WI: Alternate laws of succesion in France

Ok, so here is something I was wondering for a long time - what's the best moment in history for Kingdom of France (we are talking mostly about medieval period) to have completly different laws of succesion than OTL?

1)What's the best POD for France to use Semi-salic primogeniture instead (Note: We are talking about full time Queen Ragnant here!)

2) Is there any chance for any chance for any illegimiate son of french king to ascend to the throne and found new dynasty?
 
Ok, so here is something I was wondering for a long time - what's the best moment in history for Kingdom of France (we are talking mostly about medieval period) to have completly different laws of succesion than OTL?

1)What's the best POD for France to use Semi-salic primogeniture instead (Note: We are talking about full time Queen Ragnant here!)

2) Is there any chance for any chance for any illegimiate son of french king to ascend to the throne and found new dynasty?
For the first question; the optimal period is that of the very end of the reign of Philip IV the Fair. His sons, Louis I of Navarre, Philip of Poitiers (future Philip V) third son, Charles (future Charles IV) were married respectively to Margaret, Joan and Blanche of Burgundy. In 1314, a crisis of importance broke out that of the Tour de Nesle affair, the three daughters-in-law of Philip IV were accused of adultery, if Joan is finally found innocent their two others will be imprisoned but remained the wives of the two princes . The same year, Philip IV dies and Louis becomes king under the name of Louis X, seeking to wash himself of this affront he sought a divorce and sought another woman. Margaret dies imprisoned, some say strangled and Louis X marries Clementia of Hungary who becomes pregnant, however the king dies prematurely after a year of reign during the queen pregnancy. For the first time since ascending to the throne of House Capet, a king dies without a living heir son.

After a bitter conflict over who was to ensure the regency between Philip of Poitiers, Charles of Valois, brother of Philip IV and the Duke Odo of Burgundy. Philip, outgoing victor, takes the opportunity to modify the laws of succession of the French crown, indeed at this time nothing clearly said that a princess could not become queen of France, only the principle of direct agnatic primogeniture prevailed but never the case of Louis X has not been observed before. Thus, if Clementia gives birth to a daughter, the crown should pass to the eldest who was Joan of France, daughter of Louis and Margueret. However, this young 4-year-old princess was recognized by Louis as a bastard (without ever being able to prove it) and therefore excluded the line of succession during her lifetime. Death, speculations were still in order, despite the support of his uncle the Duke of Burgundy. Philip of Poitiers used this to his advantage, further advancing the highly unstable character of a woman's reign, thus securing his own accession to the throne, Philip resumed and applied the traditions of the Salian Franks of a total agnatic primogeniture rejecting the possibility to a woman to ascend the throne, known as "Salic Laws". Clementia finally gave birth to a boy; John I the Posthumous who reigns and dies five days after being born and according to the new laws, the crown passed to Philip.

It is in this period which extends from November 1314 to November 1316 that France missed an opportunity to know the ascension of a Queen of France. We can imagine several scenarios:
  • Even before the Tour de Nesle affair; Louis was destined for Joan of Burgundy - the only one faithful to her husband - but ended up marrying Margaret. If Louis marries Joan, there can still be an affair, but she remains innocent with a daughter recognized as legitimate and on the death of her father ascends the throne;
  • No Tour de Nesle affair; Margaret remains faithful or is not caught, she becomes full queen, Louis dies and Joan of France becomes queen;
  • No Tour de Nesle affair and regency of Odo; the same as the previous scenario but in addition Margaret's brother becomes regent ensuring Joan of France's ascension without "hang-ups";
  • The last Capet; after the death of Philip V and Charles IV without son the more serious question of who will succeed the Capetians direct arose. Four candidates; Joan I of Navarre (daughter of Louis X), Philip of Valois and Philip of Evreux cousins of the deceased kings and Edward III of England, grandson of Philip IV. Philip of Valois as the closest relative was appointed king (Philip VI) by the French barons, and applied the Salic laws to Joan but also to Edward III, if a woman cannot become queen she cant also transmit rights to the crown. However this was only possible by the fact that Philip was regent and therefore controlled the power but if in his place there was a man in favor of Joan she had her chance to become queen.


