now it looks like i havent done a decent job for 1946
No worries, not any map is perfect no matter how long you had to work on it : it's why we have threads, after all.
interesting thing about those occupation zones in germany, they were administered by 4 powers, but western germany was a trizone with no independence whatsoever,
In fact, you shouldn't distinguish western or eastern Germany yet, except by occupation zoning.
french indochina was at time only begining to be affected by activities of communist insurgency as were other parts of china
I'd strongly disagree there.
Leclerc managed to enter Hanoi in 1946 essentially because he negociated with Ho-Chi-Minh. Bombing of Hải Phòng in November by French Navy highlight a de facto situation of political control (more or less shared, arguably) that can be found in aformentioned negociations with Leclerc, or the latter's appreciation of the situation.
J'ai recommandé au gouvernement la reconnaissance de l’État du Viêt Nam, il n'y avait pas d’autre solution. Il ne pouvait être question de reconquérir le Nord par les armes, nous n'en avions pas, et nous n'en aurions jamais les moyens. Rappelez-vous le Sud. Ici l'insuccès est certain... Il faut garder le Viêt Nam dans l'Union française, voilà le but, même s'il faut parler d'indépendance. A Fontainebleau doit être trouvée une solution garantissant à la France au moins le maintien de ses intérêts économiques et culturels... étant entendu que Hô Chi Minh persistera à vouloir se débarasser de nous... Pour cela, tendez la corde, tirez dessus... mais surtout qu'elle ne casse jamais!... Il nous faut la paix
Simply said : the North of Vietnam was under Viet-Minh control, at least partially so. And we're talking of a situation that began before the end of WWII, not just merely beggining.
soviet army was present in much of these countries and remained there for decades
Well, it wasn't the case of Yugoslavia and Albania, to begin with. These territories were freed not by Soviet Army but local communist resistance, which provided a base to Soviet-Yugoslavian split, and later Soviet-Albanian split.
ere stalinist style ruled countries aligned with soviet union, so i dont see the reason for making them outside of its influence
Even for states occupied by Soviet armies, the sovietisation didn't happened overnight.
Czech coup points how in the immediate aftermath of the war, the sovietisation was only but one objective (Stalin himself wasn't that too sure about how to deal with Eastern Europe at this point).
I'd notice, that said, that "influence" shade (the lighter shade) is not what I disagree with there. But what you used wasn't the light Soviet colour (to mark influence/clientelisation) but puppet-state (outline filled with plain colour).