After Austrian Nazis killed Dollfuss, what if the Austrofascists rallied and resisted German domination, even if Anschluss happens? Looks like Prince Ernst Rüdiger Camillo von Starhemberg was still alive, even if he had fled the country. Would be awkward if "Free Austrian" forces was led by a fascist, albeit one that seemed relatively light for the era?
Would also be interesting if this caused any tensions between Mussolini and Hitler, like say if the former covertly continued to support the Austrofascists in exile as a sort of check against the Nazis.
Though that's a 1940s American reporter writing, and his cultural stereotyping would seem to have been contradicted by Hitler's Austrianness.John Gunther wrote in 1940 that the state "assaulted the rights of citizens in a fantastic manner", noting that in 1934 the police raided 106,000 homes in Vienna and made 38,141 arrests of Nazis, social democrats, and communists. He added, however:[5]
But—and it was an important "but"—the terror never reached anything like the repressive force of the Nazi terror. Most of those arrested promptly got out of jail again. Even at its most extreme phase, it was difficult to take the Schuschnigg dictatorship completely seriously, although Schutzbunders tried in 1935 got mercilessly severe sentences. This was because of Austrian gentleness, Austrian genius for compromise, Austrian love for cloudy legal abstractions, and Austrian Schlamperei.
Would also be interesting if this caused any tensions between Mussolini and Hitler, like say if the former covertly continued to support the Austrofascists in exile as a sort of check against the Nazis.