For the second question; There was only one moment in the history of France when such an eventuality could occur. The end of the reign of Louis XIV. On the successive death in 1711-1712 of his son, Dauphin Louis, of his grandson, Louis of Burgundy then his great-grandson Louis of Brittany, the succession passed to his last great-grandson, Louis of Anjou, 3 years old and frail. If the latter were to disappear, the succession would therefore have to pass to its closest relative, the second grandson of Louis XIV, Philip of Anjou who had become king of Spain under the name of Philip V. However, if this The last one was to succeed Louis XIV, he would cumulate the titles of king of France and Spain creating an empire unbalancing the whole of Europe - Europe already at war since 1701 against Louis and Philip to prevent this from happening.

Despite this threat, Louis of Anjou seemed to live and peace was signed in 1713-1714. Philip renounced for himself and his descendants to become the crown of France but in 1714, Charles of Berry, the last grandson of Louis XIV died without a descendant, making the young Dauphin Louis the sole representative of the Bourbons in France and causing a dynastic crisis. To remedy this Louis XIV decided to legitimize his bastard sons, because if the Sun King had a legitimate living son, he had seven children from his mistresses, including two prominent boys in 1714; Louis-Auguste, Duke of Maine and Louis-Alexandre, Count of Toulouse. In order to prevent any union with Spain but also to avoid the ascension of Philip of Orléans, nephew of the king and therefore disappearance of the eldest house of the Bourbons. Louis XIV legitimized the two bastards and made them suitable to succeed him in total violation of the laws of succession. Nevertheless, on the death of the Sun King, the regency came under the control of Orleans which broke, the day after the death of Louis XIV, the king's will and the possibility for the bastards to accede to the throne. Philip subsequently retained power, dismissing the Duke of Maine as his main rival, and the regency ended with the coming of age of Louis XV.

Here it is more complex and fuzzy to find a scenario that would lead to the editing of one of the bastards but I have two ideas:
  • Regency of Maine and death of Louis XV; the Regency had been organized in a precise manner by Louis XIV before his death. If Orleans does not take power when the Parliament of Paris opens and Maine is more active, he can obtain the power that was guaranteed to him, see more and thus keep his right of succession. On the death of the young Louis XV he will become king;
  • Death of the Dauphin and succession of Louis XIV; here the young Louis dies between the end of the War of the Succession and the death of his great-grandfather. Louis XIV designating the Duke of Maine as Dauphinand prepare him to be king;
 
Last edited:
1) The best POD is simply to butterfly the Tour de Nesle affair. Either make it so that A) Margaret and/or Blanche don't get caught (assuming one believes the sisters-in-law were actually guilty) or:

B) make Philip IV and/or his daughter more chill and less paranoid or worried about the succession (in the case one subscribes to the school of thought that the Burgundian girls were innocent and Philip IV was just either paranoid about his sons being cuckolded, or just generally worried about the fact he didn't have a male-line grandson yet).

It's tight, but an alternative would be to keep the Tour de Nesle affair the same, but make Pope Clement V live longer; he died at a crucial time for Philip IV, after his daughters-in-law had already been formally accused of adultery, but before annulments could be granted on those grounds. Philip IV and his sons had to wait for a new Pope to be chosen before any of this could be done OTL. Assuming Clement lives just a bit longer, there's a chance Philip IV gets his annulments early and his sons can get remarried and start producing heirs ASAP.

Theoretically, this wouldn't actually change anything, but having the Tour de Nesle affair simply blow over and not being followed immediately thereafter by a succession crisis would do wonders for the French monarchy. Their next succession crisis (which would happen eventually) wouldn't come right after the female claimant in said succession crisis was implicated to be a bastard, which means said theoretical female claimant has a better shot at actually obtaining the crown.

Another opportunity would be to make Louis X live longer; long enough to father more sons than just John the Posthumous or simply long enough for Joan's supposed illegitimacy to blow over. You could even make it so that John the Posthumous lives a little longer; OTL John wasn't actually considered a 'real' French king at the time. If he lives longer but still dies childless, then his half-sister Joan has a better shot at being considered his natural heir. Joan had been acknowledged by their father to be legitimate on his deathbed, so I don't see what reason John could have for denying her the crown.

A later opportunity, strange as it sounds, is make Henri of Navarre decide that Paris isn't worth a mass during the French wars of Religion. But I'll need to consider the implications of that a bit more before I commit to anything.
 
@SunZi @30PrincesAndAKing: Louis X had recognized Joan as his legitimate daughter before dying and had NEVER declared her as bastard before that.
What you need is simply NOT having Louis die while Clementia is pregnant as that would deprive Philip of the time for intriguing for the crown
 
Louis X had recognized Joan as his legitimate daughter before dying and had NEVER declared her as bastard before that.
What you need is simply NOT having Louis die while Clementia is pregnant as that would deprive Philip of the time for intriguing for the crown
I forgot that fact, but the point is that it is stated that this child was not his as an argument to divorce, which he wanted. The very fact that he is made this volt-face, proves that he maintained the suspicion and the opprobrium on his daughter during his short reign.

