If you're going by the Gregorian calendar, two days ago (as of 19th July, Australian time) was the 102nd anniversary of the execution of Tar Nicholas II and his family by order of the Ural Regional Soviet.
After his abdication from the throne, his cousin, King George, attempted to offer him refuge, but fear of a socialist uproar (on the scale of the 1916 Easter Rising) in the United Kingdom essentially cowed the King into not making the offer. The French government declined to accept the Romanovs in view of increasing unrest on the Western Front and on the home front as a result of the ongoing war with Germany. The British ambassador in Paris advised the Foreign Secretary that the Romanovs would be unwelcome in France as the ex-Empress was regarded as pro-German.
So if the British and the French weren't going to give them asylum, who else could've given the Tsar and/or his family asylum?
After his abdication from the throne, his cousin, King George, attempted to offer him refuge, but fear of a socialist uproar (on the scale of the 1916 Easter Rising) in the United Kingdom essentially cowed the King into not making the offer. The French government declined to accept the Romanovs in view of increasing unrest on the Western Front and on the home front as a result of the ongoing war with Germany. The British ambassador in Paris advised the Foreign Secretary that the Romanovs would be unwelcome in France as the ex-Empress was regarded as pro-German.
So if the British and the French weren't going to give them asylum, who else could've given the Tsar and/or his family asylum?