TLIAW: Steadfast in Loyalty: The Story of Prince Rupert, the Cavalier Elector

Objections lifted
Or more precisely, reformulated.
A ruler must and should send a contingent of troops (commanded by his loyal brother), but a private person does not have to be personally present at the battlefield. It's personal presence that sound weird and adds unneccessary moral complications. After all, Protestant coalition is interested in Palatine troops, not in a sword of a single cavalry general.
 
Or more precisely, reformulated.
A ruler must and should send a contingent of troops (commanded by his loyal brother), but a private person does not have to be personally present at the battlefield. It's personal presence that sound weird and adds unneccessary moral complications. After all, Protestant coalition is interested in Palatine troops, not in a sword of a single cavalry general.
More often than not rulers in that era still personally lead their troops at least in name, whatever is their level of competence, unless health do not consent them to do it...
Rupert is both a ruler and a very competent general, would be very strange if he was not personally leading his troops and his allies and subject would doubt of his commitment to the war, plus sending the troops would be already breaking his oath.
 
More often than not rulers in that era still personally lead their troops at least in name, whatever is their level of competence, unless health do not consent them to do it...
Rupert is both a ruler and a very competent general, would be very strange if he was not personally leading his troops and his allies and subject would doubt of his commitment to the war, plus sending the troops would be already breaking his oath.
Depends on exact words. But then, I'm getting too legalistic.
 
Part the Fifth: The Regent
Part the Fifth: The Regent


Rupert IV, Elector Palatine and Prince-Consort of Orange

As the Holy Roman Empire slowly recovered and even began to move on, so to did the normal state of affairs slowly resume. Unfortunately for Rupert, however, this only brought further problems, chief among them that he needed an heir. Before becoming Elector, Rupert had had several illegitimate relationships, most notably with Susan Kuffstein, the daughter of his jailer during his years as an Imperial prisoner, but had never married and thus lacked any legitimate children to take the throne after him. Even worse, five of his brothers were dead, one had converted to Catholicism, one was living a rakish life in France and had likely converted to Catholicism, two of his sisters had become Abbesses, with one having converted to Catholicism to do so, and one was dead. This left only two sisters, Henriette Marie and Sophie, or rather any sons they had, as suitable heirs but neither of them were married either. This left Rupert in desperate need of a wife and ideally husbands for his sisters as well.

===​

His pursuit of a wife was considerably complicated by his age, 29 at the end of the war, which meant that all of the eligible candidates had already married. If Rupert was prepared to broaden his search, however, there were several candidates to be considered. Chief among these was Mary Henrietta, Princess Royal and Princess of Orange. Of course, she had been already married to William II, Prince of Orange, but he had died from smallpox in 1650, leaving Mary Henrietta a 19 year old widow and to first give birth to and then raise their son. A potential marriage would thus be somewhat complicated, not to mention unorthodox, but also had potential advantages for both parties. For Rupert, it would be a prestigious match, probably the most prestigious he could hope for, it would strengthen his ties to the Royalist cause, which by now was led by Mary’s brother Charles II after their father’s execution, and Mary, crucially for dynastic interests, was still of child birthing age.

For Mary, the marriage would be a boost for her popularity in the Netherlands, which had never been strong, as Rupert was not only still popular there from his time with Frederick Henry, Prince of Orange, but was also related to the ruling Nassau family through his grandmother, Countess Louise Juliana of Nassau, the daughter of William the Silent, and brother of both Prince Maurice and Frederick Henry. Furthermore, Mary had been somewhat overshadowed as regent and guardian for her son by her mother-in-law, Amalia of Solms-Braunfels, and brother-in-law, Frederick William I, Elector of Brandenberg and Duke of Prussia, and a new husband, especially one as popular as Rupert, would no doubt help address the balance in her favour. Admittedly, Rupert and Mary were first cousins once removed through their Stuart relatives but this was distant enough to be immaterial in the circumstances.

