He means Arizona and NM becoming prime confederate territory somehow...
Why would the Union hand territories over to slavery?
He means Arizona and NM becoming prime confederate territory somehow...
according to him, Because they politely ask for them.Why would the Union hand territories over to slavery?
according to him, Because they politely ask for them.
When I mean west I mean like... the Western USA I forget there was a "Western Theater" of the Civil War, shits confusingI feel like people forget about the western front of the Civil War too, it's not as flashy and glamorized as the east, but still somewhat important
I feel like people forget about the western front of the Civil War too, it's not as flashy and glamorized as the east, but still somewhat important
When I mean west I mean like... the Western USA I forget there was a "Western Theater" of the Civil War, shits confusing
Agree on the first point. Disagree on the second point.Assuming the CSA survived, they'd end up as a backwater, impoverished, corrupt and backwards.
The CSA constitution preserved slavery in perpetuity. It would likely persist at least until the 1890s, more likely as late as the 1930s.
Agree on the first point. Disagree on the second point.
Whatever the CSA constitution said about slavery, the economic reality was that plantation slavery went uneconomical by the mid 1880s.
It is no coincidence that the mid 1880s are when Brazilian slaves were freed, Cuba wrapped up its multi generational phased emancipation and Martinique (France's hard core colonial hold out) emancipated its still involuntary and perpertually bound uhmm...."contract workers".
Sure, the some member states of the CSA might try industrial slaves. But.... that would be a pretty fast dead end as well. Whites needed what few industrialized jobs there were. Likewise, industrialization required growing numbers of skilled workers. Difficult to operate slavery in that environment. Ostensible slaves as skilled workers did exist in CSA, Ottomans etc. - but they were small scale and often not truly slaves on the month to month basis.
I see and recognize your point. I also agree with it. Slavery would likely stay legal until the 1890s on paper with fewer and fewer slaves in practice.It's possible that practical slavery might fade away while the legal framework and legal slavery remains in place. Basically, slavery would become a minority thing, as more and more slaves are granted freedom. But the Confederacy might still preserve it indefinitely, just have less and less actual slaves.
On the other hand, the institution of Jim Crow and it's forced labour elements suggests that slavery in some form would have a hell of a life span.
I see and recognize your point. I also agree with it. Slavery would likely stay legal until the 1890s on paper with fewer and fewer slaves in practice.
As for Jim Crow and perpetuated de facto slavery in the CSA, I imagine that the CSA would follow the pattern of Brazil, Cuba, Martinique, Yucatan etc. Slaves transition into semi free share croppers. Contract conditions and freedom of movement etc. gradually improve over generations.
James Eastland and John Stennis were still using prisoners and indebted sharecroppers as forced labor on their plantations, well into the 1960s.Years ago I read "Slavery by another name" by Douglas Blackmon. He argued slavery lasted until WWII in the South with convict labor.
I don't know if he wrote about specific individuals to say it happened later, he could have. It's been awhile since I read the book. Legally by WWII it was going away. That's why you see inmates picking up roadside trash, instead of working for "commercial enterprises".James Eastland and John Stennis were still using prisoners and indebted sharecroppers as forced labor on their plantations, well into the 1960s.
Just adding on, MD state militia would also probably seize Ft McHenry, otherwise Baltimore is at risk under its guns.2. Maryland Secedes
(Ben Butler gets delayed by a week) partially sparked by outrage over the Brown raid.
Maryland Militia blocks RR tracks from Pennsylvania and disarms the guards at the Naval Academy in Annapolis.
US government negotiates a withdrawal from DC and Annapolis, as its impossible to defend with a handful of Marines from the Navy yard and cut off from the North. Government evacuated by sea by the Potomac River to Philadelphia or NY.
Good point, I added it and Fort Washington which commanded the Potomac river.Just adding on, MD state militia would also probably seize Ft McHenry, otherwise Baltimore is at risk under its guns.
I don't know if he wrote about specific individuals to say it happened later, he could have. It's been awhile since I read the book. Legally by WWII it was going away. That's why you see inmates picking up roadside trash, instead of working for "commercial enterprises".
In most places in the South it is still against the law, even though some places have revived the practice.
A son of a wealthy Northeast family was traveling the country and picked up in Florida as a vagrant and forced to work in a tree cutting "gulag". The family sent private investigators after he went missing. Which resulted in a rather large scandal at the time.
IIRC two of these cases involved a distant metropole enforcing their dictates and the third was the unpopular edict of a monarchy which got them overthrown. The CSA is not in the same boat as either and unless/until DC or London has them by the economic short hairs they never will be.It is no coincidence that the mid 1880s are when Brazilian slaves were freed, Cuba wrapped up its multi generational phased emancipation and Martinique (France's hard core colonial hold out) emancipated its still involuntary and perpertually bound uhmm...."contract workers".