I don't see how making Louis survive beyond Clementia's pregnancy will give Joan a better chance of becoming queen and prevent Philip from being interested in the crown? That he survives John the posthumous and dies thereafter, while maintaining suspicion on the legitimacy of Joan (and recognizing on her deathbed her full legitimacy), will not prevent the game of intrigue around the regency and which then led Philip to the throne. The latter was already prepared to be king, as evidenced by the rapid appearance of his royal seal.
 
Last edited:
I forgot that fact, but the point is that it is stated that this child was not his as an argument to divorce, which he wanted. The very fact that he is made this volt-face, proves that he maintained the suspicion and the opprobrium on his daughter during his short reign.

I don't see how making Louis survive beyond Clementia's pregnancy will give Joan a better chance of becoming queen and prevent Philip from being interested in the crown? That he survives John the posthumous and dies thereafter, while maintaining suspicion on the legitimacy of Joan (and recognizing on her deathbed her full legitimacy), will not prevent the game of intrigue around the regency and which then led Philip to the throne. The latter was already prepared to be king, as evidenced by the rapid appearance of his royal seal.
Without Clementia’s pregnancy and the months of waiting for its outcome Philip will have no way to take the crown as Jeanne will become Queen as soon her father died
 
...she would...? She was considered a bastard...
Did you miss the post upthread that Louis X never doubted his daughter's legitimacy?
@SunZi @30PrincesAndAKing: Louis X had recognized Joan as his legitimate daughter before dying and had NEVER declared her as bastard before that.
What you need is simply NOT having Louis die while Clementia is pregnant as that would deprive Philip of the time for intriguing for the crown
 
Did you miss the post upthread that Louis X never doubted his daughter's legitimacy?
Well, I don't know if he never doubted her legitimacy (we can assume there might have been a hot second where he may have contemplated it due to the implication of Margaret's supposed adultery), but he never did so publicly. In any case, he did explicitly acknowledge her as his child on at least one occasion after the scandal, and she was in all probability his biological child, so the odds are certainly in her favour on that front.

The main problem with Joan's claim OTL is that she had absolutely nothing going for her in 1316 when her claim needed to be made:
1) She was an unmarried minor,
2) She was female,
3) She was rumoured to be illegitimate (but probably wasn't),
4) Her mother was dead (and disgraced to boot),

Her maternal family was also not particularly well-connected at the time. Her eldest uncle Hugh had just died the year before (he was actually on his deathbed when his sister Margaret had been accused of adultery, so he wasn't in a position to defend her OTL), and her next uncle Odo was easily bought off.

Her paternal family is also chock-full of married adult males with better connections who have every reason to want a patrilineal succession (as that gives them greater chances of becoming king). If the French royal line was a little sparser (say Louis X was an only son and Joan didn't have any paternal uncles), then her chances are much better since the rival 'Salic' claimants are much more distant. Beefing up the political positions of her maternal family wouldn't hurt either.
 
  • Even before the Tour de Nesle affair; Louis was destined for Joan of Burgundy - the only one faithful to her husband - but ended up marrying Margaret. If Louis marries Joan, there can still be an affair, but she remains innocent with a daughter recognized as legitimate and on the death of her father ascends the throne;
  • No Tour de Nesle affair; Margaret remains faithful or is not caught, she becomes full queen, Louis dies and Joan of France becomes queen;
  • No Tour de Nesle affair and regency of Odo; the same as the previous scenario but in addition Margaret's brother becomes regent ensuring Joan of France's ascension without "hang-ups";
  • The last Capet; after the death of Philip V and Charles IV without son the more serious question of who will succeed the Capetians direct arose. Four candidates; Joan I of Navarre (daughter of Louis X), Philip of Valois and Philip of Evreux cousins of the deceased kings and Edward III of England, grandson of Philip IV. Philip of Valois as the closest relative was appointed king (Philip VI) by the French barons, and applied the Salic laws to Joan but also to Edward III, if a woman cannot become queen she cant also transmit rights to the crown. However this was only possible by the fact that Philip was regent and therefore controlled the power but if in his place there was a man in favor of Joan she had her chance to become queen.
So maybe all we have to do is for Charles IV to live longer? Assuming that he will reign for another few years/decades, but have no luck with trying for sun, he could push for making sure that his daughter will be recognized as his heir apparent.
Without Clementia’s pregnancy and the months of waiting for its outcome Philip will have no way to take the crown as Jeanne will become Queen as soon her father died
I'm still not sure that Jeanne have a chance for succesion as a child. With problems with Edward III, pushing for this kind of succesion would be problemastic.
 