Thus, once the marriage negotiations were completed and the dowry somewhat reluctantly provided from the Dutch coffers by Frederick William I in his role as one of William III’s regents, Rupert travelled up the Rhine in a splendid barge to Amsterdam and then southwards to The Hague where, after a few days of socialising with the Dutch court, married Mary Henrietta in the Great (St. James’) Church, an honour accorded to Mary Henrietta as a Princess of Orange, in June 1652. The fact that the wedding took place in the Netherlands, and not the Electoral Palatinate was rather unusual but Mary had feared that her enemies in the royal court would usurp her from her influence over her son, which was already weakened. Even more unusual, however, was Mary Henrietta and Rupert’s subsequent splitting of their time between The Hague and Heidelberg, with Rupert leaving Princess Sophia in his place whilst he was in The Hague.

===​

Rupert would be a co-regent of the Netherlands and the self styled Prince-Consort of Orange for only 8 years but those 8 years would be profitable for him. When he wasn’t engaged in one of many disputes with Frederick William I and Amalia, Rupert would continue his interests in the arts and science, especially naval science. This might come as a surprise given his prior experience was a cavalry commander but he had taken an interest in naval warfare during his service in Venice. He would set up small foundries in both the grounds of his wife’s residence in The Hague and at his own palace in Heidelberg and would thereafter dabble in metallurgy for the much of his life. The result of his efforts during his time as regent, however, would be the Rupertinoe cannon, an advanced artillery gun ostensibly for use in naval warfare but also potentially for use in land combat. Unfortunately, however, the Rupertinoe was 3 times the price of a regular gun and thus never got beyond being Rupert’s pet project and the occasional deployment in Palatinate forces.

His role as regent was similarly mixed, he certainly bolstered Mary Henrietta’s popularity and position as regent and guardian, but Rupert himself was not especially interested in being regent to William III, though he is recorded as doing an admirable job as a guardian, not least teaching the young Prince of Orange to ride. The birth of his own son, Frederick Charles, in 1654 might have complicated matters but William III and Frederick, who was only 4 years younger, would grow up as friends. Rupert would go on to have two more children with Mary Henrietta, a daughter called Elisabeth and a second son called Rupert. The birth of his three children, in 1654, 1657 and 1658 respectively would increasingly lead to Rupert becoming more detached from the regency. In part because Frederick William I increasingly came to see Rupert as his rival and went to great lengths to reduce Rupert’s influence in the regency, though in truth he need not have bothered as Rupert had little desire to try and coup his fellow Elector. The same could not be said for Princess Mary, however, who would spend the rest of her life in confrontation with Frederick William I, ultimately without success, over her son before her death in 1660 from pneumonia bought on by complications from the birth of her last child, who would follow his mother to the grave only a year later.

===​

Princess Mary’s death, at the age of 29 years, was very untimely, not least because her brother had been restored to the English throne only a few months previously, an event which had ended the Anglo-Dutch War between the Commonwealth and the Dutch Republic, a war which had even seen Rupert commanded a squadron of Dutch ships, and greatly boosted Mary’s popularity in the Netherlands. In short, she had died just when things were looking up for her in the Netherlands. For Rupert, the combined blows of the death of his wife and young son was a great personal tragedy, one that would haunt him for several years, and following his wife’s funeral, at the Saint James’ Church where they had been married, he returned with his surviving children to Heidelberg.
 
Last edited:
Part the Sixth: The King
Part the Sixth: The King

457px-Prince_Rupert%2C_Count_Palatine.jpg

Rupert IV and I, Elector Palatine and King of Bohemia
He is wearing the robes of a Stranger Knight of the Garter, a honour unique at the time and bestowed upon him by Charles II for his service to Charles I

The end of the Thirty Years’ War in 1648 and the subsequent Treaty of Frankfurt had established a new, and uneasy, balance of power in the Holy Roman Empire. The Swedish, having followed up their gains in Germany with victory in the Second Northern War, had established a virtual mare nostrum over the Baltic Sea with only Denmark itself holding out. Their principal foes, the Habsburgs in Austria, meanwhile had been humbled and, in the biggest change of all, Bohemia had gained its independence and promptly elected John George I, Elector of Saxony, who had been the Estates’ first choice in 1618, as their King. This , combined with other small gains for Protestant Princes (the Electoral Palatinate had only gained a few cities in the Rhineland but had been restored in full), had ensured that the Holy Roman Empire, though Austria had retained their title as Emperor, was now Protestant dominated.

