Nazi Germany isn't going to be able to pick off it's Eastern neighbours one at a time,
What? You are speaking nonsense. Puppeting Austria-Hungary is way out of the reach of Nazi Germany, while invading it wouldn't just be disaster and meatgrinder, because of the terrain, but furthermore it would trigger actions from France, Britain and Poland.Disagree- Nazi Germany will be able to puppetize Austria-Hungary in one piece, or destabilize and fragment it pretty easily. Austria-Hungary cannot afford a war with Germany or even a bluff-based containment strategy against it at all.
Yes, but I think A-H would survive longer than first Yugoslavia. At least A-H is not entirely new state and is too important for European balance of power to be sacrificed like Czechoslovakia.I think it's inevitable Austria-Hungary would've fallen apart like Yugoslavia.
Yugoslavia fell because it had big economic issues, which brought the ethnic tensions to the surface. Such thing wouldn't happen to Austria-Hungary.I think it's inevitable Austria-Hungary would've fallen apart like Yugoslavia.
It seems ethnic strife always becomes a big issue. Look at the American South.Yugoslavia fell because it had big economic issues, which brought the ethnic tensions to the surface. Such thing wouldn't happen to Austria-Hungary.
Disagree- Nazi Germany will be able to puppetize Austria-Hungary in one piece, or destabilize and fragment it pretty easily. Austria-Hungary cannot afford a war with Germany or even a bluff-based containment strategy against it at all.
I think there's wide disagreement on this front, but Berlin can always catch more flies with honey than with viniger. A-H, more than anybody else except perhaps Poland, has reason to find the Anti-Communist elements of Fascism appealing, particularly Mussolini's, Franco's and Vichy's more Clerical-Facist variety (The ties between Catholicism and the ritual and traditions of the Empire are deep, deep indeed and resonate deeply with the rural and border populations, and a tradition ethnic enemy, atheistic, anti-Monarchy, foe who stands for basically OTL's Soviets did would be horrifying indeed), so by toning up the Anti-Communist and traditional (IE Right-wing elements of society; industrialists, peasant small land-holders, the army, ect.) parts of the ideology and weakening the Pan-ethnic forces would make it easy for the two nations to align against the common threat in the East. Added bonus; it gives Hitler diplomatic "good sport" points with the Western Allies.
I think there's wide disagreement on this front, but Berlin can always catch more flies with honey than with viniger. A-H, more than anybody else except perhaps Poland, has reason to find the Anti-Communist elements of Fascism appealing, particularly Mussolini's, Franco's and Vichy's more Clerical-Facist variety (The ties between Catholicism and the ritual and traditions of the Empire are deep, deep indeed and resonate deeply with the rural and border populations, and a tradition ethnic enemy, atheistic, anti-Monarchy, foe who stands for basically OTL's Soviets did would be horrifying indeed), so by toning up the Anti-Communist and traditional (IE Right-wing elements of society; industrialists, peasant small land-holders, the army, ect.) parts of the ideology and weakening the Pan-ethnic forces would make it easy for the two nations to align against the common threat in the East. Added bonus; it gives Hitler diplomatic "good sport" points with the Western Allies.
Hungary OTL was itself for a while red though.Existing A-H would greatly affect European alliances and Russian Civil War:
-Austria-Hungary could ally with Poland, perhaps Charles Stephen Habsburg get Polish crown? Galizia is little price for friendly Poland with Habsburg king.
-Poland could get more land in the west-UK would not fear that Poland will turn into French puppet. Thus Poland do better in Polish-Bolshevik war.
-Austria-Hungary, unlike Czechislovakia would be fiercely anti-Bolshevik and would aid Poland with weapons and ammo like Hungary did IOTL, just on bigger scale.
-With Bolsheviks beaten more than IOTL maybe rump White Russian or Ukrainian state survives?
part 2part 1 ( might continue it later)
There are tons of sceniarios, which could lead to the survival of Austria-Hungary. Excluding any CP victory sceniario, the two most latest sceniarios are the followings:
-The Monarchy stays on defensive on the Italian Front in 1918, thus avoids both the fail at the Second Battle of the Piave and disaster at the Battle of Vittorio Veneto. (Very Likely)
-The Second Battle of the Piave is another Caporetto for the Italians, which cripples the remnants of the Italian Army and favourable knocks Italy out of the war. (Less Likely)
First sceniario:
Since the army was still under reorganisation and there were still not that much Entente forces in the region, there were no plans for offensive on the Italian's behalf for 1918. Since in this sceniario neither does Austria-Hungary have any intention to attack, a reasonable amount of troops could be transfered to the Macedonian Front, when the situation becomes dire for the Bulgarians, which could easily mean the prevention of the collapse of that front. This means, when after the German defenses collapse on the Western Front, both the Italian and Macedonian Fronts would be still intact. From this point the Central Powers either call for armistice/sue for peace together or the Germans are abandoned by their allies right after the Entente breakthrough on the Western Front. It might sound silly to differentiate these two outcomes, but if Austria-Hungary and Bulgaria detache themselves from Germany even just a month or so earlier, that could significantly improve the British and French opinion on them ("they are not just German puppets afterall...").
After all of this, the fate of Germany and Turkey wouldn't change, while Bulgaria would either lose the same territories of OTL or it would get a status quo ante. Austria-Hungary would have to abandon all it's gains and it would have to give Galicia to Poland (and maybe to Ukraine) and Bucovina to Romania. Italy is likely to get Trentino and Austrian Littoral with Triest, but not more. Serbia wouldn't get any territory from the Monarchy, but their territorial integrity would be restored. Montenegro might or might not be united with Serbia.
After the war, Austria-Hungary would have averted it's collapse, but it would be still in a quite difficult situation and some reforms would be needed. However don't imagine any kind of federalisation or whatsoever, that won't happen. There won't be any special autonoumus territories established either. However the decentralisation of power to the existing administrative subdivisions seems likely. Now I will speak about Hungary a bit. To ease the tension in society, the voting rights would be considerably extended, which would cause higher representation of the lower classes, which would lead to the further decline of the power of the nobility. At the same time, it would also raise the representation of the minorities in the parliement, which would make the Hungarians more likely to revise the laws concerning minorities and language.
Moving on, the economic situation would quite bad for a couple of years, but then the Austro-Hungarian economy would recover quickly and would probably become one of the fastest growing economies in Europe. Why do I say that? Because the industry of Austria-Hungary sustained no physical damage during the war, and it wouldn't come under foreign occupation either, while there are plenty of resources available domestically. The Great Depression could raise things up a bit, but since Austria-Hungary could endure a little autarky much better, than OTL Austria and Hungary could, the system wouldn't be in danger.