So maybe all we have to do is for Charles IV to live longer? Assuming that he will reign for another few years/decades, but have no luck with trying for sun, he could push for making sure that his daughter will be recognized as his heir apparent.
None of Charles IV's daughters had a chance to succeed him. Making him live longer would not have changed the state of mind of the king who would have always sought to produce a male heir. I would even say that with age he would have resigned himself to recognizing his cousins (or their sons) as an heir, simply ensuring that his daughters were married to them. The rise of a woman as head of state at this time must come at a time of sudden crisis.
I'm still not sure that Jeanne have a chance for succesion as a child. With problems with Edward III, pushing for this kind of succesion would be problemastic.
It is for this that I see as a more plausible scenario the arrival of a woman on the throne of France, little Joan after the death of her father. The most logical (for me) would be, that there is no affair of the Tour de Nesle, Margaret of Burgundy becoming regent after the death of Louis X and having publicly obtained from him the full guarantee of the rights of her daughter to ride on the throne and by heavy compromises with his brothers-in-law (Philip and Charles) and the lords of France: for example the convocation of the States-General, an enlarged council of regency, the guarantee of the marriage of the queen with a son of the princes Philip or Charles see Charles of Valois and Louis of Evreux, etc .... Joan becoming the "short term" answer to the succession crisis. Of course, Edward II's England will come to claim the crown but not for the Prince of Wales, for Isabelle of France who will however be quickly dismissed because if the brothers of Louis X do not have the crown then the sister will have no chance .
 
I'm still not sure that Jeanne have a chance for succesion as a child. With problems with Edward III, pushing for this kind of succesion would be problemastic.
Well, the thing is, even with all she had against her OTL, Joan still had enough supporters that they needed to be bought off at least twice (Odo with a marriage to Philippe le Long's daughter; Joan herself with Navarre after the death of Charles IV). Strengthening her position and shuffling the timetable might actually be enough to get her the crown.
 
Well, I don't know if he never doubted her legitimacy (we can assume there might have been a hot second where he may have contemplated it due to the implication of Margaret's supposed adultery), but he never did so publicly. In any case, he did explicitly acknowledge her as his child on at least one occasion after the scandal, and she was in all probability his biological child, so the odds are certainly in her favour on that front.

The main problem with Joan's claim OTL is that she had absolutely nothing going for her in 1316 when her claim needed to be made:
1) She was an unmarried minor,
2) She was female,
3) She was rumoured to be illegitimate (but probably wasn't),
4) Her mother was dead (and disgraced to boot),

Her maternal family was also not particularly well-connected at the time. Her eldest uncle Hugh had just died the year before (he was actually on his deathbed when his sister Margaret had been accused of adultery, so he wasn't in a position to defend her OTL), and her next uncle Odo was easily bought off.
Easily bought off? Philip was forced to hand over his own elder daughter who was most likely to be the heiress of her mother (so Artois and Burgundy) as bride to Odo for stopping him to support Jeanne‘s claim. And was more or less forced to go full on the exclusion of any female from the succession to the French crown for buying the other support of Jeanne aka his uncle Charles of Valois. Also because his taking possession of Navarre and Champagne was a blatant usurpation he was forced to deprive his own daughters of the chance to inherit them… Jeanne’s uncle was NOT easily bought and Philip had months for securing the crown for himself and persuade Jeanne’s supporters to recognize him as King (he had already Parliament on his side and was still forced to give his daughter (and her inheritance) for placating Odo)…
Her paternal family is also chock-full of married adult males with better connections who have every reason to want a patrilineal succession (as that gives them greater chances of becoming king). If the French royal line was a little sparser (say Louis X was an only son and Joan didn't have any paternal uncles), then her chances are much better since the rival 'Salic' claimants are much more distant. Beefing up the political positions of her maternal family wouldn't hurt either.
Again, her maternal family was NOT powerless, her father’s uncle supported her succession (and most likely also her father’s younger brother would support his niece over his brother as he wanted be free from his adulteress wife) meaning who Jeanne would be Queen without the months of interregnum who gave to Philip the chance to take the Crown
 