===​

In 1662, however, there came a challenge to that balance. John George I died in March and the Bohemian Estates, who had been greatly angered by John George I’s refusal to hold court in Prague and his attempt to centralise rule of Bohemia to Dresden, then refused to elect his son John George II as King. Even more dangerously, they then delayed on choosing a new king, a delay that prompted the Habsburgs to sense weakness and make a bid to reclaim the Bohemian throne. The 22 year-old Emperor Leopold, with the daring of youth, would do just that and issued a proclamation declaring the election of both Frederick V and John George I illegitimate and that his grandfather, Ferdinand II, was the last legitimate King of Bohemia and, having done so, invaded Bohemia to try and claim his ‘inheritance’.

This act of aggression spurred the Estates into action for, although Austria had been weakened by the loss of Bohemia, they had retained their Hungarian lands and remained a stronger force than the worn down and embattled Bohemia. With John George II ruled out, they turned, just as they had done 44 years previously, to the Electoral Palatinate and elected Rupert as their new King. Like his father, however, Rupert was initially reluctant to accept the crown, arguably even more so than his father had been. Much like his father’s bid for the throne, however, Rupert promptly gained the support of not only Sweden but also most of the other Protestant Princes of the Holy Roman Empire, Prussia and Saxony were notable exceptions, and he felt obliged to take the crown and in June, Rupert left Heidelberg for Prague.

The ensuing Bohemian War was shorter than some, who no doubt feared a repeat of the Thirty Years’ War, had expected. The Austrians, who had fought both against the Turks and in the Second Northern War, since 1648, were weaker than had been anticipated and soon found war exhaustion escalating after a string of initial defeats. At the same time, it quickly became apparent that the reforms of John George I, unpopular though they had been in Bohemia, were effective enough to significantly reduce the problems that had blighted Bohemia’s war effort under Frederick V. This allowed Rupert to utilise the resources of Bohemia much more effectively Frederick V had done and, despite the devastation inflicted on the state during the Thirty Years War, Rupert, with a much wiser head on his shoulders than he had had during the English Civil War, was able to marshal the Bohemian forces and, with assistance from the other Protestant Princes, would push back the Austrians. Leopold I would do his best to respond but was driven out of Bohemia after only 2 years of warfare in 1664 and the following year the Treaty of Prague was signed, recognising Rupert as King of Bohemia.

===​

This was a great triumph for Rupert, that made him one of the powers of the Holy Roman Empire, and allowed him to achieve what his father had died trying to do, and he promptly set out to try and fix Bohemia’s problems. John George I had already made a good effort, the fruits of which Rupert had reap in the Bohemian War, but the further warfare had damaged Bohemia’s economy more, leaving the state on a long road to recovery. Rupert would thus prove to be a good ‘caretaker king’ as he avoided tinkering with the structures of Bohemian government and administration too much, only instituting a handful of small reforms, and rather gave Bohemia a reign of peace in which it could recover, throwing himself once more into the arts and science.

Privately, however, Rupert was unhappy. He had spent his carefree bachelor days entangled with a string of lovers, of whom only the aforementioned Susan Kuffstein is worth mentioning, and now as a widower he would marry again. This was not for the need of an heir, his eldest son Prince Frederick Charles was now 11 and had grown up to be dashing young prince, both his sisters had married and had children, Henriette Marie to John Louis, Count of Nassau-Ottweiler, and Sophia to Ernest Augustus, Prince-Bishop of Osnabruck, and even his brother Philip Frederick had returned from France to settle down at court and married Marie Sibylle, the daughter of William Louis, Count of Nassau-Saarbrücken. Rather, Rupert, who had lost his father at nine, many of his siblings since then and also been at war for most of his life, was now a tired and lonely 46 year old man.

