was trying to tie in Zoroastrianism to the fall of the Sassanids, as well as was very east-focused.
But is it possible to, say, have Khosrau flee to China or the Göktürks instead, and Bahram remaining on the throne in Ctesiphon for longer (or his whole lifetime)?
I'm planning to write a TL here, which would be my first in AH.com, dealing with late antiquity Persia (hence the questions) for a while, and I've been wondering about Bahram Chobin for a while. Bahram Chobin, in a quick rundown, was a general from the House of Mihran (one of the seven Parthian clans) in Ray who was one of Hormizd IV's chief generals, was offended by him after a mild failure, was humilliated and then rebelled, crowned himself king and ruled for a year before Khosrau II came from Byzantium with an army lent to him by Maurice. This ended the Sassanid-Byzantine War of the 570-590 and would lead to the 602-628 one. It seems that Bahram was trying to tie in Zoroastrianism to the fall of the Sassanids, as well as was very east-focused.
But is it possible to, say, have Khosrau flee to China or the Göktürks instead, and Bahram remaining on the throne in Ctesiphon for longer (or his whole lifetime)?