Assuming WW1 goes on into 1919. What does the armistice and peace look like? What are likely terms? What German kind of government emerges?
Historical assumptions I have heard before, but may differ from the opinions of people on this board:
1) It has always been though that a more complete Allied victory would avoid the "stab in the back" theory and the rise of Hitler.
2) A 1919 Allied victory would be an "American" peace since they would be doing the bulk of the work by 1919. The thought is an "American" dictated peace would be better.
Since how it happens matters, a couple of possible scenarios:
a) OTL through November 1st 1918. The Germans don't try a last naval sortie and continue fighting to secure better terms than the Allies are willing to give. The manage to scrape together a force to block the Brenner pass after the Austrian surrender. The Allies stop their offensive over the winter on the German frontier to build up strength, and to wait for better weather and on the Italian and Balkan fronts the Allies have to gather POWs, feed the local populations, build up infrastructure to attack through Germany, this takes all winter. A May 1919 offensive crushes Germany and the Allies are across the Rhine in 3 months taking Frankfurt and Karlshrue before the German request an armistice on any terms.
b) The German 1918 offensive goes a littler better than OTL and the Allied have to continue to withdraw forces from Italy, Salonika and Palestine to make up for it. The result is the Allies are at the same point they were after the 100 days OTL but the Salonika, Italian and Palestine fronts hold on their August 1918 lines. A 1919 Allied offensive on all fronts crushes all the Central Powers in 4 months. Allies are across the Rhine in the west and have crushed in the Italian, Balkan and Salonika fronts easily against the barely motivated German Allies. Germany requests an armistice on any terms.
Historical assumptions I have heard before, but may differ from the opinions of people on this board:
1) It has always been though that a more complete Allied victory would avoid the "stab in the back" theory and the rise of Hitler.
2) A 1919 Allied victory would be an "American" peace since they would be doing the bulk of the work by 1919. The thought is an "American" dictated peace would be better.
Since how it happens matters, a couple of possible scenarios:
a) OTL through November 1st 1918. The Germans don't try a last naval sortie and continue fighting to secure better terms than the Allies are willing to give. The manage to scrape together a force to block the Brenner pass after the Austrian surrender. The Allies stop their offensive over the winter on the German frontier to build up strength, and to wait for better weather and on the Italian and Balkan fronts the Allies have to gather POWs, feed the local populations, build up infrastructure to attack through Germany, this takes all winter. A May 1919 offensive crushes Germany and the Allies are across the Rhine in 3 months taking Frankfurt and Karlshrue before the German request an armistice on any terms.
b) The German 1918 offensive goes a littler better than OTL and the Allied have to continue to withdraw forces from Italy, Salonika and Palestine to make up for it. The result is the Allies are at the same point they were after the 100 days OTL but the Salonika, Italian and Palestine fronts hold on their August 1918 lines. A 1919 Allied offensive on all fronts crushes all the Central Powers in 4 months. Allies are across the Rhine in the west and have crushed in the Italian, Balkan and Salonika fronts easily against the barely motivated German Allies. Germany requests an armistice on any terms.