Despite his age, Rupert’s titles and reputation would make it relatively easy for him to find a wife, but of the suitors, he would marry Christine of Baden-Durlach, the niece of King Charles X Gustav of Sweden and a fellow widower, in Prague’s Cathedral of Saint Vitus. Despite the gap in their ages, Christine being only 21, less than half Rupert’s age, at the time of the marriage, their marriage would be relatively happy and even result in two children, Princess Charlotte born in 1668 and Prince Maurice born in 1671. The introduction of new children, and thus new rivals for inheritance, might have caused conflict in the family, but the 17 year old Prince Frederick Charles and the 14 year old Elizabeth are recorded as having been good half-siblings to the new members of their family. To top if all of, relations with his brother Edward, who had driven a rift in the family by converting to Catholicism, thawed and Edward began to visit Rupert both in Heidelberg and Prague. All in all, Rupert was at last able to enjoy a happy and content family life in in his remaining years.
 
... both his sisters had married and had children, Henriette Marie ..., and Sophia to Ernest Augustus, Prince-Bishop of Osnabruck ...
I know that not all Prince-Bishops would necessarily have been ordained priests back then, but wouldn't a marriage still have been a bridge too far?
 
Elisabeth of Palatinate, the muse of Decartes, was unmentioned. Did she still have the career as first female mathematics professor in Germany among other things (such as being Princess-Abbess)?
Of all his sisters in OTL Rupert was close to Elisabeth and Louise Hollandine.

Do both become abbesses TTL like OTL?
 
I know that not all Prince-Bishops would necessarily have been ordained priests back then, but wouldn't a marriage still have been a bridge too far?
Prince-bishop of Osnabruck had "bishop" as the honorary word, it was a secular administrator gaining income from a bishopric.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prince-Bishopric_of_Osnabrück
That is actually her OTL marriage, marriage which would lead to the Hanoverian Kings of England.
Elisabeth of Palatinate, the muse of Decartes, was unmentioned. Did she still have the career as first female mathematics professor in Germany among other things (such as being Princess-Abbess)?
Of all his sisters in OTL Rupert was close to Elisabeth and Louise Hollandine.

Do both become abbesses TTL like OTL?
They do indeed, I think its mentioned in passing in Chapter 5 as a matter of fact.
 
Part the Seventh: The Legacy
Part the Seventh: The Legacy

470px-Charles_II%2C_Elector_Palatine_01.jpg

Frederick VI and II, Elector Palatine and King of Bohemia

Rupert I and IV, King of Bohemia, Elector Palatinate, the former Prince-Consort of Orange, Duke of Cumberland and the Earl of Holderness, the archetypal cavalier of the English Civil War, the veteran of wars fought everywhere from the British Isles to Crete, the patron and innovator of the arts and sciences and family man, died on the 29th November 1682 at the age of 62 in Prague Castle surrounded by his family. There would first be a funerary mass in the Cathedral of Saint Vitus with Rupert lying in state before Rupert was returned to Heidelberg one final time and buried in the Church of the Holy Spirit which had been founded by his namesake Rupert III. His eldest son, Frederick Charles, inherited the Electoral Palatinate as Frederick VI and in January the Bohemian Estates elected him to succeed his father as Fidrich II.