I'm still not sure that Jeanne have a chance for succesion as a child. With problems with Edward III, pushing for this kind of succesion would be problemastic.
It is for this that I see as a more plausible scenario the arrival of a woman on the throne of France, little Joan after the death of her father. The most logical (for me) would be, that there is no affair of the Tour de Nesle, Margaret of Burgundy becoming regent after the death of Louis X and having publicly obtained from him the full guarantee of the rights of her daughter to ride on the throne and by heavy compromises with his brothers-in-law (Philip and Charles) and the lords of France: for example the convocation of the States-General, an enlarged council of regency, the guarantee of the marriage of the queen with a son of the princes Philip or Charles see Charles of Valois and Louis of Evreux, etc .... Joan becoming the "short term" answer to the succession crisis. Of course, Edward II's England will come to claim the crown but not for the Prince of Wales, for Isabelle of France who will however be quickly dismissed because if the brothers of Louis X do not have the crown then the sister will have no chance .
The point is who WITHOUT Philip’s intrigues for taking the Crown for himself the question of an English claim to France would NEVER EVER be raised as the ONLY REASON for which Edward advanced his claim was who the current laws and costumes in France made him as the most legitimate heir to the French crown, excluding DIRECT female succession as Edward III was Charles IV’s closest male relative.
If we have NO Tour de Nesle then NOBODY would challenge Jeanne’s succession and Margaret would NOT NEED to get any compromise: her daughter is Queen and she is the Regent… With the Tower of Nesle but without Clementia’s pregnancy then Jeanne will be Queen, likely under the regency of Charles of Valois (if Philip try to made a play for the Crown ) or Philip…
 
The point is who WITHOUT Philip’s intrigues for taking the Crown for himself the question of an English claim to France would NEVER EVER be raised as the ONLY REASON for which Edward advanced his claim was who the current laws and costumes in France made him as the most legitimate heir to the French crown, excluding DIRECT female succession as Edward III was Charles IV’s closest male relative.
If we have NO Tour de Nesle then NOBODY would challenge Jeanne’s succession and Margaret would NOT NEED to get any compromise: her daughter is Queen and she is the Regent… With the Tower of Nesle but without Clementia’s pregnancy then Jeanne will be Queen, likely under the regency of Charles of Valois (if Philip try to made a play for the Crown ) or Philip…
Perhaps Jeanne can marry her cousin, Philip, Count of Burgundy to merge claims.
 
Perhaps Jeanne can marry her cousin, Philip, Count of Burgundy to merge claims.
Isabella's point was that Jeanne's claim would be recognized as superior if the Tour de Nesle thing is butterflied, I think, so she doesn't NEED to wed a cousin. (And thank god for that, did y'all hear about the Habsburg clan?)
 
Easily bought off?
It depends on your definition of "easily" (and I'm only talking about Odo here, not Charles of Valois). At this time it would not be entirely uncommon for someone in Odo's position to accept a bribe and then still raise a ruckus about the same issue later. The fact he never came to Joan's defense after this tells me the man was not particularly interested in defending his niece's rights. A more 'faithful' uncle (or a more opportunistic politician) may have refused to accept any bribe and/or exploit the situation for all it was worth.

Plus, the possibility of Philippe le Longe having a son is not out of the question at this point; both he and his wife are still young enough to try. Case-in-point: Philippe le Longe did have a son (also named Philip) who was born 24 June 1316, the very year he becomes king (and the boy didn't die until February of the next year, so only a year before Odo marries Philippe's eldest daughter). So, sure, Joan of France is the heiress to Burgundy at the time of the marriage, but there's no guarantee she's going to stay that way.
her maternal family was NOT powerless
I never said they were powerless, I said they weren't particularly well-connected at this time (e.g. I don't believe they have a figure on the ground who is constantly at court arguing on their behalf). They have plenty of influence, but they're not well-positioned in 1316 to take advantage of it.
 
No need at all for that match. Jeanne is far likelier to marry Evreux as OTL or a (grand)son of Charles of Valois
Assuming that Jeanne will ascend to the throne, she will be no doubt the most desirable party in Europe, I see no reason why she couldn't try to use to gain from any potential husband as possible ( of course, she can terribly miscalculate). All her cousins will do their best, and not sure if any contender that ain't son of a king, king himself or heir presumptive would be considered worthy a Queen of France.
 
Top