At the age of 32, Frederick had many similarities to his father, he was handsome, dashing and had enjoyed all the expected past times of a Prince, from hunting to dancing. Unlike Rupert, however, Frederick had lived a somewhat quiet life, if one ignored his mother’s death when he was 6 and the moving from The Hague to the Heidelberg to Prague, and his only experience of war had been as his father’s page during the Bohemian War. He had also married at a more usual age than his father had, marrying Elisabeth Henriette, daughter of William IV, Landgrave of Hesse-Kassel, in 1577 at the age of 23 and the two had had three children, Prince Rupert Augustus in 1680, Prince Charles in 1681 and Princess Louise Elisabeth in 1685, before Frederick’s succession in 1686 and would go on to have two more, Prince William in 1687 and Princess Sophia Ruperta in 1691.
===​

Frederick and Elisabeth Henriette’s relatively uneventful first years as monarchs came to an end in 1688 when King James II of England and VII of Scotland, Frederick’s first cousin once removed, was deposed and replaced by Frederick’s half-brother William III, Prince of Orange, and his wife Mary, the daughter of James II and Frederick’s second cousin. William III’s ascension to the throne muddied the balance of power considerably, putting England, Scotland, Ireland and the United Provinces of the Netherlands under a personal union, a personal union that could wield dominance over the English Channel. In truth though, this was of far greater concern to France and Sweden than Frederick, at least in the sort term, and whilst the French, with intermittent help from the Swedish, waged war on the Dutch and the English, he remained largely uninvolved and sent only occasional assistance.

Mary II’s death only 6 years after the Glorious Revolution of 1688, having had no children, dramatically changed the outlook for Frederick and his family. William III now ruled on his own and only his sister-in-law Anne and her son Prince William were left in the Protestant line of succession and after that Frederick, as the grandson of Charles I, just as William III was, and great-grandson of James I, was generally recognised as being the next in line. Some might have actively pushed for their claim but really it was unsurprisingly, given that Anne remained of childbearing age, even if she had suffered several miscarriages in the past few years, and Prince William lived, although he was blighted by precarious health, that Frederick held little ambitions of ever sitting on the English throne.
===​

Fate seemed intent making it happen, however, and 6 years after Mary II’s death Prince William also died, throwing the Protestant line of succession into doubt. William III and Parliament were greatly worried that, despite the Glorious Revolution, that James II would be able to retake the throne should Anne also die. As it happened, James II would himself die in 1701 but not before Parliament passed the Act of Settlement and confirmed Frederick as the heir to the throne after Anne. Settling the succession in law would prove to be William III’s last meaningful action before his own death and he passed away in 1702, leaving Anne as Queen. During Anne’s reign, Frederick, despite his responsibilities as King of Bohemia and Elector Palatine and indeed his age (he was now 48 years old), would visit her royal court at Kensington Palace twice and received several royal ambassadors from Anne in both Heidelberg and Prague. Incidentally, this had a major effect on the Grand Tour, a widespread rite of passage for men of sufficient means, with Heidelberg becoming a popular destination, especially for those who wished to ingratiate themselves with the heir to the throne.

Queen Anne would eventually die in 1714 having had only one major achievement, the Acts of Union in 1707 which had united the Kingdom of England and the Kingdom of Scotland into the United Kingdom of Great Britain. Parliament almost immediately issued an invitation to Frederick to take the throne of the United Kingdom and he lost no time in accepting it setting off from Prague in July and arriving in England in November. After a week or two spent recuperating and familiarising himself with the English court, Frederick was crowned King Frederick I of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland in Westminster Abbey.
===​

Frederick’s coronation put him on three European thrones and established a cross-Euopean personal union of the like not seen since Charles V but this was not to last long as the aged Frederick, who by the time of his coronation was already 60 years old, would only hold the British throne for 7 years before dying in June 1621 and his presented the problem of what to do with his lands. As Charles V had found, it was a great challenge to administer disparate and unconnected land, especially when both continental domains were landlocked. It was quickly agreed therefore that Prince Rupert Augustus would inherit the United Kingdom of Great Britain, Prince Charles would be made King of Bohemia, assuming the Bohemian Estates agreed and Prince William would inherit the Electoral Palatinate. This last decision did cause some arguments as both Rupert Augustus and Charles had hoped to inherit the throne but with three sons and three thrones to give it was the obvious choice.

Rupert Augustus’s coronation as King Rupert I Augustus of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland and the subsequent coronations of Charles as King Charles II of Bohemia and William as Elector Palatine William I marked the beginning of a new era for the House of Palatine-Simmern, a new era built on the foundations of Rupert IV and I, the Cavalier Elector.

___________________________________________________________________________________
This brings us to the end of Rupert's story and this TLIAW. Thank you to everyone who has followed this work, I hope you enjoyed it and I look forward to seeing you again in my other works!
Gwyn​
 
Last edited:

VVD0D95

Banned
A fascinating read!

Just one or two quibbles at one point you have Mary II die but then mention she's alive unless I've misunderstood that.

Also, I think Rupert Augustus would rule as Robert no?
 
A fascinating read!

Just one or two quibbles at one point you have Mary II die but then mention she's alive unless I've misunderstood that.

Also, I think Rupert Augustus would rule as Robert no?
Good spot, I put Mary when it should have been William.

Quite possibly, but I liked the idea of a King Rupert to be honest.
 
I actually think they would crown him Rupert rather than Robert simply as that is how Prince Rupert was known.
TTL - not so sure. This Rupert IIRC was never involved in British affairs past Restoration except for token visit or two, and Civil War pamphlets and related correspondence frequently refer to him frequently as "Prince Robert".
 
At the age of 32, Frederick had many similarities to his father, he was handsome, dashing and had enjoyed all the expected past times of a Prince, from hunting to dancing. Unlike Rupert, however, Frederick had lived a somewhat quiet life, if one ignored his mother’s death when he was 6 and the moving from The Hague to the Heidelberg to Prague, and his only experience of war had been as his father’s page during the Bohemian War. He had also married at a more usual age than his father had, marrying Elisabeth Henriette, daughter of William IV, Landgrave of Hesse-Kassel, in 1577 at the age of 23 and the two had had three children, Prince Rupert Augustus in 1680, Prince Charles in 1681 and Princess Louise Elisabeth in 1685, before Frederick’s succession in 1686 and would go on to have two more, Prince William in 1687 and Princess Sophia Ruperta in 1691.
IMO this prince would have been a natural pick for Princess Anne of York to marry - if Rupert has any connections to motherland - or even for Mary; though I think that the author shyed away from changing Glorious Revolution-related stuff.
But OTL marriage for Anne in TL when a bunch of (non-Hanover) Stuart-blooded cousins exist strikes me as determinism for the sake of determinism - like the 1640ies going as OTL bar some token changes despite Gustavus Adolphus living.
 
IMO this prince would have been a natural pick for Princess Anne of York to marry - if Rupert has any connections to motherland - or even for Mary; though I think that the author shyed away from changing Glorious Revolution-related stuff.
But OTL marriage for Anne in TL when a bunch of (non-Hanover) Stuart-blooded cousins exist strikes me as determinism for the sake of determinism - like the 1640ies going as OTL bar some token changes despite Gustavus Adolphus living.
William of Orange would still be a more logical pick for Mary and for Anne a foreign match with a second son still better than the heir of Palatinate (and half-brother of William)
 
IMO this prince would have been a natural pick for Princess Anne of York to marry - if Rupert has any connections to motherland - or even for Mary; though I think that the author shyed away from changing Glorious Revolution-related stuff.
But OTL marriage for Anne in TL when a bunch of (non-Hanover) Stuart-blooded cousins exist strikes me as determinism for the sake of determinism - like the 1640ies going as OTL bar some token changes despite Gustavus Adolphus living.
I mean, I did say there would be butterfly nets at start. I full admit there is a fair amount of determinisim in this TLIAW but it was determinism I considered necessary for the story to fit together, not least in terms of dates. I suppose if I'm honest, this TL is more a case of changing one thing and seeing where it leads without tinkering with the butterflies too much. If I'd gone full butterfy effect then things would have been unrecognisable which, in the case of this particular work at least, I considered less interesting than having the butterflies flap only in cases directly related to Rupert himself in order to create the desired story.
 
Last edited:
Top